sr-users December 2018

sr-users@lists.kamailio.org

60 participants
74 discussions

by Duarte Rocha

Greetings, I have some things that i want to udnerstand about Kamailio's memory allocation. My settings are 1024Mb for shared memory and 12Mb for private memory. I'm running Kamailio on a machine with CentOS7 and 2Gb of RAM. As i understand, at startup Kamailio will allocate 1024+12*number_of_processes megabytes of memory. Is this correct? When i set up Kamailio to run with 150 processes, after starting, i still have 500Mb of free RAM and therefore not allocated to any process. That goes against what i wrote earlier. What is the best way to plan for memory specs in my machines according to the desired number of processes and shared\private memory defined? Best Regards, Duarte Rocha

5 years, 7 months

reg_fetch_contacts always returns -1

by Denys Pozniak

Hello! I want to get some parameters from user location database via function reg_fetch_contacts(). But it returns -1 and $(ulc(caller=>aor)) is <null> respectively. Please help me to understand where issue is. Script: ... $var(c_uri)="sip:+1234567890@10.10.10.10:5065"; reg_fetch_contacts("location","$var(c_uri)","caller"); $var(rc) = $rc; xlog("L_WARNING","[LOCATION] caller=>aor: rc=$var(rc) aor=$(ulc(caller=>aor)) \n"); ... [root@kamailio]# kamcmd ul.lookup location customer1 { AoR: customer1 Contacts: { Contact: { Address: sip:+1234567890@10.10.10.10:5065 Expires: 861 Q: -1.000000 Call-ID: 00DB5F27-0B02-E966-92C3-A231C378F993(a)10.10.10.10 CSeq: 1787 User-Agent: SIPPER for PhonerLite Received: sip:2.2.2.2:15043 Path: [not set] State: CS_SYNC Flags: 0 CFlags: 64 Socket: udp:3.3.3.3:5060 Methods: 8095 Ruid: uloc-1-5c1a3512-66a6-1 Instance: <urn:uuid:00FB3C49-24E8-E811-ACAA-D72FCD766436> Reg-Id: 0 Server-Id: 1 Tcpconn-Id: -1 Keepalive: 1 Last-Keepalive: 1545232794 Last-Modified: 1545232794 } } } [root@kamailio]# kamailio -v version: kamailio 5.1.6 (x86_64/linux) flags: STATS: Off, USE_TCP, USE_TLS, USE_SCTP, TLS_HOOKS, USE_RAW_SOCKS, DISABLE_NAGLE, USE_MCAST, DNS_IP_HACK, SHM_MEM, SHM_MMAP, PKG_MALLOC, Q_MALLOC, F_MALLOC, TLSF_MALLOC, DBG_SR_MEMORY, USE_FUTEX, FAST_LOCK-ADAPTIVE_WAIT, USE_DNS_CACHE, USE_DNS_FAILOVER, USE_NAPTR, USE_DST_BLACKLIST, HAVE_RESOLV_RES ADAPTIVE_WAIT_LOOPS=1024, MAX_RECV_BUFFER_SIZE 262144 MAX_URI_SIZE 1024, BUF_SIZE 65535, DEFAULT PKG_SIZE 8MB poll method support: poll, epoll_lt, epoll_et, sigio_rt, select. id: unknown compiled on 13:53:57 Nov 12 2018 with gcc 4.8.5 -- BR, Denys Pozniak

5 years, 7 months

RFC: updates to some core functions

by Daniel-Constantin Mierla

Hello, it was brought into discussions several times in the past about core functions not accepting variables in the parameters. I think it is time to update them during the 5.3 release development. For few of them, I added in the past some alternative function in the corex module (e.g., force_send_socket() in core and set_send_socket() in corex module). So, I see two options: 1) add a function with similar name in corex module and same behaviour like the one from core 2) remove the function export from the core and export one with the same name from the corex module First one will ensure that configs using the functions right now keep working without any update. The second one will be better in long term from the point of documentation (no duplicated docs), but there might be few cases that would require updates in the config -- iirc, there are some functions that can get special tokens in the parameters (like forward(uri:host, uri:port)), they will get an equivalent with variables, but old config will not be compatible. Obviously the reason for this email is to ask the developers and users what would be the preferred way from own point of view. Cheers, Daniel -- Daniel-Constantin Mierla -- www.asipto.com www.twitter.com/miconda -- www.linkedin.com/in/miconda Kamailio World Conference - May 6-8, 2019 -- www.kamailioworld.com Kamailio Advanced Training - Mar 4-6, 2019 in Berlin; Mar 25-27, 2019, in Washington, DC, USA -- www.asipto.com

5 years, 7 months

passing $avp to t_relay functions.

by YAS0 CANER

Hello , is there a way to pass $avp values to t_relay function. i tried ; t_relay t_relay_udp/tcp t_relay_to t_relay_avp functions log 0(75155) ERROR: tm [tm.c:2456]: fixup_t_relay_to(): fixing ($avp(dd), 1) 0(75155) ERROR: tm [tm.c:2459]: fixup_t_relay_to(): param type 8 0(75155) ERROR: tm [tm.c:2456]: fixup_t_relay_to(): fixing ($avp(flags), 2) 0(75155) ERROR: tm [tm.c:2459]: fixup_t_relay_to(): param type 11 0(75155) CRITICAL: tm [tm.c:2549]: fixup_t_relay_to(): invalid flags <$avp(flags)> 0(75155) ERROR: <core> [core/route.c:1154]: fix_actions(): fixing failed (code=-1) at cfg:/usr/local/etc/kamailio/kamailio.cfg:489 0(75155) ERROR: <core> [core/rvalue.c:3860]: fix_rval_expr(): failure in cfg at line: 489 col: 42 0(75155) ERROR: <core> [core/route.c:1154]: fix_actions(): fixing failed (code=-1) at cfg:/usr/local/etc/kamailio/kamailio.cfg:494 0(75155) ERROR: <core> [core/route.c:1154]: fix_actions(): fixing failed (code=-1) at cfg:/usr/local/etc/kamailio/kamailio.cfg:495 in addition i have a look code , in fixup functions try to resolve host values so parameteres cannot find $avp . in conclusion , does kamailio need new function to pass $avp value? Can i try to code? Thanks.

5 years, 7 months

Kazoo module problem.

by Володимир Іванець

Hello! I'm trying to test kazoo module but unfortunately it is not loading: *0(25107) ERROR: <core> [core/sr_module.c:498]: load_module(): could not open module </usr/lib64/kamailio/modules/kazoo.so>: /usr/lib64/kamailio/modules/kazoo.so: undefined symbol: event_set* It was built today together with other modules and Kamailio itself today from branch 5.2 on CentOS 6. librabbitmq version is 0.5.2-1. Does anyone has it running and if so what version is it? Thanks a lot!

5 years, 7 months

Access to tables like location, imc_rooms and imc_members when kamailio is running

by hamidreza ramezani

Hello everyone I have a question regarding kamailio database, I see when kamailio is stopped, usrloc -> location and imc -> imc_rooms module tables shows some information. but when kamailio is running it's not. is it possible to manually insert to these tables, I don't want to use IMC commands like #join #accept ... is it possible to access location table and see which users are registered when kamailio is running? Best regards Hamid

5 years, 7 months

Routing of Audio and Video Stream.

by Abhijit Dutta

Hi All, Is it possible to redirect only the audio stream towards Asterisk from Kamailio (Proxy) via RTPEngine and not to send the video stream to Asterisk. I am yet to get the complete reason why my client wants this to happen though. Thanks Abhijit

5 years, 7 months

Re: [SR-Users] Setup dmq_usrloc

by Gertjan Wolzak

Hello Kamailions, Reading and understanding is a skill in it self.. Learned a bit more of that this morning. To be able to use the dmq_ursloc, just use: if(is_method("KDMQ")) { dmq_handle_message(); } So, I have registrar replication working, on with reading to get the rest working. With regards, Gertjan

5 years, 7 months

Setup dmq_usrloc

by Gertjan Wolzak

Hello Kamailions, Im trying to setup registration replication with the use of the dmq and dmq_usrlog modules. I have configured two servers, configured kamailio on both. When I register a sip client on the one I get a nice KDMQ message on the second server, but the second server reacts with a 404 not found: U 2018/12/17 05:08:38.974495 10.10.0.1:6000 -> 10.10.0.2:6000 #3 KDMQ sip:usrloc@10.10.0.2:6000 SIP/2.0. Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.10.0.1:6000;branch=z9hG4bK00ed.e1666b85000000000000000000000000.0. To: <sip:usrloc@10.10.0.2:6000>. From: <sip:usrloc@10.10.0.1:6000>;tag=a2652bb825a097f3b7285d4c70edd51a-0513. CSeq: 10 KDMQ. Call-ID: 35571d0247178282-3780(a)10.88.77.172. Content-Length: 360. User-Agent: kamailio (5.1.6 (x86_64/linux)). Max-Forwards: 1. Content-Type: application/json. . {"action":2,"aor":"test01(a)10.88.77.172","ruid":"uloc-5c177363-ec4-1","c":"sip:test01@10.88.77.140:59293;ob","received":"","path":"","callid":"zjucvmzUT2hNJCIfqeUXEsOaEzyHCs-4","user_agent":"CSipSimple_G3121-26/r2457","instance":"","expires":1545041786,"cseq":24435,"flags":0,"cflags":0,"q":-1,"last_modified":1545040886,"methods":8159,"reg_id":0,"server_id":0} U 2018/12/17 05:08:38.979062 10.10.0.2:6000 -> 10.10.0.1:6000 #4 SIP/2.0 404 Not Found. Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.10.0.1:6000;branch=z9hG4bK00ed.e1666b85000000000000000000000000.0;rport=6000. To: <sip:usrloc@10.10.0.2:6000>;tag=02f7a7b91eadf5e07797231cb2f64326-b794. From: <sip:usrloc@10.10.0.1:6000>;tag=a2652bb825a097f3b7285d4c70edd51a-0513. CSeq: 10 KDMQ. Call-ID: 35571d0247178282-3780(a)10.88.77.172. Server: kamailio (5.1.6 (x86_64/linux)). Content-Length: 0. . I think I have to configure a bit more than just the parameters of the dmq and dqm_usrloc modules. Ive googled, looked in the Sip routing with kamailio book, but no luck. Did not see any examples in the kamailio source, with regards to the dmq_usrloc module. I am not looking for direct answers, have not provided you with enough information for that, but I would appreciate information on how to correctly configure registration replication using the dmq/dmq_usrloc module... Thank you. With regards, Gertjan

5 years, 7 months

Reminding again about private/direct emails from mailing lists discussions

by Daniel-Constantin Mierla

I see that still a lot of emails are sent directly to me after a discussion started on public mailing lists (subject with mailing lists prefix, but the sender header is not the mailing list daemon), I would like to remind that, at least in my case, writing emails directly without cc-ing the mailing list is highly not recommended and there is practically 0 chance to get an answer from myself. The rule is also suggested in the mailing lists presentation page: - https://www.kamailio.org/w/mailing-lists/ Unless I asked explicitly for a private email with some specific details, the message will not be noticed in decent time and therefore not replied. I use this email address for many public mailing lists and it is intended only for that usage, I am reacting based on the filters I created, unmatched messages getting the lowest priority. Therefore if you wrote me and expect a response, re-send the message to the appropriate public mailing list. Checking and answering the messages on Kamailio mailing lists are among the top of priorities on my daily activity, so it is high chance you get the response faster when you write there. Note that you can always mask sensitive data (e.g., replace passwords, IP addresses) before sending logs or config file. There are several common sense as well as technical reasons for keeping the discussion on public mailing lists. Here are some along with other suggestions to improve the likeliness of getting an answer: - we are not answering questions on mailing lists to help only one person, but also other people that may have similar issues in the future -- they can find the answers in the archive with a search engine. Also, other people subscribed to the list can learn from conversation or contribute to the discussion, resulting in better outcome - the amount of unexpected messages is very high -- it is practically a zero chance to get to the folder with messages that didn't match any filter (thus your message is not going to be replied) - whenever I find time, the first emails I answer are those coming on mailing lists. They are many there as well, people are traveling or having other personal or business projects, so sometime is good to send a reminder if a question does not get an answer - starting with negative approach or no technical content, like you are going to use something else if you don't get a reply instantly, or this application is missing what so ever tutorial giving exactly the solution you need, or simply asking for full config of complex requirements, is not helping at all, but actually making people to ignore your messages. Start with what you tried and where you got stuck. Everything you get is for free, have appropriate expectation and behavior. Cheers, Daniel -- Daniel-Constantin Mierla http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda

5 years, 7 months

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

sr-users December 2018