sr-users September 2017

sr-users@lists.kamailio.org

86 participants
123 discussions

by Aleksandar Sosic

Hi everyone, we're trying to make work usrloc over dmq without a db on our nodes. Our `kamailio.cfg` code to make it work on the nodes is like this: ``` ... loadmodule "usrloc.so" ... loadmodule "dmq.so" loadmodule "dmq_usrloc.so" ... modparam("dmq", "server_address", DMQ_ADDRESS) modparam("dmq", "notification_address", "sip:routers.ourcloud.com:5060") modparam("dmq", "multi_notify", 1) modparam("dmq", "num_workers", 4) modparam("dmq_usrloc", "enable", 1) modparam("dmq_usrloc", "sync", 1) ``` Where `DMQ_ADDRESS="sip:<some_address>:5060"` is the public IP address of the running node. `nslookup` of `routers.ourcloud.com`: ```➜ ~ nslookup routers.ourcloud.com Server: 8.8.8.8 Address: 8.8.8.8#53 Non-authoritative answer: Name: rrouters.ourcloud.com Address: <IP1> Name: routers.ourcloud.com Address: <IP2> ``` and obviously IP1 and IP2 are pubblic IPs of kamailio nodes that respond to my pings. When i register a client to node IP1 it's ul dump is: ``` { "jsonrpc": "2.0", "result": { "Domain": "location", "Size": 1024, "AoRs": [{ "Info": { "AoR": "0409828030", "HashID": 1970914268, "Contacts": [{ "Contact": { "Address": "sip:0409828030@172.19.0.255:56328;ob", "Expires": 289, "Q": -1, "Call-ID": "5mclwiX4oYAVK0z-iT7M0p9RBX5-02g6", "CSeq": 59427, "User-Agent": "Telephone 1.2.6", "Received": "sip:<PROXY_IP>:5060", "Path": "[not set]", "State": "CS_NEW", "Flags": 0, "CFlags": 192, "Socket": "udp:<IP1>:5060", "Methods": 8159, "Ruid": "uloc-599d8fa8-f-1", "Instance": "[not set]", "Reg-Id": 0, "Last-Keepalive": 1503498176, "Last-Modified": 1503498176 } }] } }], "Stats": { "Records": 1, "Max-Slots": 1 } }, "id": 1 } ``` On node with IP2 the ul dump is: ``` { "jsonrpc": "2.0", "result": { "Domain": "location", "Size": 1024, "AoRs": [], "Stats": { "Records": 0, "Max-Slots": 0 } }, "id": 1 } ``` What are we doing wrong? Are we missing something? -- Aleksandar Sosic mail: alex.sosic(a)timenet.it skype: alex.sosic cell: +385 91 2505 146

6 years, 8 months

Help to understand kamailio error msgs

by José Seabra

Hello there, I'm facing some error msg on my kamailio server in production that i would like to understand what they means in order to avoid them. The msg are: - *ERROR: tm [t_reply.c:1270]: t_should_relay_response(): ERROR: t_should_relay_response: status rewrite by UAS: stored: 408, received: 200* - *dispatcher [dispatch.c:1509]: ds_load_replace(): cannot find load for (16720.mydomain.com <http://16720.mydomain.com>)* - *dispatcher [dispatch.c:2270]: ds_next_dst(): cannot update load distribution* - *tm [t_reply.c:533]: _reply_light(): ERROR: _reply_light: can't generate 487 reply when a final 603 was sent out* - *tm [t_reply.c:533]: _reply_light(): ERROR: _reply_light: can't generate 487 reply when a final 480 was sent out* - *WARNING: tm [t_lookup.c:245]: ack_matching(): WARNING: ack_matching() attempted on a transaction with no E2EACK callbacks => the results are not completely reliable when forking is involved* Thank you Best regards -- José Seabra

6 years, 8 months

jsonrpc execution error

by David Villasmil

Hello guys, i configured jsonrpc on kamailio.cfg and RPCFIFOPATH on kamctlrc to the same file, seems to work for some commands, but not for others: root@ip-172-31-30-160:/home/admin# kamctl trusted show +----+--------------+-------+--------------+--------------+- -----+----------+ | id | src_ip | proto | from_pattern | ruri_pattern | tag | priority | +----+--------------+-------+--------------+--------------+- -----+----------+ | 1 | 1.2.3.4 | udp | | NULL | | 0 | | 2 | 5.4.3.2 | udp | | NULL | | 0 | +----+--------------+-------+--------------+--------------+- -----+----------+ root@ip-172-31-30-160:/home/admin# kamctl trusted dump { "jsonrpc": "2.0", "error": { "code": -32000, "message": "Execution Error" }, "id": 32022 } root@ip-172-31-30-160:/home/admin# kamctl trusted reload { "jsonrpc": "2.0", "error": { "code": -32000, "message": "Execution Error" }, "id": 32041 } Any help? Thanks! Regards, David Villasmil email: david.villasmil.work(a)gmail.com phone: +34669448337 ᐧ

6 years, 8 months

Multiple Htable Reload

by Logeshwaran G

Hi, I have multiple Htables, Is it possible to Reload all the Htables at one time via jsonrpc: As of Now I am using the below command to Reload one htable at a time. {"jsonrpc": "2.0","method": "htable.reload","params": ["b"],"id": 123} Input Please? Thanks & Kind Regards, *Logeshwaran G* *"Be Hungry, Stay Foolish"*

6 years, 8 months

Map Technique(Key value pair) in kamailio

by Logeshwaran G

Hi, Is there any way to use the Mapping technique in kamailio. For Example: ========== Key = 91, Value = India Key = 92, Value = Srilanka How to store Key Value Pairs into kamailio and how to Retrieve? If I pass 91 it should Retrieve India, Is it possible? Input Please Thanks & Kind Regards, *Logeshwaran G* *"Be Hungry, Stay Foolish"*

6 years, 8 months

Passive Open TCP sessions increases and kamailio runs out of memory

by Niklas Larsson

Hi, I have a kamailio 4.4.5 (x86_64/linux), running as a proxy in front of asterisk, handling udp/tcp/tls registration, using udp towards asterisk. Over time memory is consumed and the Passive Open TCP sessions is increasing until we run out of memory and a restart is needed. Sep 11 06:25:03 ERROR: <core> [mem/f_malloc.c:415]: fm_search_defrag(): fm_search_defrag(0x7f9d55184000, 34120); Free fragment not found! Sep 11 06:25:03 ERROR: <core> [mem/f_malloc.c:498]: fm_malloc(): fm_malloc(0x7f9d55184000, 34120) called from tls: tls_init.c: ser_malloc(275), module: tls; Free fragment not found! This image contains graphs that show the behaviour: https://imgur.com/68PvmyA Should it behave like this? Is there a knob to twist to change behaviour? tcp / tls stuff from kamailio.cfg: enable_tls=yes tcp_max_connections=8196 tls_max_connections=8196 tcp_no_connect=yes # Don't try to connect - drop if there is no session tcp_connection_lifetime=3605 modparam("tcpops", "closed_event", 1) modparam("usrloc", "handle_lost_tcp", 1) modparam("usrloc", "close_expired_tcp", 1) in the registrar route I have: tcp_keepalive_enable("60", "5", "5"); /niklas

6 years, 8 months

kamailio asterisk queue

by Жан Базаров

hello! how i can forward presence peer state to asterisk queue? Thank's

6 years, 8 months

Q: purpose of t_newtran() in kamailio-basic.cfg route[LOCATION]?

by Anthony Alba

In kamailio-basic.cfg route[LOCATION] we have the following: --snip-- $var(rc) = $rc; t_newtran(); switch ($var(rc)) { case -1: case -3: --snip-- What is the purpose of t_newtran() here? Since we have not hit t_relay() yet (and don't have a transaction) is this to ensure the caller sees/acks the 404/405? Earlier in the mailing list https://lists.kamailio.org/pipermail/sr-users/2015-April/088062.html I read, although this is in reply to a different situation: "Why do you need to create new transactions yourself with t_newtran()? Nonexotic applications of Kamailio usually don't require this. ..." # User location service route[LOCATION] { if (!lookup("location")) { $var(rc) = $rc; t_newtran(); switch ($var(rc)) { case -1: case -3: send_reply("404", "Not Found"); exit; case -2: send_reply("405", "Method Not Allowed"); exit; } } # when routing via usrloc, log the missed calls also if (is_method("INVITE")) { setflag(FLT_ACCMISSED); } route(RELAY); exit; } Thanks AAlba

6 years, 8 months

Re: [SR-Users] append_branch + dispatcher

by Aidar Kamalov

After I add route(DISPATCH) to branch_route branch calls are going throught asterisk # Manage outgoing branches branch_route[MANAGE_BRANCH] { xdbg("new branch [$T_branch_idx] to $ru\n"); xnotice("BRANCH: $rm $ru [$ci]"); route(DISPATCH); route(NATMANAGE); } but if I set $ru = "sip:34200@domain.org"; append_branch("sip:34201@domain.org"); first main ($ru) INVITE resolve to contact of ip phone INVITE sip:34200@172.16.3.7:5060 but branch doesnt' resolve INVITE sip:34201@domain.org Is there any way to resolve it? -- Aydar A. Kamalov

6 years, 8 months

append_branch + dispatcher

by Aidar Kamalov

Hello! I have a simple route route[HUNT] { $ru = "sip:34200@172.16.3.7:5060"; append_branch("sip:34201@192.168.2.71"); } 172.16.3.7 and 192.168.2.71 ip phones 192.168.10.54 is kamailio 192.168.10.47 is asterisk If I called to this route kamailio will call to 34200 through dispatcher via asterisk. But branch going directly to the ip phone. Is it possible to call all branches through dispatcher and asterisks? U 192.168.10.54:5060 -> 192.168.10.47:5060 INVITE sip:34200@172.16.3.7:5060 SIP/2.0. Record-Route: <sip:192.168.10.54;lr=on;ftag=1dc09a643aa66d85o0;did=12f.336>. Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.10.54;branch=z9hG4bK2fd3.b2bbf3cfc7962b4cb7a1c6a174668c0d.0. Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 172.16.3.4:5060;branch=z9hG4bK-8b2e7bed. From: ".............. .......... ................" <sip:53003@192.168.10.54 >;tag=1dc09a643aa66d85o0. To: <sip:1111@192.168.10.54>. Call-ID: 7c5b5710-57b4f8c9(a)172.16.3.4. U 192.168.10.54:5060 -> 192.168.2.71:5060 INVITE sip:34201@192.168.2.71 SIP/2.0. Record-Route: <sip:192.168.10.54;lr=on;ftag=1dc09a643aa66d85o0;did=12f.336>. Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.10.54;branch=z9hG4bK2fd3.b2bbf3cfc7962b4cb7a1c6a174668c0d.1. Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 172.16.3.4:5060;branch=z9hG4bK-8b2e7bed. From: ".............. .......... ................" <sip:53003@192.168.10.54 >;tag=1dc09a643aa66d85o0. To: <sip:1111@192.168.10.54>. Call-ID: 7c5b5710-57b4f8c9(a)172.16.3.4. -- Aydar A. Kamalov

6 years, 8 months

← Newer
1
...
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
Older →

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

sr-users September 2017