sr-users August 2017

sr-users@lists.kamailio.org

89 participants
144 discussions

by Logeshwaran G

Hi, Is there any other module need to be added for xmlrpc for using dispatch_rpc(). Because I am getting an below error: 0(22485) ERROR: <core> [core/cfg.y:3274]: yyparse(): cfg. parser: failed to find command dispatch_rpc (params 0) 0(22485) CRITICAL: <core> [core/cfg.y:3414]: yyerror_at(): parse error in config file /usr/local/etc/kamailio/kamailio_final.cfg, line 640, column 17: unknown command, missing loadmodule? I have loaded xmlrpc as well as xhttp modules. Do I need to enable some other modules as well?? Please Guide me. Thanks & Kind Regards, Logeshwaran G

7 years, 4 months

SIP_DOMAIN in /etc/kamailio/kamctlrc

by Trent

Hello. I have not been able to find anything in the wiki, or documentation which covers this. The only item I have found is related to a module. >From the information, I have gleaned on this, it is clear an IP address, or a domain name is to be set here. What is not clear, is if the server is on multiple IP address whether they are on a WAN, LAN, or both, if multiple IP addresses are need, or can be added. I have a situation where I have a public WAN address, and a LAN address. Thanks a bunch!

7 years, 4 months

kamailio restart:errors

by Uzma Anjum

Hi,I am new to kamailio. when i restart kamailio,I found errors on log.please help through this. 6(5633) ERROR: mymodule [my_mod.c:373]: outbound_call_process(): [outbound_call_process] URI : sip:11111111112@107.170.69.191:1008 received ip 183.82.115.246 in network ips:107.170.69.191:6090|c1|c2 6(5633) ERROR: mymodule [my_mod.c:379]: outbound_call_process(): [outbound_call_process] Request URI : 11111111112 6(5633) ERROR: mymodule [my_mod.c:395]: outbound_call_process(): outbound_call_process, obcalls privilges :select u.ob_call_privileges, a.phone_number, replace(a.name,'.','-') from account_info a, users u, subscriber s where a.id=u.account_id and u.account_id=s.account_id and u.extension=s.extension and s.username='dyan-dayan' 6(5633) ERROR: mymodule [my_mod.c:425]: outbound_call_process(): outbound_call_process query from user:dyan-dayan, phone_type:1 acc_name:dayan 6(5633) ERROR: mymodule [my_mod.c:501]: outbound_call_process(): [outbound_call_process]NEW URI : sip:ivr-1-dayan@107.170.69.191:6090 6(5633) ERROR: <core> [udp_server.c:448]: udp_rcv_loop(): recvfrom:Received encrypted packet len:4, v▒..

7 years, 4 months

ClueCon Slides: Industrial Grade FreeSWITCH, Scaling, Balancing, High Availability, SIP, WebRTC

by Giovanni Maruzzelli

*Industrial Grade FreeSWITCH Scaling, Balancing and High Availability for SIP and WebRTC* Scaling your FreeSWITCH platform to serve a growing user base is a critical challenge. We'll go through the best techniques, practices, and implementations for Voice and Video Calls, Conferencing, WebRTC, SIP, Chatting, Presence and Instant Messaging Slides can be downloaded from http://opentelecom.it/cluecon2017.pdf Enjoy ClueCon! -giovanni -- Sincerely, Giovanni Maruzzelli OpenTelecom.IT cell: +39 347 266 56 18

7 years, 4 months

Re: [SR-Users] DMQ Not Discovering all Nodes

by Charles Chance

Hello, Can you share the rest of your config (at least, any dmq modparams and the main route block)? Cheers, Charles On 16 Aug 2017 22:48, "John Petrini" <jpetrini(a)coredial.com> wrote: Hello, I've just started doing some testing with dmq but I'm having trouble getting it to discover all of the nodes in my cluster. There are 7 kamailio instances with the following in their configs: Example from the notification server (10.0.10.211): listen=udp:10.0.10.211:5080 loadmodule "dmq.so" # ----- dmq params ----- modparam("dmq", "server_address", "sip:10.0.10.211:5080") modparam("dmq", "notification_address", "sip:10.0.10.211:5080") Example from one of the nodes (10.0.10.216). (Only the listen and server_address is changed to match the local ip of each node.) listen=udp:10.0.10.216:5080 loadmodule "dmq.so" # ----- dmq params ----- modparam("dmq", "server_address", "sip:10.0.10.216:5080"); modparam("dmq", "notification_address", "sip:10.0.10.211:5080") Output from kamcmd dmq.list_nodes { host: 10.0.10.211 port: 5080 resolved_ip: 10.0.10.211 status: 2 last_notification: 0 local: 0 } { host: 10.0.10.216 port: 5080 resolved_ip: 10.0.10.216 status: 2 last_notification: 0 local: 1 } I'm expecting to see all 7 nodes in the output but only see the local node and the notification node. I imagine I could use an SRV record for the notication address to add all of the nodes but I thought the notification node was supposed to share the rest of the nodes in the cluster. Can anyone explain what it is I'm doing wrong? Thank You, John Petrini _______________________________________________ Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List sr-users(a)lists.kamailio.org https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users -- Sipcentric Ltd. Company registered in England & Wales no. 7365592. Registered office: Faraday Wharf, Innovation Birmingham Campus, Holt Street, Birmingham Science Park, Birmingham B7 4BB.

7 years, 4 months

DMQ Not Discovering all Nodes

by John Petrini

Hello, I've just started doing some testing with dmq but I'm having trouble getting it to discover all of the nodes in my cluster. There are 7 kamailio instances with the following in their configs: Example from the notification server (10.0.10.211): listen=udp:10.0.10.211:5080 loadmodule "dmq.so" # ----- dmq params ----- modparam("dmq", "server_address", "sip:10.0.10.211:5080") modparam("dmq", "notification_address", "sip:10.0.10.211:5080") Example from one of the nodes (10.0.10.216). (Only the listen and server_address is changed to match the local ip of each node.) listen=udp:10.0.10.216:5080 loadmodule "dmq.so" # ----- dmq params ----- modparam("dmq", "server_address", "sip:10.0.10.216:5080"); modparam("dmq", "notification_address", "sip:10.0.10.211:5080") Output from kamcmd dmq.list_nodes { host: 10.0.10.211 port: 5080 resolved_ip: 10.0.10.211 status: 2 last_notification: 0 local: 0 } { host: 10.0.10.216 port: 5080 resolved_ip: 10.0.10.216 status: 2 last_notification: 0 local: 1 } I'm expecting to see all 7 nodes in the output but only see the local node and the notification node. I imagine I could use an SRV record for the notication address to add all of the nodes but I thought the notification node was supposed to share the rest of the nodes in the cluster. Can anyone explain what it is I'm doing wrong? Thank You, John Petrini

7 years, 4 months

Kamailio not forces TLS socket

by Yuriy Gorlichenko

Hi! I using uac for send MESSAGE request from kamailio to remote destination endpoint Before sending i setting up $fs seudovariable as $fs = "tls:12.3.4.5:443"; kamailio listeinig this interface and succesfully receives requests and sending responses on it When i call uac_req_send();There is error in log file: ERROR: tm [ut.h:327]: uri2dst2(): no corresponding socket found for "2.3.26.11" af 2 (udp:2.3.26.11:57050) ERROR: tm [uac.c:272]: t_uac_prepare(): t_uac: no socket found If I setting up udp interface for listening then kamailio ognores my $fs set up and sending message through udp socket. kamailio version 4.4.6 Now i trying to roll back to 4.4.4 version but not sure if it will be helpfull.

7 years, 4 months

Permission denied for /var/run/kamailio

by Ryan Wagoner

I'm running Kamailio 4.4.6-2.1 installed from RPM on CentOS 7, where /var/run is a tmpfs (by default). After every reboot Kamailio fails to start with the following error: Aug 16 00:27:39 sbc1 /usr/sbin/kamailio[7135]: ERROR: mi_fifo [fifo_fnc.c:72]: mi_init_fifo_server(): Can't create FIFO: Permission denied (mode=432) I have the following line in my kamailio.cfg modparam("mi_fifo", "fifo_name", "/var/run/kamailio/kamailio_fifo") At this point the /var/run/kamailio directory looks like this drwx------. 2 root root 80 Aug 16 00:30 . drwxr-xr-x. 26 root root 880 Aug 16 00:30 .. srw-------. 1 kamailio kamailio 0 Aug 16 00:30 kamailio_ctl If I run "chown kamailio /var/run/kamailio" and "systemctl start kamailio" I am good to go. Am I missing something in my config? It appears Kamailio is creating the /var/run/kamailio folder as root, writing the kamailio_ctl file, dropping root privileges, and then trying to write the kamailio_fifo file. Thanks, Ryan

7 years, 4 months

sipcapture/HEP msg sizes>1500

by Daniel Tryba

While looking into HOMER I saw that large INVITEs got truncated in the webinterface, looking at the HEP traffic these (UDP) messages got fragmented in transport (asterisk/res_hep) and I started to think these were not getting reassembled correctly. Only to find out the database schemas have set the msg size set to varchar(1500). Is there any good reason for not changing this to a bigger default?

7 years, 4 months

RTP loops

by Mauro Costantini

Hi everyone, we have an installation with: - 1 kamailio instance - with 2 interface, one with public and one with private IP (for local communication to the db and asterisk ). We use keepalived service for failover and so, every interface has 2 IPs: the real one and the “virtual” one for the keepalived service - some asterisk instances for transcoding and billing - with one interface with private IP - 2 RTP (rtpengine) instances - with 2 interfaces, one with public and one with private IP A few times happens a loop on the RTPengine and we could see a lot of lines like this in the log: “Too many packets in UDP receive queue (more than 50), aborting loop. Dropped packets possible” This loop doesn't stop until all the resources are exhausted and it results in the freeze of the machine. We don’t understand the reason why these loops are generated. We have 2 cases: 1) we send an INVITE to the CPE (a Bria on iOS) The CPE answers with a "100 Trying", a "180 Ringing" and a few seconds later sends us 3 packets of "200 ok" with SDP like this: SIP/2.0 200 OK Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 178.250.x.y;branch=z9hG4bKb842.29952898c30d6d06b75b916618357ccd.2 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.x.y:5090;rport=5090;branch=z9hG4bK7fd100fb Record-Route: <sip:178.250.x.y;r2=on;lr=on;ftag=as26b82ac7;did=cb5.0ce;nat=yes> Record-Route: <sip:192.168.x.z;r2=on;lr=on;ftag=as26b82ac7;did=cb5.0ce;nat=yes> Contact: <sip:6051018****@158.148.x.y:3180;rinstance=ffdff5e0142dfd2d> To: <sip:6051018****@192.168.x.z>;tag=29859d3c From: <sip:051438****@192.168.x.y>;tag=as26b82ac7 Call-ID: 698200851849894c5874186163abe668@192.168.x.y:5090 CSeq: 102 INVITE Allow: INVITE, ACK, CANCEL, BYE, REFER, INFO, NOTIFY, OPTIONS, UPDATE, PRACK, MESSAGE, SUBSCRIBE Content-Type: application/sdp Supported: replaces User-Agent: Bria iOS release 3.9.7 stamp 38887.38893 Content-Length: 230 v=0 o=- 1085831961 3 IN IP4 100.81.231.195 s=Cpc session c=IN IP4 100.81.231.195 t=0 0 m=audio 65454 RTP/AVP 18 101 a=rtpmap:18 G729/8000 a=fmtp:18 annexb=no a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000 a=fmtp:101 0-15 a=sendrecv Could the IP of the media part (100.81.231.195 in the CGNAT 100.64.0.0/10) be the cause of the loop? If that’s the case, how can we prevent the loop? 2) in the second case the CPE is an Avaya The Avaya send us an INVITE. (Also in this case in the SDP there is a private IP) INVITE sip:04818****@178.250.x.y SIP/2.0 From: <sip:0432415453@185.55.x.y>;tag=4500808-c0a8077d-13c4-50022-313081f-200d750c-313081f To: <sip:04818****@178.250.x.y> Call-ID: 44e8f20-c0a8077d-13c4-50022-313081f-31e99586-313081f CSeq: 1 INVITE Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 185.55.x.y:5060;rport;branch=z9hG4bK-313081f-257bc48-1472e4a5 Privacy: none Max-Forwards: 70 User-Agent: OfficeServ 7200 Contact: <sip:0432415453@185.55.z.y:5060;transport=udp> Allow: REGISTER,INVITE,ACK,BYE,REFER,NOTIFY,CANCEL,INFO,OPTIONS,PRACK,SUBSCRIBE,UPDATE Supported: 100rel Content-Type: application/sdp Content-Length: 289 v=0 o=SAMSUNG_SIP_GATEWAY 39304265 0 IN IP4 185.55.x.y s=SIP_CALL c=IN IP4 192.168.7.126 t=0 0 m=audio 30012 RTP/AVP 18 8 0 101 a=rtpmap:18 G729/8000 a=fmtp:18 annexb=no a=rtpmap:8 PCMA/8000 a=rtpmap:0 PCMU/8000 a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000 a=fmtp:101 0-15 a=sendrecv We reply with a “183 Session Progress” and the Avaya send US an “INFO” packet (dtmf) we replay with a “200 OK”; and then, after another “INFO” packet we replay with a “200 OK” with SDP. After that the Avaya replies with an ACK 2017/08/02 10:17:32.101121 185.55.x.y:5060 -> 178.250.x.y:5060 ACK sip:04818****@178.250.x.y SIP/2.0 From: <sip:0432415453@185.55.x.y>;tag=4500808-c0a8077d-13c4-50022-313081f-200d750c-313081f To: <sip:04818****@178.250.x.y>;tag=as783106e4 Call-ID: 44e8f20-c0a8077d-13c4-50022-313081f-31e99586-313081f CSeq: 1 ACK Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 185.55.x.y:5060;rport;branch=z9hG4bK-3130831-257ffea-84906e4 Max-Forwards: 70 User-Agent: OfficeServ 7200 Route: <sip:178.250.x.y;lr=on;r2=on;ftag=4500808-c0a8077d-13c4-50022-313081f-200d750c-313081f;did=adc.2f61> Route: <sip:192.168.x.y;lr=on;r2=on;ftag=4500808-c0a8077d-13c4-50022-313081f-200d750c-313081f;did=adc.2f61> Contact: <sip:043241****@185.55.x.y:5060;transport=udp> Content-Length: 0 And after that the chaos… Has anyone had a problem like this? Can somebody help us in order to prevent this loop? In the attached images you can see: [0] a call, our machines IPs, an ACK from public interface of our SBC to its private one; and than a lot of ACKs from the keepalived IP to the private IP of our SBC. [1] one of these strange ACKs, they are all different in content, but similar in structure: multiple Record-Route / Via, truncating too long message; [2] a "never ending" BYEs. After modifying the configuration adding some "listen=IP_ADDR:PORT" (and of course excluding the keepalive IP) we had no loops but is this enough? Why Kamailio generated the loops? Is there something else we should review in our config? Any advice would help a lot. Thanks. [0] https://goo.gl/rWh5db [1] https://goo.gl/MNShq9 [2] https://goo.gl/6mxepG

7 years, 4 months

← Newer
1
...
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
...
15
Older →

Jump to page:

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

sr-users August 2017