sr-users March 2007

sr-users@lists.kamailio.org

192 participants
380 discussions

[Serusers] unable to register SIP users after 24 hours (1 day)
by Ranjeet Kumar 06 Mar '07

06 Mar '07

Hi, I am using ser 0.9.6-2 on ubuntu edgy (linux) OS. After one day, it is not registering any user what may be the cause of this problem. Is it(daemon) stops/sleeps after some time of inactivity? Thanks, Ranjeet The information contained in, or attached to, this e-mail, contains confidential information and is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed and is subject to legal privilege. If you have received this e-mail in error you should notify the sender immediately by reply e-mail, delete the message from your system and notify your system manager. Please do not copy it for any purpose, or disclose its contents to any other person. The views or opinions presented in this e-mail are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of the company. The recipient should check this e-mail and any attachments for the presence of viruses. The company accepts no liability for any damage caused, directly or indirectly, by any virus transmitted in this email. www.aztecsoft.com

1 0

[Users] Subscriber table for GUI authentication
by alper ozbilen 06 Mar '07

06 Mar '07

Dear All, I am preparing php interface for web user authentication. But some fields on subscriber table confuse my mind. please let me write below : http://openser.org/dokuwiki/doku.php/database:1.2.x#subscriber 1st: How can we generate phplib_id value to keep phplib_id field? 2nd: I cant decide on username field whether I should generate username automatically or allow users to choose any available name or number ? 3th: what is the difference between username field and phone field at last: What is meaning of ha1 and ha1b field? any help wolud be appreciated Thanks a lot Alper Ozbilen _________________________________________________________________ Rates near 39yr lows! $430K Loan for $1,399/mo - Paying Too Much? Calculate new payment http://www.lowermybills.com/lre/index.jsp?sourceid=lmb-9632-18226&moid=7581

3 2

[Serusers] ser 0.10.99 - unixsock_server.c:274: error: ‘last_process’ undeclared (first use in this function)
by "tzieleniewski" 06 Mar '07

06 Mar '07

Hi After a long way of trying to compile ser 0.10.99 I am still left some errors: Please help me with those: ser@tomix:~/src/ser-0.10.99$ make group_include="standard standard-dep stable" include_modules="xcap" all > ser.makeall.log make[1]: *** Nie podano obiektów i nie znaleziono makefile. Stop. make[1]: *** Nie podano obiektów i nie znaleziono makefile. Stop. make[1]: *** Nie podano obiektów i nie znaleziono makefile. Stop. unixsock_server.c: In function ‘init_unixsock_children’: unixsock_server.c:274: error: ‘last_process’ undeclared (first use in this function) unixsock_server.c:274: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once unixsock_server.c:274: error: for each function it appears in.) unixsock_server.c:256: warning: unused variable ‘sockfd’ unixsock_server.c:253: warning: unused variable ‘backup’ make[1]: *** [unixsock_server.o] Błąd 1 checks.c: In function ‘generate_avps’: checks.c:89: error: ‘A_SER_ATTRS’ undeclared (first use in this function) checks.c:89: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once checks.c:89: error: for each function it appears in.) checks.c: In function ‘radius_does_uri_exist’: checks.c:146: error: ‘V_CALL_CHECK’ undeclared (first use in this function) make[1]: *** [checks.o] Błąd 1 Errors in the above files correspond to the following lines: unixsock_server.c:274: error: snprintf(pt[last_process].desc, MAX_PT_DESC, "unix domain socket server @ %s", unixsock_name); checks.c:89: error: ‘A_SER_ATTRS’ undeclared (first use in this function) while ((vp = rc_avpair_get(vp, attrs[A_SER_ATTRS].v, 0))) { Bests Tomasz

3 2

[Users] Dialog module bug?
by T.R. Missner 06 Mar '07

06 Mar '07

Hello, We are seeing this line in our logs quite consistently. Using dialog module with openser 1.1.1 I looked at the code and cannot determine why this condition would be happening. Any ideas? BUG:dialog:update_dlg_timer: links are nul (not in timer)! Thanks TR

2 2

Re: [Serusers] Error Message
by Greger V. Teigre 06 Mar '07

06 Mar '07

Please copy the list. Strange, could you please post all the information about what you have done, your hardware configuration, your config, and the error trace to serdev? g-) Barton Fisher wrote: > Same results. I tried to compile after removing DSHM_MMAP from > Makefile.defs - no luck there either > That was only change I made after hello world test > > Bart > > Greger V. Teigre wrote: >> Hm, try a minimum (hello world) ser.cfg to see if you get the same >> error. PTR is not required. >> I assume you have not done any makefile changes. >> g-) >> >> Barton Fisher wrote: >>> Greger V. Teigre wrote: >>>> What is confusing? The message is pretty clear. But maybe the >>>> reason is unknown? >>>> What kind of system is this? Hardware? How much memory, etc etc? >>>> g-) >>>> >>>> >>>> Barton Fisher wrote: >>>>> A bit confused by startup message: >>>>> >>>>> 0(16102) ERROR: shm_mem_init: could not attach shared memory >>>>> segment: No space left on device >>>>> 0(16102) could not initialize shared memory pool, exiting... Too >>>>> much shared memory demanded: 33554432 >>>>> >>>>> I found prior message to upgrade Kernel to 2.4 - currently I'm on >>>>> 2.6.8-022stab076.1-enterprise >>>>> At another place it said to recompile ser with SYSV shm instead of >>>>> mmap (remove -DSHM_MMAP from Makefile.defs) <= This I'm not sure >>>>> exactly how / what to change in Makefile.def. >>>>> And yet another regarding no PTR <= I've contracted ISP regarding >>>>> this, but was hoping to bypass - I was hoping there was some >>>>> temporary fix for this until they act? >>>>> >>>>> I'm running SER 0.9.6 >>>>> >>>>> Thanks for any assistance. >>>>> >>>>> Bart >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Serusers mailing list >>>>> Serusers(a)lists.iptel.org >>>>> http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers >>> I have never seen PC, but here's what I know about it: >>> Processors = 4 >>> Model = Intel(R) XEON(TM) CPU 1.80GHz >>> Speed = 1.8GHz >>> Kernel Version = 2.6.8-022stab076.1-enterprise (SMP) >>> Distro Name = CentOS release 4.4 (Final) >>> Physical Memory = 3.89G >>> Me thinks issue is there is no PTR record as I see something like >>> this before it errors out: >>> >>> ... lots of junk ahead of this.... >>> 0(13373) if ( 0(13373) NOT( 0(13373) OR( 0(13373) uri 0(13373) =~ >>> 0(13373) "1 >>> 83" 0(13373) , 0(13373) uri 0(13373) =~ 0(13373) "200" 0(13373) ) >>> 0(13373) ) >>> 0(13373) ) { 0(13373) drop( 0(13373) type<0> 0(13373) ); 0(13373) } >>> else { 0(13 >>> 373) }; 0(13373) external_module_call( 0(13373) f_ptr<0x40573860> >>> 0(13373) , " >>> FA" 0(13373) ); 0(13373) external_module_call( 0(13373) >>> f_ptr<0x40573860> 0(13 >>> 373) , "FA" 0(13373) ); 0(13373) >>> >>> If it is PTR record checking, can I disable this checking? >>> Bart >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> >> __________ NOD32 2096 (20070305) Information __________ >> >> This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system. >> http://www.eset.com >> >> >> > > > >

1 0

[Users] Param in SIP header
by Michel Bensoussan 06 Mar '07

06 Mar '07

2 2

[Serusers] re: npid=yes
by Alex Fler 05 Mar '07

05 Mar '07

Hello guys, Does anybody knows how to remove ";npdi=yes" from INVITE. INVITE sip:XXXXXXXXXXXXX;npdi=yes@server ip:5060;dtg=SIP;user=phone I've hear that subst_uri ,can be used . Can someone give me an example Thanks Alex Fler _____ I've stopped 5,370 spam and fraud messages. You can too! Free trial of spam and fraud protection at <http://www.cloudmark.com/sigs?rc=mrcr6> www.cloudmark.com <http://www.cloudmark.com/sigs?rc=mrcr6> Cloudmark Desktop - Join the fight against spam!

1 0

Re: [Serusers] Error Message
by Greger V. Teigre 05 Mar '07

05 Mar '07

Hm, try a minimum (hello world) ser.cfg to see if you get the same error. PTR is not required. I assume you have not done any makefile changes. g-) Barton Fisher wrote: > Greger V. Teigre wrote: >> What is confusing? The message is pretty clear. But maybe the reason >> is unknown? >> What kind of system is this? Hardware? How much memory, etc etc? >> g-) >> >> >> Barton Fisher wrote: >>> A bit confused by startup message: >>> >>> 0(16102) ERROR: shm_mem_init: could not attach shared memory >>> segment: No space left on device >>> 0(16102) could not initialize shared memory pool, exiting... Too >>> much shared memory demanded: 33554432 >>> >>> I found prior message to upgrade Kernel to 2.4 - currently I'm on >>> 2.6.8-022stab076.1-enterprise >>> At another place it said to recompile ser with SYSV shm instead of >>> mmap (remove -DSHM_MMAP from Makefile.defs) <= This I'm not sure >>> exactly how / what to change in Makefile.def. >>> And yet another regarding no PTR <= I've contracted ISP regarding >>> this, but was hoping to bypass - I was hoping there was some >>> temporary fix for this until they act? >>> >>> I'm running SER 0.9.6 >>> >>> Thanks for any assistance. >>> >>> Bart >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Serusers mailing list >>> Serusers(a)lists.iptel.org >>> http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers > I have never seen PC, but here's what I know about it: > Processors = 4 > Model = Intel(R) XEON(TM) CPU 1.80GHz > Speed = 1.8GHz > Kernel Version = 2.6.8-022stab076.1-enterprise (SMP) > Distro Name = CentOS release 4.4 (Final) > Physical Memory = 3.89G > Me thinks issue is there is no PTR record as I see something like this > before it errors out: > > ... lots of junk ahead of this.... > 0(13373) if ( 0(13373) NOT( 0(13373) OR( 0(13373) uri 0(13373) =~ > 0(13373) "1 > 83" 0(13373) , 0(13373) uri 0(13373) =~ 0(13373) "200" 0(13373) ) > 0(13373) ) > 0(13373) ) { 0(13373) drop( 0(13373) type<0> 0(13373) ); 0(13373) } > else { 0(13 > 373) }; 0(13373) external_module_call( 0(13373) f_ptr<0x40573860> > 0(13373) , " > FA" 0(13373) ); 0(13373) external_module_call( 0(13373) > f_ptr<0x40573860> 0(13 > 373) , "FA" 0(13373) ); 0(13373) > > If it is PTR record checking, can I disable this checking? > Bart > > >

1 0

[Serusers] 4 Rings and Fast Busy
by Ing. Marco Moran 05 Mar '07

05 Mar '07

Hi, I am having an issue when I call or someone calls among the registered users, SER only gives 4 rings to answer before it gives a fast-busy. Any suggestions? Thanks, Marco -----Mensaje original----- De: serusers-bounces(a)lists.iptel.org [mailto:serusers-bounces@lists.iptel.org] En nombre de serusers-request(a)lists.iptel.org Enviado el: Monday, March 05, 2007 3:40 AM Para: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org Asunto: Serusers Digest, Vol 47, Issue 5 Send Serusers mailing list submissions to serusers(a)lists.iptel.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to serusers-request(a)lists.iptel.org You can reach the person managing the list at serusers-owner(a)lists.iptel.org When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of Serusers digest..." Today's Topics: 1. Re: SIP SER (Greger V. Teigre) 2. Re: ask for ser performance parameters (Greger V. Teigre) 3. Re: test run (Greger V. Teigre) 4. Re: PATH Module in SER (0.9.6 or 0.10.x) (Greger V. Teigre) 5. Re: Problems creating DB in SER Ottendorf (Greger V. Teigre) 6. Re: speeddial - CANCEL MESSAGE ERROR (Greger V. Teigre) 7. Re: Error compiling eval module (Greger V. Teigre) 8. Re: Error Message (Greger V. Teigre) 9. RE: SIP SER (Goh, Tee-Yong) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Message: 1 Date: Mon, 05 Mar 2007 08:02:52 +0100 From: "Greger V. Teigre" <greger(a)teigre.com> Subject: Re: [Serusers] SIP SER To: "Goh, Tee-Yong" <gohty(a)m1.com.sg> Cc: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org Message-ID: <45EBC09C.7050800(a)teigre.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" You can do that using exec command from ser.cfg when you receive a REGISTER. Use sipp or the internal SER stack to create new messages (see faqs on iptel.org) Or http://iptel.org/sems if you want to do it in a better way. g-) Goh, Tee-Yong wrote: > Hi Karim, > > Thank you for your advice. Noted your advice. > > Yes. My objective here is once the SER receives a REGISTER message > from one of the client, it will auto generate "INVITE" messages to the > clients. > > I am using the ser-0.9.6. I have looked through the coding as such > > /ser-0.9.6/modules/nathelper/nathelper.c > /ser-0.9.6/modules/nathelper/nathelper.cfg > /ser-0.9.6/modules/nathelper/nathelper_rrtpp.cfg > /ser-0.9.6/modules/registrar/save.c > /ser-0.9.6/modules/registrar/reply.c > /ser-0.9.6/modules/registrar/sip_msg.c > > Anyone knows where can i find the portion where once the SER receives > the REGISTER message, it responds with 200 OK to the client? Can i > find them inside nathelper or registrar or paser? > > Apologies if any inconvenience caused. > > Thank you. > > Regards, > Tee Yong > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > *From:* karim basraoui [mailto:basraouik@gmail.com] > *Sent:* Sat 3/3/2007 8:36 PM > *To:* Goh, Tee-Yong > *Cc:* serusers(a)lists.iptel.org > *Subject:* Re: [Serusers] SIP SER > > Well, first of all a SER server does not generate messages it only > interprets the messages it receives. so it can not generate INVITE > messages. so if you want to call several clients from one client, this > one has to initiate the call by sending an INVITE to SER. > > When receiving the INVITE message, SER will forward it to the callees. > i did not try this yet, but i think that you can do this with the > method : "forward" as follows: > > if(method == INVITE) { > forward("callee1_IP_address","callee1_port"); > forward("callee2_IP_address","callee2_port"); > forward("callee3_IP_address","callee3_port"); > #and so on ... > } > > try this for example... and let me know if it works or not. > > ps: (personnally i think it won't work :p) > > 2007/3/3, Goh, Tee-Yong < gohty(a)m1.com.sg <mailto:gohty@m1.com.sg>>: > > Hi Karim, > > Yes you are right. > Please advice. > > Thank you. > > Regards, > Howard > > -----Original Message----- > *From:* karim basraoui [mailto:basraouik@gmail.com > <mailto:basraouik@gmail.com>] > *Sent:* Saturday, March 03, 2007 8:01 PM > *To:* Goh, Tee-Yong > *Cc:* serusers(a)lists.iptel.org <mailto:serusers@lists.iptel.org> > *Subject:* Re: [Serusers] SIP SER > > So if i understand, when a clint registers, SER will > automatically send invites to the other clients and make > connections with them? > > 2007/3/3, Goh, Tee-Yong < gohty(a)m1.com.sg > <mailto:gohty@m1.com.sg>>: > > Dear Karim, > > Thank you for your reply. > > Yes you are right. I have having difficulty searching for > this for past 2 months. > > Yes. Here is what i want. Once i receive the REGISTER > messages, my SER will send out "INVITE" message to my > other clients. This is what i am intended to do. However, > i could not search for the right coding inside the ser-0.9.6. > > Please advice and apologies if any inconvenience caused > for you. > > Thanks. > > Regards, > Howard > > -----Original Message----- > *From:* karim basraoui [mailto:basraouik@gmail.com > <mailto:basraouik@gmail.com>] > *Sent:* Saturday, March 03, 2007 7:18 PM > *To:* Goh, Tee-Yong > *Subject:* Re: [Serusers] SIP SER > > Hi, > > Do you want to make changes on SER behaviour when it > receives REGISTER messages. If it's the case you can > make a condition in the "ser.cfg" file, in the bloc > "route{ ... }". for example: > route { > if (method == "REGISTER") > { #what you want to do}; > } > > > 2007/3/3, Goh, Tee-Yong <gohty(a)m1.com.sg > <mailto:gohty@m1.com.sg>>: > > Hi, > > May i know from the SER-0.9.6, where can i look > for and make changes for the SER when receiving > "REGISTER" message and responsing " 200 OK" back > to the corresponding node or clients? > > Would appreciate your assistance and advice as > soon as possible as i have difficultly locating > the coding. Please advice where i can find the > script to edit the above mentioned messages. > > Apologies for the inconvenience caused. > > Thank you. > > Regards, > Howard > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > This email (including any attachment) is subject > to the following disclaimer: > http://m1.com.sg/M1/misc/disclaimer > <http://m1.com.sg/M1/misc/disclaimer> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > Serusers mailing list > Serusers(a)lists.iptel.org > <mailto:Serusers@lists.iptel.org> > http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers > > > > > -- > BASRAOUI Karim > www.basraouik.afrikart.net > <http://www.basraouik.afrikart.net> > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > This email (including any attachment) is subject to the > following disclaimer: http://m1.com.sg/M1/misc/disclaimer > <http://m1.com.sg/M1/misc/disclaimer> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > > > -- > BASRAOUI Karim > www.basraouik.afrikart.net <http://www.basraouik.afrikart.net> > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > This email (including any attachment) is subject to the following > disclaimer: http://m1.com.sg/M1/misc/disclaimer > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > > > -- > BASRAOUI Karim > www.basraouik.afrikart.net <http://www.basraouik.afrikart.net> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > This email (including any attachment) is subject to the following > disclaimer: http://m1.com.sg/M1/misc/disclaimer > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > Serusers mailing list > Serusers(a)lists.iptel.org > http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers >

1 0

[Users] avp_check and AVP's with index's?
by Brandon Armstead 05 Mar '07

05 Mar '07

Hello, Can I simply do something like so? if(avp_check("$avp(i:1[1])", "eq/s:5/g")) { # true } else { # false } ?? I seem to get an error when I try to check the value against an AVP with index's, is there an easier way then copying the index's value into a full AVP, can't I just use the index's like normal AVP's? Thanks, all help is appreciated! -- Brandon Armstead

2 1

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

sr-users March 2007