sr-users April 2012

sr-users@lists.kamailio.org

75 participants
132 discussions

by Norm

Take a look at Homer. Reda Aouad <reda.aouad(a)gmail.com> wrote: >Hello, > >Anyone knows a tool/software (NOT CDRTool) to graphically visualize the SIP >traces recorded in database by Kamailio's siptrace module? > >Thanks >Reda > >_______________________________________________ >SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list >sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org >http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users

12 years, 1 month

Visualizing SIP Trace

by Reda Aouad

Hello, Anyone knows a tool/software (NOT CDRTool) to graphically visualize the SIP traces recorded in database by Kamailio's siptrace module? Thanks Reda

12 years, 1 month

RFC 5626 Outbound/ sip.instance in Contact header?

by Daniel Pocock

Hi, I'm just wondering if there has been any type of work to implement any part of RFC 5626, particularly the registrar server code? Lumicall now generates a UUID at install time, and sends that as sip.instance in the Contact header. It always sends reg-id=1 (only trying one proxy at the moment). Although this is not a full implementation of the spec, it seems to be sufficient for eliminating extra Contact records in the repro registration server (from reSIProcate). However, I've noticed Kamailio doesn't seem to understand this parameter yet. Regards, Daniel

12 years, 1 month

Core Dump from select stmt

by Akan Technology

hello, I am running kamailio 3.2.2 on Solaris 10 64 bit and I am getting a core dump on this statement: $ru = "sip:" + $rU + "@" + $sel(cfg_get.registrar1.server_ip) + $sel(cfg_get.registrar1.server_port); Here is how the variable is defined: registrar1.server_ip = "xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx" desc "Registrar server IP address" registrar1.server_port = "5080" desc "Registrar server Port" Here is the output from the logs with debug: 10(25373) ERROR: *** cfgtrace: c=[/opt/kamailio-3.2/etc/kamailio/kamailio.cfg] l=1072 a=65 n=assign 10(25373) DEBUG: <core> [select.c:424]: Calling SELECT 1004b2bc0 10(25373) DEBUG: <core> [select.c:424]: Calling SELECT 1004b4da0 10(25373) ERROR: *** cfgtrace:14(25377) : <core> [pass_fd.c:293]: ERROR: receive_fd: EOF on 22 14(25377) DEBUG: <core> [tcp_main.c:3555]: DBG: handle_ser_child: dead child 10, pid 25373 (shutting down?) 14(25377) DEBUG: <core> [io_wait.h:617]: DBG: io_watch_del (1003738b8, 22, 0, 0x0) fd_no=18 called 14(25377) DEBUG: <core> [tcp_main.c:3316]: DBG: handle_tcp_child: dead tcp child 0 (pid 25373, no 10) (shutting down?) 14(25377) DEBUG: <core> [io_wait.h:617]: DBG: io_watch_del (1003738b8, 24, 1, 0x0) fd_no=17 called 0(25363) ALERT: <core> [main.c:751]: child process 25373 exited by a signal 11 0(25363) ALERT: <core> [main.c:754]: core was generated 0(25363) INFO: <core> [main.c:766]: INFO: terminating due to SIGCHLD 14(25377) INFO: <core> [main.c:817]: INFO: signal 15 received Here is the full route code: route[TO_REGISTRAR] { # check if Registrar server's IP is defined if (strempty($sel(cfg_get.registrar1.server_ip))) { xlog("SCRIPT: REGISTRAR - registrar1.server_ip not defined\n"); return; } $ru = "sip:" + $rU + "@" + $sel(cfg_get.registrar1.server_ip) + ":" + $sel(cfg_get.registrar1.server_port); route(RELAY); exit; } # End of TO_Registrar Route I am trying to setup the proxy server to route all registers requests to another kamailio server Thanks Nathaniel

12 years, 1 month

200 OK with SDP got wrong Contact HF after fix_nated_contact()

by Karsten Horsmann

Hello! I got the following problem. My 200 OK with SDP sends the private ip of the B-Leg party. Kamailio is multihomed (pulic/private address) in front of an ivr system. 222.222.222.222 public ip kamailio 172.20.100.74 private ip kamailio 172.20.100.61 private ip ivr 217.217.217.217 public ip uac 172.20.100.203 private ip uac U 2012/04/13 13:56:57.307314 222.222.222.222:5060 -> 217.217.217.217:42885 SIP/2.0 200 Ok. Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 172.20.100.103:28472;rport=42885;branch=z9hG4bK-d8754z-824b81ca678a7de4-1---d8754z-;received=217.217.217.217. From: <sip:4horsmann@222.222.222.222>;tag=e9d1124c. To: <sip:kalkbrenner@222.222.222.222>;tag=ds-1c78ac-2ca01e29. Call-ID: NjQ5YWU0NGYxZjM3YWJhYmE5ZWYxYmQzZjYzYzQyMzI.. CSeq: 2 INVITE. Content-Length: 202. Content-Type: application/sdp. Record-Route: <sip:172.20.100.74;r2=on;lr=on;ftag=e9d1124c;nat=yes>. Record-Route: <sip:222.222.222.222;r2=on;lr=on;ftag=e9d1124c;nat=yes>. Supported: replaces. Supported: 100rel. Allow: INVITE. Allow: ACK. Allow: BYE. Allow: CANCEL. Allow: OPTIONS. Allow: NOTIFY. Allow: REFER. Allow: PRACK. Allow: INFO. Allow: UPDATE. Allow: MESSAGE. Contact: <sip:172.20.100.61:5060>. P-hint: NATMANAGE WITH SDP. . v=0. o=aculab-04246C01 2060618394 2060618394 IN IP4 212.59.42.189. s=-. c=IN IP4 222.222.222.222. t=0 0. m=audio 40390 RTP/AVP 0 101. a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000. a=fmtp:101 0-15. a=nortpproxy:yes. ############################################################## # RTPProxy control route[NATMANAGE] { #!ifdef WITH_NAT xlog("NATMANAGE M=$rm RURI=$ru F=$fu T=$tu IP=$si ID=$ci\n"); if(has_body("application/sdp")) { xlog("NATMANAGE M=$rm with SDP\n"); append_hf("P-hint: NATMANAGE WITH SDP\r\n"); fix_nated_contact(); } if (is_request()) { if(has_totag()) { if(check_route_param("nat=yes")) { setbflag(FLB_NATB); } } } if (isbflagset(FLB_NATB)) return; if (dst_ip == 212.59.42.189) { xlog("rtpproxy_manage extern zu intern\n"); #rtpproxy_manage("OCFEI","172.20.10.74"); rtpproxy_manage("FWCEI","172.20.10.74"); #xlog("e->i Body vor fix: $rb\n"); #fix_nated_contact(); #xlog("e->i Body nach fix: $rb\n"); } else { xlog("rtpproxy_manage intern zu extern\n"); #rtpproxy_manage("OCFIE","222.222.222.222"); rtpproxy_manage("FWCIE","222.222.222.222"); xlog("i->e Body vor fix: $rb\n"); fix_nated_contact(); xlog("i->e Body nach fix: $rb\n"); } if (is_request()) { if (!has_totag()) { add_rr_param(";nat=yes"); } } if (is_reply()) { if(isbflagset(FLB_NATB)) { fix_nated_contact(); } } #!endif return; } -- Mit freundlichen Grüßen *Karsten Horsmann*

12 years, 1 month

200 OK with SDP gets private ip in contact field

by Karsten Horsmann

Hello! I get step by step to my multihomed setup and have now problems that kamailio didnt rewrite the 200 OK to my public ip address. I have attached an ngrep trace and my kamailio 3.2.2 config. Would be great if someone can give me an hint! 222.222.222.222 public ip-address from kamailio 172.20.100.74 private ip-address from kamailio 217.777.777.777 public ip-address from the UAC 172.20.100.103 private ip-address from the UAC 172.20.100.61 sip ip-address from the IVR behind kamailio 172.20.100.71 rtp ip-address from the IVR behind kamailio -- Mit freundlichen Grüßen *Karsten Horsmann*

12 years, 1 month

LCR routing and From Uri

by Alexey Mechanoshin

Hello all. In my config added LCR routing by this manual: http://www.amitnepal.com/using-lcr-with-kamailio/ and if added, to 'lcr_rule' table, uri to 'from_uri' column - kamailio always reply 503 - 'No More Gateways' :-( If remove data - routing work. A'm using last kamailio from git ... Please help me change my config to working routing by checking 'from_uri' . Need check routing prefix 5499 only from IP 192.xxx.xxx.59 , as example. In Log: Apr 10 17:01:23 r59vredfs /usr/sbin/kamailio[29582]: INFO: <script>: New request - M=INVITE RURI=sip:5499@192.xxx.xxx.50:5070 F=sip:5491@192.xxx.xxx.59 T=sip:5499@192.xxx.xxx.50:5070 IP=192.xxx.xxx.59 ID=6c518b61-fd9f-122f-91b7-002655e85348 Apr 10 17:01:23 r59vredfs /usr/sbin/kamailio[29582]: INFO: <script>: Entering route[LCR] for method: INVITE <sip:5499@192.xxx.xxx.50:5070>, and rU=5499, caller_uri='0' Apr 10 17:01:23 r59vredfs /usr/sbin/kamailio[29582]: INFO: <script>: No More Gateways … Apr 10 17:01:23 r59vredfs /usr/sbin/kamailio[29582]: INFO: <script>: Send back 503 code … MySQL data: mysql> select * from lcr_rule; +----+--------+--------+----------+---------+---------+ | id | lcr_id | prefix | from_uri | stopper | enabled | +----+--------+--------+----------+---------+---------+ | 1 | 1 | 5498 | | 0 | 1 | | 2 | 1 | 57 | NULL | 0 | 1 | | 3 | 1 | 58 | NULL | 0 | 1 | | 4 | 1 | 541 | NULL | 0 | 1 | | 5 | 1 | 5499 | sip:192.xxx.xxx.59 | 1 | 1 | +----+--------+--------+----------+---------+---------+ 5 rows in set (0.00 sec) mysql> select * from lcr_gw; +----+--------+---------+----------------+----------+------+--------+------------+-----------+-------+--------+------+-------+---------+ | id | lcr_id | gw_name | ip_addr | hostname | port | params | uri_scheme | transport | strip | prefix | tag | flags | defunct | +----+--------+---------+----------------+----------+------+--------+------------+-----------+-------+--------+------+-------+---------+ | 1 | 1 | route1 | 213.xxx.xxx.26 | NULL | 5060 | NULL | 1 | 1 | NULL | | NULL | 1 | NULL | | 2 | 1 | routemy | 192.xxx.xxx.59 | NULL | 5070 | NULL | 1 | 1 | NULL | NULL | NULL | 1 | NULL | | 3 | 1 | route1 | 213.xxx.xxx.27 | NULL | 5060 | NULL | 1 | 1 | NULL | NULL | NULL | 1 | NULL | +----+--------+---------+----------------+----------+------+--------+------------+-----------+-------+--------+------+-------+---------+ 3 rows in set (0.00 sec) mysql> select * from lcr_rule_target; +----+--------+---------+-------+----------+--------+ | id | lcr_id | rule_id | gw_id | priority | weight | +----+--------+---------+-------+----------+--------+ | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 10 | 1 | | 2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 10 | 1 | | 3 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 10 | 1 | | 4 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 10 | 1 | | 5 | 1 | 5 | 1 | 10 | 1 | | 6 | 1 | 5 | 3 | 20 | 1 | +----+--------+---------+-------+----------+--------+ 6 rows in set (0.00 sec) Config: #!define WITH_LCR ... #!ifdef WITH_LCR loadmodule "avpops.so" loadmodule "lcr.so" #!endif ... #!ifdef WITH_LCR modparam("lcr", "db_url",DBURL) modparam("lcr", "gw_uri_avp", "$avp(i:709)") modparam("lcr", "ruri_user_avp", "$avp(i:500)") modparam("lcr", "flags_avp", "$avp(i:712)") modparam("lcr", "lcr_id_avp", "$avp(s:lcr_id_avp)") #!endif ... # dispatch destinations to PSTN route(PSTN); # LCR route route(LCR); # user location service #route(LOCATION); ... # --=== LCR routing ===-- # route[LCR] { xlog("L_INFO","Entering route[LCR] for method: $rm <$ru>, and rU=$rU, caller_uri='$var(caller_uri)'\n"); #!ifdef WITH_LCR ### if (!load_gws(1)) { ### if (!load_gws(1, $rU)) { if (!load_gws(1)) { sl_send_reply("500", "Server Internal Error - Cannot load gateways"); exit; } else { $var(i) = 0; while(is_avp_set("$(avp(i:709)[$var(i)])")) { xlog("L_INFO", "loading gw_uri_avp[$var(i)]='$(avp(i:709)[$var(i)])'\n"); $var(i) = $var(i) + 1; } if(is_avp_set("$avp(i:709)")) { xlog("L_INFO", "Trying gateway '$avp(i:709)'\n"); } else { xlog("L_INFO", "No More Gateways …\n"); } # try the first matched gateway if (next_gw()) { xlog("L_INFO", "ruri_user_avp='$avp(i:500)'\n"); # Print AVP - for debug #avp_print(); # Route to failure for failover route(RELAY); } else { avp_print(); xlog("L_INFO", "Send back 503 code …\n"); sl_send_reply("503", "No available gateways"); exit; } } #!endif #sl_send_reply("503", "Service Unavailable"); #exit; return; } PS Sorry for my bad English please. -- "В связи с отсутствием интереса общественности, конец света отменяется" (с) ? С Уважением, Механошин Алексей

12 years, 1 month

rtpproxy 1.2.1 segfaults with kamailio 3.2.2 in bridging mode

by Karsten Horsmann

Hi all, i try to register at the rtpproxy mailinglist, but its still pending. Maybe someone here had the same issue. In my multihomed setup (with mhomed=1 in kamailio.cfg) i had segfaults from rtpproxy if i called rtpproxy_manage with params. Notice that i must run rtpproxy as root to get core files. Any hints? Maybe my kamailio config isnt right? ulimit -c unlimited ; /usr/local/bin/rtpproxy -u root -s /home/sys/bin/rtpproxy.sock -l <PUBLIC-IP> 172.20.100.74 -d DBUG:LOG_LOCAL5 Apr 10 15:13:40 kamailio1 rtpproxy[19728]: DBUG:handle_command: received command "V" Apr 10 15:13:40 kamailio1 rtpproxy[19728]: DBUG:doreply: sending reply "20040107#012" Apr 10 15:13:40 kamailio1 rtpproxy[19728]: DBUG:handle_command: received command "VF 20050322" Apr 10 15:13:40 kamailio1 rtpproxy[19728]: DBUG:doreply: sending reply "1#012" Apr 10 15:13:40 kamailio1 rtpproxy[19728]: DBUG:handle_command: received command "VF 20071116" Apr 10 15:13:40 kamailio1 rtpproxy[19728]: DBUG:doreply: sending reply "1#012" Apr 10 15:13:40 kamailio1 rtpproxy[19728]: DBUG:handle_command: received command "VF 20081102" Apr 10 15:13:40 kamailio1 rtpproxy[19728]: DBUG:doreply: sending reply "1#012" Apr 10 15:13:40 kamailio1 rtpproxy[19728]: DBUG:handle_command: received command "UEIc107,0,8,101 NTgxNzRkMmJmYzFlYjg2NTdiN2Q3MzJkYjkzMzI3Yjk. 217.XXX.XXX.XX 49814 00671612;1" Apr 10 15:13:40 kamailio1 rtpproxy[19728]: INFO:handle_command: new session NTgxNzRkMmJmYzFlYjg2NTdiN2Q3MzJkYjkzMzI3Yjk., tag 00671612;1 requested, type strong Apr 10 15:13:40 kamailio1 rtpproxy[19728]: INFO:handle_command: new session on a port 36156 created, tag 00671612;1 Apr 10 15:13:40 kamailio1 rtpproxy[19728]: INFO:handle_command: pre-filling caller's address with 217.XXX.XX.XX:49814 Apr 10 15:13:40 kamailio1 rtpproxy[19728]: DBUG:doreply: sending reply "36156 212.XX.XX.XXX#012" (gdb) bt #0 0x0804ccb8 in ishostseq (ia1=0x99c54c8, ia2=0x0) at rtpp_util.c:55 #1 0x080514ba in handle_command (cf=0xbffb9d8c, controlfd=5, dtime=1334063620.8220949) at rtpp_command.c:761 #2 0x0804afb7 in process_commands (argc=9, argv=0xbffda634) at main.c:752 #3 main (argc=9, argv=0xbffda634) at main.c:856 (gdb) p ia1->sa_family $1 = 2 (gdb) p ia2->sa_family Cannot access memory at address 0x0 # RTPProxy control route[NATMANAGE] { #!ifdef WITH_NAT xlog("NATMANAGE M=$rm RURI=$ru F=$fu T=$tu IP=$si ID=$ci\n"); if (is_request()) { if(has_totag()) { if(check_route_param("nat=yes")) { setbflag(FLB_NATB); } } } if (isbflagset(FLB_NATB)) return; if (dst_ip == PUBLIC_IP ) { xlog("rtpproxy_manage extern zu intern\n"); rtpproxy_manage("OCFEI","172.20.10.74"); } else { xlog("rtpproxy_manage intern zu extern\n"); rtpproxy_manage("OCFIE","PUBLIC_IP"); } if (is_request()) { if (!has_totag()) { add_rr_param(";nat=yes"); } } if (is_reply()) { if(isbflagset(FLB_NATB)) { fix_nated_contact(); } } #!endif return; } -- Mit freundlichen Grüßen *Karsten Horsmann*

12 years, 1 month

Kamailio Failed to have audo converstaion with RTP

by Ryan Gholam

Dear Daniel , I thank you for your reply , I have a server having the Astersisk ip address (192.168.10.15) , and rtp + kamailio is installed on an another pc have the following ip (192.168.10.17) which is linked to the Astersik , and on the same pc , another network card exists having the ip address (192.168.20.3 ) which is linked to a client pc having the ip address ( 192.168.20.4) . I tracked the call and i can see SIP ACK nd BYE between 20.3 and 20.4 but there is no audio conversation this is my configuration file for kamailio attached above . P.S : testing without NATING as described in the above setup . I thank you alot again for all your help .

12 years, 1 month

Variable $fu Kamailio 3.2

by Gilbert T. Gutierrez, Jr.

I wrote the code below to rewrite an extension to a phone number (It is called in route[LOCATION]). This code works fine with MULTIDOMAIN enabled but when I run it as a single domain the line $fu=$var(b); does not seem to work.. You can see that I have several xlog lines outputting the variable values into my /var/log/messages. $var(b) has the correct value in it, so I do not know what is happening. I have also included the /var/log/messages output which I redacted the phone number, domain, and extension for security purposes. I am sure I am going about this backwards, but can someone provide me some guidance as to what is going wrong? Thank you, Gilbert # Rewrite - Gilbert route[REWRITE] { # This section rewrites the outbound calling number so that caller id works correctly. #!ifdef WITH_REWRITE # lookup an outbound number to replace the extension with $var(b)="NO REV"; sql_xquery("ca","select number from pioutalias where username='$fU'","ra"); # determine if a outbound number exists if ($xavp(ra=>number)) { $var(b)="sip:" + $xavp(ra=>number) + "@" + $fd; xlog("L_INFO","var(b): '$var(b)'"); xlog("L_INFO","fu: '$fu'"); # Assign the outbound calling number $fu=$var(b); xlog("L_INFO","New fu: '$fu'"); } sql_result_free("ra"); # see if it found a number and log if it did not if ($var(b)=="NO REV") xlog("L_INFO","No number found for extension: '$fu'"); #!endif } /var/log/messages output Apr 9 14:38:38 tempfax /usr/sbin/kamailio[6088]: INFO: <script>: var(b): 'sip:602XXXXXXX@xxxx.com' Apr 9 14:38:38 tempfax /usr/sbin/kamailio[6088]: INFO: <script>: fu: 'sip:30XXXXX@xxxx.com' Apr 9 14:38:38 tempfax /usr/sbin/kamailio[6088]: INFO: <script>: New fu: 'sip:30XXXXX@xxxx.com'

12 years, 1 month

← Newer
1
...
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
Older →

Jump to page:

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

sr-users April 2012