sr-users February 2013

sr-users@lists.kamailio.org

84 participants
124 discussions

Multiple radius responses on a missed call

by Efelin Novak

Hi folks, I'd like to ask you how can I solve an issue when I'm receiving three RADIUS requests on one missed call. My scenario is as follows: A calls to B. B returns 503 error message, INIVITE is then sent to C and C sends 486. After first 503 I receive a first RADIUS request. This is correct. However after 486 I receive three RADIUS requests with different IDs. As you can see in a DEBUG one RADIUS is send after the SIP reply message is received and second and third RADIUS messages are sent after the SIP reply message is forwarded. I'd like to receive only two RADIUS messages. One after 503 and second after 486. FLT_ACC is defined as 1. My config is as follows: modparam("acc", "failed_transaction_flag", FLT_ACC) modparam("acc", "report_cancels", 1) modparam("acc", "report_ack", 0) modparam("acc", "detect_direction", 0) modparam("acc", "early_media", 0) modparam("acc", "log_level", 5) modparam("acc", "log_flag", 1) modparam("acc", "log_missed_flag", 1) modparam("acc_radius", "radius_config", "/etc/radiusclient-ng/radiusclient.conf") # This is the location of the configuration file of radius client modparam("acc_radius", "radius_flag", FLT_ACC) modparam("acc_radius", "radius_missed_flag", FLT_ACC) In a route I set setflag("FLT_ACC") only once per call. Here is the debug for debug level 7: 0(5890) DEBUG: <core> [parser/msg_parser.c:634]: SIP Reply (status): 0(5890) DEBUG: <core> [parser/msg_parser.c:636]: version: <SIP/2.0> 0(5890) DEBUG: <core> [parser/msg_parser.c:638]: status: <486> 0(5890) DEBUG: <core> [parser/msg_parser.c:640]: reason: <Busy here> 0(5890) DEBUG: <core> [parser/parse_via.c:1286]: Found param type 232, <branch> = <z9hG4bK8d9c.4438d232.1>; state=6 0(5890) DEBUG: <core> [parser/parse_via.c:1286]: Found param type 234, <received> = <192.168.21.101>; state=16 0(5890) DEBUG: <core> [parser/parse_via.c:2561]: end of header reached, state=5 0(5890) DEBUG: <core> [parser/msg_parser.c:511]: parse_headers: Via found, flags=2 0(5890) DEBUG: <core> [parser/msg_parser.c:513]: parse_headers: this is the first via 0(5890) DEBUG: <core> [receive.c:149]: After parse_msg... 0(5890) DEBUG: tm [t_lookup.c:1079]: DEBUG: t_check_msg: msg id=6 global id=5 T start=0xffffffff 0(5890) DEBUG: <core> [parser/parse_via.c:1286]: Found param type 232, <branch> = <z9hG4bK8d9c.e7b650e1.0>; state=16 0(5890) DEBUG: <core> [parser/parse_via.c:2561]: end of header reached, state=5 0(5890) DEBUG: <core> [parser/msg_parser.c:511]: parse_headers: Via found, flags=22 0(5890) DEBUG: <core> [parser/msg_parser.c:524]: parse_headers: this is the second via 0(5890) DEBUG: <core> [parser/parse_via.c:1286]: Found param type 232, <branch> = <z9hG4bK463ae086>; state=6 0(5890) DEBUG: <core> [parser/parse_via.c:1286]: Found param type 235, <rport> = <5060>; state=16 0(5890) DEBUG: <core> [parser/parse_via.c:2561]: end of header reached, state=5 0(5890) DEBUG: <core> [parser/msg_parser.c:511]: parse_headers: Via found, flags=22 0(5890) DEBUG: <core> [parser/parse_to.c:178]: DEBUG: add_param: tag=as493d6134 0(5890) DEBUG: <core> [parser/parse_to.c:802]: end of header reached, state=29 0(5890) DEBUG: <core> [parser/msg_parser.c:188]: DEBUG: get_hdr_field: <To> [42]; uri=[sip:5556003900000@dr.vm] 0(5890) DEBUG: <core> [parser/msg_parser.c:190]: DEBUG: to body [<sip:5556003900000@dr.vm>] 0(5890) DEBUG: <core> [parser/msg_parser.c:168]: get_hdr_field: cseq <CSeq>: <102> <INVITE> 0(5890) DEBUG: tm [t_lookup.c:965]: DEBUG: t_reply_matching: hash 51672 label 590185284 branch 1 0(5890) DEBUG: tm [t_lookup.c:1016]: DEBUG: t_reply_matching: reply matched (T=0x871afc98)! 0(5890) DEBUG: tm [t_hooks.c:288]: DBG: trans=0x871afc98, callback type 2, id 0 entered 0(5890) DEBUG: acc [acc_logic.c:537]: acc callback called for t(0x871afc98) event type 2, reply code 486 0(5890) DEBUG: tm [t_hooks.c:288]: DBG: trans=0x871afc98, callback type 2, id 0 entered 0(5890) DEBUG: <core> [parser/parse_to.c:178]: DEBUG: add_param: tag=as5c1d222e 0(5890) DEBUG: <core> [parser/parse_to.c:802]: end of header reached, state=29 0(5890) DEBUG: siptrace [siptrace.c:794]: storing info... 0(5890) DEBUG: tm [t_lookup.c:1148]: DEBUG: t_check_msg: msg id=6 global id=6 T end=0x871afc98 0(5890) DEBUG: tm [t_reply.c:2081]: DEBUG: reply_received: org. status uas=180, uac[1]=180 local=0 is_invite=1) 0(5890) DEBUG: tm [t_hooks.c:288]: DBG: trans=0x871afc98, callback type 4194304, id 0 entered 0(5890) DEBUG: siptrace [siptrace.c:794]: storing info... 0(5890) DEBUG: tm [t_lookup.c:1079]: DEBUG: t_check_msg: msg id=6 global id=6 T start=0x871afc98 0(5890) DEBUG: tm [t_lookup.c:1151]: DEBUG: t_check_msg: T already found! 0(5890) DEBUG: tmx [t_var.c:438]: reply code is <486> 0(5890) INFO: <script>: XLOG: 38e422e10af08b2e34d58e5b765e81d3(a)dr.vm [REPLY_TWO] Incoming reply code: 486 0(5890) DEBUG: tm [t_reply.c:1204]: ->>>>>>>>> T_code=180, new_code=486 0(5890) DEBUG: tm [t_hooks.c:288]: DBG: trans=0x871afc98, callback type 128, id 0 entered 0(5890) DEBUG: acc [acc_logic.c:537]: acc callback called for t(0x871afc98) event type 128, reply code 486 0(5890) acc [acc.c:275]: ACC: call missed: timestamp=1360265692;method=INVITE;from_tag=as5c1d222e;to_tag=as493d6134;call_id=38e422e10af08b2e34d58e5b765e81d3(a)dr.vm;code=486;reason=Busy here 0(5890) DEBUG: acc [acc.c:872]: missed event for engine: radius 0(5890) DEBUG: <core> [md5utils.c:67]: DEBUG: MD5 calculated: 6e1b9f35a8b3e65859e29aefc1c26fc3 0(5890) DEBUG: exec [exec_hf.c:267]: SIP_HF_CONTENT_LENGTH=262 0(5890) DEBUG: exec [exec_hf.c:267]: SIP_HF_CONTENT_TYPE=application/sdp 0(5890) DEBUG: exec [exec_hf.c:267]: SIP_HF_SUPPORTED=replaces 0(5890) DEBUG: exec [exec_hf.c:267]: SIP_HF_ALLOW=INVITE, ACK, CANCEL, OPTIONS, BYE, REFER, SUBSCRIBE, NOTIFY, INFO 0(5890) DEBUG: exec [exec_hf.c:267]: SIP_HF_DATE=Thu, 07 Feb 2013 19:35:53 GMT 0(5890) DEBUG: exec [exec_hf.c:267]: SIP_HF_MAX_FORWARDS=68 0(5890) DEBUG: exec [exec_hf.c:267]: SIP_HF_USER_AGENT=Asterisk PBX 0(5890) DEBUG: exec [exec_hf.c:267]: SIP_HF_CSEQ=102 INVITE 0(5890) DEBUG: exec [exec_hf.c:267]: SIP_HF_CALLID=38e422e10af08b2e34d58e5b765e81d3(a)dr.vm 0(5890) DEBUG: exec [exec_hf.c:267]: SIP_HF_CONTACT=<sip:0221028400@192.168.21.106> 0(5890) DEBUG: exec [exec_hf.c:267]: SIP_HF_TO=<sip:5556003900000@dr.vm> 0(5890) DEBUG: exec [exec_hf.c:267]: SIP_HF_FROM="Janko" <sip:0221028400@dr.vm>;tag=as5c1d222e 0(5890) DEBUG: exec [exec_hf.c:267]: SIP_HF_VIA=SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.21.100;branch=z9hG4bK8d9c.e7b650e1.0,SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.21.106:5060;branch=z9hG4bK463ae086;rport=5060 0(5890) DEBUG: exec [exec_mod.c:175]: executing [/opt/kamrouter/scripts/notify_reroute.sh 503 sip:3333003900000@ast-car.vm sip:0221028400@dr.vm 38e422e10af08b2e34d58e5b765e81d3(a)dr.vm] sh: /opt/kamrouter/scripts/notify_reroute.sh: not found 0(5890) INFO: <core> [main.c:797]: INFO: dont_fork turned on, living on 0(5890) DEBUG: tm [t_lookup.c:1079]: DEBUG: t_check_msg: msg id=0 global id=0 T start=0x871afc98 0(5890) DEBUG: tm [t_lookup.c:1151]: DEBUG: t_check_msg: T already found! 0(5890) DEBUG: tmx [t_var.c:438]: reply code is <486> 0(5890) INFO: <script>: XLOG: 38e422e10af08b2e34d58e5b765e81d3(a)dr.vm [FAIL_TWO] Rerouted gw returned 486 0(5890) INFO: <script>: XLOG: 38e422e10af08b2e34d58e5b765e81d3(a)dr.vm [aaa] VYMAZAVAM3 0(5890) DEBUG: tm [t_reply.c:1702]: DEBUG: relay_reply: branch=1, save=0, relay=1 0(5890) DEBUG: <core> [msg_translator.c:1933]: old size: 572, new size: 485 0(5890) DEBUG: <core> [msg_translator.c:1951]: build_res_from_sip_res: copied size: orig:110, new: 23, rest: 462 msg= SIP/2.0 486 Busy here Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.21.100;branch=z9hG4bK8d9c.e7b650e1.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.21.106:5060;branch=z9hG4bK463ae086;rport=5060 From: "Janko" <sip:0221028400@dr.vm>;tag=as5c1d222e To: <sip:5556003900000@dr.vm>;tag=as493d6134 Call-ID: 38e422e10af08b2e34d58e5b765e81d3(a)dr.vm CSeq: 102 INVITE Server: Asterisk PBX 11.0.2 Allow: INVITE, ACK, CANCEL, OPTIONS, BYE, REFER, SUBSCRIBE, NOTIFY, INFO, PUBLISH Supported: replaces, timer Content-Length: 0 0(5890) DEBUG: tm [t_hooks.c:288]: DBG: trans=0x871afc98, callback type 1048576, id 0 entered 0(5890) DEBUG: dialog [dlg_hash.c:588]: ref dlg 0x871af3f0 with 1 -> 2 0(5890) DEBUG: dialog [dlg_hash.c:590]: dialog id=3894 found on entry 2825 0(5890) DEBUG: dialog [dlg_hash.c:940]: dialog 0x871af3f0 changed from state 2 to state 5, due event 4 (ref 2) 0(5890) DEBUG: dialog [dlg_hash.c:735]: ref dlg 0x871af3f0 with 1 -> 3 0(5890) DEBUG: dialog [dlg_handlers.c:1469]: executing event_route 4 on state 5 0(5890) INFO: <script>: XLOG: 38e422e10af08b2e34d58e5b765e81d3(a)dr.vm [dialog:failed] Deleting 38e422e10af08b2e34d58e5b765e81d3(a)dr.vm from dialogs and dstprefix_limit 0(5890) DEBUG: dialog [dlg_hash.c:753]: unref dlg 0x871af3f0 with 1 -> 2 0(5890) DEBUG: dialog [dlg_handlers.c:543]: dialog 0x871af3f0 failed (negative reply) 0(5890) DEBUG: dialog [dlg_cb.c:256]: dialog=0x871af3f0, type=4 0(5890) DEBUG: dialog [dlg_hash.c:643]: ref dlg 0x871af3f0 with 1 -> 3 0(5890) DEBUG: dialog [dlg_hash.c:646]: dialog callid='38e422e10af08b2e34d58e5b765e81d3(a)dr.vm' found on entry 2825, dir=1 0(5890) DEBUG: dialog [dlg_var.c:203]: Internal var-list ((nil)): 0(5890) DEBUG: dialog [dlg_var.c:213]: Dialog var-list (0x871af6f8): 0(5890) DEBUG: dialog [dlg_var.c:218]: "ru"=sip:003900000@cr1.vm:5060 (flags 1) 0(5890) DEBUG: dialog [dlg_var.c:218]: d=0 (flags 1) 0(5890) DEBUG: dialog [dlg_var.c:218]: et=1360265682.889 (flags 1) 0(5890) DEBUG: dialog [dlg_var.c:218]: st=1360265682.889 (flags 1) 0(5890) DEBUG: dialog [dlg_hash.c:753]: unref dlg 0x871af3f0 with 1 -> 2 0(5890) acc [acc_cdr.c:192]: st=1360265682.889; et=1360265682.889; d=0; c1= 0(5890) DEBUG: dialog [dlg_hash.c:753]: unref dlg 0x871af3f0 with 1 -> 1 0(5890) DEBUG: dialog [dlg_handlers.c:937]: registering TMCB to wait for negative ACK 0(5890) DEBUG: dialog [dlg_hash.c:735]: ref dlg 0x871af3f0 with 1 -> 2 0(5890) DEBUG: dialog [dlg_hash.c:753]: unref dlg 0x871af3f0 with 1 -> 1 0(5890) DEBUG: tm [t_hooks.c:288]: DBG: trans=0x871afc98, callback type 512, id 0 entered 0(5890) DEBUG: acc [acc_logic.c:537]: acc callback called for t(0x871afc98) event type 512, reply code 486 0(5890) acc [acc.c:275]: ACC: call missed: timestamp=1360265692;method=INVITE;from_tag=as5c1d222e;to_tag=as493d6134;call_id=38e422e10af08b2e34d58e5b765e81d3(a)dr.vm;code=486;reason=Busy here 0(5890) DEBUG: acc [acc.c:872]: missed event for engine: radius 0(5890) acc [acc.c:275]: ACC: transaction answered: timestamp=1360265692;method=INVITE;from_tag=as5c1d222e;to_tag=as493d6134;call_id=38e422e10af08b2e34d58e5b765e81d3(a)dr.vm;code=486;reason=Busy here 0(5890) DEBUG: acc [acc.c:867]: acc event for engine: radius 0(5890) DEBUG: tm [t_hooks.c:288]: DBG: trans=0x871afc98, callback type 8388608, id 0 entered Thanks for a help. Efelin

11 years, 9 months

Reg. functions in custom modules

by madhumanjusha＠integramicro.com

Hello All, Is it possible to call functions in custom modules say modules/my_module/my_file.c if my_file.c has a function and want to access/call it from kamailio core file ie., which is under /root/kamailio-3.3.2/receive.c ?? If not possible,what is the way to access functions in custom modules. Please do reply. Thanks & Regards, Manjusha A. Integra Micro Software Services (P) Ltd.

11 years, 9 months

dlg_manage and engage_media_proxy

by Eduardo Lejarreta Langarica SARENET

Good evening. Kamailio 3.2.2 and mediaproxy 2.5.2 We find a problem when using engage_media_proxy and dlg_manage on the same kamailio.cfg (we loose one way audio) is ther any issue with regard to this? may be anything we're doing wrong? any other easy way to control concurrent calls? If 1.- we avoid dlg_manage with engage_media_proxy or 2.- we use dlg_manage with "use_media_proxy/end_media_session" every thing works fine. Any idea will be helpful. Thanks and best regards. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Eduardo Lejarreta

11 years, 9 months

kamctl restart and mediaproxy

by Eduardo Lejarreta Langarica SARENET

Good evening again. Kamailio 3.2.2 and mediaproxy 2.5.2 An long-time issue for us: kamctl restart stops mediaproxy audio. is there anyway to avoid this? Any idea will be helpful. Thanks and best regards. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Eduardo Lejarreta

11 years, 9 months

Somewhat OT: Specific SIP packets can cause ethernet controller reset

by Kristian Kielhofner

While not strictly Kamailio related this issue could certainly affect some of you: http://blog.krisk.org/2013/02/packets-of-death.html I'm hearing initial reports that this issue is fairly widespread. -- Kristian Kielhofner

11 years, 9 months

Re: [SR-Users] sr-users Digest, Vol 92, Issue 50:Modify IP address in SDP (Austin Einter)

by madhumanjusha＠integramicro.com

On Tue, January 22, 2013 1:58 pm, sr-users-request(a)lists.sip-router.org wrote: > Send sr-users mailing list submissions to > sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > sr-users-request(a)lists.sip-router.org > > You can reach the person managing the list at > sr-users-owner(a)lists.sip-router.org > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of sr-users digest..." > > > Today's Topics: > > > 1. Modify IP address in SDP (Austin Einter) > 2. Re: Modify IP address in SDP (Olle E. Johansson) > 3. Problem with 4.0 nightlies and IMS - sem_post undefined > (Barry Flanagan) > 4. Patch to resolve segfault in json module (Richard Brady) > 5. Re: Modify IP address in SDP (Austin Einter) > 6. Re: Patch to resolve segfault in json module > (Daniel-Constantin Mierla) > 7. Re: [sr-dev] FOSDEM (Daniel Pocock) > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > Message: 1 > Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2013 18:37:13 +0530 > From: Austin Einter <austin.einter(a)gmail.com> > Subject: [SR-Users] Modify IP address in SDP > To: "SIP Router - Kamailio (OpenSER) and SIP Express Router (SER) - > Users Mailing List" <sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org> > Message-ID: > <CANXt1k--VtC6aYHGTBZ5GqF8n=66g5PVwG4YhOC_uefxpVYy=g(a)mail.gmail.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" > > > Dear All > When 200 OK to INVITE passes through Kamailio proxy , I want to change the > IP address in SDP to a specific IP address. > > > Can this be done by just modifying configuration files or do I need to > modify in source code. > > In case I need to modify source code, which files I need to look at. > > > Kindly provide pointers for said problem. > > > Thanks > Austin Hello Austin, 1...I was doing similar one for my task. Files : /root/kamailio-3.3.2/parser/sdp/sdp.h sdp.h file has struct that holds ip address and port numbers of audio and video. Stucture: sdp_session_cell struct has member named str ip_addr will give you ip address in sdp. 2...Yes you can edit existing code or else you can create your own 200ok packet.I created my own 200OK and invite packets with sdp. 3...You can grab below ip address when kamailio proxy is about to forward 200OK to end client.File where you can find 200OK is (though not sure but you can try this file edit existing 200OK): /root/kamailio-3.3.2/modules/tm/t_reply.c has below function static int _reply( struct cell *trans, struct sip_msg* p_msg, unsigned int code, char * text, int lock ) { } 4...I did the following way to get ipaddr...and below piece of code you can use it in the above function's body to edit 200OK's ip address:: char my_src_rtp_addr[8]; int my_src_rtp_addr_len=0; struct sdp_session_cell *sdp_session; if(0 != parse_sdp(p_msg)) { LOG(L_INFO,"Unable to parse sdp\n"); } sdp_session=get_sdp_session(p_msg,0); if(sdp_session!=0){ my_src_rtp_addr_len=strlen(my_src_rtp_addr); my_src_rtp_addr[my_src_rtp_addr_len]='\0'; my_src_rtp_addr[my_src_rtp_addr_len+1]='\0'; my_src_rtp_addr[my_src_rtp_addr_len+2]='\0'; my_src_rtp_addr[my_src_rtp_addr_len+3]='\0'; strncpy(my_src_rtp_addr,sdp_session->ip_addr.s,sdp_session->ip_addr.len); } If any questions,please let me know. Thanks & Regards, Manjusha A. Integra Micro Software Services (P) Ltd.

11 years, 9 months

Need help in rewriting the Request URI

by Ajay Sabat

Hi, I use Kamailio for basic call setup with one exception where it has to route call to another server by seeing the domain name in the Request URI. If the Request uri in the received INVITE message looks like "sip12345@video-conf", then it should route the INVITE request to the video-conf server by resolving the domain name. I changed the config file kamailio.cfg as given below. route[SIPOUT] { if (!uri==myself) { append_hf("P-hint: outbound\r\n"); # AKS: call routing if (uri=~".*@video-conf") { rewritehost("video-conf"); } # AKS route(RELAY); } } It resolves the domain name and routes the INVITE message to the resolved IP address. However it uses the domain name in the Request line and To header and I need to replace domain with the resolved IP address in the Request URI and To header. Now Request URI and To header look like "INVITE sip:12345@video-conf" and "To: <sip:12345:video-conf>" respectively and I need them as "INVITE sip:12345@video-conf" and "To: <sip:12345:video-conf>". I don't have any knowledge in tweaking kamailio. I tried some tricks like the following by going through documents and pervious emails in the forum. But it didn't work. Some of them have spoken about avp and pseudo variables. But I am getting confused as I have just begun using Kamailio and it is vast. # $ru = "sip:" + $rU + "@" + to_ip; I will appreciate if you could help me or guide me in right direction. Thanks, Ajay

11 years, 9 months

Problems with MSILO module can't receive messages with m_dump.

by Nord7

Hello i have two problems with module MSILO and text messages from SIP client BRIA. 1. I can't send messages with m_dump. I have installed Kamailio 3.3 in default configuration. I'm added "m_dump("$fu")" to my config in route[REGISTRAR]. If i use client CSipSimple for sending messages to offline user "333". i'm receive notification message "*** User 333 offline!". Next i connect to Kamailio with user "333" and i see in kamailio log what "m_dumt" trying to send messages but can't because "request authorisation". How to disable authorisation request, without leak security. route[REGISTRAR] { if (is_method("REGISTER")) { if(isflagset(FLT_NATS)) { setbflag(FLB_NATB); # uncomment next line to do SIP NAT pinging ## setbflag(FLB_NATSIPPING); } if (!save("location")) sl_reply_error(); if (m_dump("$fu")) { log("MSILO: offline messages dumped - if they were\n"); } else { log("MSILO: no offline messages dumped\n"); } exit; } }

11 years, 9 months

msilo patch

by Stoyan Mihaylov

When I used, last versions from git, I got error and crash of kamailo using m_dump. I got latest version from git, and I made one patch: diff --git a/modules/msilo/msilo.c b/modules/msilo/msilo.c index 209b309..4bda8fa 100644 --- a/modules/msilo/msilo.c +++ b/modules/msilo/msilo.c @@ -1125,8 +1125,16 @@ static int m_dump(struct sip_msg* msg, str* owner_s) memcpy(tmp_extra_hdrs.s, extra_hdrs_str.s, extra_hdrs_str.len); memcpy(tmp_extra_hdrs.s+extra_hdrs_str.len, str_vals[4].s, str_vals[4].len); } else { - tmp_extra_hdrs.len = 0; - tmp_extra_hdrs.s = ""; + tmp_extra_hdrs.len = 1; + if ((tmp_extra_hdrs.s = pkg_malloc(1)) == NULL) + { + LM_ERR("Out of pkg memory"); + if (msilo_dbf.free_result(db_con, db_res) < 0) + LM_ERR("failed to free the query result\n"); + msg_list_set_flag(ml, mid, MS_MSG_ERRO); + goto error; + } + tmp_extra_hdrs.s[0]='\x0'; } hdr_str.len = 1024; if(m_build_headers(&hdr_str, str_vals[3] /*ctype*/, The problem is: tmp_extra_hdrs.s = ""; and consequent pkg_free(tmp_extra_hdrs.s); As I see, there are couple of ways to solve problem, one of them is setting tmp_extra_hdrs.s = 0; but then we have warnings, or setting tmp_extra_hdrs.s = 0; and check before pkg_free, but pkg_free is used on couple of places. I am not sure what is the best way to report bugs and offer patches.

11 years, 9 months

Deleting the expired contacts using the Rtimer module

by kiran bhosale

Hi we have developed the custom module which stores the registered users in a file.now we are trying to remove the expired contacts using the rtimer module.while saving the registered users to the file we also store the expires values in static array.but when we try to decrement the these values in a function called with the help of rtimer module. the values used by this periodic function are not modified ones but the initial which are zero. is it that we cant pass the modified values of the global variables to the timed functions. to get around this problem, we also registered the timer in our module but got same results !!!!!!! Please Help. Thanks and regards .

11 years, 9 months

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

sr-users February 2013