sr-users December 2007

sr-users@lists.kamailio.org

130 participants
234 discussions

[OpenSER-Users] need Help in TLS Problem in openser 1.3 Black CAT

by raviprakash sunkara

Hello Users Merry XMAS Resently I installed and Configure the openser 1.3 with TLS Support in FC6 with openSSL 0.9.8b Am Trying implementing the TLS of my OpenSER proxy First I trying TLS for Registering to My OpenSER Proxy Server. The Certificatation am using the default while in installing the openser 1.3 Am using eyebeam 1.5 with TLS. on the Screen am getting 503 service unavilable I don't know what happening in Server side. Please Help in this . -- Thanks &Regards Ravi Prakash Sunkara VoIP Development Tech Lead.

17 years

[OpenSER-Users] error_route not working

by Jayesh Nambiar

Hi All, I am using openser 1.3. Yesterday I added the error_route in my script to handle the parsing errors. But I see that the script logic is not going into error_route and I still see the message log filled up with messages like below: INFO:core:parse_first_line: bad message Dec 19 08:02:17 sw1 /usr/local/sbin/openser[26964]: ERROR:core:parse_msg: message=<INVITE sip:61: 394086416(a)207.251.84.106 SIP/2.0 If the error route is present in the script should'nt the script go to the error route in the case like above? My error_route is as follows: error_route { xlog("--- error route class=$(err.class) level=$(err.level) info=$(err.info) rcode=$(err.rcode) rreason=$(err.rreason) ---\n"); xlog("--- error from [$si:$sp]\n+++++\n$mb\n++++\n"); sl_send_reply("$err.rcode", "$err.rreason"); exit; } Can somebody give me some pointers on why error_route is not working in this case or am I missing something. Thanks in advance w/regards, Jayesh Save all your chat conversations. Find them online at http://in.messenger.yahoo.com/webmessengerpromo.php

17 years

[Serusers] nat problem

by Pezhman Lali

Dear I have a lot of problems with nat and registering, for example, grandstream does not work with a lot of internet providers, also linksys and ... sometimes the sip phone was registered, but the call is one way or no way. please help me, if my config has problem. Best Mani listen=1.1.1.1 debug=0 # debug level (cmd line: -dddddddddd) fork=yes log_stderror=no # (cmd line: -E) log_facility=LOG_LOCAL5 check_via=no # (cmd. line: -v) dns=no # (cmd. line: -r) rev_dns=no # (cmd. line: -R) port=5060 children=4 fifo="/tmp/ser_fifo" fifo_db_url="postgres://postgres:mypass@localhost:5432/test" alias="xxx.com" alias="xxx.com" alias="xxx.com" alias="xxx.com" alias="xxx.com" sip_warning=yes # ------------------ module loading ---------------------------------- loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/postgres.so" loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/sl.so" loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/tm.so" loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/acc.so" loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/rr.so" loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/maxfwd.so" loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/usrloc.so" loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/registrar.so" loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/nathelper.so" loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/textops.so" loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/auth.so" loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/auth_db.so" loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/xlog.so" loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/uri.so" # ----------------- setting module-specific parameters --------------- # -- usrloc params -- #modparam("acc", "log_level", 1) #modparam("acc", "log_flag", 1) modparam("acc", "db_url", "postgres://postgres:mypass@localhost:5432/test") modparam("acc", "db_missed_flag", 2) modparam("acc", "db_flag", 1) #modparam("acc", "radius_config", "/usr/local/etc/radiusclient-ng/radiusclient.conf") modparam("usrloc", "db_mode", 1) modparam("usrloc", "user_column", "user_id") modparam("usrloc", "db_url", "postgres://postgres:mypass@localhost:5432/test") # Uncomment this if you want to use SQL database # for persistent storage and comment the previous line #modparam("usrloc", "db_mode", 2) modparam("auth_db", "use_domain", 0) modparam("auth_db", "calculate_ha1", 1) modparam("auth_db", "user_column", "user_id") modparam("auth_db", "password_column", "password") modparam("auth_db", "db_url", "postgres://postgres:mypass@localhost:5432/test") # -- rr params -- # add value to ;lr param to make some broken UAs happy modparam("rr", "enable_full_lr", 1) modparam("rr", "enable_double_rr", 0) modparam("registrar", "nat_flag", 6) modparam("registrar", "use_domain", 0) modparam("usrloc", "use_domain", 0) modparam("nathelper", "natping_interval", 30) # Ping interval 30 s modparam("nathelper", "ping_nated_only", 1) # Ping only clients behind NAT modparam("nathelper", "rtpproxy_sock","unix:/var/run/rtpproxy.sock") # ------------------------- request routing logic ------------------- # main routing logic route{ # initial sanity checks -- messages with # max_forwards==0, or excessively long requests if (!mf_process_maxfwd_header("10")) { sl_send_reply("483","Too Many Hops"); break; }; if (msg:len >= 2048 ) { sl_send_reply("513", "Message too big"); break; }; if (method=="INVITE" || method=="BYE" || method=="ACK") { setflag(1); }; # !! Nathelper # Special handling for NATed clients; first, NAT test is # executed: it looks for via!=received and RFC1918 addresses # in Contact (may fail if line-folding is used); also, # the received test should, if completed, should check all # vias for rpesence of received if (nat_uac_test("3")) { # Allow RR-ed requests, as these may indicate that # a NAT-enabled proxy takes care of it; unless it is # a REGISTER if (method == "REGISTER" || ! search("^Record-Route:")) { log("LOG: Someone trying to register from private IP, rewriting\n"); # This will work only for user agents that support symmetric # communication. We tested quite many of them and majority is # smart enough to be symmetric. In some phones it takes a configuration # option. With Cisco 7960, it is called NAT_Enable=Yes, with kphone it is # called "symmetric media" and "symmetric signalling". fix_nated_contact(); # Rewrite contact with source IP of signalling if (method == "INVITE") { fix_nated_sdp("1"); # Add direction=active to SDP }; force_rport(); # Add rport parameter to topmost Via setflag(6); # Mark as NATed }; }; # we record-route all messages -- to make sure that # subsequent messages will go through our proxy; that's # particularly good if upstream and downstream entities # use different transport protocol if (!method=="REGISTER") record_route(); # subsequent messages withing a dialog should take the # path determined by record-routing if (loose_route()) { # mark routing logic in request append_hf("P-hint: rr-enforced\r\n"); route(1); break; }; if (!uri==myself) { append_hf("P-hint: outbound\r\n"); route(1); break; }; if (method == "INVITE") { # if (!lookup("location")) { # xlog("L_ERR","%Tf: Rejecting %ru From %fu To %tu \n"); # sl_send_reply("404", "Not Registered"); # break; # }; if (!uri =~ "sip:43[0-9]{6}@*") { log(1, "Forwarding to Asterisk\n"); forward(2.2.2.2,5060); break; } } # if the request is for other domain use UsrLoc # (in case, it does not work, use the following command # with proper names and addresses in it) if (uri==myself) { if (method=="REGISTER") { if (!www_authorize("xxx.com", "subscriber")) { www_challenge("xxx.com", "0"); break; }; save("location"); break; }; lookup("aliases"); if (!lookup("location")) { sl_send_reply("404", "Not Found"); #acc_db_request("404 missed call", "missed_calls"); break; }; setflag(2); }; append_hf("P-hint: usrloc applied\r\n"); route(1); } route[1] { if (uri=~"[@:](192\.168\.|10\.|172\.(1[6-9]|2[0-9]|3[0-1])\.)" && !search("^Route:")){ sl_send_reply("479", "We don't forward to private IP addresses"); break; }; # if client or server know to be behind a NAT, enable relay if (isflagset(6)) { force_rtp_proxy(); }; # NAT processing of replies; apply to all transactions (for example, # re-INVITEs from public to private UA are hard to identify as # NATed at the moment of request processing); look at replies t_on_reply("1"); # send it out now; use stateful forwarding as it works reliably # even for UDP2TCP if (!t_relay()) { sl_reply_error(); }; } onreply_route[1] { # NATed transaction ? if (isflagset(6) && status =~ "(183)|2[0-9][0-9]") { fix_nated_contact(); force_rtp_proxy(); # otherwise, is it a transaction behind a NAT and we did not # know at time of request processing ? (RFC1918 contacts) } else if (nat_uac_test("1")) { fix_nated_contact(); }; } ____________________________________________________________________________________ Never miss a thing. Make Yahoo your home page. http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs

17 years

[Serusers] multi-domain support solution

by satish patel

Dear all I have solve my multidomain configuration with ser-0.9.6 and it is working fine for me and i am sending you my configuration for incomming users whos want do some stuff wid ser i have find many document on multi-support and i have consolidate all document and make my ser.cfg script or config cat /usr/local/etc/ser/ser.cfg # # $Id: ser.cfg,v 1.21.4.1 2003/11/10 15:35:15 andrei Exp $ # # simple quick-start config script # # ----------- global configuration parameters ------------------------ #debug=7 # debug level (cmd line: -dddddddddd) #fork=yes #log_stderror=yes # (cmd line: -E) /* Uncomment these lines to enter debugging mode debug=7 fork=no log_stderror=yes */ check_via=no # (cmd. line: -v) dns=no # (cmd. line: -r) rev_dns=no # (cmd. line: -R) listen=192.168.104.20 port=5060 #children=4 fifo="/tmp/ser_fifo" # ------------------ module loading ---------------------------------- # Uncomment this if you want to use SQL database loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/mysql.so" loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/domain.so" loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/sl.so" loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/tm.so" loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/rr.so" loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/maxfwd.so" loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/usrloc.so" loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/registrar.so" #loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/call.so" #loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/vm.so" # Uncomment this if you want digest authentication # mysql.so must be loaded ! loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/auth.so" loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/auth_db.so" # ----------------- setting module-specific parameters --------------- # -- usrloc params -- #modparam("usrloc", "db_mode", 0) # Uncomment this if you want to use SQL database # for persistent storage and comment the previous line modparam("usrloc", "db_mode", 0) # -- auth params -- # Uncomment if you are using auth module # modparam("auth_db", "calculate_ha1", yes) # # If you set "calculate_ha1" parameter to yes (which true in this config), # uncomment also the following parameter) modparam("auth_db", "password_column", "password") # -- rr params -- # add value to ;lr param to make some broken UAs happy modparam("rr", "enable_full_lr", 1) modparam("domain", "db_url", "mysql://root:mypasswd@localhost/ser") modparam("domain", "db_mode", 1) # Use chaching modparam("domain", "domain_table", "domain") modparam("domain", "domain_col", "domain") modparam("usrloc|registrar|auth_db|avpops|group", "use_domain", 1) #modparam("usrloc", "use_domain", 1) #modparam("registrar", "use_domain", 1) # ------------------------- request routing logic ------------------- # main routing logic route{ # initial sanity checks -- messages with # max_forwards==0, or excessively long requests if (!mf_process_maxfwd_header("10")) { sl_send_reply("483","Too Many Hops"); break; }; if ( msg:len > max_len ) { sl_send_reply("513", "Message too big"); break; }; # we record-route all messages -- to make sure that # subsequent messages will go through our proxy; that's # particularly good if upstream and downstream entities # use different transport protocol record_route(); # loose-route processing if (loose_route()) { t_relay(); break; }; # if the request is for other domain use UsrLoc # (in case, it does not work, use the following command # with proper names and addresses in it) #-----------Multi-domain Logic work blow in stanza--------# if (is_from_local()) { if (method=="REGISTER") { # Uncomment this if you want to use digest authentication if (!www_authorize("", "subscriber")) { www_challenge("", "0"); break; }; save("location"); break; save("aliases"); break; }; #----Alias check--- # lookup("aliases"); # if (!uri==myself) { # route(1); # break; # }; # native SIP destinations are handled using our USRLOC DB if (!lookup("location")) { sl_send_reply("404", "Not Found"); break; }; }; # forward to current uri now; use stateful forwarding; that # works reliably even if we forward from TCP to UDP if (!t_relay()) { sl_reply_error(); }; } #-----END---# Now to test configuration start ser #serctl start #serctl domain add abc.com #serctl add 222(a)abc.com tulip 222(a)abc.com #serctl add 333(a)abc.com tulip 333(a)abc.com this to user 222 and 333 for domain abc.com **Notes:- you should configure SRV recode on your DNS otherwise it will not work for you NOW configure your Xlite and try to call each other Then try to add new domain and do same thing which u have done before abc.com Thanks and Best of Luck $ cat ~/satish/url.txt http://www.linuxbug.org _____________________________________________________________________________________________________ --------------------------------- Meet people who discuss and share your passions. Join them now.

17 years

[Serusers] Fwd: Newbie Problems: ser.cfg

by frq ser

---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: frq ser <frq.ser(a)googlemail.com> Date: Dec 18, 2007 11:32 PM Subject: Newbie Problems: ser.cfg To: serusers(a)iptel.org Hi, I am trying to understand the process flow in the following ser.cfg file, which controls a SER proxy server at root@ip.address:5060. I have added "log()" command at almost every step to see how things proceed. The problem is that when I generate an OPTIONS message through SIPSAK (sipsak -T -vv -s sip:root@ip.address:5060), the process branches from route(0) to route(3), sends a message (200 Message received, probably from Sipsak), then comes back to route(0), completes this route, and then loops back to start of route(0) (as evident from the last log message "Inside main route..."). This is despite the "break" command in the main route block. Here's the output of the SER: [root@drone08 ~]# ser Listening on udp: 192.168.3.208 [192.168.3.208]:5060 tcp: 192.168.3.208 [192.168.3.208]:5060 Aliases: tcp: 192.168.3.208:5060 udp: 192.168.3.208:5060 WARNING: no fork mode stateless - initializing 0(0) Maxfwd module- initializing 0(0) INFO: udp_init: SO_RCVBUF is initially 107520 0(0) INFO: udp_init: SO_RCVBUF is finally 262142 2(0) INFO: fifo process starting: 5116 2(0) SER: open_uac_fifo: fifo server up at /tmp/ser_fifo... 2(0) WARNING: no fifo_db_url given - fifo DB commands disabled! 0(5114) Inside the main route.... 0(5114) Inside the main route.... 0(5114) just passed the sanity checks... 0(5114) inside method-register... 0(5114) inside method-options... 0(5114) Inside route3... 0(5114) End of route3... 0(5114) just past redir-route3.. 0(5114) Inside the main route.... The corresponding SIPSAK output is: C:\..Sipsak>sipsak -v -T -s sip:root@192.168.3.208:5060 warning: IP extract from warning activated to be more informational 0: 192.168.3.208 (0.000 ms) SIP/2.0 483 Too Many Hops 1: 192.168.3.208 (0.000 ms) SIP/2.0 201 Options message received, probably from Sipsak without Contact header On the other hand, when I send an INVITE message, this problem doesn't happen. The process completes the main route and doesn't loop back (ie I don't get the "Inside the main route..." message). [root@drone08 ~]# ser Listening on udp: 192.168.3.208 [192.168.3.208]:5060 tcp: 192.168.3.208 [192.168.3.208]:5060 Aliases: tcp: 192.168.3.208:5060 udp: 192.168.3.208:5060 WARNING: no fork mode stateless - initializing 0(0) Maxfwd module- initializing 0(0) INFO: udp_init: SO_RCVBUF is initially 107520 0(0) INFO: udp_init: SO_RCVBUF is finally 262142 2(0) INFO: fifo process starting: 4860 2(0) SER: open_uac_fifo: fifo server up at /tmp/ser_fifo... 2(0) WARNING: no fifo_db_url given - fifo DB commands disabled! 0(4858) Inside the main route.... 0(4858) just passed the sanity checks... 0(4858) inside method-register... 0(4858) outside methods-options... 0(4858) inside lookup-location... All I want to know is that when I send an OPTIONS msg, why the process doesn't terminate at the break command in the (if (method == "OPTIONS")) in the main route. Although it is not a critical problem, I just want to improve my understanding. I'll be glad if any of you could help. Fr. PS: The config file (ser.cfg) is given below: # $Id: hello-world.cfg 46 2006-01-25 04:21:30Z /CN=Paul Hazlett/emailAddress=paul(a)onsip.org $ debug=3 fork=no log_stderror=yes listen= 192.168.3.208 #2.13 port=5060 children=4 dns=no rev_dns=no fifo="/tmp/ser_fifo" loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/sl.so" loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/tm.so" loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/rr.so" loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/maxfwd.so" loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/usrloc.so" loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/registrar.so" # chg_rsf dec07 #loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/textops.so" #loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/avpops.so" modparam("usrloc", "db_mode", 0) modparam("rr", "enable_full_lr", 1) #modparam("tm", "pass_provisional_replies", 1) route { log(1, "Inside the main route....\n"); # ------------------------------------------------------------------------ # Sanity Check Section # ------------------------------------------------------------------------ if (!mf_process_maxfwd_header("10")) { sl_send_reply("483", "Too Many Hops"); break; }; if (msg:len > max_len) { sl_send_reply("513", "Message Overflow"); break; }; log(3, "just passed the sanity checks...\n"); # ------------------------------------------------------------------------ # Record Route Section # ------------------------------------------------------------------------ if (method!="REGISTER") { record_route(); log(3, "inside method-register...\n"); }; # ------------------------------------------------------------------------ # Loose Route Section # ------------------------------------------------------------------------ if (loose_route()) { log(3, "inside loose route...\n"); route(1); break; }; # ------------------------------------------------------------------------ # Call Type Processing Section # ------------------------------------------------------------------------ if (uri!=myself) { log(3, "inside uri-myself...\n"); route(1); break; }; if (method=="ACK") { log(3, "inside method-ack...\n"); route(1); break; } else if (method=="REGISTER") { log(3, "inside method-register...\n"); route(2); break; }; if (method=="OPTIONS"){ log(3, "inside method-options...\n"); route(3); log(3, "just past redir-route3..\n"); break; log(3, "just past break...\n"); }; log(3, "outside methods-options...\n"); lookup("aliases"); if (uri!=myself) { log(3, "inside uri-myself 2....\n"); route(1); break; }; if (!lookup("location")) { log(3, "inside lookup-location...\n"); sl_send_reply("404", "User Not Found"); break; }; route(1); } route[1] { # ------------------------------------------------------------------------ # Default Message Handler # ------------------------------------------------------------------------ log(3, "Inside route1...\n"); if (!t_relay()) { sl_reply_error(); }; } route[2] { # ------------------------------------------------------------------------ # REGISTER Message Handler # ------------------------------------------------------------------------ log(3, "Inside route2...\n"); if (!save("location")) { #sl_reply_error(); sl_send_reply("201", "Register message received at Proxy Server"); }; } route[3]{ # ----------------------------------------------------------------------- # OPTIONS Message Handler # ----------------------------------------------------------------------- log(3, "Inside route3...\n"); if (!t_relay()){ sl_reply_error(); }; sl_send_reply("201", "Options message received, probably from Sipsak"); #forward(192.168.3.208, 5070); log(3, "End of route3...\n"); #t_release(); }

17 years

[OpenSER-Users] Exposing the NIC IP's in openser.cfg

by Robert Dyck

I have been using openser as an ALG for the purpose of NAT traversal. Unfortunately my public IP is dynamically assigned. Although openser is aware of the IP's available on the host, I have searched unsuccessfully the documentation for a way to expose this information to the configuration script. Have I missed something? I am using the following ugly work around. DHCP client writes to /var/openser/my-ip From the rtpproxy init script - OPTIONS="-l 192.168.1.1/`cat /var/openser/my_ip` -s udp:localhost:12221" from openser.cfg - route{ # get our public ip, this happens only once if !$var(ip_initialized) == "yes" { xlog("L_NOTICE", "****************************************************\n"); xlog("L_NOTICE", "*** Initializing the IP for masquerading SIP Contact\n"); exec_avp("cat /var/openser/my_ip", "$avp(s:pub_ip)"); pv_printf("$var(my_ip)", "$avp(s:pub_ip)"); xlog("L_NOTICE", "*** New public IP is <$var(my_ip)>\n"); $var(ip_initialized) = "yes"; }; mangle contacts

17 years

[OpenSER-Users] newbie help - handeling 302s and 404s

by Lazer Ramm

Hi, i need a simple config that achieves the following (w/ out a db) if a user is not registered then all calls should go to a default gw 192.168.10.1 the default gw will only respond w/ a 302 or a 404 if a 302 is received then openser should forward the call on to the new gw listed in the reply if a 404 is received the call should be forwarded to a different gw 172.16.20.1 if the send gw is done then the call should die. here is what i was thinking of but as a newbie i may be off my rocker i seem to get an error ERROR: t_check_status: cannot check status for a reply which has no T-state established but again my whole approach may be wrong. if (!lookup("location")) { rewritehostport ("192.168.10.1:5060"); if (t_check_status("(404)|(480)")) { log("404 or 480 negative reply\n"); rewritehostport ("172.16.20.1:5060"); } else{ t_on_failure("1"); t_relay(); } failure_route[1] { get_redirects("*"); t_relay(); } } thanx in advance

17 years

Re: [OpenSER-Users] Want to know about configuring openser as strict router

by Vikas CG.

Hi, Thanks for the information, Actually we were looking to some server which can acts as a strict router. Can u suggest regarding this? Thanks, Vikas C.G. -----Original Message----- From: Klaus Darilion [mailto:klaus.mailinglists@pernau.at] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2007 7:59 PM To: Vikas CG. Cc: users(a)openser.org Subject: Re: [OpenSER-Users] Want to know about configuring openser as strict router Hi! Openser is a loose-router. This means that the inserted Record-Route header do have the ;lr parameter. Thus, other SIP clients know that openser is a looserouter and weill send messages in loose-router syntax. On the other hand, openser checks if the next route header and/or the RURI contains the ;lr parameter to make conversion from/to strict-router syntax. Thus, depending on if the previous and next hops are strict or loose routers, openser will do the conversion (by using the loose_route() function). regards klaus Vikas CG. schrieb: > Hi all, > > > > We are using openser server for testing. Can we configure it as > strict router? > > I have tried making changes in configuration file by enabling Record > Route. > I want to know whether the openser will strictly acts as "Strict Router" > I.e. performing actions like modifying Request URI and last route header. > Can any body suggest me? > > > > Thanks in advance , > Vikas C.G. > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > Users mailing list > Users(a)lists.openser.org > http://lists.openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users

17 years

[OpenSER-Users] OpenSER: AVP script flag bugs in 1.3 and trunk

by Helmut Kuper

Hello, in openser 1.3 and current trunk the AVP script flags still not work as expected. So here again the fixes I did to solve that problems in 1.3 and trunk: ... Hi again, further tests with avp and script_flags raised new problems. When I write resp. set an AVP like "$avp(i1:10)=10; $avp(i2:10)=20;" and checking them with "xlog('L_INFO', 'avp(i1:10) avp(i1:20)\n');" it leads to "20 20" as output. In file pvar.c in function pv_get_avp_name() I had to replace *name_type = 0; with *name_type = ip->pvn.u.isname.type; Then that worked. - -.- Additionally I fixed the Alias-Duplicate Problem when you do something like avp_aliases("A=i1:10; B=i2:20"); In file usr_avp.c I had to change line 427 in function check_avp_galias() from type &= AVP_NAME_STR; to type &= (AVP_NAME_STR|AVP_SCRIPT_MASK); - -.- Then at last, if u want assign a value to an AVP-Alias which uses script flags replace in file usr_avp.c in function add_avp_galias() around line 482 the line ga->avp.type = type&AVP_NAME_STR; with ga->avp.type = type&(AVP_NAME_STR|AVP_SCRIPT_MASK); regards Helmut

17 years

[OpenSER-Users] Want to know about configuring openser as strict router

by Vikas CG.

Hi all, We are using openser server for testing. Can we configure it as strict router? I have tried making changes in configuration file by enabling Record Route. I want to know whether the openser will strictly acts as "Strict Router" I.e. performing actions like modifying Request URI and last route header. Can any body suggest me? Thanks in advance , Vikas C.G.

17 years

← Newer
1
...
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
...
24
Older →

Jump to page:

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

sr-users December 2007