Hello,
because the registrar module imports now some values of usrloc
parameters it must be loaded before the usrloc module.
http://openser.org/dokuwiki/doku.php/install:1.1.x-to-1.2.x#registrar
use:
loadmodule "usrloc.so"
loadmodule "registrar.so"
Cheers,
Daniel
On 03/03/07 15:14, Henri Keski-Sikkilä wrote:
>
> Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > henri keski-sikkila wrote:
> >
> >> [...]
> >>
> >> When user exit room only admin gets message "The user [user] has left
> >> the room" others doesn't know anything that user has left room...
> >
> > Could you test with the latest CVS version? If you get the same, please
> > capture the sip traffic on openser box and send it to me for this case
> > ngrep -d any -qt port 5060
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Daniel
> >
>
> Hello Daniel,
>
> I took the latest source code from svn. I used a default routing script
> "imc.cfg" that comes with the imc module. When I started openser, I got
> these messages:
>
> 0(0) imc:mod_init:the query returned no result
> 0(0) find_cmd_export_t: found <load_tm>(0) in module tm
> [modules/tm/tm.so]
> 0(0) pool_remove: Removing connection from the pool
> 0(0) DEBUG: register_stats: imc
> 0(0) DEBUG: register_mi: imc
> 0(0) DEBUG: init_mod: tm
> 0(0) TM - initializing...
> 0(0) Call-ID initialization: '7fbb9de7'
> 0(0) unixsock_register_cmd: New command (t_uac_dlg) registered
> 0(0) unixsock_register_cmd: New command (t_uac_cancel) registered
> 0(0) unixsock_register_cmd: New command (t_hash) registered
> 0(0) unixsock_register_cmd: New command (t_reply) registered
> 0(0) DEBUG: lock_initialize: lock initialization started
> 0(0) DEBUG: MD5 calculated: 72dbedf8f6d9bc423ac07e79fbac2ddb
> 0(0) DEBUG: MD5 calculated: ce1d8ecb1b6d4462277ac0abb13e18fc
> 0(0) DEBUG: register_stats: tm
> 0(0) DEBUG: register_mi: tm
> 0(0) DEBUG: init_mod: xlog
> 0(0) XLOG: initializing ...
> 0(0) DEBUG: init_mod: registrar
> 0(0) registrar - initializing
> 0(0) find_cmd_export_t: found <load_sl>(0) in module sl
> [modules/sl/sl.so]
> 0(0) find_cmd_export_t: found <ul_bind_usrloc>(1) in module usrloc
> [modules/usrloc/usrloc.so]
> 0(0) ERROR:usrloc:bind_usrloc: configuration error - trying to bind to
> usrlo module before being initialized
> 0(0) init_mod(): Error while initializing module registrar
> ERROR: error while initializing modules
> 0(0) INFO:mi_fifo:mi_destroy:memory for the child's mi_fifo_pid was
> not allocated -> nothing to destroy
> 0(0) XLOG: destroy module ...
> 0(0) DEBUG: tm_shutdown : start
> 0(0) DEBUG: unlink_timer_lists : emptying DELETE list
> 0(0) DEBUG: tm_shutdown : emptying hash table
> 0(0) DEBUG: tm_shutdown : releasing timers
> 0(0) DEBUG: tm_shutdown : removing semaphores
> 0(0) DEBUG: tm_shutdown : destroying tmcb lists
> 0(0) DEBUG: tm_shutdown : done
> 0(0) imc: destroy module ...
> 0(15800) shm_mem_destroy
> 0(15800) destroying the shared memory lock
>
>
> Best Regards,
> Henri
>
>
So if i understand, when a clint registers, SER will automatically send
invites to the other clients and make connections with them?
2007/3/3, Goh, Tee-Yong <gohty(a)m1.com.sg>:
>
> Dear Karim,
>
> Thank you for your reply.
>
> Yes you are right. I have having difficulty searching for this for past 2
> months.
>
> Yes. Here is what i want. Once i receive the REGISTER messages, my SER
> will send out "INVITE" message to my other clients. This is what i am
> intended to do. However, i could not search for the right coding inside the
> ser-0.9.6.
>
> Please advice and apologies if any inconvenience caused for you.
>
> Thanks.
>
> Regards,
> Howard
>
> -----Original Message-----
> *From:* karim basraoui [mailto:basraouik@gmail.com]
> *Sent:* Saturday, March 03, 2007 7:18 PM
> *To:* Goh, Tee-Yong
> *Subject:* Re: [Serusers] SIP SER
>
> Hi,
>
> Do you want to make changes on SER behaviour when it receives REGISTER
> messages. If it's the case you can make a condition in the "ser.cfg" file,
> in the bloc "route{ ... }". for example:
> route {
> if (method == "REGISTER")
> { #what you want to do};
> }
>
>
> 2007/3/3, Goh, Tee-Yong <gohty(a)m1.com.sg >:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > May i know from the SER-0.9.6, where can i look for and make changes for
> > the SER when receiving "REGISTER" message and responsing " 200 OK" back to
> > the corresponding node or clients?
> >
> > Would appreciate your assistance and advice as soon as possible as i
> > have difficultly locating the coding. Please advice where i can find the
> > script to edit the above mentioned messages.
> >
> > Apologies for the inconvenience caused.
> >
> > Thank you.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Howard
> >
> > ------------------------------
> > This email (including any attachment) is subject to the following
> > disclaimer: http://m1.com.sg/M1/misc/disclaimer
> > ------------------------------
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Serusers mailing list
> > Serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
> > http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> BASRAOUI Karim
> www.basraouik.afrikart.net
>
> ------------------------------
> This email (including any attachment) is subject to the following
> disclaimer: http://m1.com.sg/M1/misc/disclaimer
> ------------------------------
>
--
BASRAOUI Karim
www.basraouik.afrikart.net
Hi,
May i know from the SER-0.9.6, where can i look for and make changes for the SER when receiving "REGISTER" message and responsing " 200 OK" back to the corresponding node or clients?
Would appreciate your assistance and advice as soon as possible as i have difficultly locating the coding. Please advice where i can find the script to edit the above mentioned messages.
Apologies for the inconvenience caused.
Thank you.
Regards,
Howard
This email (including any attachment) is subject to the following disclaimer:
http://m1.com.sg/M1/misc/disclaimer
Hi
I'm not sure whether this belongs in the developer one or not. When I
proxy requests through openSER, and the contact address for the client
uses a secure URI (SIPS) and the protocol stated is TLS, I get the
following error:
7(6639) ERROR: uri2proxy: bad transport for sips uri: 3
7(6639) ERROR:tm:t_forward_nonack: failure to add branches
This is in ut.h, line 113. If the URI is a secure one (SIPS), why must
the protocol be TCP or NONE?
openSER exits when the URI is secure (SIPS) AND the transport is TLS.
Why is this?
Hi List,
I need config one module UAC to do authentication and redirect my calls to
other Voip Provider.
Somebody already did it? If can tell me what functions you used.
Thanks in advanced!
Thiago Maluf.
----------------------------------------------------------------
THIAGO MALUF RESENDE
Consultor Voip e Programador WEB (Voip Developer and Web Developer)
e-mail: malufrj(a)gmail.com
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
I'm interessting in using WeSIP as a ALG. I got running openser as a SIP
frontend for WeSIP by using SEAS module. But I have no idea what do to
to get WeSIP running. Do I need here apache to run those xml files? Or
is there any WeSIP binaries to strat WeSIP Server ??
regards
Helmut
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD4DBQFF6Bc84tZeNddg3dwRAmchAKCtliDoToB1SeWeNEJtQ/AKf4viJgCXVZPv
D6k7Vzrru5NaXEXLL70IBQ==
=kpT1
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Hello Users
Good Morning,
Is Any Using the WeSIP to OpenSER for SEAS,
Please can anyone Give the WeSIP API documentation ,
So that I view the Classes and Methods in WeSIP,
Does WeSIP supports the b2bua for the OpenSER, So that I can Generate it,
I'll use the WeSIP only for INVITE request, For Post Paid Billing
Generating
Main Question is WeSIP support the NAT,
--
Thanks and Regards
Ravi Prakash Sunkara
ravi.sunkara(a)hyperion-tech.com
M:+91 9985077535
www.hyperion-tech.com
Client and Parent company :- www.august-networks.com
Hello list,
My openser (1.1.0) does not forward provisionnal replies. Currently, the "180 Ringing" I receive are absorbed, and that is bad.
But I don't use any configuration directive to explicitely and statefully forward provisionnal answers. Please, which can I use? The reply_route block that is used is set with a call to t_on_reply .
Thanks a lot.
JF Smigielski.
Hello
I have an OpenSER which receives an initial INVITE request with a Route
HF. It processes Route HF (by applying loose routing mechanism). Then it
appends a new branch and relay the request.
My problem is that the CANCEL request, which is generated by the TM
module when a 200 OK response from the other leg was acknowledged,
contains the original Route HF from the INVITE request, and not the
processed Route HF. I think that the correct behavior is that the Route
HF from the CANCEL request should not contains this proxy as topmost
route.
Thanks for any hints!
Regards,
MArius
