sr-users November 2007

sr-users@lists.kamailio.org

138 participants
249 discussions

[OpenSER-Users] OpenSER with multidomain configuration
by satish patel 15 Nov '07

15 Nov '07

Dear all I am going to install openser with multidomain support do anyone have sample .cfg file or configuration guide i have find many document but it is very hard to implement so just suggest me how to test and configure it ----PGP Signature-- Satish Patel mobile:- +91-9818875535 http://www.linuxbug.org --------------------------------- Never miss a thing. Make Yahoo your homepage.

2 1

[Serusers] SER Dispatcher Module
by Arun Kumar 15 Nov '07

15 Nov '07

Hi Here is my setup Users ----> SER ----> Asterisk ----> PSTN works fine. when ever user dial able to hear balance message and calls goes fine. Just now I replaced my setup to use Dispatcher module Users -----> SER (Dispatcher module) ----------> Asterisk Boxes -----> PSTN when user makes calls not able to hear balance message all the times but able to make PSTN calls ? In my config I just changed replace IP of my asterisk box with dispatcher config: Old config: strip(1); rewritehostpost("x.x.x.x:5060"); route(4); NAT Detet. New conifg: strip(1); ds_select_dst("1", "0"); forward(uri:host, uri:port); route(4); dispatcher file: 1 sip:x.x.x.x:5060 1 sip.y.y.y.y:5060 Need help on above. Thanks, Arun

2 2

[Serusers] DTMF Problem
by Arun Kumar 15 Nov '07

15 Nov '07

Hi Here is my setup: USER ------> PSTN -----> Asterisk A ----> IAX2 Trunk ----> Asterisk B ---------> SER --------> Asterisk C I'm not able to receive DTMF passed by USER on Asterisk C. All my asterisk boxs are configured with same DTMF type (auto) but no luck. Please help on this issue. Thanks, Arun

1 0

[OpenSER-Users] MyISAM or InnoDB in MySQL tables?
by Iñaki Baz Castillo 15 Nov '07

15 Nov '07

Hi, MySQL tables of OpenSer created by the script are "MyISAM". Is there any reason for that instead of using InnoDB? As I know: MyISAM: - Is faster reading and writting (except writting various entries to same table since it blocks the entire table). - No transactions or rollbacks. - Small disc space requeriments. InnoDB: - Transactions, rollbacks, restrictions in foreing keys. - Faster writting various entries in same table (entry lock instead of table lock). - More disc space and RAM requeriments. Yes, it can be obvious that for OpenSer the engine MyISAM can be a good choice but I would like to know if there is more data for this choice. Regards. -- Iñaki Baz Castillo ibc(a)in.ilimit.es

9 11

Re: [Serusers] Voicemail setup on SER v0.9.6
by roayu 15 Nov '07

15 Nov '07

Thanks Stefan! I need to confirm that after the installation, I will be having 2 SERs + 1 SEMS, rite? ( 1 SER for normal sip, 1 SER as SIP stack, 1 SEMS) Thanks. Roa Yu -----Original Message----- From: Stefan Sayer [mailto:stefan.sayer@iptego.de] Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2007 6:27 PM To: roayu Cc: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org Subject: Re: [Serusers] Voicemail setup on SER v0.9.6 Hello, roayu wrote: > Which version of SEMS should I download? Is it included the SER as well? > I would prefer a stable version =) I would recommend the stable SEMS 0.10.0 release. Bundled with its SER its available at ftp://ftp.iptel.org/pub/sems/sems-0.10.0-bundle.tar.gz You will find all information at http://iptel.org/sems. Regards Stefan Sayer > > Thanks. > > Roa Yu > > -----Original Message----- > From: SIP [mailto:sip@arcdiv.com] > Sent: Monday, November 12, 2007 10:53 AM > To: roayu > Subject: Re: [Serusers] Voicemail setup on SER v0.9.6 > > You CAN have those on the same box. Although it's not required. You > could have one SER on one box and then the other SER/SEMS on another box > of you preferred. > > > > roayu wrote: >> Hi Eneref, >> >> Thanks for your reply. So, do u mean that I'm gonna have the follwing >> applications in the SAME box? >> - 2 SER servers ( 1 existing SER + 1 new SER for SEMS ) with different > port >> - 1 SEMS >> >> Thanks. >> >> Roa Yu >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Eneref [mailto:eneref@arcdiv.com] >> Sent: Friday, November 09, 2007 4:14 PM >> To: roayu >> Subject: Re: [Serusers] Voicemail setup on SER v0.9.6 >> >> Yes. You need either SEMS or Asterisk or some such. Meshing SEMS with >> SER, though it LOOKS complex, is really not that bad. >> >> The easiest thing to do is to run another SER server to handle voicemail >> (on a different port from the first SER if it's on the same box) and >> forward messages to it if voicemail is required (on time outs, or >> whatever conditions you set). There are some good instructions on how >> to do that in the SEMS docs. >> >> This also makes it quite easy to swap out with Asterisk or any other >> sort of voicemail-capable server should the need arise in future. >> >> N. >> >> roayu wrote: >> >>> Hi there! >>> >>> >>> >>> Could anyone let me know how to setup Voicemail on SER v.0.9.6 ? Do I >>> need to install SEMS as well? >>> >>> >>> >>> Thanks >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> Regards, >>> >>> Roa Yu >>> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Serusers mailing list >>> Serusers(a)lists.iptel.org >>> http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers >>> >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> Serusers mailing list >> Serusers(a)lists.iptel.org >> http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers >> > _______________________________________________ > Serusers mailing list > Serusers(a)lists.iptel.org > http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers -- Stefan Sayer VoIP Services stefan.sayer(a)iptego.de www.iptego.de iptego GmbH Am Borsigturm 40 13507 Berlin Germany Amtsgericht Charlottenburg, HRB 101010 Geschaeftsfuehrer: Alexander Hoffmann

2 1

[OpenSER-Users] pua_usrloc
by Venter, Andries <andries＠sun.ac.za> 15 Nov '07

15 Nov '07

listen=udp:196.211.9.222 port=5065 loadmodule "presence.so" loadmodule "avpops.so" loadmodule "auth.so" loadmodule "auth_db.so" loadmodule "mi_fifo.so" loadmodule "uri.so" loadmodule "uri_db.so" loadmodule "nathelper.so" loadmodule "textops.so" loadmodule "acc.so" loadmodule "domain.so" loadmodule "pua.so" loadmodule "pua_mi.so" loadmodule "pua_usrloc.so" modparam("usrloc|auth_db|uri_db|acc", "db_url", mysql://openser:password@localhost/openser") modparam("presence|pua", "db_url", "mysql://openser:password@localhost/openser") modparam("pua_usrloc", "default_domain", "196.211.9.222") modparam("presence", "force_active", 1) modparam("presence", "max_expires", 3600) modparam("presence", "server_address", "sip:196.211.9.222:5065") if( is_method("PUBLISH|SUBSCRIBE")) { route(4); } if (method=="REGISTER") { xlog("L_INFO", "Kyk of ek moet PUBLISH........................\n"); if(!search("^User-Agent: X-Lite")) { xlog("L_INFO", "JA - ek moet PUBLISH........................\n"); pua_set_publish(); } save("location"); exit; }; # presence handling route route[4] { xlog("L_INFO","Route 4........................................\n"); sl_send_reply("100","trying"); # absorb retransmissions if (! t_newtran()) { xlog("L_INFO", "Not new transaction.................................\n"); sl_reply_error(); exit; }; # append_to_reply("Contact: <sip:196.211.9.222:5065>\r\n"); if(is_method("PUBLISH")) { xlog("L_INFO", "Handling PUBLISH.................................\n"); handle_publish(); t_release(); } else if( is_method("SUBSCRIBE")) { xlog("L_INFO", "Handling SUBSCRIBE.................................\n"); handle_subscribe(); t_release(); }; exit; }

2 1

Re: [OpenSER-Users] pua_usrloc
by Venter, Andries <andries＠sun.ac.za> 15 Nov '07

15 Nov '07

My config is as follows listen=udp:196.211.9.222 port=5065 loadmodule "presence.so" loadmodule "avpops.so" loadmodule "auth.so" loadmodule "auth_db.so" loadmodule "mi_fifo.so" loadmodule "uri.so" loadmodule "uri_db.so" loadmodule "nathelper.so" loadmodule "textops.so" loadmodule "acc.so" loadmodule "domain.so" loadmodule "pua.so" loadmodule "pua_mi.so" loadmodule "pua_usrloc.so" modparam("usrloc|auth_db|uri_db|acc", "db_url", mysql://openser:password@localhost/openser") modparam("presence|pua", "db_url", "mysql://openser:password@localhost/openser") modparam("pua_usrloc", "default_domain", "196.211.9.222") modparam("presence", "force_active", 1) modparam("presence", "max_expires", 3600) modparam("presence", "server_address", "sip:196.211.9.222:5065") if( is_method("PUBLISH|SUBSCRIBE")) { route(4); } if (method=="REGISTER") { xlog("L_INFO", "Kyk of ek moet PUBLISH........................\n"); if(!search("^User-Agent: X-Lite")) { xlog("L_INFO", "JA - ek moet PUBLISH........................\n"); pua_set_publish(); } save("location"); exit; }; # presence handling route route[4] { xlog("L_INFO","Route 4........................................\n"); sl_send_reply("100","trying"); # absorb retransmissions if (! t_newtran()) { xlog("L_INFO", "Not new transaction.................................\n"); sl_reply_error(); exit; }; # append_to_reply("Contact: <sip:196.211.9.222:5065>\r\n"); if(is_method("PUBLISH")) { xlog("L_INFO", "Handling PUBLISH.................................\n"); handle_publish(); t_release(); } else if( is_method("SUBSCRIBE")) { xlog("L_INFO", "Handling SUBSCRIBE.................................\n"); handle_subscribe(); t_release(); }; exit; }

1 0

[OpenSER-Users] pua_usrloc
by Venter, Andries <andries＠sun.ac.za> 15 Nov '07

15 Nov '07

I would like to get presence published for all phones. I call pua_set_publish() before doing save ("location"), but no PUBLISH messages are generated when the REGISTER request comes through. I am using OpenSER 1.2.2. Any ideas?

2 1

[Serusers] tcp branching errors
by Tomasz Zieleniewski 15 Nov '07

15 Nov '07

Hi, I have the following situation. I have two ser rel_2_0_0 instances one acting as a boundary proxy the other on as internal proxy (registrar, location). I have the following situation I have a user which has registered two contacs one woth tcp transport the other one with udp. All messages coming to and outgoing from my network travels through boundary sip proxy. When internal ser perform lookup_location it get to contacts and the destination set contains two records: Nov 15 11:03:13 sen ser[3673]: route[FORWARD]: destination set: Contact: sip:xlite@192.168.0.164:1221;rinstance=d35f9cda6bd79b0a;transport=TCP, sip:xlite@192.168.0.164:7060 Then internal ser forward message to boundary SIP proxy by changing the destination of the message and with the usage of t_relay(). I see from log that there are two branches involved: Nov 15 11:03:13 sen ser[3673]: branch_route[BRANCH_ROUTE]: <INVITE> ruri:<sip:xlite@192.168.0.164:1221;rinstance=d35f9cda6bd79b0a;transport=TCP> t:<sip:00@voip.rd.touk.pl> f:<sip:lkl@voip.rd.touk.pl> Nov 15 11:03:13 sen ser[3673]: branch_route[BRANCH_ROUTE]: append_hf(P-Warn: forked branch) Nov 15 11:03:13 sen ser[3673]: branch_route[BRANCH_ROUTE]: <INVITE> ruri:<sip:xlite@192.168.0.164:7060;rinstance=cfca8523e3747cb0> t:<sip:00@voip.rd.touk.pl> f:<sip:lkl@voip.rd.touk.pl> Nov 15 11:03:13 sen ser[3673]: branch_route[BRANCH_ROUTE]: append_hf(P-Warn: forked branch) both INVITES reaches boudary SIP proxy. Because first contact was unreachable there was an tcp error: ser[3516]: ERROR: tcp_blocking_connect: poll error: flags 18 Nov 15 11:03:13 sen ser[3516]: ERROR: tcp_blocking_connect: SO_ERROR (111) Connection refused Nov 15 11:03:13 sen ser[3516]: ERROR: tcpconn_connect: tcp_blocking_connect failed Nov 15 11:03:13 sen ser[3516]: ERROR: tcp_send: connect failed Nov 15 11:03:13 sen ser[3516]: msg_send: ERROR: tcp_send failed Nov 15 11:03:13 sen ser[3516]: ERROR: t_send_branch: sending request on branch 0 failed after which ser invokes sl_reply_error() which results in 477 next hop error reponse message sent to internal ser instance. The problem arises when boudary sip proxy processes second INVITE which correspond to second destination. when boundary SIP proxy receives it doesn't send it to user agent but instead reponses to internal ser with 500 I'm terribly sorry, server error occurred (1/SL) the only thing I see in the boundary SIP proxy log is: ERROR: sl_reply_error used: I'm terribly sorry, server error occurred (1/SL) Did I miss something here or this is an error? Waiting for Your feedback Best regards Tomasz

1 0

[OpenSER-Users] OpenSER CVS
by Bogdan-Andrei Iancu 15 Nov '07

15 Nov '07

Hi, If there are good arguments against, Wednesday 14th, 12:00 AM GMT, the CVS repository from SF will be disabled. Regards, Bogdan

1 2

← Newer
1
...
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
...
25
Older →

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

sr-users November 2007