sr-users November 2007

sr-users@lists.kamailio.org

138 participants
249 discussions

Re: [Serusers] Linux version -information request-
by Jiri Kuthan 21 Nov '07

21 Nov '07

Almost any unless you have a real historical one -- debian, RH, gentoo, etc, ideally with 2.6 kernel. -jiri At 21:04 21/11/2007, Mary Allen (mrallen) wrote: >Content-class: urn:content-classes:message >Content-Type: multipart/alternative; > boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C82C79.91616C64" > >Hi, > >I need to install the SERi proxy. Would you please let me know what version of Linux should I put in my system before the installation of SERi? > >Thanks, >Mary >_______________________________________________ >Serusers mailing list >Serusers(a)lists.iptel.org >http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers -- Jiri Kuthan http://iptel.org/~jiri/

1 0

[Serusers] Linux version -information request-
by Mary Allen (mrallen) 21 Nov '07

21 Nov '07

Hi, I need to install the SERi proxy. Would you please let me know what version of Linux should I put in my system before the installation of SERi? Thanks, Mary

1 0

[OpenSER-Users] [OT] Looking for a good SIP PBX
by Iñaki Baz Castillo 21 Nov '07

21 Nov '07

Hi, first of all I'm sorry for this OffTopic. I'm looking for a good SIP PBX since Asterisk SIP implementation doesn't let me using it in a multidomain SIP enviroment properly with OpenSer ("From" domain not respected when generates a SIP channel, no good behaviour in parallel forking, etc). I can use it just as media server for now. So I'm looking for other SIP PBX server. One I've in mind is, of course, WeSIP, but I'd like to know if any of you has good experiences integrating other PBX's as FreeSwitch or SipX/SipFoundry. If possible, it would be really great a SIP PBX with virtual domains support, so the PBX logic for independent SIP domains would exist in the same server/PBX (less and easy maintenance). The aim of this PBX is to allow SIP incoming calls and during the execution of the dialplan maybe call to that domain users (registered in a multidomain main OpenSer). Please, any opinion or experience about it with some of those PBX's? I'm going now to install and try of all them, but some help would be really appreciated. Thanks a lot. Regards. -- Iñaki Baz Castillo ibc(a)in.ilimit.es

3 2

Re: [Serusers] Implicit Registration Set
by Jiri Kuthan 21 Nov '07

21 Nov '07

well it depends -- doing what you are suggesting literally is quite tricky and I'm not sure this IMS feature is worth the effort. IF you would like to register and be then available under all of your aliases (both "that address" and "his tel-uri"), you can easily use aliases. -jiri At 14:52 15/11/2007, Magnus Sörman wrote: >Content-class: urn:content-classes:message >Content-Type: multipart/alternative; > boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C8278E.D8F42EB4" > >Hi, > >How do you/could you configure SER to use implicit registration set? >If e.g. a user with a sip URI registers, then both that address and his tel-uri should be registered. > >Thanks, > /Magnus Sorman >_______________________________________________ >Serusers mailing list >Serusers(a)lists.iptel.org >http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers -- Jiri Kuthan http://iptel.org/~jiri/

2 1

[Serusers] November 79% OFF
by Canadian Doctor Damon Herrera 21 Nov '07

21 Nov '07

Spam detection software, running on the system "mail.iptel.org", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Best Price for VIAGRA & CIALIS ONLINE, All Credit Cards Accepted, FREE DELIVERY http://www.foodenter.com [...] Content analysis details: (18.1 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.0 UNPARSEABLE_RELAY Informational: message has unparseable relay lines 2.7 DRUG_ED_ONLINE BODY: Fast Viagra Delivery 0.5 DRUG_ED_CAPS BODY: Mentions an E.D. drug 3.5 BAYES_99 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 99 to 100% [score: 0.9999] 1.6 URIBL_SBL Contains an URL listed in the SBL blocklist [URIs: foodenter.com] 4.1 URIBL_JP_SURBL Contains an URL listed in the JP SURBL blocklist [URIs: foodenter.com] 2.1 URIBL_WS_SURBL Contains an URL listed in the WS SURBL blocklist [URIs: foodenter.com] 3.0 URIBL_OB_SURBL Contains an URL listed in the OB SURBL blocklist [URIs: foodenter.com] 0.5 DRUGS_ERECTILE Refers to an erectile drug

1 0

[Serusers] Another alternative for handling RTP packets
by Carlos Loarca 20 Nov '07

20 Nov '07

Hi everyone: I have been working with NATHELPER or MEDIAPROXY to handle audio and video calls. However I have got into the point that there should be another way to work Firewalls and NAT transversal rather than mediaproxies and rtp-proxies. I have heard about STUN servers with ICE support but never seen it working and I wonder if this works. And I dont know any server like this, and I know that the softphones or IPphones need to support it. If I dont want to force the audio or video to come to my server, what kind of solution is the most recommendable? Best regards, /Carlos ____________________________________________________________________________________ Never miss a thing. Make Yahoo your home page. http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs

2 1

Re: [OpenSER-Users] CPL serial call attempt
by Iñaki Baz Castillo 20 Nov '07

20 Nov '07

El Martes, 20 de Noviembre de 2007, Daniel Grotti escribió: > Hi Inaki, > Thank you for your help. > I've a question, does Serial Forking (with LCR) work well with NAT ? Sure, there is not difference. Just force RtpProxy (or MediaProxy) in each branch (when neccesary). -- Iñaki Baz Castillo

1 0

[OpenSER-Users] Openser 1.3 trunk: unix_sock
by Helmut Kuper 20 Nov '07

20 Nov '07

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi, after upgrading from openser 1.2 to 1.3 trunk the core commands unix_sock, sock_mode, sock_user, sock_group are missing. Does anybody know what happend to this commands ? regards helmut -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFHQuo/4tZeNddg3dwRAkx9AKCPRZKGfyOxbox73Asf+aaIgAWLnACfc/Uu IepPGsTGfNwJt2p1frTRSwM= =VFPA -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

2 3

[OpenSER-Users] Natping & register
by Stanisław Pitucha 20 Nov '07

20 Nov '07

Hey Is it possible to do with openser/nathelper what some other sip/nat gateways do? - for initial register, keep location, but pass registration packets upstream -> save("location", 0x02) - when there's a nat flag set, rewrite response to client with very low "Expire:" header - accept frequent register packets from client, but register on real server, when original expire time is reached It's basically natping done the other way - should be more stable, because when one natping doesn't reach the client, it's lost till next register / invite from that phone. With registers, phone tries to sent packets itself, so when one is lost, next one will reactivate nat anyway. Is there any module that does it now? Or does it need some avp & database hacking?

1 0

[OpenSER-Users] cpl-c module problems
by Aki Rehn 20 Nov '07

20 Nov '07

Hi, Im having some cpl-c module problems.. Both are related to time-switch. What it seems to me like is that bymonth parameter is parsed somehow wrong which then causes overflow. I added bit more debug and attr_name and attr_len seem to be completely off-the-track. (The actual line number of the overflow in cpl_switches.h is 763 because of the one line added.) Input: <time dtstart="20071101T090000" dtend="20171101T090000" byhour="7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20"> Output: openser[5160]: DEBUG:cpl_run_script: processing CPL node openser[5160]: DEBUG:cpl_run_script: processing time-switch node openser[5160]: DEBUG:cpl-c:run_time_switch: checking recv. time stamp <1195111240> openser[5160]: DEBUG:cpl-c:set_TZ: switching TZ as "TZ=Europe/Helsinki" openser[5160]: ---> fill = Thu Nov 15 09:20:40 2007 openser[5160]: DEBUG:cpl_c:testing, attr_name: [0], attr_len: [16] openser[5160]: DEBUG:cpl_c:run_time_node: attribute [0] found :[20071101T090000] openser[5160]: DEBUG:cpl_c:testing, attr_name: [1], attr_len: [16] openser[5160]: DEBUG:cpl_c:run_time_node: attribute [1] found :[20171101T090000] openser[5160]: DEBUG:cpl_c:testing, attr_name: [19], attr_len: [12592] openser[5160]: ERROR:cpl_c: overflow detected ip=0xb5a3c8ec ptr=0xb5a3fa6e in func. cpl_switches.h, line 764 openser[5160]: DEBUG:cpl-c:set_TZ: switching TZ as "TZ=" openser[5160]: ERROR:cpl_c:cpl_run_script: script error Second problem is the byhour attribute, which doesnt seem to be supported at all. Input: <time dtstart="20071101T090000" dtend="20171101T090000" byhour="7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20"> Output: openser[5162]: DEBUG:cpl_run_script: processing CPL node openser[5162]: DEBUG:cpl_run_script: processing time-switch node openser[5162]: DEBUG:cpl-c:run_time_switch: checking recv. time stamp <1195111623> openser[5162]: DEBUG:cpl-c:set_TZ: switching TZ as "TZ=Europe/Helsinki" openser[5162]: ---> fill = Thu Nov 15 09:27:03 2007 openser[5162]: DEBUG:cpl_c:testing, attr_name: [0], attr_len: [16] openser[5162]: DEBUG:cpl_c:run_time_node: attribute [0] found :[20071101T090000] openser[5162]: DEBUG:cpl_c:testing, attr_name: [1], attr_len: [16] openser[5162]: DEBUG:cpl_c:run_time_node: attribute [1] found :[20171101T090000] openser[5162]: DEBUG:cpl_c:testing, attr_name: [9], attr_len: [39] openser[5162]: DEBUG:cpl_c:run_time_node: attribute [9] found :[7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20] openser[5162]: ERROR:cpl_c:run_time_switch: unsupported attribute [9] found in TIME node openser[5162]: DEBUG:cpl-c:set_TZ: switching TZ as "TZ=" openser[5162]: ERROR:cpl_c:cpl_run_script: script error Br, Aki Rehn

2 2

← Newer
1
...
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
...
25
Older →

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

sr-users November 2007