sr-users December 2018

sr-users@lists.kamailio.org

60 participants
73 discussions

Sending to an announcement server from a failure_route

by Boden Garman

Hi list, I'm trying to play an announcement for my users when my PSTN gateway responds with a 404 Not Found (Reason: Q.850;cause=3), indicating a wrong number. I'm a bit lost and would appreciate any advice. What I am seeing is two parallel SIP invites, one to my announcement server (hooray!) and one to the PSTN gateway again (which I don't want). How do I stop the original branch from starting again? I've tried changing the order of rewritehostport and append_branch without any difference. I've also tried to use t_relay() instead of the RELAY route. I'm using Kamailio 5.1 and have modified the deafult kamailio.cfg Thanks! Boden I think this is the relevant parts of the config: # PSTN GW routing route[PSTN] { [PSTN regex logic omitted] # classify as an outbound call set_dlg_profile("outbound_calls"); # select a PSTN gateway from the dispatcher if (!ds_select_dst("66", "8")) { send_reply("404", "No destination"); exit; } # failover if the selected PSTN gateway is down t_on_failure("RTF_DISPATCH"); route(RELAY); exit; } # Try next destinations in failure route failure_route[RTF_DISPATCH] { xlog("inside RTF_DISPATCH"); if (t_is_canceled()) { exit; } # wrong number from PSTN if (t_check_status("404")) { append_branch(); append_hf("X-Application: announcement\r\n"); append_hf("X-Announcement-Playback: wrong-number\r\n"); route(TO_ANNOUNCEMENT); exit; } # next DST - only for 500 or local timeout if (t_check_status("500") or (t_branch_timeout() and !t_branch_replied())) { xlog("selecting next destination"); if (ds_next_dst()) { t_on_failure("RTF_DISPATCH"); route(RELAY); exit; } } } # Routing to announcement server route[TO_ANNOUNCEMENT] { if (!is_method("INVITE")) { return; } rewritehostport('ANNOUNCEMENT_SERVER:5060'); route(RELAY); exit; }

5 years, 4 months

Problem with selection Transport Protocol - MultiHomed Problem

by YAS0 CANER

Hello , i have trouble about selection transport protocol. i have tried so many thing but couldnt find TM selected which IPv? and protocol type (TCP or UDP) For example; i have 2 interface ipv6 and ipv4. i will route my message (INVITE-Register etc.) another node that use TCP and IPV6 , domain name is test1.test. TM module or some module resolve this domain to IPV6:UDP but i want to sent it over IPV6:TCP socket. so i cannot know which protocol is resolved and cannot route the right socket. $du variable show only sip:ali@test1.test Conclusion : There isn't any pseudo value about which destination of IP version will use. Thanks Flow: UAC (IPv4:UDP) ----------> Kamailio (MultiHomed) ----> (TCP:IPv6)Kamailio ---- Kamailo (multiHomed ) cfg ------ auto_bind_ipv6=1 dns_try_ipv6=yes dns_retr_time=1 dns_retr_no=1 dns_cache_flags=4 mhomed=1 fork=yes tcp_source_ipv6 = [fd61:c23c:b3b6::5] listen=tcp:[fd61:c23c:b3b2::5]:5060 listen=udp:[fd61:c23c:b3b2::5]:5060 listen=udp:192.168.1.107:5060 listen=tcp:192.168.1.107:5060 route []{ if($dP=="TCP"){ xlog("L_INFO","[route] [TCP] 1\n"); if (!t_relay_to_tcp()) { xlog("L_ERR", "Error t_relay [route] \n"); t_reply("500","Server - ERROR "); exit; } } else if($dP=="TCP"){ xlog("L_INFO","[route] [TCP] 2\n"); if (!t_relay_to_tcp()) { xlog("L_ERR", "Error t_relay [route] \n"); t_reply("500","Server - ERROR "); exit; } }else if($dP=="UDP"){ xlog("L_INFO","[route] [UDP] 1\n"); if (!t_relay_to_udp()) { xlog("L_ERR", "Error t_relay [route] \n"); t_reply("500","Server - ERROR "); exit; } }else{ xlog("L_INFO","[route] [??] 1\n"); if (!t_relay()) { xlog("L_ERR", "Error t_relay [route] \n"); t_reply("500","Server - ERROR "); exit; } } }

5 years, 4 months

Re: [SR-Users] sr-users Digest, Vol 163, Issue 15

by Toufic Mobarak

Tnhxtx Regards, Toufic Mobarak > On Dec 15, 2018, at 6:00 AM, sr-users-request(a)lists.kamailio.org wrote: > > Send sr-users mailing list submissions to > sr-users(a)lists.kamailio.org > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > sr-users-request(a)lists.kamailio.org > > You can reach the person managing the list at > sr-users-owner(a)lists.kamailio.org > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of sr-users digest..." > > > Today's Topics: > > 1. Re: Routing of Audio and Video Stream. (Daniel-Constantin Mierla) > 2. Problem with selection Transport Protocol - MultiHomed > Problem (YAS0 CANER) > 3. Re: Problem with selection Transport Protocol - MultiHomed > Problem (YAS0 CANER) > 4. Re: Routing of Audio and Video Stream. (Sergiu Pojoga) > 5. Re: Problem with selection Transport Protocol - MultiHomed > Problem (Daniel-Constantin Mierla) > 6. Issue on kamailio 4.1.9 of database reconnection (Emmanuel BUU) > 7. Re: Routing of Audio and Video Stream. (Abhijit Dutta) > 8. Re: Routing of Audio and Video Stream. (Abhijit Dutta) > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Message: 1 > Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2018 12:54:44 +0100 > From: Daniel-Constantin Mierla <miconda(a)gmail.com> > To: "Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List" > <sr-users(a)lists.kamailio.org>, Abhijit Dutta <duttaa(a)hotmail.com> > Subject: Re: [SR-Users] Routing of Audio and Video Stream. > Message-ID: <26c51f12-5242-4794-5124-f37bc523c7ae(a)gmail.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252" > > Hello, > > > I guess you still need to send the INVITE to Asterisk, right? > > > Cheers, > Daniel > > >> On 14.12.18 11:15, Abhijit Dutta wrote: >> Hi All, >> >> Is it possible to redirect only the audio stream towards Asterisk from >> Kamailio (Proxy) via RTPEngine and not to send the video stream to >> Asterisk. I am yet to get the complete reason why my client wants this >> to happen though. >> >> Thanks >> Abhijit >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List >> sr-users(a)lists.kamailio.org >> https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users > > -- > Daniel-Constantin Mierla -- www.asipto.com > www.twitter.com/miconda -- www.linkedin.com/in/miconda > Kamailio World Conference - May 6-8, 2019 -- www.kamailioworld.com > Kamailio Advanced Training -- www.asipto.com > >

5 years, 4 months

Automating installation

by John Tuxies

Hi all. I am new to this and i would like some help please. I am looking to deploy Kamailio and Asterisk in my systems and i would like to automate the process. I have found a bash script but it it outdated from here: https://github.com/gurumelo/asteriskkamailio i did some changes and modifications to adapt it to newer version of software, but it fails to start Kamailio and continue to Asterisk. I would appreciate if someone could help me with this script and make it work. The systems i am planning to execute it is in Debian 9 and Ubuntu 18.04 server, both 64bit. Sincerely yous, John

5 years, 4 months

FreeBSD Kamailio pkg

by Sergiu Pojoga

Did anyone notice that when installing Kamailio from FreeBSD package, by default, it accepts registration with whatever account credentials? Not sure if it's like that with other OS packages (usually I install it from source), but this behavior kind of doesn't go with the popular saying that Kamailio by default "does nothing", lol. Regards, --Sergiu

5 years, 4 months

Kamailio ERROR: _reply_light(): can't generate xxx reply when a final yyy was sent out

by Olli Attila

Hello, I'm getting these error messages on kamailio log from time to time: Dec 11 19:18:30 /usr/sbin/kamailio[23913]: ERROR: tm [t_reply.c:482]: _reply_light(): can't generate 487 reply when a final 200 was sent out Dec 8 04:44:56 /usr/sbin/kamailio[14960]: ERROR: tm [t_reply.c:482]: _reply_light(): can't generate 487 reply when a final 486 was sent out Dec 5 07:46:04 /usr/sbin/kamailio[14961]: ERROR: tm [t_reply.c:482]: _reply_light(): can't generate 487 reply when a final 480 was sent out Kamailio is configured to act as a proxy between SBC and a softswitch. According to the signaling we can see that these errors occure when the SBC sends CANCEL message towards Kamailio when at the same time final reply is received from the Softswitch side. The call seems to be teared down nicely and finally Kamailio replies to SBC by sending "200 ok, no more pending brances". I guess Kamailio treats this situation as an error because the sip processing engine has sent the final reply out and at the same time SBC sends the CANCEL to Kamailio. Is there any way we could handle this situation better on Kamailio end? The three example ERROR messages are from cases where B subscriber has answered the call, the B has been busy and the last one is from a case where B subscriber has been temporarily unavailable. Cheers, Olli

5 years, 4 months

is_e164 logic to detect valid number

by Patrick Wakano

Hello list, Hope you are all doing fine! I am using the is_e164() function to validate the number we receive, and I come to see that the number +555 was accepted.... After some googling it looks like(it is not very clear though) that 7 digits are the minimum we could have for e164 numbers but after checking the source code, I saw it accepts anything starting with + and having between 2 and 16 numbers. So is it really valid to have a number with just 2 digits? What is the case? Thank you, Kind regards, Patrick Wakano

5 years, 4 months

Performance tests of native vs. kemi scripting for SIP routing

by Daniel-Constantin Mierla

Hello, during the preparations of Kamailio v5.2.0 and the days after, I got the time to run some tests in order to see the differences of running similar SIP routing logic when using native configuration file scripting versus KEMI languages. So far I did it for Lua and Python (v2), hopefully I will find time to run also for the rest of supported scripting languages: Python (v3), JavaScript, Ruby, Squrrel and Lua with LuaJIT. The pleasant surprise was to see that this time, the results of using Python were similar to native scripting and Lua. When I did some basic tests during development of KEMI, using Python seemed slower. More details about how tests were performed, the config files/scripts, used tools and results were published in a wiki page: - https://www.kamailio.org/wiki/kemi/performance-tests/5.2.x A news article with further details is on kamailio website: - https://www.kamailio.org/w/2018/12/performance-tests-for-kemi-scripting-lan… Should anyhow of you have some time to run the tests in own environment and share the results (on sr-users mailing list), it would be appreciated and would help to validate the tests and discover if I forgot something in any of the configs. Note that the goal of the tests is not measuring the capacity of Kamailio in your environment, but see the differences between using different scripting languages in the same environment (so you can do the tests on raspberry pi, if you like). I would also be interested in knowing if you are using Kamailio with KEMI or you are planning to, if yes, which scripting language. If already doing it, is already in production? These are useful to plan where to allocate developer resources in the future... And to start, I am running Kamailio with Lua (4 instances) and Python (1) scripting in production deployments, with very good results so far. Cheers, Daniel -- Daniel-Constantin Mierla -- www.asipto.com www.twitter.com/miconda -- www.linkedin.com/in/miconda Kamailio World Conference - May 6-8, 2019 -- www.kamailioworld.com Kamailio Advanced Training -- www.asipto.com

5 years, 4 months

core at kamailio 5.1.6

by David Escartín

hello all we are seeing in a new kamailio instance some crashes. We are not sure the root cause, here you have the last core generated https://pastebin.com/xMRrug2X COuld you please take a look to see if there might be any issue with the last message that caused the core (to me seems normal) or there might be some issues related to other system libraries, etc? thanks a lot and regards david

5 years, 4 months

DTLS HA redis-pacemaker-corosync

by Жан Базаров

Hello! Are there any ways to implement using DTLS in redis HA scenario? When I reboot the active RTPEngine server the system correctly fails over to the other server and, after only a small pause (~1s), incoming audio continues to arrive. However, approximately 15 seconds after this I hear nothing but silence. Thanks.

5 years, 4 months

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

sr-users December 2018