sr-users March 2007

sr-users@lists.kamailio.org

192 participants
381 discussions

[Users] SIP Registrartions
by raviprakash sunkara 28 Mar '07

28 Mar '07

Hello Users , I have one OpenSER server , this can handle the Both Sip Registrar , location server, proxy server, But I need OpenSER only proxy that , When UAC send the Registrartion to OpenSER , and OpenSER send to Vendor Proxy ( Cisco Proxy server ). And other one I have 2 openSER , first one Registrar server say OP1 and other is OP2 UAC( register) -------->OP2-----------> OP1( here it have to save ) -- Thanks and Regards Ravi Prakash Sunkara ravi.sunkara(a)hyperion-tech.com M:+91 9985077535 www.hyperion-tech.com Client and Parent company :- www.august-networks.com

2 1

[Serusers] global contact list
by Barta János 28 Mar '07

28 Mar '07

Hello! I have a little problem with the (global) contact list subscription of the presence, please help me. I installed the presence server (0.10.99-dev35-pa-4.1), and it works without any problems. But I can not use the "Subscribe to contact list" of the eyeBeam. (The user subscribe list works fine.) I typed the next content into this field (of the eyeBeam): sip:bartaj-list@test.intra and my config file contains: sip:/var/xcap-root/rls-services/global# cat ./index <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <rls-services> <service uri="sip:bartaj-list@test.intra"> <list name="Human resources"> <entry uri="sip:test1@test.intra"> <display-name>bartaj</display-name> </entry> <entry uri="sip:test2@test.intra"> <display-name>12345</display-name> </entry> </list> <packages> <package>presence</package> </packages> </service> </rls-services> But I can see only the user subscribe list, and can't see the global one. Why? Can anybody help me? Thx, Jani _________________________________________________________________ Vásároljon kényelmesen! Több 10.000 ajánlattal, kedvező árakkal várjuk. http://cthandler.adverticum.net/?cturl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.vasarlas.origo.hu%3…

2 1

[Users] Radius
by jidn jidn 28 Mar '07

28 Mar '07

Hi list, I need to know if open ser have a module, that uses radius, for connect with Alepo Because I have Alepo for billing. Thanks, Pablo __________________________________________________ Preguntá. Respondé. Descubrí. Todo lo que querías saber, y lo que ni imaginabas, está en Yahoo! Respuestas (Beta). ¡Probalo ya! http://www.yahoo.com.ar/respuestas

1 0

Re: [Users] Simple xcap-emulator for OpenSER
by sukerry 28 Mar '07

28 Mar '07

Adrian Georgescu, Thanks for your great job! However , when I compile php, an error says that Log.php can not be found! Thanks sukerry ======= 2007-03-28 00:56:33======= >Hello, > >We wrote a simple xcap emulator to be able to manage the XCAP >documents used by OpenSER presence agent, by using PHP scripts in >combination with Apache web server. > >I have tested it against OpenSER with MySQL and Eyebeam for Apple. >Klaus Darilion has tested it against Postgress and Eyebeam for Windows. > >The software can be downloaded from: > >http://download.dns-hosting.info/XCAP/xcap-0.5.tar.gz > >Regards, >Adrian > > >_______________________________________________ >Users mailing list >Users(a)openser.org >http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users > 　　　　　　　　sukerry 　　　　　　　　sukerry(a)126.com 　　　　　　　　　　2007-03-28

2 1

[Users] Content-type in PUBLISH request
by jh＠tutpro.com 28 Mar '07

28 Mar '07

i started to experiment with sending PUBLISH requests using pua_mi module. if i understood correctly from RFC 3903, PUBLISH request should contain a content-type header, such as Content-Type: application/pidf+xml PUBLISH request sent via pua_mi does not contain any content-type header. should one be added so that the receiver of PUBLISH request could know how to decode the body? another question related to this is, what event packages does openser presence server support? i assume that it supports "presence" event package (where content type usually is pidf+xml), but how about "message-summary" event package (RFC 3842) that could be used to publish message waiting events? -- juha

4 7

[Users] OpenSER 1.2 support for sip:wizard
by SipWise Support 28 Mar '07

28 Mar '07

Hi all, We'd like to announce that sip:wizard (http://www.sipwise.com/wizard), the OpenSER configuration generator, now also supports OpenSER 1.2. Cheers, Your sip:wise Team

2 1

[Users] out of memory
by Papadopoulos Georgios 28 Mar '07

28 Mar '07

Hello, Lately our OpenSER 1.1.1 is running out of memory and I get the following message 4(25190) get_hdr_field: out of memory The result is that it stops processing any incoming request. This is a production system and of course it causes a great deal of frustration. The last time this happened I got the following statistics before restarting > ./openserctl fifo get_statistics Total statistics = 37 Total modules = 5 Module name = core; statistics=8 core:rcv_requests = 3259334 core:rcv_replies = 8816 core:fwd_requests = 736 core:fwd_replies = 137 core:drop_requests = 743 core:drop_replies = 0 core:err_requests = 0 core:err_replies = 43 Module name = shmem; statistics=6 shmem:total_size = 268435456 shmem:used_size = 1675864 shmem:real_used_size = 1835104 shmem:max_used_size = 4399048 shmem:free_size = 266600352 shmem:fragments = 17710 Module name = sl; statistics=9 sl:1xx_replies = 0 sl:2xx_replies = 1690410 sl:3xx_replies = 43 sl:4xx_replies = 334827 sl:5xx_replies = 1185629 sl:6xx_replies = 0 sl:sent_replies = 3210909 sl:sent_err_replies = 0 sl:received_ACKs = 743 Module name = tm; statistics=11 tm:received_replies = 8636 tm:relayed_replies = 7096 tm:local_replies = 1718 tm:UAS_transactions = 7003 tm:UAC_transactions = 94 tm:2xx_transactions = 1528 tm:3xx_transactions = 3 tm:4xx_transactions = 5129 tm:5xx_transactions = 468 tm:6xx_transactions = 0 tm:inuse_transactions = 0 Module name = usrloc; statistics=3 usrloc:location-users = 0 usrloc:location-contacts = 0 usrloc:location-expires = 7282 I am not sure how to read these numbers but I see a big "free_size" and still OpenSER is out of memory. Any suggestions? thank you George Disclaimer The information in this e-mail and any attachments is confidential. It is intended solely for the attention and use of the named addressee(s). If you are not the intended recipient, or person responsible for delivering this information to the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately. Unless you are the intended recipient or his/her representative you are not authorized to, and must not, read, copy, distribute, use or retain this message or any part of it. E-mail transmission cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error-free as information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost, destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.

2 1

[Users] why b2bua always relay 403
by liu york 28 Mar '07

28 Mar '07

Dear all I use astersik b2bua and radius for auth and prepaid on pstn call,there is a big problem is that any responese from PSTN GW,for example 406,503...,the bubua always relay 403 to sip client.So i cant make the status clearly when pstn call,what's wrong with my b2bua,any cfg of bubua for me? many many thx.

2 1

[Users] Openser Not Send Ack to Callee?
by 杨冬 28 Mar '07

28 Mar '07

hi, all: I'm new to here and just installed an instance of openser-1.2.0-notls version under CentOS 4.3 platform. Also I've added mysql db support and it seemed all is working well. But when I made a common call through openser, I found a problem that the openser didn't send ACK message to the callee. The flow is as follows: caller ---INVITE--> openser openser ---INVITE--> callee openser <--180-------- callee caller <----180------ openser openser <----200------- callee caller <----200------ openser caller ------ACK----> openser At this time when the caller send ACK to openser, openser didn't send ACK to the callee. So after 30 seconds, the callee released the call due to time out. Does anyone know what's the problem? Any help will be appreciate!

2 2

[Serusers] Problems with ACK
by Ricardo Martinez 27 Mar '07

27 Mar '07

Hello List. I have a problem with an ACK message for a CANCEL. I'm just wondering if anyone knows what could be happening here. It seems that SER can't route or "understand" this ACK ACK sip:0299005622408196@sipvoiss.desa.redvoiss.net SIP/2.0. v: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.1.100:5060;branch=z9hG4bK2861608023. f: "5502203289" <sip:5502203289@sipvoiss.desa.redvoiss.net>;tag=1349608987. t: <sip:0299005622408196@sipvoiss.desa.redvoiss.net>;tag=f146818fa4. i: 5c83a04822964085e07aabd210e9d72f(a)192.168.1.100. CSeq: 4 ACK. l: 0. Could be something with the COMPACT form ??? This is the log from the debug : Mar 23 12:18:10 sipvoiss ser[5430]: t_lookup_request: start searching: hash=52251, isACK=1 Mar 23 12:18:10 sipvoiss ser[5430]: DEBUG: RFC3261 transaction matching failed Mar 23 12:18:10 sipvoiss ser[5430]: DEBUG: t_lookup_request: no transaction found Mar 23 12:18:10 sipvoiss ser[5430]: SER: forwarding ACK statelessly Mar 23 12:18:10 sipvoiss ser[5430]: DEBUG: mk_proxy: doing DNS lookup... Mar 23 12:18:10 sipvoiss ser[5430]: get_record: lookup(_sip._udp.sipvoiss.desa.redvoiss.net, 33) failed Mar 23 12:18:10 sipvoiss ser[5430]: sip_resolvehost: no SRV record found for sipvoiss.desa.redvoiss.net, trying 'normal' lookup... Mar 23 12:18:10 sipvoiss ser[5430]: check_via_address(10.0.0.248, 192.168.1.100, 0) Mar 23 12:18:10 sipvoiss ser[5430]: Sending: ACK sip:0299005622408196@sipvoiss.desa.redvoiss.net SIP/2.0^M Max-Forwards: 10^M Record-Route: <sip:10.0.0.246;ftag=2639303304;lr=on>^M Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.0.0.246;branch=0^M v: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.1.100:5060;received=10.0.0.248;branch=z9hG4bK365542204^M f: "5502203289" <sip:5502203289@sipvoiss.desa.redvoiss.net>;tag=2639303304^M t: <sip:0299005622408196@sipvoiss.desa.redvoiss.net>;tag=2746a580a4^M i: 81983e61d980fd3ef0046dafe9518284(a)192.168.1.100^M CSeq: 10 ACK^M l: 0^M ^M . Mar 23 12:18:10 sipvoiss ser[5430]: orig. len=338, new_len=477, proto=1 Mar 23 12:18:10 sipvoiss ser[5430]: DEBUG:destroy_avp_list: destroying list (nil) Mar 23 12:18:10 sipvoiss ser[5430]: receive_msg: cleaning up What does it means : "RFC3261 transaction matching failed" and why ??? The weird situation happend when almost the same message arrives without the Compact Form : V102 ACK sip:0299005622408196@sipvoiss.desa.redvoiss.net SIP/2.0. Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.0.0.237:5060;branch=z9hG4bK2364391837. From: "5502203289" <sip:5502203289@sipvoiss.desa.redvoiss.net>;tag=827237367. To: <sip:0299005622408196@sipvoiss.desa.redvoiss.net>;tag=6b466391a4. Call-ID: 43b2cc325b7fbe9f8790e4cee01dc4b3(a)10.0.0.237. CSeq: 2 ACK. Content-Length: 0. This message works ok!. .... ... Mar 23 16:30:06 sipvoiss ser[5974]: DEBUG: RFC3261 transaction matched, tid=424819551 Mar 23 16:30:06 sipvoiss ser[5974]: DEBUG: t_lookup_request: transaction found (T=0x404ce3e8) Mar 23 16:30:06 sipvoiss ser[5974]: DEBUG: cleanup_uac_timers: RETR/FR timers reset Mar 23 16:30:06 sipvoiss ser[5974]: DEBUG: add_to_tail_of_timer[2]: 0x404ce430 Mar 23 16:30:06 sipvoiss ser[5974]: DEBUG:destroy_avp_list: destroying list (nil) Mar 23 16:30:06 sipvoiss ser[5974]: receive_msg: cleaning up Can someone give me a hand here? Thanks in advance Regards, Ricardo Martinez-

3 4

← Newer
1
...
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
...
39
Older →

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

sr-users March 2007