Hi All,
Presently i am working on OpenSER 1.3.2 version to make as presence server and i include the presence module.
But i am getting some errors when i explored it seems xcap client was not include.Now i was include but my doubt is for xcap-client to make run is xcap-server is needed. If so where i can get it.
Please help me on this.
Thanks & Regards,
Mahesh
Regards,
Mahesh Peddi
Infospectrum India Pvt. Ltd.
Cell: +91 9765775176
IP-Phone Ext. - 764
Hi All,
Presently i am working on OpenSER 1.3.2 version to make as presence server and i include the presence module.
But i am getting some errors when i explored it seems xcap client was not include.Now i was include but my doubt is for xcap-client to make run is xcap-server is needed. If so where i can get it.
Please help me on this.
Regards,
Mahesh Peddi
Infospectrum India Pvt. Ltd.
Cell: +91 9765775176
IP-Phone Ext. - 764
Hi guys ..tired of this conflict..dont we supposed to have a mojor
release today??
On 8/7/08, users-request(a)lists.kamailio.org
<users-request(a)lists.kamailio.org> wrote:
> Send Users mailing list submissions to
> users(a)lists.kamailio.org
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> http://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> users-request(a)lists.kamailio.org
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> users-owner(a)lists.kamailio.org
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of Users digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
> 1. Re: Question about registrar lookup() and branching.
> (Gustavo Mistrinelli)
> 2. Re: [Kamailio-Devel] [OpenSER-Users] OpenSER Advanced
> Programming Course, Bucharest, Voice System, August 11-14, 2008
> (Andhika Gannesha Gemilang)
> 3. Problem using additional attributes through radius_extra
> parameter (Juha Heinanen)
> 4. Re: [Kamailio-Devel] call for contribution: project logo
> (Benny Prijono)
> 5. Re: [Kamailio-Devel] call for contribution: project logo
> (Torben Friese)
> 6. Re: OpenSIPS project (Francois Menard)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2008 09:59:43 -0300
> From: "Gustavo Mistrinelli" <gmistrinelli(a)gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: [Kamailio-Users] Question about registrar lookup() and
> branching.
> To: "Alex Balashov" <abalashov(a)evaristesys.com>
> Cc: users(a)lists.kamailio.org
> Message-ID:
> <c6717cc80808060559k24a7c774v96049c8fb5c7677a(a)mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
> Hi Alex,
>
> I don't know your complete architecture, but let me ask you why Asterisk is
> not a trusted gateway?
> The you can use rewritehost or LCR logic to route DIDs to Asterisk
> If you need to associate users with DIDs, you can use dbaliases.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Gustavo
> On Tue, Aug 5, 2008 at 8:55 PM, Alex Balashov
> <abalashov(a)evaristesys.com>wrote:
>
>> Greetings,
>>
>> I've got a small problem with how registration lookups work.
>>
>> I have several concurrent registrations from one PBX that have multiple
>> contact URIs that they declare that aren't the same; they contain the
>> DIDs to route a call to. So, for instance, in Asterisk:
>>
>> register => user:pass@registrar/DID1
>> register => user:pass@registrar/DID2
>>
>> Of course, lookup() doesn't care what those contacts actually are. If
>> it sees multiple contacts for one username, t_relay() will simply create
>> branches for all of them and and ring them all. I can't actually have
>> that happen.
>>
>> I'm looking for suggestions on how to handle this most elegantly. The
>> two options I've got in mind are:
>>
>> 1. Stop using lookup() and do my own URI rewrites and branch forking (if
>> the contact URIs are identical) with attention to the contact.
>>
>> 2. Use BRANCH-ROUTEs to arrest the call leg if it is going to an RURI
>> user part that does not match the user part of the contact URI, and...
>> drop() the branches?
>>
>> I also need to build in some other logic, such that for example if a
>> user has only one contact registered and it does not match the DID, or
>> none of the contacts match the DID, proceed as normal anyway.
>>
>> Is it possible there is a better way? Recommendations welcome.
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> -- Alex
>>
>> --
>> Alex Balashov
>> Evariste Systems
>> Web : http://www.evaristesys.com/
>> Tel : (+1) (678) 954-0670
>> Direct : (+1) (678) 954-0671
>> Mobile : (+1) (706) 338-8599
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Users mailing list
>> Users(a)lists.kamailio.org
>> http://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
>>
>
hello all,
Could two UAs call each other via several SER proxy?
I want to implement this function.How to do it?Do I need to modify the ser.cfg?
How dose SER server connect each other?
---------------------------------
雅虎邮箱,您的终生邮箱!
Hi everybody,
Following the tradition started last year, the second edition of the
"OpenSER Advanced Programming Course" will be held in Bucharest,
Romania, starting with 11th of August 2008.
The primary goal is the same: to attract more developers to OpenSER and
build a higher development squad.
There are three major upgrades from last edition:
- free participation - there will be no fees for attending to this
course; you just need to register.
- there will be 4 days course instead of 3 days
- the course will contain also a practical work where the students
will have the chance to consolidate the knowledge they have accumulated
during the theoretical presentations. The course will have a 60% - 40%
distribution between theory and practice.
The course is dedicated to people willing to learn how to develop
OpenSER extensions. The course will follow the idea of writing a new
openser module from scratch, with all the dependencies it has from the
core: dynamic memory usage, MI interface, registering timers, locking,
exporting pseudo-variables, etc
The course is sponsored courtesy of :
- Packt Publishing (donating 5% of the revenue from the Flavio E.
Goncalves's "Building Telephony Systems with OpenSER" book.)
- Voice System (logistics and hosting)
Teachers from the OpenSER development team will be:
- Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
- Anca Vamanu
As, said, the registration is free, but the class is limited as size up
to 17 - 20 people. The seats will be granted on the "first in, first
served" policy :).
For registration, you need to mail me (bogdan(a)voice-system.ro) or to
openser(a)voice-system.ro . You will receive a confirmation response to
guarantee your registration.
Best regards,
Bogdan
Hello,
I´m using the SER for my phones at home.
Now I want to phone as an anonymous.
So I add a line in the ser.cfg:
subst('/^From:(.*)sip[^@]*@[a-
zA-Z0-9.]+(.*)$From:anonymous@anonymous.invalid;/ig');
But this doesn´t work.
I just want to have in the Message Header the line
From: anonymous(a)ananymous.invalid;
So that I can phone anonym.
Thank you for your help.
Greeting
Frank Haase
mail it again
On Wed, Aug 6, 2008 at 11:00 AM, <serusers-request(a)lists.iptel.org> wrote:
> Send Serusers mailing list submissions to
> serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> serusers-request(a)lists.iptel.org
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> serusers-owner(a)lists.iptel.org
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of Serusers digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
> 1. 2.0 survey (Jiri Kuthan)
> 2. ser 2.1 - compilation error - conflicting types
> (Tomasz Zieleniewski)
> 3. ser 2.1 - compilation error - conflicting types
> (Tomasz Zieleniewski)
> 4. SER/FIFO not accessible (cindy.cao)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Tue, 05 Aug 2008 19:20:33 +0200
> From: Jiri Kuthan <jiri(a)iptel.org>
> Subject: [Serusers] 2.0 survey
> To: "serusers(a)iptel.org" <serusers(a)iptel.org>
> Message-ID: <48988BE1.9030503(a)iptel.org>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
>
> I'm just wondering if folks using the 2.0 have found so far any issue
> which has not been tracked -- I've been off-line for vacation, IETF and
> a couple of other trips and began to be uncertain if I might have missed
> something. Any concerns/issues/comments regarding 2.0 are most welcome,
> publicly or privately.
>
> Thanks a lot
>
> -jiri
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2008 01:11:34 +0200
> From: "Tomasz Zieleniewski" <tzieleniewski(a)gmail.com>
> Subject: [Serusers] ser 2.1 - compilation error - conflicting types
> To: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org, serusers(a)iptel.org
> Message-ID:
> <5fd52d7a0808051611g2017ff27uef0685ef960450d(a)mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-2"
>
> Hi,
>
> When I try to compile ser from sources I get the following conflicting
> types
> errors:
> gcc -m64 -g -O9 -funroll-loops -Wcast-align -minline-all-stringops
> -falign-loops -ftree-vectorize -mtune=opteron -Wall -DNAME='"ser"'
> -DVERSION='"2.1.0-dev23-make"' -DARCH='"x86_64"' -DOS='linux_'
> -DOS_QUOTED='"linux"' -DCOMPILER='"gcc 4.3.1"' -D__CPU_x86_64 -D__OS_linux
> -DSER_VER=2001000 -DCFG_DIR='"/usr/local/etc/ser/"'
> -DMODS_DIR='"/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/"' -DPKG_MALLOC -DSHM_MEM
> -DSHM_MMAP
> -DDNS_IP_HACK -DUSE_IPV6 -DUSE_MCAST -DUSE_TCP -DDISABLE_NAGLE
> -DHAVE_RESOLV_RES -DUSE_DNS_CACHE -DUSE_DNS_FAILOVER -DUSE_DST_BLACKLIST
> -DUSE_NAPTR -DDBG_QM_MALLOC -DUSE_TLS -DTLS_HOOKS -DFAST_LOCK
> -DADAPTIVE_WAIT -DADAPTIVE_WAIT_LOOPS=1024 -DCC_GCC_LIKE_ASM
> -DHAVE_GETHOSTBYNAME2 -DHAVE_UNION_SEMUN -DHAVE_SCHED_YIELD
> -DHAVE_MSG_NOSIGNAL -DHAVE_MSGHDR_MSG_CONTROL -DHAVE_ALLOCA_H -DHAVE_TIMEGM
> -DHAVE_SCHED_SETSCHEDULER -DHAVE_EPOLL -DHAVE_SIGIO_RT
> -DSIGINFO64_WORKARROUND -DUSE_FUTEX -DHAVE_SELECT -c lock_ops.c -o
> lock_ops.o
> In file included from ut.h:53,
> from lock_ops.c:28:
> /usr/include/sys/types.h:46: error: conflicting types for 'loff_t'
> /usr/include/linux/types.h:30: error: previous declaration of 'loff_t' was
> here
> /usr/include/sys/types.h:62: error: conflicting types for 'dev_t'
> /usr/include/linux/types.h:13: error: previous declaration of 'dev_t' was
> here
> In file included from /usr/include/sys/types.h:133,
> from ut.h:53,
> from lock_ops.c:28:
> /usr/include/time.h:105: error: conflicting types for 'timer_t'
> /usr/include/linux/types.h:22: error: previous declaration of 'timer_t' was
> here
> In file included from ut.h:53,
> from lock_ops.c:28:
> /usr/include/sys/types.h:198: error: conflicting types for 'int64_t'
> /usr/include/linux/types.h:98: error: previous declaration of 'int64_t' was
> here
> /usr/include/sys/types.h:204: error: conflicting types for 'u_int64_t'
> /usr/include/linux/types.h:97: error: previous declaration of 'u_int64_t'
> was here
> In file included from /usr/include/sys/types.h:220,
> from ut.h:53,
> from lock_ops.c:28:
> /usr/include/sys/select.h:78: error: conflicting types for 'fd_set'
> /usr/include/linux/types.h:12: error: previous declaration of 'fd_set' was
> here
> In file included from ut.h:53,
> from lock_ops.c:28:
> /usr/include/sys/types.h:235: error: conflicting types for 'blkcnt_t'
> /usr/include/linux/types.h:124: error: previous declaration of 'blkcnt_t'
> was here
> make: *** [lock_ops.o] B??d 1
>
> Is there any fix for that?
>
> Regards
> Tomasz
>