sr-users November 2007

sr-users@lists.kamailio.org

138 participants
248 discussions

by Chris Heiser

So I'm playing with CPL, and I notice that the dbtext table isn't getting updated. Anyone seen this behavior before? I'm running 1.2.2-tls --Chris

16 years, 10 months

[OpenSER-Users] Reg. conditional processing of invite

by padmaja.rv＠vodcalabs.com

HiThanks for the reply, I however, do not know how to implement what you mentioned in your earlier mail. can you detail the steps? One of the openser users has suggested the following: ******************************************* if (is_method('INVITE')) { # check if from URI domain equals 911operator.com if ($fd == '911operator.com') { # relay stateless using request URI forward(); exit; } else { # relay statefull using request URI if (!t_relay()) { sl_reply_error(); }; exit; } } However, the function forward(); does not parse and gives error bad arguments. Can you suggest how to get this code working? I need it working asap. Thanks again, Padmaja Hi Padmaja, There is no other way around but just to implement a call back service on your proxy. Save in DB the last caller hitting the 911 service and when receiving the 8911, just load it and fwd to it. regards, bogdan Padmaja wrote: > Hi all, > > I have an issue, where the sip user dials 911 number and hangs up. The 911 > operator then calls back to the user using the call back command provided > earlier say 8911 (there is a b2bua that interprets the call back number and > routes the call to the specific user). This number is to be routed via the > openser proxy to the b2bua. However, when the 911 calls back, proxy treats > this number as a username and since there are no registrations to this 8911 > number (though this entry is present at the proxy, no device has registered > with this number), it sends back "404 Not found". How can this be > circumvented? > > Thanks, > Padmaja

16 years, 10 months

[OpenSER-Users] Drop reply

by Alex Hermann

Hello all, is it possible to completely drop a reply from failure_route? I know it is possible to change the reply with t_reply, but I need the possibility to send nothing back to the UAC. -- Greetings, Alex Hermann

16 years, 10 months

[OpenSER-Users] carrierroute Error

by Mark Baker

I am attempting to use carrierroute for the first time, and the problem that I am having is that when I attempt to place a call, I see the following in stderror: /usr/local/sbin/openser[32664]: New request - M=INVITE RURI= sip:1678XXXXXXX@domain.com F=sip:1404XXXXXXX@domain.com T= sip:1678XXXXXXX@domain.com IP=204.XXX.XXX.XXX ID=133DAB62-97D8-4A2C-8D68-BAA4EC4B310C(a)192.168.5.147 /usr/local/sbin/openser[32664]: Callee is not local - M=INVITE RURI= sip:1678XXXXXXX@domain.com F=sip:1404XXXXXXX@domain.com T= sip:1678XXXXXXX@domain.com IP=204.XXX.XXX.XXX ID=133DAB62-97D8-4A2C-8D68-BAA4EC4B310C(a)192.168.5.147 /usr/local/sbin/openser[32664]: Not normalized callee '1678XXXXXXX' to E.164format - M=INVITE RURI= sip:1678XXXXXXX@domain.com F=sip:1404XXXXXXX@domain.com T= sip:1678XXXXXXX@domain.com IP=204.XXX.XXX.XXX ID=133DAB62-97D8-4A2C-8D68-BAA4EC4B310C(a)192.168.5.147 /usr/local/sbin/openser[32664]: carrierroute:carrier_rewrite_msg: Domain too big. (We only have 5 domains, you wanted 0.) /usr/local/sbin/openser[32664]: Request leaving server, D-URI='<null>' - M=INVITE RURI=sip:1678XXXXXXX@domain.com F=sip:1404XXXXXXX@domain.com T= sip:1678XXXXXXX@domain.com IP=204.XXX.XXX.XXX ID=133DAB62-97D8-4A2C-8D68-BAA4EC4B310C(a)192.168.5.147 /usr/local/sbin/openser[32667]: New request - M=INVITE RURI= sip:1678XXXXXXX@domain.com F=sip:1404XXXXXXX@domain.com T= sip:1678XXXXXXX@domain.com IP=72.XXX.XXX.XXX ID=133DAB62-97D8-4A2C-8D68-BAA4EC4B310C(a)192.168.5.147 /usr/local/sbin/openser[32660]: NAT-Reply - S=100 D=Trying F= sip:1404XXXXXXX@domain.com T=sip:1678XXXXXXX@domain.com IP=72.XXX.XXX.XXX ID=133DAB62-97D8-4A2C-8D68-BAA4EC4B310C(a)192.168.5.147 /usr/local/sbin/openser[32667]: Proxy authentication failed - M=INVITE RURI= sip:1678XXXXXXX@domain.com F=sip:1404XXXXXXX@domain.com T= sip:1678XXXXXXX@domain.com IP=72.XXX.XXX.XXX ID=133DAB62-97D8-4A2C-8D68-BAA4EC4B310C(a)192.168.5.147 /usr/local/sbin/openser[32663]: NAT-Reply - S=407 D=Proxy Authentication Required F=sip:1404XXXXXXX@domain.com T=sip:1678XXXXXXX@domain.com IP= 72.XXX.XXX.XXX ID=133DAB62-97D8-4A2C-8D68-BAA4EC4B310C(a)192.168.5.147 /usr/local/sbin/openser[32663]: Failure route for PSTN entered - M=INVITE RURI=sip:1678XXXXXXX@domain.com F=sip:1404XXXXXXX@domain.com T= sip:1678XXXXXXX@domain.com IP=204.XXX.XXX.XXX ID=133DAB62-97D8-4A2C-8D68-BAA4EC4B310C(a)192.168.5.147 Thanks for any direction!!

16 years, 10 months

Re: [Serusers] Damaged message body

by Jiri Kuthan

At 10:55 02/11/2007, Stefan.Brozinski(a)materna.de wrote: >Hello everybody > >there is a bug in SER that removes the last byte from a message body if >this happens to be a binary zero. > >This may be the case when the Content-Type is something binary (i.e. >*not* using "Content-Type: text/something"). > >The bad code is in udp_server.c. It is present in SER 0.9.x a well as in >2.0. I have reported it in the bug tracker as SER-324 and attached a >comment which points out the bad section of the code. > >How shall I proceed to fix this bug? Ideally submit a patch to JIRA...http://tracker.iptel.org/browse/SER -jiri >Best regards >Stefan >_______________________________________________ >Serusers mailing list >Serusers(a)lists.iptel.org >http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers -- Jiri Kuthan http://iptel.org/~jiri/

16 years, 10 months

Re: [Serusers] R: R: R: Loadbalancing for interco

by Jiri Kuthan

At 18:48 12/11/2007, Stefano Capitanio wrote: >Yes, it seems really strange also to me. > >I've tried with both SER-0.9.6 and OpenSER-1.2.2 on a Gentoo-linux >And in both cases there is the same problem... > >Do you think that can be a problem of installation/compiling? >Have ever heard something like that? Not really :-( Calling forward can't change contacts -- perhaps you are mistakenly starting SER with other config file than you think? -jiri >-Stefano > >> -----Messaggio originale----- >> Da: Jiri Kuthan [mailto:jiri@iptel.org] >> Inviato: lunedì 12 novembre 2007 18.28 >> A: Stefano Capitanio; serusers(a)lists.iptel.org >> Oggetto: Re: [Serusers] R: R: Loadbalancing for interco >> >> I think there is some confusion here ... SER doesn't change contacts by >> the action referred to >> bellow. >> >> -jiri >> >> At 17:54 12/11/2007, Stefano Capitanio wrote: >> >It is the simplest ser.cfg you can imagine: >> > >> > Route { >> > forward(z.z.z.z,5060); >> > } >> > >> > >> >The message enter in SER (y.y.y.y) as: >> > >> > U x.x.x.x:5060 -> y.y.y.y:5060 >> > REGISTER sip:213.203.128.126 SIP/2.0. >> > Via: SIP/2.0/UDP >> x.x.x.x:5060;rport;branch=z9hG4bKFCDF5014775145F7BBFB33B621BC8BC0. >> > From: openser <sip:123456102@y.y.y.y>;tag=1540538748. >> > To: openser <sip:123456102@y.y.y.y>. >> > Contact: "openser" <sip:123456102@x.x.x.x:5060>. >> > Call-ID: 23FDB6F533AC4BCF840FD35F34B385FD(a)y.y.y.y. >> > CSeq: 60558 REGISTER. >> > Expires: 120. >> > Max-Forwards: 70. >> > User-Agent: X-Lite release 1103m. >> > Content-Length: 0. >> > >> >And goes out as: >> > >> > U y.y.y.y:5060 -> z.z.z.z:5060 >> > REGISTER sip:y.y.y.y SIP/2.0. >> > Via: SIP/2.0/UDP y.y.y.y:5060;branch=0. >> > Via: SIP/2.0/UDP >> 195.110.129.41:5060;rport=5060;branch=z9hG4bKFCDF5014775145F7BBFB33B621BC8 >> BC0. >> > From: openser <sip:123456102@y.y.y.y>;tag=1540538748. >> > To: openser <sip:123456102@y.y.y.y>. >> > Contact: "openser" <sip:123456102@y.y.y.y:5060>. >> > Call-ID: 23FDB6F533AC4BCF840FD35F34B385FD(a)y.y.y.y. >> > CSeq: 60558 REGISTER. >> > Expires: 120. >> > Max-Forwards: 70. >> > User-Agent: X-Lite release 1103m. >> > Content-Length: 0. >> > >> > >> > >> >> -----Messaggio originale----- >> >> Da: Jiri Kuthan [mailto:jiri@iptel.org] >> >> Inviato: lunedì 12 novembre 2007 17.41 >> >> A: Stefano Capitanio; serusers(a)lists.iptel.org >> >> Oggetto: Re: [Serusers] R: Loadbalancing for interco >> >> >> >> I haven't seen your config file, but normally it does not change >> Contacts. >> >> It changes contacts if it is configured to deal with NATs. >> >> >> >> -jiri >> >> >> >> At 17:20 12/11/2007, Stefano Capitanio wrote: >> >> >Ok, thanks for your answer, I understand your position. >> >> > >> >> >Anyway I cannot understand why SER modify the Contact header without >> any >> >> instruction about that in the config file...is there any reason >> concerning >> >> RFC compliance? >> >> > >> >> >Best regards, >> >> >Stefano >> >> > >> >> >> -----Messaggio originale----- >> >> >> Da: Jiri Kuthan [mailto:jiri@iptel.org] >> >> >> Inviato: lunedì 12 novembre 2007 17.09 >> >> >> A: Stefano Capitanio; serusers(a)lists.iptel.org >> >> >> Oggetto: Re: [Serusers] Loadbalancing for interco >> >> >> >> >> >> Well, load-balancing is not easy. To deal with issues like you are >> >> >> describing, >> >> >> your best choice is a load-balancer which is capable of working in >> >> >> transparent >> >> >> mode. We have such in our intelligence, some work, some less so, let >> me >> >> >> know >> >> >> if you need some intelligence on this. >> >> >> >> >> >> -jiri >> >> >> >> >> >> At 12:23 12/11/2007, Stefano Capitanio wrote: >> >> >> >Content-class: urn:content-classes:message >> >> >> >Content-Type: multipart/alternative; >> >> >> > boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C8251E.664EA61A" >> >> >> > >> >> >> >Hi, >> >> >> > >> >> >> >we are trying to do the same with our servers but we have some >> problem >> >> >> with registrations: >> >> >> >it seem that when the REGISTER message pass through SER, the host- >> part >> >> of >> >> >> Contact field is modified with the local address of SER. >> >> >> >Is it a misconfiguration problem? >> >> >> >Do you have experience in balancing also the registrations? >> >> >> > >> >> >> >Thanks, >> >> >> >Stefano >> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> >> >On Thu, 2007-09-13 at 11:02 +0200, inge wrote: >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> Hi all, >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> Is there a way to have something like a loadbalancing on SER for >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> outgoing calls ? >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> I want to distribute the calls between two gateways. Ideally, >> with a >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> coefficient (ie. 60% for the first and 40% for the second). >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> Thanks for your support. >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> Adrien .L >> >> >> >_______________________________________________ >> >> >> >Serusers mailing list >> >> >> >Serusers(a)lists.iptel.org >> >> >> >http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> >> >> Jiri Kuthan http://iptel.org/~jiri/ >> >> >_______________________________________________ >> >> >Serusers mailing list >> >> >Serusers(a)lists.iptel.org >> >> >http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> >> Jiri Kuthan http://iptel.org/~jiri/ >> >_______________________________________________ >> >Serusers mailing list >> >Serusers(a)lists.iptel.org >> >http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers >> >> >> >> -- >> Jiri Kuthan http://iptel.org/~jiri/ >_______________________________________________ >Serusers mailing list >Serusers(a)lists.iptel.org >http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers -- Jiri Kuthan http://iptel.org/~jiri/

16 years, 10 months

[OpenSER-Users] Checking Reply to INVITE

by Douglas Garstang

I need to be able to check the SIP response code to INVITE messages only. I don't care about BYE, CANCEL or anything else. I tried putting a hint header in the INVITE when I sent it out, but the replies came back from the upstream provider with the header removed. I tried setting a flag when an INVITE was received and using that. Didn't work. How can I do this? Is there a way to see what method a response is for? If there is, I could ignore everything that wasn't a response to an INVITE. Thanks, Doug. ____________________________________________________________________________________ Never miss a thing. Make Yahoo your home page. http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs

16 years, 10 months

[OpenSER-Users] missing cflags column in User Locations (location) Table definition in wiki

by Piotr Sobolewski

HI There is one column missing in User Locations (location) Table definition in wiki link below http://www.openser.org/dokuwiki/doku.php/database:1.2.x#user_locations missing column name is cflags. -- Piotr Sobolewski sobolewski(a)gmail.com

16 years, 10 months

[OpenSER-Users] Number of sessions

by Bruno Machado

Hi I`d like to know if is possible to use 'openserctl' to find the number of sessions OpenSER is managing. I think that it isn't possible. Is there another way? Thanks. Bruno Machado Abra sua conta no Yahoo! Mail, o único sem limite de espaço para armazenamento! http://br.mail.yahoo.com/

16 years, 10 months

[OpenSER-Users] xml body parser

by Daniel

Hi all, Is openser able to parse and interpret a xml script contained, for example, in the body of INVITE method ? If it was possible, what kind of module I'd have to use ? Regards, Daniel -- Daniel Grotti ________________________ e-mail : d.grotti(a)gmail.com

16 years, 10 months

← Newer
1
...
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
...
25
Older →

Jump to page:

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

sr-users November 2007