sr-users April 2012

sr-users@lists.kamailio.org

75 participants
132 discussions

by Saul Waizer

Greetings list, I am experiencing a strange behavior with openser 1.3.2 running on ubuntu 10. I have a basic configuration (see bellow) and i am using Linphone for iPad as my client. I have 2 users registered and I am able to place calls no problem. The problem is that the calls (audio or A/V) drop after 38 seconds exactly, this behavior is pretty consistent, 38 seconds is all I can get. There is no firewall in front of the clients. Here is my configuration, ip addresses changed to protect the innocent: http://pastie.org/private/x1ck8rxjcxv6hl44hrmqg You can see the logs of the call here (the majority): http://pastie.org/private/4fj5efpbsrxan8plzqvfza Am I missing something or is there anything that needs to be changed in the routing/configuration to achieve basic functionality? Thank you in advance!

12 years, 1 month

Re: [SR-Users] Variable $fu Kamailio 3.2

by Alex Balashov

$fu is not mutable. -- Alex Balashov - Principal Evariste Systems LLC 235 E Ponce de Leon Ave Suite 106 Decatur, GA 30030 Tel: +1-678-954-0670 Fax: +1-404-961-1892 Web: http://www.evaristesys.com/, http://www.alexbalashov.com "Gilbert T. Gutierrez, Jr." <mailing-lists(a)phoenixinternet.net> wrote: >I wrote the code below to rewrite an extension to a phone number (It is >called in route[LOCATION]). This code works fine with MULTIDOMAIN >enabled but when I run it as a single domain the line $fu=$var(b); does >not seem to work.. You can see that I have several xlog lines >outputting the variable values into my /var/log/messages. $var(b) has >the correct value in it, so I do not know what is happening. I have also >included the /var/log/messages output which I redacted the phone number, >domain, and extension for security purposes. I am sure I am going about >this backwards, but can someone provide me some guidance as to what is >going wrong? > >Thank you, >Gilbert > ># Rewrite - Gilbert >route[REWRITE] { ># This section rewrites the outbound calling number so that caller id >works correctly. >#!ifdef WITH_REWRITE > # lookup an outbound number to replace the extension with > $var(b)="NO REV"; > sql_xquery("ca","select number from pioutalias where >username='$fU'","ra"); > # determine if a outbound number exists > if ($xavp(ra=>number)) { > $var(b)="sip:" + $xavp(ra=>number) + "@" + $fd; > xlog("L_INFO","var(b): '$var(b)'"); > xlog("L_INFO","fu: '$fu'"); > # Assign the outbound calling number > $fu=$var(b); > xlog("L_INFO","New fu: '$fu'"); > } > sql_result_free("ra"); > # see if it found a number and log if it did not > if ($var(b)=="NO REV") > xlog("L_INFO","No number found for extension: '$fu'"); >#!endif >} > > >/var/log/messages output > >Apr 9 14:38:38 tempfax /usr/sbin/kamailio[6088]: INFO: <script>: >var(b): 'sip:602XXXXXXX@xxxx.com' >Apr 9 14:38:38 tempfax /usr/sbin/kamailio[6088]: INFO: <script>: fu: >'sip:30XXXXX@xxxx.com' >Apr 9 14:38:38 tempfax /usr/sbin/kamailio[6088]: INFO: <script>: New >fu: 'sip:30XXXXX@xxxx.com' > > > >_______________________________________________ >SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list >sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org >http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users

12 years, 1 month

[OT] sip:provider CE v2.5 is out!

by Andreas Granig

Hi all, I'm excited to announce the release of the Sipwise sip:provider Community Edition v2.5, a free and open source turn-key platform, which uses Kamailio, Sems and Asterisk in its core to provide a full-blown and feature-rich VoIP soft-switch. http://www.sipwise.com/news/announcements/spce-v2_5-release/ New core features are IPv6 and video support, serial call hunting and time based routing, beside lots of other fixes and enhancements. Check our VM images to get started within a couple of minutes and learn what can be built with the power of Kamailio as a stateless load-balancer and a stateful proxy/registrar, and Sems as an SBC and application server. Thanks a lot to all developers, contributors and members of this mailing list to make this possible and for helping us out! Andreas

12 years, 1 month

ClueCon 2012: Call For Speakers

by Michael Collins

[image: Inline image 2] ClueCon 2012 - Call For Speakers ClueCon - the open source telephony conference by developers, for developers - would like to announce that we are having an open call for speaking proposals for this year's event. If you have an idea for a technical presentation for ClueCon 2012 then we would like to hear about. What makes a great ClueCon presentation? The tech savvy crowd that attends ClueCon loves *technical* presentations. In general, the more technical the presentation, the better. If you are thinking about a presentation then consider these points: - ClueCon talks are 30 minutes in length, including Q&A time with the audience - ClueCon has a special focus on open source VoIP and telephony projects like FreeSWITCH, Asterisk, OpenSIPS, and Kamailio - Attendees enjoy hearing about projects built with open source tools - Highly technical discussions that show the nuts and bolts are especially well-liked - The audience appreciates seeing and participating in live demonstrations Please send your proposals to marketing(a)cluecon.com. Be sure to include a working title, description of the talk, and name of the presenter. Don't delay! There are a limited number of openings. ClueCon 2012 Registration Information ClueCon 2012 registration is now open. Visit the registration page<http://www.cluecon.com/register?cc12cfs>for details. Be sure to book your room at the Wyndham <http://www.cluecon.com/hotels?cc12cfs> and qualify for the $300 discount. As always, feel free to call us at 877.742.CLUE (877.742.2583) if you have any questions about ClueCon 2012. Also, keep in mind that the FreeSWITCH community has a conference call<http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/Weekly_Conference_Call?cc12cfs>each Wednesday at 1PM Eastern time. This is a great opportunity to talk about open source telephony and get to know a number folks who will be at ClueCon 2012. Stay tuned for more news about ClueCon speakers, sponsors, and related events! -- Michael S Collins ClueCon Team http://www.cluecon.com 877-7-4ACLUE cc12cfs2

12 years, 1 month

Can rtpproxy be used withou NAT ?

by Rabary

Hi mailing, I installed kamailio 3.2, rtpproxy 1.2.1, callcontrol 2.0.15 on a vz, and cdrtool 8.2.5 and freeradius 2.1.10 on another vz. The 2 vz container have public ip address, and the UAC have private ip address. I want to use rtpproxy, and the following are what ps and netstat command returns about rtpproxy: teddy@kamailio:~$ ps aux | grep rtpproxy teddy 22866 0.0 0.0 3312 800 pts/0 S+ 11:08 0:00 grep rtpproxy teddy 31326 0.0 0.0 11360 804 ? Ssl Apr06 0:02 /usr/sbin/rtpproxy -F -l our_public_ip -s udp:localhost 22222 teddy@kamailio:~$ sudo netstat -pln | grep rtp udp 0 0 127.0.0.1:22222 0.0.0.0:* 31326/rtpproxy And my problem is: when I make calls, for example the UAC1 calls UAC2, with ngrep I see the UAC1 calls UAC1 and not UAC2, and I don't know why. In kamailio config file, there are directive WITH_NAT for everything related to rtpproxy (loadmodule, routing logic, etc) as you can see in the attached conf file. I try disable the use of this directive WITH_NAT so I disable the use of rtpproxy in kamailio and it works: when UAC1 calls UAC2, the UAC2 is ringing. Please tell me what am I doing wrong, or to use rtpproxy without NAT is not possible ? In attached file the kamailio config file, the diff between rtpproxy enable and rtpproxy disable, and the result of ngrep and what is in syslog when I made calls. Thanks in advance. -- Rabary Teddy Inutile d'imprimer ce mail

12 years, 1 month

ACK to 200 OK discarded by loose_route()

by SIP Mailing-list

Hi guys, Hope someone can help me with this. The background: I'm just trying to implement a simple load balancer with one source and multiple destinations using the call load balancer (ALG10) in dispatcher. kamailio version 3.2.0 The symptoms: I have a simple script working in one test environment (csipsimple -> kamailaio -> Twinkle) but can't get it to work in another (Dialogic HMP 3.0 -> kamailio -> Dialogic HMP 3.0) The details: I've done a debug trace (below) in both environments and can't see the problem. For some reason the ACK is destroyed before it is forwarded even though the log says "[forward.c:601]: Sending:#012ACK..." Any help would be much appreciated! TIA, Richard kamailio.cfg: ... #!KAMAILIO # # Kamailio (OpenSER) SIP Server v3.2 - default configuration script # - web: http://www.kamailio.org # - git: http://sip-router.org # # Direct your questions about this file to: <sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org> # # Refer to the Core CookBook at http://www.kamailio.org/dokuwiki/doku.php # for an explanation of possible statements, functions and parameters. # # # Several features can be enabled using '#!define WITH_FEATURE' directives: # # RAC: Uses dispatcher algorithm 10 to keep track of load distribution # # Use: kamctl start/stop/restart ####### Global Parameters ######### # Output goes to /var/log/syslog # 5 gives too much output # 3 is DEBUG, even this can go crazy # 2 is INFO # 1 is NOTICE debug=3 #log_stderror=yes memdbg=5 memlog=5 mem_summary=2 log_facility=LOG_LOCAL0 fork=yes children=4 /* uncomment the next line to disable TCP (default on) */ disable_tcp=yes /* uncomment the next line to disable the auto discovery of local aliases based on reverse DNS on IPs (default on) */ auto_aliases=no /* add local domain aliases */ alias=10.130.11.121:5060 /* uncomment and configure the following line if you want Kamailio to bind on a specific interface/port/proto (default bind on all available) */ listen=udp:10.130.11.121:5060 /* port to listen to * - can be specified more than once if needed to listen on many ports */ #port=5062 # life time of TCP connection when there is no traffic # - a bit higher than registration expires to cope with UA behind NAT tcp_connection_lifetime=3605 ####### Modules Section ######## # set paths to location of modules (to sources or installation folders) #!ifdef WITH_SRCPATH mpath="modules_k:modules" #!else mpath="/usr/lib/kamailio/modules_k/:/usr/lib/kamailio/modules/" #!endif # For the kamctl interface loadmodule "mi_fifo.so" #loadmodule "kex.so" # TM module is required for t_relay() loadmodule "tm.so" #loadmodule "tmx.so" loadmodule "sl.so" # RR module is required for loose_route() and record_route() loadmodule "rr.so" # PV is required for avp's for ALG10 loadmodule "pv.so" # Used for mf_process_maxfwd_header() loadmodule "maxfwd.so" #loadmodule "usrloc.so" #loadmodule "registrar.so" # textops is required for is_method() loadmodule "textops.so" # For has_totag() loadmodule "siputils.so" # xlog is required for user xlog() formatted messages. Output goes to /var/log/messages loadmodule "xlog.so" # For sanity_check() loadmodule "sanity.so" #loadmodule "ctl.so" #loadmodule "cfg_rpc.so" #loadmodule "mi_rpc.so" #loadmodule "acc.so" # Added by RAC 2012-04-04: required for ds_select_dst() etc loadmodule "dispatcher.so" # ----------------- setting module-specific parameters --------------- # ----- mi_fifo params ----- modparam("mi_fifo", "fifo_name", "/tmp/kamailio_fifo") # Added by RAC 2012-04-04 # ----- dispatcher params ----- modparam("dispatcher", "list_file", "/etc/kamailio/dispatcher.list") modparam("dispatcher", "force_dst", 0) modparam("dispatcher", "use_default", 1) modparam("dispatcher", "ds_ping_method", "OPTIONS") # Only set ping reply codes that are acceptable. CE should only reply "200OK" if OK, "486 Busy Here" if not modparam("dispatcher", "ds_ping_reply_codes", "class=2") modparam("dispatcher", "ds_ping_from", "sip:proxy@10.130.11.121") modparam("dispatcher", "ds_ping_interval", 20) # In this mode only inactive destinations marked as probe-able will be pinged modparam("dispatcher", "ds_probing_mode", 2) modparam("dispatcher", "ds_probing_threshhold", 1) modparam("dispatcher", "ds_hash_expire", 3600) # Flag "2" MUST be set to use the AVPs listed below. If not set these will be <null> modparam("dispatcher", "flags", 2) modparam("dispatcher", "dst_avp", "$avp(dsdst)") modparam("dispatcher", "grp_avp", "$avp(dsgrp)") modparam("dispatcher", "cnt_avp", "$avp(dscnt)") # For algorithm 10, call load distribution duid (in list_file), dstid_avp and ds_hash_size are required modparam("dispatcher", "dstid_avp", "$avp(dsdstid)") # Appears to be the size (2^ds_hash_size) of a hashtable for storing the state of individual sessions # Presumably needs to be bigger than the number of concurrent sessions expected # 2^12 = 4096 modparam("dispatcher", "ds_hash_size", 12) ####### Routing Logic ######## # ds_load_update(): # if it is a BYE or CANCEL - remove the load from destination address used to forward the INVITE # if it is a reply to INVITE - set internal state to confirmed for call load structure when reply code is 2xx. # # ds_load_unset(): Remove the call load for the destination that routed the call. # Main SIP request routing logic # - processing of any incoming SIP request starts with this route # - note: this is the same as route { ... } request_route { if (!mf_process_maxfwd_header("10")) { sl_send_reply("483","Too Many Hops"); exit; } if(!sanity_check("1511", "7")) { xlog("Malformed SIP message from $si:$sp\n"); exit; } # Added by RAC 2012-04-04 # Do not run ds_load_update() here; the reply to the orginal invite is sufficient to release the load # loose_route() performs routing of in-dialog requests if(has_totag()) { if (loose_route()) { # t_relay() relays a message statefully; forward() (stateless) easily gets in a muddle if(!t_relay()) { if (method == "ACK") xlog("L_ERR", "cid:$ci [$rm] [200-OK] t_relay failed\n"); else xlog("L_WARN", "cid:$ci Existing Transaction relay failed: [$rm] from($ft) [$fu] to($tt) [$tu]\n"); sl_reply_error(); } else xlog("L_INFO", "cid:$ci Existing Transaction: [$rm] from($ft) [$fu] to($tt) [$tu]\n"); } else if (method == "ACK") { if (t_check_trans()) { # stateful ACK after 487 or 404 t_relay(); } else { # ACK without transaction, ignore and discard xlog("L_WARN", "cid:$ci Dropping ACK: from($ft) [$fu] to($tt) [$tu]\n"); } } else { sl_send_reply("404","Not here"); } exit; } # has_totag() # dest set1, ALG10: call load distribution: least number of calls receives the next call # Keeps a hash table of calls based on Call-ID to track call load per destination if(ds_select_dst("1", "10")) xlog("L_NOTICE", "cid:$ci Destination Selected: [$rm] from($ft) [$fu] routed to [sip:$tU@$dd:$dp] ($avp(dsdstid))\n"); else { xlog("L_ERR", "No destinations available: [$rm] from [$fu]\n"); sl_send_reply("500","No destinations available"); drop(); exit(); } # record_route() causes ALL messages to go through the proxy including ACKs and BYEs. Results in 16 SIP packets # Without record_route(), after 200OK, the ACK and BYE is sent direct. Results in 11 SIP packets # Must use record_route() with call load distribution, otherwise we will not know when a call is released # and cannot account for it record_route(); # With t_relay(), the proxy creates its own messages like 100 trying, instead of forwarding the original # forward() is not recommended t_relay(); } event_route[dispatcher:dst-down] { xlog("L_ERR", "Destination down: [$rm] $ru ($du)\n"); } event_route[dispatcher:dst-up] { xlog("L_NOTICE", "Destination up: [$rm] $ru\n"); } # Added by RAC 2012-04-04: Update call loads on replies for ALG10. # Default action is to reply upstream statelessly using Via headers onreply_route { xlog("L_INFO", "cid:$ci Reply: [$rm] [$rs-$rr] from($ft) [$fu] to($tt) [$tu]\n"); if(is_method("INVITE")) { if(status=~"2[0-9][0-9]") ds_load_update(); else if(status=~"[3-7][0-9][0-9]") ds_load_unset(); } else if(is_method("BYE")) { ds_load_update(); } } ... Bad debug trace (CE to IVRSim): NOTE: Phone numbers have been changed ... Apr 6 14:10:29 UKCY-VM-LINUX199 /usr/sbin/kamailio[28277]: DEBUG: <core> [parser/msg_parser.c:628]: SIP Request: Apr 6 14:10:29 UKCY-VM-LINUX199 /usr/sbin/kamailio[28277]: DEBUG: <core> [parser/msg_parser.c:630]: method: <ACK> Apr 6 14:10:29 UKCY-VM-LINUX199 /usr/sbin/kamailio[28277]: DEBUG: <core> [parser/msg_parser.c:632]: uri: <sip:18000005835@10.130.11.121> Apr 6 14:10:29 UKCY-VM-LINUX199 /usr/sbin/kamailio[28277]: DEBUG: <core> [parser/msg_parser.c:634]: version: <SIP/2.0> Apr 6 14:10:29 UKCY-VM-LINUX199 /usr/sbin/kamailio[28277]: DEBUG: <core> [parser/parse_to.c:174]: DEBUG: add_param: tag=f8a6698-0-13c4-50022-16d0d4-103b30a3-16d0d4 Apr 6 14:10:29 UKCY-VM-LINUX199 /usr/sbin/kamailio[28277]: DEBUG: <core> [parser/parse_to.c:803]: end of header reached, state=29 Apr 6 14:10:29 UKCY-VM-LINUX199 /usr/sbin/kamailio[28277]: DEBUG: <core> [parser/msg_parser.c:187]: DEBUG: get_hdr_field: <To> [81]; uri=[ sip:18000005835@10.130.11.121] Apr 6 14:10:29 UKCY-VM-LINUX199 /usr/sbin/kamailio[28277]: DEBUG: <core> [parser/msg_parser.c:189]: DEBUG: to body [<sip:18000005835@10.130.11.121>] Apr 6 14:10:29 UKCY-VM-LINUX199 /usr/sbin/kamailio[28277]: DEBUG: <core> [parser/msg_parser.c:167]: get_hdr_field: cseq <CSeq>: <1> <ACK> Apr 6 14:10:29 UKCY-VM-LINUX199 /usr/sbin/kamailio[28277]: DEBUG: <core> [parser/parse_via.c:1288]: Found param type 232, <branch> = <z9hG4bK-182890-5e5e75ec-235d6d1e>; state=16 Apr 6 14:10:29 UKCY-VM-LINUX199 /usr/sbin/kamailio[28277]: DEBUG: <core> [parser/parse_via.c:2563]: end of header reached, state=5 Apr 6 14:10:29 UKCY-VM-LINUX199 /usr/sbin/kamailio[28277]: DEBUG: <core> [parser/msg_parser.c:515]: parse_headers: Via found, flags=2 Apr 6 14:10:29 UKCY-VM-LINUX199 /usr/sbin/kamailio[28277]: DEBUG: <core> [parser/msg_parser.c:517]: parse_headers: this is the first via Apr 6 14:10:29 UKCY-VM-LINUX199 /usr/sbin/kamailio[28277]: DEBUG: <core> [receive.c:146]: After parse_msg... Apr 6 14:10:29 UKCY-VM-LINUX199 /usr/sbin/kamailio[28277]: DEBUG: <core> [receive.c:187]: preparing to run routing scripts... Apr 6 14:10:29 UKCY-VM-LINUX199 /usr/sbin/kamailio[28277]: DEBUG: sl [sl_funcs.c:307]: DEBUG : sl_filter_ACK: to late to be a local ACK! Apr 6 14:10:29 UKCY-VM-LINUX199 /usr/sbin/kamailio[28277]: DEBUG: maxfwd [mf_funcs.c:85]: value = 70 Apr 6 14:10:29 UKCY-VM-LINUX199 /usr/sbin/kamailio[28277]: DEBUG: <core> [parser/msg_parser.c:201]: DEBUG: get_hdr_body : content_length=0 Apr 6 14:10:29 UKCY-VM-LINUX199 /usr/sbin/kamailio[28277]: DEBUG: <core> [parser/msg_parser.c:103]: found end of header Apr 6 14:10:29 UKCY-VM-LINUX199 /usr/sbin/kamailio[28277]: DEBUG: <core> [parser/parse_to.c:174]: DEBUG: add_param: tag=774ee38-650b820a-13c4-50022-182890-4de156df-182890 Apr 6 14:10:29 UKCY-VM-LINUX199 /usr/sbin/kamailio[28277]: DEBUG: <core> [parser/parse_to.c:803]: end of header reached, state=29 Apr 6 14:10:29 UKCY-VM-LINUX199 /usr/sbin/kamailio[28277]: DEBUG: sanity [mod_sanity.c:251]: sanity checks result: 1 Apr 6 14:10:29 UKCY-VM-LINUX199 /usr/sbin/kamailio[28277]: DEBUG: siputils [checks.c:107]: totag found Apr 6 14:10:29 UKCY-VM-LINUX199 /usr/sbin/kamailio[28277]: DEBUG: rr [loose.c:85]: is_preloaded: No Apr 6 14:10:29 UKCY-VM-LINUX199 /usr/sbin/kamailio[28277]: DEBUG: <core> [socket_info.c:502]: grep_sock_info - checking if host==us: 13==13 && [10.130.11.121] == [10.130.11.121] Apr 6 14:10:29 UKCY-VM-LINUX199 /usr/sbin/kamailio[28277]: DEBUG: <core> [socket_info.c:505]: grep_sock_info - checking if port 5060 matches port 5060 Apr 6 14:10:29 UKCY-VM-LINUX199 /usr/sbin/kamailio[28277]: DEBUG: rr [loose.c:594]: Next hop: 'sip:10.130.11.121;lr;ftag=774ee38-650b820a-13c4-50022-182890-4de156df-182890' is loose router Apr 6 14:10:29 UKCY-VM-LINUX199 /usr/sbin/kamailio[28277]: DEBUG: rr [loose.c:644]: The last route URI: 'sip:10.130.11.121;lr;ftag=774ee38-650b820a-13c4-50022-182890-4de156df-182890' Apr 6 14:10:29 UKCY-VM-LINUX199 /usr/sbin/kamailio[28277]: DEBUG: tm [t_lookup.c:1379]: DEBUG: t_newtran: msg id=6 , global msg id=5 , T on entrance=(nil) Apr 6 14:10:29 UKCY-VM-LINUX199 /usr/sbin/kamailio[28277]: DEBUG: tm [t_lookup.c:527]: t_lookup_request: start searching: hash=37904, isACK=1 Apr 6 14:10:29 UKCY-VM-LINUX199 /usr/sbin/kamailio[28277]: DEBUG: tm [t_lookup.c:485]: DEBUG: RFC3261 transaction matching failed Apr 6 14:10:29 UKCY-VM-LINUX199 /usr/sbin/kamailio[28277]: DEBUG: tm [t_lookup.c:709]: DEBUG: t_lookup_request: no transaction found Apr 6 14:10:29 UKCY-VM-LINUX199 /usr/sbin/kamailio[28277]: DEBUG: tm [t_funcs.c:315]: SER: forwarding ACK statelessly Apr 6 14:10:29 UKCY-VM-LINUX199 /usr/sbin/kamailio[28277]: DEBUG: <core> [msg_translator.c:204]: check_via_address(10.130.11.101, 10.130.11.101, 0) Apr 6 14:10:29 UKCY-VM-LINUX199 /usr/sbin/kamailio[28277]: DEBUG: <core> [forward.c:601]: Sending:#012ACK sip:10.130.11.121;lr;ftag=774ee38-650b820a-13c4-50022-182890-4de156df-182890 SIP/2.0#015#012From: <sip:441865000101@10.130.11.101>;tag=774ee38-650b820a-13c4-50022-182890-4de156df-182890#015#012To: <sip:18000005835@10.130.11.121>;tag=f8a6698-0-13c4-50022-16d0d4-103b30a3-16d0d4#015#012Call-ID: fb041312-da6d-4fb7-bfee-32677fbab37b#015#012CSeq: 1 ACK#015#012Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.130.11.121;branch=z9hG4bKcydzigwkX#015#012Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.130.11.101:5060;branch=z9hG4bK-182890-5e5e75ec-235d6d1e#015#012Max-Forwards: 69#015#012Contact: <sip:441865000101@10.130.11.101>#015#012Allow-Events: refer#015#012Content-Length: 0#015#012#015#012. Apr 6 14:10:29 UKCY-VM-LINUX199 /usr/sbin/kamailio[28277]: DEBUG: <core> [forward.c:603]: orig. len=550, new_len=566, proto=1 Apr 6 14:10:29 UKCY-VM-LINUX199 /usr/sbin/kamailio[28277]: DEBUG: <core> [usr_avp.c:644]: DEBUG:destroy_avp_list: destroying list (nil) Apr 6 14:10:29 UKCY-VM-LINUX199 /usr/sbin/kamailio[28276]: DEBUG: <core> [parser/msg_parser.c:628]: SIP Request: Apr 6 14:10:29 UKCY-VM-LINUX199 /usr/sbin/kamailio[28277]: DEBUG: <core> [usr_avp.c:644]: DEBUG:destroy_avp_list: destroying list (nil) Apr 6 14:10:29 UKCY-VM-LINUX199 /usr/sbin/kamailio[28276]: DEBUG: <core> [parser/msg_parser.c:630]: method: <ACK> Apr 6 14:10:29 UKCY-VM-LINUX199 /usr/sbin/kamailio[28277]: DEBUG: <core> [usr_avp.c:644]: DEBUG:destroy_avp_list: destroying list (nil) Apr 6 14:10:29 UKCY-VM-LINUX199 /usr/sbin/kamailio[28276]: DEBUG: <core> [parser/msg_parser.c:632]: uri: <sip:10.130.11.121;lr;ftag=774ee38-650b820a-13c4-50022-182890-4de156df-182890> Apr 6 14:10:29 UKCY-VM-LINUX199 /usr/sbin/kamailio[28277]: DEBUG: <core> [usr_avp.c:644]: DEBUG:destroy_avp_list: destroying list (nil) Apr 6 14:10:29 UKCY-VM-LINUX199 /usr/sbin/kamailio[28276]: DEBUG: <core> [parser/msg_parser.c:634]: version: <SIP/2.0> Apr 6 14:10:29 UKCY-VM-LINUX199 /usr/sbin/kamailio[28277]: DEBUG: <core> [usr_avp.c:644]: DEBUG:destroy_avp_list: destroying list (nil) Apr 6 14:10:29 UKCY-VM-LINUX199 /usr/sbin/kamailio[28276]: DEBUG: <core> [parser/parse_to.c:174]: DEBUG: add_param: tag=f8a6698-0-13c4-50022-16d0d4-103b30a3-16d0d4 Apr 6 14:10:29 UKCY-VM-LINUX199 /usr/sbin/kamailio[28277]: DEBUG: <core> [usr_avp.c:644]: DEBUG:destroy_avp_list: destroying list (nil) Apr 6 14:10:29 UKCY-VM-LINUX199 /usr/sbin/kamailio[28276]: DEBUG: <core> [parser/parse_to.c:803]: end of header reached, state=29 Apr 6 14:10:29 UKCY-VM-LINUX199 /usr/sbin/kamailio[28277]: DEBUG: <core> [xavp.c:365]: destroying xavp list (nil) Apr 6 14:10:29 UKCY-VM-LINUX199 /usr/sbin/kamailio[28276]: DEBUG: <core> [parser/msg_parser.c:187]: DEBUG: get_hdr_field: <To> [81]; uri=[ sip:18000005835@10.130.11.121] Apr 6 14:10:29 UKCY-VM-LINUX199 /usr/sbin/kamailio[28277]: DEBUG: <core> [receive.c:290]: receive_msg: cleaning up Apr 6 14:10:29 UKCY-VM-LINUX199 /usr/sbin/kamailio[28276]: DEBUG: <core> [parser/msg_parser.c:189]: DEBUG: to body [<sip:18000005835@10.130.11.121>] Apr 6 14:10:29 UKCY-VM-LINUX199 /usr/sbin/kamailio[28276]: DEBUG: <core> [parser/msg_parser.c:167]: get_hdr_field: cseq <CSeq>: <1> <ACK> Apr 6 14:10:29 UKCY-VM-LINUX199 /usr/sbin/kamailio[28276]: DEBUG: <core> [parser/parse_via.c:1288]: Found param type 232, <branch> = <z9hG4bKcydzigwkX>; state=16 Apr 6 14:10:29 UKCY-VM-LINUX199 /usr/sbin/kamailio[28276]: DEBUG: <core> [parser/parse_via.c:2563]: end of header reached, state=5 Apr 6 14:10:29 UKCY-VM-LINUX199 /usr/sbin/kamailio[28276]: DEBUG: <core> [parser/msg_parser.c:515]: parse_headers: Via found, flags=2 Apr 6 14:10:29 UKCY-VM-LINUX199 /usr/sbin/kamailio[28276]: DEBUG: <core> [parser/msg_parser.c:517]: parse_headers: this is the first via Apr 6 14:10:29 UKCY-VM-LINUX199 /usr/sbin/kamailio[28276]: DEBUG: <core> [receive.c:146]: After parse_msg... Apr 6 14:10:29 UKCY-VM-LINUX199 /usr/sbin/kamailio[28276]: DEBUG: <core> [receive.c:187]: preparing to run routing scripts... Apr 6 14:10:29 UKCY-VM-LINUX199 /usr/sbin/kamailio[28276]: DEBUG: sl [sl_funcs.c:307]: DEBUG : sl_filter_ACK: to late to be a local ACK! Apr 6 14:10:29 UKCY-VM-LINUX199 /usr/sbin/kamailio[28276]: DEBUG: <core> [parser/parse_via.c:1288]: Found param type 232, <branch> = <z9hG4bK-182890-5e5e75ec-235d6d1e>; state=16 Apr 6 14:10:29 UKCY-VM-LINUX199 /usr/sbin/kamailio[28276]: DEBUG: <core> [parser/parse_via.c:2563]: end of header reached, state=5 Apr 6 14:10:29 UKCY-VM-LINUX199 /usr/sbin/kamailio[28276]: DEBUG: <core> [parser/msg_parser.c:515]: parse_headers: Via found, flags=100 Apr 6 14:10:29 UKCY-VM-LINUX199 /usr/sbin/kamailio[28276]: DEBUG: <core> [parser/msg_parser.c:528]: parse_headers: this is the second via Apr 6 14:10:29 UKCY-VM-LINUX199 /usr/sbin/kamailio[28276]: DEBUG: maxfwd [mf_funcs.c:85]: value = 69 Apr 6 14:10:29 UKCY-VM-LINUX199 /usr/sbin/kamailio[28276]: DEBUG: <core> [parser/msg_parser.c:201]: DEBUG: get_hdr_body : content_length=0 Apr 6 14:10:29 UKCY-VM-LINUX199 /usr/sbin/kamailio[28276]: DEBUG: <core> [parser/msg_parser.c:103]: found end of header Apr 6 14:10:29 UKCY-VM-LINUX199 /usr/sbin/kamailio[28276]: DEBUG: <core> [parser/parse_to.c:174]: DEBUG: add_param: tag=774ee38-650b820a-13c4-50022-182890-4de156df-182890 Apr 6 14:10:29 UKCY-VM-LINUX199 /usr/sbin/kamailio[28276]: DEBUG: <core> [parser/parse_to.c:803]: end of header reached, state=29 Apr 6 14:10:29 UKCY-VM-LINUX199 /usr/sbin/kamailio[28276]: DEBUG: sanity [mod_sanity.c:251]: sanity checks result: 1 Apr 6 14:10:29 UKCY-VM-LINUX199 /usr/sbin/kamailio[28276]: DEBUG: siputils [checks.c:107]: totag found Apr 6 14:10:29 UKCY-VM-LINUX199 /usr/sbin/kamailio[28276]: DEBUG: rr [loose.c:108]: No Route headers found Apr 6 14:10:29 UKCY-VM-LINUX199 /usr/sbin/kamailio[28276]: DEBUG: rr [loose.c:838]: There is no Route HF Apr 6 14:10:29 UKCY-VM-LINUX199 /usr/sbin/kamailio[28276]: DEBUG: tm [t_lookup.c:1079]: DEBUG: t_check_msg: msg id=6 global id=5 T start=(nil) Apr 6 14:10:29 UKCY-VM-LINUX199 /usr/sbin/kamailio[28276]: DEBUG: tm [t_lookup.c:527]: t_lookup_request: start searching: hash=37904, isACK=1 Apr 6 14:10:29 UKCY-VM-LINUX199 /usr/sbin/kamailio[28276]: DEBUG: tm [t_lookup.c:485]: DEBUG: RFC3261 transaction matching failed Apr 6 14:10:29 UKCY-VM-LINUX199 /usr/sbin/kamailio[28276]: DEBUG: tm [t_lookup.c:709]: DEBUG: t_lookup_request: no transaction found Apr 6 14:10:29 UKCY-VM-LINUX199 /usr/sbin/kamailio[28276]: DEBUG: tm [t_lookup.c:1148]: DEBUG: t_check_msg: msg id=6 global id=6 T end=(nil) Apr 6 14:10:29 UKCY-VM-LINUX199 /usr/sbin/kamailio[28276]: WARNING: <script>: cid:fb041312-da6d-4fb7-bfee-32677fbab37b Dropping ACK: from(774ee38-650b820a-13c4-50022-182890-4de156df-182890) [ sip:441865000101@10.130.11.101] to(f8a6698-0-13c4-50022-16d0d4-103b30a3-16d0d4) [ sip:18000005835@10.130.11.121] Apr 6 14:10:29 UKCY-VM-LINUX199 /usr/sbin/kamailio[28276]: DEBUG: <core> [usr_avp.c:644]: DEBUG:destroy_avp_list: destroying list (nil) Apr 6 14:10:29 UKCY-VM-LINUX199 /usr/sbin/kamailio[28276]: last message repeated 5 times Apr 6 14:10:29 UKCY-VM-LINUX199 /usr/sbin/kamailio[28276]: DEBUG: <core> [xavp.c:365]: destroying xavp list (nil) Apr 6 14:10:29 UKCY-VM-LINUX199 /usr/sbin/kamailio[28276]: DEBUG: <core> [receive.c:290]: receive_msg: cleaning up ... Bad SIP ACK: ... Session Initiation Protocol Request-Line: ACK sip:18000005835@10.130.11.121 SIP/2.0 Method: ACK Request-URI: sip:18000005835@10.130.11.121 Request-URI User Part: 18000005835 Request-URI Host Part: 10.130.11.121 [Resent Packet: False] [Request Frame: 7] [Response Time (ms): 29] Message Header From: <sip:441865000101@10.130.11.101 >;tag=774ee38-650b820a-13c4-50022-182890-4de156df-182890 SIP from address: sip:441865000101@10.130.11.101 SIP from address User Part: 441865000101 SIP from address Host Part: 10.130.11.101 SIP tag: 774ee38-650b820a-13c4-50022-182890-4de156df-182890 To: <sip:18000005835@10.130.11.121 >;tag=f8a6698-0-13c4-50022-16d0d4-103b30a3-16d0d4 SIP to address: sip:18000005835@10.130.11.121 SIP to address User Part: 18000005835 SIP to address Host Part: 10.130.11.121 SIP tag: f8a6698-0-13c4-50022-16d0d4-103b30a3-16d0d4 Call-ID: fb041312-da6d-4fb7-bfee-32677fbab37b CSeq: 1 ACK Sequence Number: 1 Method: ACK Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.130.11.101:5060 ;branch=z9hG4bK-182890-5e5e75ec-235d6d1e Transport: UDP Sent-by Address: 10.130.11.101 Sent-by port: 5060 Branch: z9hG4bK-182890-5e5e75ec-235d6d1e Max-Forwards: 70 Route: <sip:10.130.11.121;lr;ftag=774ee38-650b820a-13c4-50022-182890-4de156df-182890> Contact: <sip:441865000101@10.130.11.101> Contact Binding: <sip:441865000101@10.130.11.101> URI: <sip:441865000101@10.130.11.101> SIP contact address: sip:441865000101@10.130.11.101 Allow-Events: refer Content-Length: 0 ... Good debug trace (Richard laptop, Twinkle local and csipsimple on wifi): ... Apr 6 14:24:30 adventure /usr/sbin/kamailio[8545]: DEBUG: <core> [parser/msg_parser.c:628]: SIP Request: Apr 6 14:24:30 adventure /usr/sbin/kamailio[8545]: DEBUG: <core> [parser/msg_parser.c:630]: method: <ACK> Apr 6 14:24:30 adventure /usr/sbin/kamailio[8545]: DEBUG: <core> [parser/msg_parser.c:632]: uri: <sip:123@192.168.0.104;transport=udp> Apr 6 14:24:30 adventure /usr/sbin/kamailio[8545]: DEBUG: <core> [parser/msg_parser.c:634]: version: <SIP/2.0> Apr 6 14:24:30 adventure /usr/sbin/kamailio[8545]: DEBUG: <core> [parser/parse_via.c:1288]: Found param type 235, <rport> = <n/a>; state=6 Apr 6 14:24:30 adventure /usr/sbin/kamailio[8545]: DEBUG: <core> [parser/parse_via.c:1288]: Found param type 232, <branch> = <z9hG4bKPjWvIFG5BzVRtUe1jnpRa1ilioYiezOrTz>; state=16 Apr 6 14:24:30 adventure /usr/sbin/kamailio[8545]: DEBUG: <core> [parser/parse_via.c:2563]: end of header reached, state=5 Apr 6 14:24:30 adventure /usr/sbin/kamailio[8545]: DEBUG: <core> [parser/msg_parser.c:515]: parse_headers: Via found, flags=2 Apr 6 14:24:30 adventure /usr/sbin/kamailio[8545]: DEBUG: <core> [parser/msg_parser.c:517]: parse_headers: this is the first via Apr 6 14:24:30 adventure /usr/sbin/kamailio[8545]: DEBUG: <core> [receive.c:146]: After parse_msg... Apr 6 14:24:30 adventure /usr/sbin/kamailio[8545]: DEBUG: <core> [receive.c:187]: preparing to run routing scripts... Apr 6 14:24:30 adventure /usr/sbin/kamailio[8545]: DEBUG: sl [sl_funcs.c:307]: DEBUG : sl_filter_ACK: to late to be a local ACK! Apr 6 14:24:30 adventure /usr/sbin/kamailio[8545]: DEBUG: <core> [parser/parse_to.c:174]: DEBUG: add_param: tag=ggpxl Apr 6 14:24:30 adventure /usr/sbin/kamailio[8545]: DEBUG: <core> [parser/parse_to.c:803]: end of header reached, state=29 Apr 6 14:24:30 adventure /usr/sbin/kamailio[8545]: DEBUG: <core> [parser/msg_parser.c:187]: DEBUG: get_hdr_field: <To> [35]; uri=[ sip:123@192.168.0.104] Apr 6 14:24:30 adventure /usr/sbin/kamailio[8545]: DEBUG: <core> [parser/msg_parser.c:189]: DEBUG: to body [<sip:123@192.168.0.104>] Apr 6 14:24:30 adventure /usr/sbin/kamailio[8545]: DEBUG: <core> [parser/msg_parser.c:167]: get_hdr_field: cseq <CSeq>: <10807> <ACK> Apr 6 14:24:30 adventure /usr/sbin/kamailio[8545]: DEBUG: rr [loose.c:85]: is_preloaded: No Apr 6 14:24:30 adventure /usr/sbin/kamailio[8545]: DEBUG: <core> [socket_info.c:502]: grep_sock_info - checking if host==us: 13==13 && [192.168.0.104] == [192.168.0.104] Apr 6 14:24:30 adventure /usr/sbin/kamailio[8545]: DEBUG: <core> [socket_info.c:505]: grep_sock_info - checking if port 5062 matches port 5060 Apr 6 14:24:30 adventure /usr/sbin/kamailio[8545]: DEBUG: <core> [forward.c:448]: check_self: host != me Apr 6 14:24:30 adventure /usr/sbin/kamailio[8545]: DEBUG: <core> [socket_info.c:502]: grep_sock_info - checking if host==us: 13==13 && [192.168.0.104] == [192.168.0.104] Apr 6 14:24:30 adventure /usr/sbin/kamailio[8545]: DEBUG: <core> [socket_info.c:505]: grep_sock_info - checking if port 5062 matches port 5062 Apr 6 14:24:30 adventure /usr/sbin/kamailio[8545]: DEBUG: rr [loose.c:709]: Topmost route URI: 'sip:192.168.0.104:5062;lr;ftag=gYRr.jGE57ZMeLuxYrVmKDuHlnX964Fa' is me Apr 6 14:24:30 adventure /usr/sbin/kamailio[8545]: DEBUG: <core> [parser/msg_parser.c:201]: DEBUG: get_hdr_body : content_length=0 Apr 6 14:24:30 adventure /usr/sbin/kamailio[8545]: DEBUG: <core> [parser/msg_parser.c:103]: found end of header Apr 6 14:24:30 adventure /usr/sbin/kamailio[8545]: DEBUG: rr [loose.c:173]: No next Route HF found Apr 6 14:24:30 adventure /usr/sbin/kamailio[8545]: DEBUG: rr [loose.c:728]: No next URI found Apr 6 14:24:30 adventure /usr/sbin/kamailio[8545]: DEBUG: tm [t_lookup.c:1379]: DEBUG: t_newtran: msg id=2 , global msg id=1 , T on entrance=0xffffffffffffffff Apr 6 14:24:30 adventure /usr/sbin/kamailio[8545]: DEBUG: tm [t_lookup.c:527]: t_lookup_request: start searching: hash=17962, isACK=1 Apr 6 14:24:30 adventure /usr/sbin/kamailio[8545]: DEBUG: tm [t_lookup.c:485]: DEBUG: RFC3261 transaction matching failed Apr 6 14:24:30 adventure /usr/sbin/kamailio[8545]: DEBUG: tm [t_lookup.c:709]: DEBUG: t_lookup_request: no transaction found Apr 6 14:24:30 adventure /usr/sbin/kamailio[8545]: DEBUG: tm [t_funcs.c:315]: SER: forwarding ACK statelessly Apr 6 14:24:30 adventure /usr/sbin/kamailio[8545]: DEBUG: <core> [msg_translator.c:204]: check_via_address(192.168.0.3, 192.168.0.3, 0) Apr 6 14:24:30 adventure /usr/sbin/kamailio[8545]: DEBUG: <core> [forward.c:601]: Sending:#012ACK sip:123@192.168.0.104;transport=udp SIP/2.0#015#012Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.0.104:5062;branch=z9hG4bKcydzigwkX#015#012Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.0.3:51351;rport=51351;branch=z9hG4bKPjWvIFG5BzVRtUe1jnpRa1ilioYiezOrTz#015#012Max-Forwards: 70#015#012From: <sip:racitup@mobile>;tag=gYRr.jGE57ZMeLuxYrVmKDuHlnX964Fa#015#012To: <sip:123@192.168.0.104>;tag=ggpxl#015#012Call-ID: zH5ub5H6ooVWQmBzZyswgMSLn7rb2xJl#015#012CSeq: 10807 ACK#015#012Content-Length: 0#015#012#015#012. Apr 6 14:24:30 adventure /usr/sbin/kamailio[8545]: DEBUG: <core> [forward.c:603]: orig. len=418, new_len=411, proto=1 Apr 6 14:24:30 adventure /usr/sbin/kamailio[8545]: DEBUG: <core> [usr_avp.c:644]: DEBUG:destroy_avp_list: destroying list (nil) Apr 6 14:24:30 adventure /usr/sbin/kamailio[8545]: last message repeated 5 times Apr 6 14:24:30 adventure /usr/sbin/kamailio[8545]: DEBUG: <core> [xavp.c:365]: destroying xavp list (nil) Apr 6 14:24:30 adventure /usr/sbin/kamailio[8545]: DEBUG: <core> [receive.c:290]: receive_msg: cleaning up ... Good ACK: ... Session Initiation Protocol Request-Line: ACK sip:123@192.168.0.104;transport=udp SIP/2.0 Method: ACK Request-URI: sip:123@192.168.0.104;transport=udp Request-URI User Part: 123 Request-URI Host Part: 192.168.0.104 [Resent Packet: False] [Request Frame: 13] [Response Time (ms): 6489] Message Header Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.0.3:38653 ;rport;branch=z9hG4bKPjyL0GhUP12E0Dkn2CQ5BR9aQm67DdxKfE Transport: UDP Sent-by Address: 192.168.0.3 Sent-by port: 38653 RPort: rport Branch: z9hG4bKPjyL0GhUP12E0Dkn2CQ5BR9aQm67DdxKfE Max-Forwards: 70 From: <sip:racitup@mobile>;tag=6UtDyO9vBPzP46w7K8AGOfL6qQbFciij SIP from address: sip:racitup@mobile SIP from address User Part: racitup SIP from address Host Part: mobile SIP tag: 6UtDyO9vBPzP46w7K8AGOfL6qQbFciij To: <sip:123@192.168.0.104>;tag=lsboj SIP to address: sip:123@192.168.0.104 SIP to address User Part: 123 SIP to address Host Part: 192.168.0.104 SIP tag: lsboj Call-ID: 1jtxqtjWsDqEL3C2tsrhS3WtRirBFcB7 CSeq: 3674 ACK Sequence Number: 3674 Method: ACK Route: <sip:192.168.0.104:5062 ;lr;ftag=6UtDyO9vBPzP46w7K8AGOfL6qQbFciij> Content-Length: 0 ...

12 years, 1 month

SER or Kamailio

by Daniel Gonzalez

Hello, I am starting to deploy a SIP router, and after reading the documentation in http://sip-router.org I am a bit confused. I am planning to integrate the SIP router with an asterisk PBX. Which of the available projects is recommended to get in touch with the technology, SER or Kamailio? Which are most of you in the list using? Is there a particular use case where one or the other is more appropriate? Thanks, Daniel Gonzalez

12 years, 1 month

RTPPROXY not working with kamailio .

by Ryan Gholam

Hello I need help concerning this issue , i am creating a testing scenario to make the RTPPROXY work , where i have a server having installed on it Asterisk , running on (192.168.10.15), and another pc connected to the Asterisk server having the ip (192.168.10.17) , on this same pc i've installed RTPPROXY and managed to insert another Ethernet card to connect to a client on ip (192.168.20.3) . After connecting any client on this ip 192.168.20.* , i manage to make a call i hear the ring but no audio conversation . My RTPPROXY command is : /usr/sbin/rtpproxy -F -s udp:192.168.10.17:22222 -l 192.168.20.3/192.168.10.17 -d DBUG:LOG_LOCAL0 Thank you

12 years, 1 month

status 407 proxy authentication required

by Marwan Idriss

Greeting, while Registering with correct authentication I am getting : status 407 proxy authentication required even though the registration is successfull, do you know how I can get rid of this error Regards Marwan

12 years, 1 month

Re: [SR-Users] SER or Kamailio

by Alex Balashov

My perception is that SER is something like a kernel, but Kamailio a user-oriented distribution and ecosystem wrapper around it that serves to "practicalise" it in an applied way. -- Alex Balashov - Principal Evariste Systems LLC 235 E Ponce de Leon Ave Suite 106 Decatur, GA 30030 Tel: +1-678-954-0670 Fax: +1-404-961-1892 Web: http://www.evaristesys.com/, http://www.alexbalashov.com Daniel-Constantin Mierla <miconda(a)gmail.com> wrote: >Hello, > >if you install from sources, there is practically everything: ser + >kamailio together, it is up to you what modules you want to use. > >If you install from kamailio packages (debian, centos), you get only >kamailio specific modules (what is located in modules/ and modules_k/). > >Maturity of the code is the same, I am more into kamailio specific >modules, though, since I use them. Kamailio is traditionally more >interactive in terms of public relations, having a clear release policy, >with packages built every time. > >Also, kamailio specific modules have more into SIMPLE extensions (I mean >here presence, xcap, ...), but this is not a problem since you can use >the modules with the ones developed in the past by SER. So there is >nothing different between Kamailio and SER if you install from sources. >As mentioned in the link, there are just some inter-module dependencies, >so when using a module, you have have to use another specific one. This >is actually valid in the same group of modules (like in modules_k), one >module requires another one. > >What really make the difference in a deployment is the database >structure used behind. If you start from scratch, it does not matter >probably, but people upgrading from older versions, tend to stick to >what they have, so they continue using one or the other. > > From my observations on this mailing list, it is more likely you get >people answering more often for kamailio than ser. Also, there are more >tutorials showing how to use kamailio, including integration with >asterisk, if that is main concern, for example: > > * http://kb.asipto.com/asterisk:index > >Cheers, >Daniel > > > >On 4/9/12 9:43 PM, Daniel Gonzalez wrote: >> Thanks for the link. >> >> If I understand correctly, both projects share the same source code, >> and implement more or less the same functionality. >> Is there a list of specific features which are only available in SER >> or in Kamailio? >> >> Which is the most widely deployed / documented option? Which is more >> mature / stable? Which is the option which interoperates easier with >> Asterisk? >> >> Sorry for the beginner questions, but I have found no place where this >> questions are adressed. >> >> On Mon, Apr 9, 2012 at 9:17 PM, SamyGo <govoiper(a)gmail.com >> <mailto:govoiper@gmail.com>> wrote: >> >> :-| >> >> http://www.kamailio.org/w/sip-router-releases/ >> >> >> >> On Mon, Apr 9, 2012 at 11:06 PM, Daniel Gonzalez >> <gonvaled(a)gonvaled.com <mailto:gonvaled@gonvaled.com>> wrote: >> >> Hello, >> >> I am starting to deploy a SIP router, and after reading the >> documentation in http://sip-router.org I am a bit confused. I am >> planning to integrate the SIP router with an asterisk PBX. >> Which of >> the available projects is recommended to get in touch with the >> technology, SER or Kamailio? Which are most of you in the list >> using? >> Is there a particular use case where one or the other is more >> appropriate? >> >> Thanks, >> Daniel Gonzalez >> >> _______________________________________________ >> SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users >> mailing list >> sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org >> <mailto:sr-users@lists.sip-router.org> >> http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing >> list >> sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org <mailto:sr-users@lists.sip-router.org> >> http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list >> sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org >> http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users > >-- >Daniel-Constantin Mierla >Kamailio Advanced Training, April 23-26, 2012, Berlin, Germany >http://www.asipto.com/index.php/kamailio-advanced-training/ > > >_______________________________________________ >SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list >sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org >http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users

12 years, 1 month

← Newer
1
...
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
Older →

Jump to page:

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

sr-users April 2012