sr-users April 2013

sr-users@lists.kamailio.org

94 participants
132 discussions

Re: [SR-Users] Simulating kamailio config flows

by Daniel-Constantin Mierla

On 4/22/13 5:30 PM, Juha Heinanen wrote: > Andreas Granig writes: > >> Let me know if this is stupid and/or a complete overkill, but what about >> introducing some kind of dummy mode, where you'd pipe a message into >> kamailio via stdin, and get the resulting message out on stdout (e.g. in >> ngrep style with ip information as first line, plus the content >> following), plus a dump of internals (e.g. vars, avps) on stderr as >> they're being assigned, and once the message is processed, kamailio >> would just shut down again? > in addition to the message, you would need to be able to tell which > ip addr it is coming from and which ip/port in kamailio it is going to. > also, on the output side, kamailio would need to tell which > proto/ip/port it would use to send the message out. Details about going out can be printed on onsend_route. In this route block, one can execute drop and nothing is sent to the wire. It can be a config started with a special define specified with -A parameter. Enabling debugger module with cfg trace should give valuable information about what has been executed from config. From what Andreas suggesting, printing the value of variables as they are assigned is missing, probably can be added by hooking in the interpreter when doing the assignment operation. Grouping all above under some global/command line parameter can be useful to make it easier to do a dry run. Cheers, Daniel -- Daniel-Constantin Mierla - http://www.asipto.com http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda

10 years, 11 months

Problem with Realtime Kamailio-Asterisk integration

by aaaa aaaa

Hello, I followed the step by step guide (http://kb.asipto.com/asterisk:realtime:kamailio-3.3.x-asterisk-10.7.0-astdb) that describe the realtime integration between Kamailio and Asterisk. I have no problem with registration but when I try a call from 101 to 102 I get the followng error: [Mar 31 01:18:44] NOTICE[32330][C-00000006]: chan_sip.c:25195 handle_request_invite: Call from '101' (192.168.1.100:5060) to extension '103' rejected because extension not found in context 'DEFAULT NULL'. Kamailio and Asterisk are running in the same machine. Any idea about the cause of this problem? Best Regards, Theo

10 years, 11 months

extra_id_pv parameter

by Bruno Bresciani

Hi All, I need forking a call to multiple destinations in paralel on different network segments, requiring different rtpproxy parameters. Reading the rtpproxy module documentation I discovered that is possible by setting the "b" parameter on rtpproxy_manage(), rtpproxy_offer(), rtpproxy_answer() and rtpproxy_destroy() functions, but I'm with some doubts... I can't understanding how set the extra_id_pv parameter correctly to use when the "b" parameter is used. The "b" parameter is supported on rtpproxy version 1.2.1? Best Regards

10 years, 11 months

How to decrypt SIP message

by Khoa Pham

Hi, Currently, I'm using TLS and it works fine. But eventually, TLS is just used to agree upon a secret key. And both client and Kamailio use that secret key to encrypt message. In my solution, I have a fixed secret key. And client encrypt SIP message with that secret key. What code should I insert in Kamalio to decrypt it? -- Khoa Pham HCMC University of Science Faculty of Information Technology

10 years, 11 months

gruu and dead-lock in registrar module

by Andreas Granig

Hi, We're hitting an issue in a deployment where all udp receivers are sitting in FUTEX_WAIT caused by save() -> lock_udomain() and seem to have deadlocked themselves every couple of days. Looking at the code, enable_gruu in registrar is active by default, and in lookup there is a code path /* temp-gruu lookup */ res = ul.get_urecord_by_ruid(_d, ahash, &inst, &r, &ptr); but no lock_udomain is obtained. However, when the execution falls through to the "done:" marker, it does ul.unlock_udomain(_d, &aor); without having called ul.lock_udomain first. 1.) Could someone please review this part? Looks a bit suspicious, although I don't know what implicitly happens in this case. If it were a semaphore and you decrease it to -1 by decrementing it without prior increment, it's essentially causing a dead-lock, but the current locking implementation might work completely different. 2.) Since I have no clue how gruu is supposed to work in detail, and since in our config we don't explicitly handle gruu (no lookup in loose-route, but gruu is enabled by default in registrar and we don't explicitly turned it off), I'm not even sure if we ever hit this code path. I only see that the ruid column in the location table is filled, but in order to get to this part, the ";gr" flag needs to be set in the R-URI for a lookup(), which I don't know whether that happened somehow in some call flows (we only log $ru, which I don't think logs these parameters, right?). Some input is highly appreciated! Andreas

10 years, 11 months

dlg_end_dlg

by Dragos Oancea

Hi everyone, I believe I've run into a problem when using dlg_end_dlg (with mi_datagram ) called from an external perl script with perl_exec() . Kamailio just locks after a while (few seconds) after disconnecting a call. Some parts of my debug log can be found here: http://pastebin.com/ANaTEifC The problem was observed while performing a stress test. Is it a good idea to call dlg_end_dlg() like that or I can kill an established dialog from the routing script in some other way ? Regards, Dragos

10 years, 11 months

Re: [SR-Users] Kamailio 3.x and Asterisk Realtime Integration plus

by Aldo Antignano

Thank you very much for your reply Barry. Can you explain us yours ip 10.5.75. and 10.5.76. ? Seems your asterisks have two interfaces, one private and one public? In my infrastructure I have: SIP client -> Kamailio ---> Asterisk 01 ---> Asterisk 02 ... ---> Asterisk N Only Kamailio has a public IP address. In the REGFWD route you send all the registrations to ALL the Asterisks? If so, why? I'm trying to achieve something like: SIP clientA ---> REG ---> Kamailio Is Asterisk01 alive? Yes --> REG ---> Asterisk 01 NO --> Choose next one ---> Asterisk 02 ... ---> Asterisk N ---> Asterisk 01 SIP clientB ---> REG ---> Kamailio Is Asterisl02 alive? Yes --> REG ---> Asterisk 02 NO --> Choose next one ---> Asterisk 03 ... ---> Asterisk N and so on, with a round robin algorithm. When Sip ClientA want to call Sip ClientB, it asks Kamailio, that know that SIP Client B is registered on Asterisk 02 and so send the invite to it. I'm going to work over this in the next few days and let you know the result, if positive I'll write a new complete guide on this topic with your valuable suggestions. Any suggestion is welcome BR, Anty ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> I have read and applied the excellent guide found on: >> http://kb.asipto.com/asterisk:realtime:kamailio-3.3.x-asterisk-10.7.0-astdb >> >> Now I have added to Kamailio the HA/Load Balancer support, with the >> "dispatcher" module. >> This way I have 1 Kamailio and 2 Asterisk machines. >> >> How can I change the routing logic of the sections route[REGFWD] | >> route[FROMASTERISK] route[TOASTERISK] to use the dispatcher module? (in the >> guide above the asterisk binded ip address is cabled in the kamailio config >> code) I have done that. Relevant route entries below. # Forward REGISTER to Asterisk route[REGFWD] { if(!is_method("REGISTER")) { return; } # for each Asterisk server in setid=2 (External) we send a registration on behalf of the user. sql_xquery("ca", "SELECT SUBSTRING_INDEX(destination,':',-1) AS port, SUBSTRING_INDEX(SUBSTRING(destination,5),':',1) AS address FROM dispatcher WHERE setid = 2", "ra"); $var(i) = 0; while($xavp(ra[$var(i)]) != $null) { $var(rip) = $xavp(ra[$var(i)]=>address); $uac_req(method)="REGISTER"; $uac_req(ruri)="sip:" + $var(rip) + ":" + $xavp(ra[$var(i)]=>port); $uac_req(furi)="sip:" + $au + "@" + $var(rip); $uac_req(turi)="sip:" + $au + "@" + $var(rip); $uac_req(hdrs)="Contact: <sip:" + $au + "@" + $sel(cfg_get.kamailio.bindip) + ":" + $sel(cfg_get.kamailio.bindport) + ">\r\n"; if($sel(contact.expires) != $null) $uac_req(hdrs)= $uac_req(hdrs) + "Expires: " + $sel(contact.expires) + "\r\n"; else $uac_req(hdrs)= $uac_req(hdrs) + "Expires: " + $hdr(Expires) + "\r\n"; uac_req_send(); $var(i) = $var(i) + 1; } sql_result_free("ra"); } # Test if coming from Asterisk. We check the dispatcher "ds_is_from_list()" function to see if this is one of our Asterisk IPs route[FROMASTERISK] { if(ds_is_from_list()) { return 1; } else { return -1; } } # Send to Asterisk route[TOASTERISK] { # If call comes in to the .75 iface, we need to send it to the .75 iface of Asterisk as well. # otherwise we send to the .76 iface. We do this by calling different dispatcher sets. This is # because Asterisk needs to use NAT on the .76. (public) interface but not on the .75. if($td=~"10.5.75.") { $var(setid) = 4; xlog("SCRIPT: Call to 10.5.75. ip - using set $var(setid) \n"); } else { $var(setid) = 2; xlog("SCRIPT: Call from $fn to 10.5.76. ip - using set $var(setid) \n"); } # round robin dispatching on set determined above if(!ds_select_dst($var(setid), "4")) { send_reply("404", "No destination"); exit; } t_on_failure("RTF_DISPATCH"); route(RELAY); exit; } Hope this helps. -Barry Flanagan

10 years, 11 months

Kamailio 3.x and Asterisk Realtime Integration plus Dispatcher module

by Aldo Antignano

I have read and applied the excellent guide found on: http://kb.asipto.com/asterisk:realtime:kamailio-3.3.x-asterisk-10.7.0-astdb Now I have added to Kamailio the HA/Load Balancer support, with the "dispatcher" module. This way I have 1 Kamailio and 2 Asterisk machines. How can I change the routing logic of the sections route[REGFWD] | route[FROMASTERISK] route[TOASTERISK] to use the dispatcher module? (in the guide above the asterisk binded ip address is cabled in the kamailio config code) Thanks, Anty

10 years, 11 months

[SR-users] Radius AAA

by Victor V. Kustov

Hi again! Need tips to some tricks with radius. 1. when receive sip message with REGISTER method - initiate auth with radius. (Authentification) - radius_www_authorize in auth_radius.so 2. when receive INVITE message - ask radius 'bout permissions and parse answer: get permission and next hop IP. (Authorization) ???? misc_radius ???? 3. when call a) before call send Acct-Status-Type = Start with attributes. b) after call send Acct-Status-Type = Stop with attributes. (Accounting) - acc_radius.so 1,3 - clear, I understand how it works. 2 - ? Kamailio must send request to radius server, get answer and route call to server from "next-hop-IP" field. Can I make it? -- С уважением, Виктор В. Кустов ООО "Брянск Связь-ТВ" +7 (952) 966 76 24 JID: coyote(a)bks.tv JID: coyote(a)bryansktel.ru I use FREE operation system: 3.8.4-calculate GNU/Linux

10 years, 11 months

siptrace + flatstore

by Victor V. Kustov

Hi all loadmodule "siptrace.so" modparam("siptrace", "db_url", "flatstore:/var/log/siptrace") call sip_trace(); nothing in /var/log/siptrace, no errors in logs. whats wrong? -- SY, Victor JID: coyote(a)bks.tv JID: coyote(a)bryansktel.ru I use FREE operation system: 3.8.4-calculate GNU/Linux

10 years, 11 months

Jump to page:

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

sr-users April 2013