sr-users February 2008

sr-users@lists.kamailio.org

146 participants
260 discussions

[OpenSER-Users] OpenSER Summit & Pavilion 2008
by Bogdan-Andrei Iancu 10 Mar '08

10 Mar '08

Hi everybody, I'm glad to make public the follow up of the OpenSER related events. I'm sorry I was not able to do it sooner, but making all the arrangements took more than estimated ;). The second OpenSER Summit will take place in San Jose, USA , on the 17th of March, 2008. This is the first US edition of the OpenSER Summit - following the European edition, a large segment of the OpenSER community have continuously asked for an edition to address also the American community. The summit is again hosted inside the VoN Spring 2008 Exhibition, as a pre-conference event. All participants to register via OpenSER site before Friday, March 7th, will get free access to the OpenSER event. More details about the OpenSER Summit, agenda and registration process, are to be found on the project web page: http://www.openser.org/mos/view/OpenSER-Summit-2008/ This OpenSER Summit edition is sponsored by a parallel OpenSER related event, the OpenSER Pavilion . The pavilion is a common exhibiting area - booth 1027, inside VoN expo, gathering, under the OpenSER name, six different companies working or using the project. Their direct statement to the visitor is: "Yes, we do open source in our business and OpenSER is a success recipe and we want to share this with you" More details about the OpenSER Pavilion, location and participants, are to be found on the project web page: http://www.openser.org/mos/view/OpenSER-Pavilion-2008/ The dual event, OpenSER Summit & Pavilion is new concept of a more complex event, aiming to create a larger diversity and to give more power to the understanding of the OpenSER project. Again, I'm very happy we were able to continue the path opened with the OpenSER Summit in Berlin and show the continuity in the OpenSER project development. Also, thanks to the industry support for the project, we were able again to offer a free participation to the OpenSER Summit and allow a good community convergence. For any questions about the OpenSER Summit & Pavilion do not hesitate to contact me. Best regards, Bogdan

1 1

[OpenSER-Users] ERROR: presence_xml:get_final_notify_body?
by KevinKinnan 07 Mar '08

07 Mar '08

My testbed is combination of openser and openxcap. openser.cfg file is similar with the example on the website of OpenXCAP. After updating published information by sending PUBLISH, no NOTIFY message is sent to client-side. I got the following errors(debug=3) in syslog file. Any ideas anyone? --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ERROR:presence_xml:get_final_notify_body: while extracting the transformation node ERROR:presence_xml:pres_apply_auth: in function get_final_notify_body ERROR:presence:send_notify_request: in function apply_auth_nbody ERROR:presence:notify: sending Notify not successful ERROR:presence:publ_notify: Could not send notify for presence --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Regards, Kevin _________________________________________________________________ 手机也能上 MSN 聊天了，快来试试吧！ http://mobile.msn.com.cn/

2 1

[OpenSER-Users] "noisy_ctimer" parameter in TM module
by Bogdan-Andrei Iancu 07 Mar '08

07 Mar '08

Hi, I want to get some feedback from the users regarding one of the TM parameters: "noisy_ctimer" . This parameter, is disabled, would try to let a call to ring for ever (openser will never give internal timeout). But, the parameter is automatically turned on (disregarding the script setting) in certain conditions: - parallel forking is done - a failure route is set - a failure callback is set by other module (like acc, cpl, dialog, etc) - a fr_invite timeout was configured via AVP - some reply was already received - no other module explicitly asked for this (like siptrace, acc,osp) Following some discussion on the tracker, there is large support for removing this parameter as: 1) it is difficult to anticipate the final behaviour due complicated logic 2) due all dependencies, in 99% of the case, the param will be automatically turned on 3)it breaks the RFC3261, which make mandatory to have a final reply form a stateful proxy My question is: Is anybody having a good point in not removing this parameter (and having noisy_ctimer behaviour all the time)? I'm pushing this question only on users list, as between the developers, there is an consent in removing it ;) Regards, Bogdan

9 20

[OpenSER-Users] OpenSER Randomly crashes.
by Sergio Gutierrez 06 Mar '08

06 Mar '08

Hello everybody. I have written to list these days, I am still having the same symptom, so I apologize for writting again. My OpenSER 1.3 installation running on Solaris Sparc is facing random and unexpected crashes, in appearance related to timer process. The last core presents the following backtrace #0 0xfe977a04 in get_expired_dlgs (time=4233810208) at dlg_timer.c:194 #1 0xfe977540 in dlg_timer_routine (ticks=7980, attr=0x0) at dlg_timer.c:210 #2 0x000a839c in timer_ticker (timer_list=0x15ec00) at timer.c:275 #3 0x000a80ec in run_timer_process (tpl=0x1b8088, do_jiffies=1) at timer.c :357 #4 0x000a8668 in start_timer_processes () at timer.c:386 #5 0x00035ea8 in main_loop () at main.c:873 #6 0x000397c4 in main (argc=-4195024, argv=0x150e9c) at main.c:1372 Thanks in advance for any hint you can give me. Best regards. Sergio Gutierrez

3 5

[Serusers] AVP/SELECT type / length in ser.cfg?
by Mike Trest - Personal 04 Mar '08

04 Mar '08

Hi, How can I reference the type and length attributes of a variable ( @set or $avp) ? ? ? ..mike..

4 5

[OpenSER-Users] fail to authenticate INVITE messages
by antalsia＠free.fr 04 Mar '08

04 Mar '08

Hi all, I'm trying to authenticate INVITE messages with OpenSER 1.3.0 (SIP Proxy + RTPPROXY) and LDAP module. Although REGISTER authentication works well, I cannot check user authorization for INVITE messages. I'm using an openser.cfg configuration template from sipwise (see an extract below). pv_proxy_authorize() routine always returns false, even if my user is registered and authenticated through our OpenLDAP. Can you tell me what I'm doing wrong ? Many thks, --------------------------- openser.cfg --------------------------- route { ... if(is_method("REGISTER")) { route(2); } if(is_method("INVITE")) { route(4); } ... } ######################################################################## # Request route 'base-route-register' ######################################################################## route[2] { sl_send_reply("100", "Trying"); if(is_present_hf("Authorization")||is_present_hf("Proxy-Authorization")) { xlog("L_INFO", "is_present_hf Authorization or Proxy-Authorization\n"); if (!ldap_search("ldap://blabla/blabla?uid,userPassword?sub?(uid=$fU)")) { switch ($retcode) { case -1: # no LDAP entry found xlog("L_INFO", "Ldap user not found\n"); sl_send_reply("404", "User Not Found"); exit; case -2: # internal error xlog("L_INFO", "Internal server error during authentication\n"); sl_send_reply("500", "Internal server error"); exit; default: exit; } } ldap_result("uid/$avp(s:username)"); ldap_result("userPassword/$avp(s:password)"); } if(!pv_www_authorize("")) { xlog("L_INFO", "Register authentication failed - M=$rm RURI=$ru F=$fu T=$tu IP=$si ID=$ci\n"); www_challenge("mydomain", "1"); exit; } if(!check_to()) { xlog("L_INFO", "Spoofed To-URI detected - M=$rm RURI=$ru F=$fu T=$tu IP=$si ID=$ci\n"); sl_send_reply("403", "Spoofed To-URI Detected"); exit; } consume_credentials(); if(!search("^Contact:[ ]*\*") && nat_uac_test("19")) { fix_nated_register(); setbflag(6); } if(!save("location")) { xlog("L_ERR", "Saving contact failed - M=$rm RURI=$ru F=$fu T=$tu IP=$si ID=$ci\n"); sl_reply_error(); exit; } xlog("L_INFO", "Registration successful - M=$rm RURI=$ru F=$fu T=$tu IP=$si ID=$ci\n"); exit; } ######################################################################## # Request route 'base-route-invite' ######################################################################## route[4] { sl_send_reply("100", "Trying"); if(nat_uac_test("19")) { fix_nated_contact(); setbflag(6); } route(5); } ######################################################################## # Request route 'invite-find-callee' ######################################################################## route[5] { if(!is_domain_local("$rd")) { setflag(20); route(7); } if(does_uri_exist()) { xlog("L_INFO", "Callee is local - M=$rm RURI=$ru F=$fu T=$tu IP=$si ID=$ci\n"); route(6); } else { xlog("L_INFO", "Callee is not local - M=$rm RURI=$ru F=$fu T=$tu IP=$si ID=$ci\n"); route(7); } exit; } ######################################################################## # Request route 'invite-to-external' ######################################################################## route[7] { if(isflagset(20)) { xlog("L_INFO", "Call to foreign domain - M=$rm RURI=$ru F=$fu T=$tu IP=$si ID=$ci\n"); if (!pv_proxy_authorize("")) { xlog("L_INFO", "TESTING : NOT AUTHENTICATED !!!!\n"); } else { xlog("L_INFO", "TESTING : AUTHENTICATED !!!!\n"); } route(3); exit; } xlog("L_INFO", "Call to unknown user - M=$rm RURI=$ru F=$fu T=$tu IP=$si ID=$ci\n"); sl_send_reply("404", "User Not Found"); exit; } --------------------- DEBUG LOGS --------------------- eb 29 15:33:14 proxy_sip /usr/sbin/openser[5444]: DBG:core:parse_headers: flags=80 Feb 29 15:33:14 proxy_sip /usr/sbin/openser[5444]: DBG:core:parse_headers: flags=80 Feb 29 15:33:14 proxy_sip /usr/sbin/openser[5444]: Call to foreign domain - M=INVITE RURI=sip:beacon@columbia.edu F=sip:test@xxxxxxxx T=sip:beacon@co lumbia.edu IP=xxxxxxx ID=282a363f-5be5-dc11-8272-0015c56ccfaa@xxxxxx Feb 29 15:33:14 proxy_sip /usr/sbin/openser[5444]: DBG:core:parse_headers: flags=10000 Feb 29 15:33:14 proxy_sip /usr/sbin/openser[5444]: DBG:auth:pre_auth: credentials with given realm not found Feb 29 15:33:14 proxy_sip /usr/sbin/openser[5444]: TESTING : NOT AUTHENTICATED

2 3

[OpenSER-Users] Openser sending BYE to itself.
by Daniel Cardoso Alves 04 Mar '08

04 Mar '08

Hi people... I am using the module dialog to finish a call. http://www.openser.org/docs/modules/1.3 ... tml#AEN461 It is working... I need that the openser send a BYE to CALLE, to CALLER and to itself... The BYE to endpoints(CALLE and CALLER) is ok, but it not sending BYE to itself... Somebody can help? Thanks in advance... --------------------------------- Abra sua conta no Yahoo! Mail, o único sem limite de espaço para armazenamento!

2 4

[Serusers] SIP Express Bundle. Step 1.
by SIP 03 Mar '08

03 Mar '08

Okay, It's time to get things going on the SIP Express Bundle. I'm stepping in to take the reins as project manager on this one so we can get things rolling. First please take a look at the project page: http://www.iptel.org/bundle/project Step 1 here, I'd like to verify a headcount of people working on this project as of now. This doesn't mean people can't join up later, and it certainly doesn't mean that I'm going to expect you to put more time into this than you can commit, but we need to know where we stand. Currently, on the project list, we have: * Jai: testing and installation work * ram: testing * SIP: testing (and now project management) * Jiri: debian, oob * Mike: testing and documentation * Stefan: SEMS Are the people listed here still available to do these particular tasks? Has anyone else volunteered time/resources on this project that hasn't been listed here? If so, shoot me an email, and I'll add you to the list. We need a people inventory so we know what roles we're missing. For instance, I've heard a few people mention that they'd be willing to donate a server to the cause so we have somewhere to test things upon. I don't have those people listed, but that's certainly an area we're going to need. Also, we've had varying reports of which direction we're going -- ISO or Virtual Machine. For now, I think we should concentrate on an ISO as that's going to be the most attractive to people for building a ready-to-go hardware appliance, and it will probably be a little less of a headache for creating a drop-in installation. However, I also think a virtual machine should be on the list in the future, and once we get an ISO ready, creating a virtual machine from that configuration should be relatively straightforward. However, on the list of people, I don't see anyone down for scripting an install -- a kickstart disc or what have you. That's another area we're lacking. If anyone has experience in that area, shoot me an email and I'll add you to the list. We need to focus. For this reason, we'll start small and work from there. Do NOT expect this first SER bundle to have every feature you could imagine in it, and don't get discouraged if your favourite feature is missing. As the project grows, we'll most certainly be adding capabilities and allowing a tailored install. But for now, the goal should be to get things running and working first in a simple format and then add on from there. Having a bundle like this is perhaps the biggest step we can take toward bringing SER to the masses and finally breaking down some of those barriers that have kept people out of the project. I'm looking forward to working with all of you on this project! Neil

9 13

[OpenSER-Users] SMS module
by Jean Boite 03 Mar '08

03 Mar '08

Hello, I am using openser-1.2.2-notls. I want to send a sms thanks to a IM (I am using Eyebeam, but i don't know if it's possible to make that with this software). Thats why, i need your help to explain me how send a sms thanks to the sms module in openser. I put in my openser.cfg, following "if(!method==MESSAGE)" the function which is on the documentation : if (sms_send_msg_to_net("Orange")) { if (!t_reply("202", "yes sir, SMS sent over")) { # if replying failed, retry statelessly sl_reply_error(); }; } else { if (!t_reply("502", "Bad gateway - SMS error")) { # if replying failed, retry statelessly sl_reply_error(); }; exit; }; Openser is running good, my problem is thats I don't know how to formulate my message in Eyebeam to send correctly my sms. Thanks.

3 6

[OpenSER-Users] No RTCP generation
by Keyur Parikh 03 Mar '08

03 Mar '08

Hi, I am working on project involving SER, SEMS and MediaProxy. Things works OK as configured. I am curious to know how I can generate RTCP message towards caller if the called UA is not generating one. I appreciate your response. Thanks, Keyur Parikh

2 1

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

sr-users February 2008