On Thursday 28 February 2008, Sergio Gutierrez wrote: and timer.c Hi Sergio, signal 10 is SIGBUS on solaris. This could be caused from an invalid address alignment, a segmention fault on a physical address and a object hardware error (wikipedia). The first crashes were both caused from a get_all_ucontact, triggered by a timer. This crash is now another timer, deletion of expired dialogs, strange.. Is this machine otherwise stable, when (openser release) does this crashes started? Do you have already inspected with the debugger the datastructures in the code of the get_expired_dlgs functions? Perhaps there is something wrong in there.. Cheers, Henning

Hi Henning. I apologize in advance for the long post. These days, Openser still has been crashing randomly. Using GDB in one of the generated core files, I found something curious: #0 0x000bcfbc in fm_malloc (qm=0x185320, size=24, file=0xfedbac10 "res.c", func=0xfedbac70 "db_mysql_get_columns", line=62) at mem/f_malloc.c:267 #1 0xfedb74b0 in db_mysql_get_columns (_h=0x1cbf68, _r=0x24dde8) at res.c:62 #2 0xfedb79f0 in db_mysql_convert_result (_h=0x1cbf68, _r=0x24dde8) at res.c:167 #3 0xfedb28c4 in db_mysql_store_result (_h=0x1cbf68, _r=0xffbff830) at dbase.c:209 #4 0xfedb40e8 in db_mysql_raw_query (_h=0x1cbf68, _s=0xff07e668 "select received, contact, socket, cflags, path from location where expires > '2008-03-04 13:37:51' and cflags & 64 = 64 and id % 1 = 0", _r=0xffbff830) at dbase.c:447 #5 0xff053260 in get_all_db_ucontacts (buf=0x1ceec0, len=320054, flags=64, part_idx=0, part_max=1) at dlist.c:128 #6 0xff0528c8 in get_all_ucontacts (buf=0x1ceec0, len=320058, flags=64, part_idx=0, part_max=1) at dlist.c:356 #7 0xfee57c6c in pingClients (ticks=60, param=0x0) at functions.h:60 #8 0x000aa430 in timer_ticker (timer_list=0x163c00) at timer.c:275 #9 0x000aa180 in run_timer_process (tpl=0x1c5808, do_jiffies=1) at timer.c:357 #10 0x000aa6fc in start_timer_processes () at timer.c:386 #11 0x00036788 in main_loop () at main.c:873 #12 0x0003a0c4 in main (argc=1137536, argv=0x155f1c) at main.c:1372 By inspecting in detail the frame 0, in particular the qm variable: (gdb) print qm $1 = (struct fm_block *) 0x185320 Which is the fm_block structure defined at mem/f_malloc.h. (gdb) frame 0 #0 0x000bcfbc in fm_malloc (qm=0x185320, size=24, file=0xfedbac10 "res.c", func=0xfedbac70 "db_mysql_get_columns", line=62) at mem/f_malloc.c:267 267 if ((*f)->size>=size) goto found; (gdb) list 262 /*search for a suitable free frag*/ 263 264 for(hash=GET_HASH(size);hash<F_HASH_SIZE;hash++){ 265 f=&(qm->free_hash[hash].first); 266 for(;(*f); f=&((*f)->u.nxt_free)) 267 if ((*f)->size>=size) goto found; 268 /* try in a bigger bucket */ 269 } 270 /* not found, bad! */ 271 return 0; If I print the qm->free_hash array, I found that is mainly empty; For the particular case of my core file, hash has a value of three, when printing that position I have the following: (gdb) print qm->free_hash[hash] $1 = {first = 0x69703a31, no = 1} (gdb) print qm->free_hash $2 = {{first = 0x0, no = 0}, {first = 0x0, no = 0}, {first = 0x0, no = 0}, {first = 0x69703a31, no = 1}, { first = 0x0, no = 0}, {first = 0x0, no = 0}, {first = 0x0, no = 0}, {first = 0x0, no = 0}, {first = 0x0, no = 0}, {first = 0x0, no = 0}, {first = 0x24dd68, no = 4641}, {first = 0x0, no = 0} <repeats 21 times>, { first = 0x1ced90, no = 1}, {first = 0x0, no = 0} <repeats 679 times>, {first = 0x1cef40, no = 1}, { first = 0x0, no = 0} <repeats 1337 times>, {first = 0x1cef40, no = 1}, {first = 0x0, no = 0}, { first = 0x24de38, no = 1}, {first = 0x0, no = 0} <repeats 11 times>, {first = 0x21d100, no = 1}, { first = 0x0, no = 0}, {first = 0x0, no = 0}} (gdb) print qm->free_hash.no $3 = 0 (gdb) print qm->free_hash[hash].first $4 = (struct fm_frag *) 0x69703a31 (gdb) x/s 0x69703a31 0x69703a31: <Address 0x69703a31 out of bounds> So, the error happened because from the list of memory fragments, an invalid one was referred. I have two questions: 1. Is it normal that free_hash array at fm_block has some positions pointing to invalid locations? 2. I could see that the fm_frag_lnk struct has a member called no, which, for the printing, I see it is 0 for most of the values at the array, and it is 1 at some members, including the one which causes the crash; would it not be possible to use that member for a check before trying the allocation? What exactly means the no member, as I also see that for some of the members it has a value higher than 1. Thanks in advance for any help, and again, I apologize for the long post. Best regards. Sergio Gutierrez On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 11:49 AM, Sergio Gutierrez &lt;saguti(a)gmail.com <mailto:saguti@gmail.com>> wrote: Hi Henning. Thanks a lot for your answer. Currently, the machine does not report any hardware problem; Solaris 10 has a service called Fault Manager, which is running on my machine, and it has not reported any error or problem related to it. At this moment, I am testing a Openser installation compiled using an optimized version of GCC released by Sun to be used on Sparc Systems; this release is based on gcc 4, and at this time, OpenSER has been running for almost 18 hours without crash. I will inspect the core file again, and I will be posting what I find. Best regards, and thanks again. Sergio Gutierrez. On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 5:19 AM, Henning Westerholt &lt;henning.westerholt(a)1und1.de <mailto:henning.westerholt@1und1.de>> wrote: On Thursday 28 February 2008, Sergio Gutierrez wrote: facing random and dlg_timer.c:194 timer.c:275 do_jiffies=1) at timer.c main.c:1372 Hi Sergio, signal 10 is SIGBUS on solaris. This could be caused from an invalid address alignment, a segmention fault on a physical address and a object hardware error (wikipedia). The first crashes were both caused from a get_all_ucontact, triggered by a timer. This crash is now another timer, deletion of expired dialogs, strange.. Is this machine otherwise stable, when (openser release) does this crashes started? Do you have already inspected with the debugger the datastructures in the code of the get_expired_dlgs functions? Perhaps there is something wrong in there.. Cheers, Henning ------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Users mailing list Users(a)lists.openser.org http://lists.openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users