I am using redirect with ENUM, and am I wanting to know if my code is
correct, then I write the code below. Could someone help me please?
.
.
.
} else if (method=="INVITE") { # If Invite is to ENUM.
# Block ENUM
prefix("+");
enum_query("e164.arpa.");
#Redirect
sl_send_reply("300","Redirect");
return;
};
Hi,
I checked archive without any result... From an openSER rule, I want to
create a 302 message if a specific RURI is used.
First I need to change the contact header to specify the URI of the new
callee.
I tried something like that:
avp_printf("$avp(s:100)", "sip:test@christophe.fr;target=$ruri;cause=486;");
avp_pushto("$ct", "$avp(s:100)"); # => error generated on this line
ERROR:avpops:fixup_pushto_avp: unsupported destination "$ct"; expected
$ru,$du,$br
So how can I modify the contact header ?
Just after the update on the contact header I envisaged to use this function
sl_send_reply(302, "Moved Temporarily")
Is it correct ? Is there a better way to 'create' 302 message in this case
?
I check UAC_REDIRECT module but I don't think I can use it in this case or
perhaps I missed something
Before to use a 302 message I succesfully tested to create a new INVITE with
the $ruri modified correctly. But I would like to create a 302 message to
prevent any problem of authentication.
Thanks,
Christophe
>> RE: [Users] rtpproxy or RTPProxy, where to download or checkout--found it:)
And no one else might have the same hesitation as you?
(i.e., why not post the answer to your own question).
This is actually semi-interesting, because if you go here
http://ftp.iptel.org/pub/rtpproxy/
you get the impression that rtpproxy-0.3 is the one to get.
There is a file there named: LATEST-IS-0.3
But here: http://www.voip-info.org/wiki-Portaone+rtpproxy
it gives instructions for how to pull it out of CVS:
* Download from CVS
note: you should update rtpproxy from CVS in order for it to work:
cvs -d:pserver:anonymous@cvs.ser.berlios.de:/cvsroot/ser login
press enter when prompted for a password
cvs -z3 -d:pserver:anonymous@cvs.ser.berlios.de:/cvsroot/ser co rtpproxy
then do the usual: ./configure; make; make install
and the code you get is different.
Note that the output of "rtpproxy -v" has not changed (yet). So, the
CVS version is still 0.3, but it looks like some obvious bug fixes as
some arrays have had their dimensions increased by one, plus a couple
of new minor features (-T ttl and -L nfiles).
But wait, there's more: there is even a man page (rtpproxy.8)!!
>> Anyone can explain following options:
>>
>> 1. -2fv
>> 2. -s path
>> 3. -L nfiles
The man page is there in the distribution from CVS:
-2 Send every RTP packet twice in sessions that use low-bitrate
codecs. Only packets that are smaller than 128 bytes will be
sent twice. This option can improve audio quality on lossy
links.
-f Rtpproxy will stay in foreground mode if this option is set.
-v Show version of program.
-s ctrl_socket
This parameter configures rtpproxy control socket. The control
[snip]
-L does not appear to be documented, but looking at the code it
sets this:
RLIMIT_NOFILE The maximum number of open files for this process.
I have other things to say about rtpproxy, but I'll save it for
the next email...
-mark
ade darmawan <generasi84(a)yahoo.com> wrote: Please help me mr...
i have read this module...but i don't understand with 4 question :
1. I found that in the SMS Module (SIP to GSM) don't explained the software which used by the client/user agent or where we should to do testing in client?
2. I wanna know the other facilities should be used, beside openser-1.0.0.tar.gz,mysql,DNS?
3. For the final result, is this module could send SMS by 2 directions?
4. Could you please the step to do the testing?
Thank's for all
---------------------------------
Stay in the know. Pulse on the new Yahoo.com. Check it out. _______________________________________________
Devel mailing list
Devel(a)openser.org
http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devel
---------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
Everyone is raving about the all-new Yahoo! Mail.
Anyone can explain following options:
1. -2fv
2. -s path
3. -L nfiles
The rest of them seems to be straight forward. This rtproxy documentation
is HARD to find:(.
usage: rtpproxy [-2fv] [-l addr1[/addr2]] [-6 addr1[/addr2]] [-s path] [-t
tos] [-r rdir [-S sdir]] [-T ttl] [-L nfiles]
Thanks in advance.
Best Regards,
Bill
-----Original Message-----
From: users-bounces(a)openser.org [mailto:users-bounces@openser.org] On Behalf
Of Bill Zhang
Sent: Tuesday, August 22, 2006 6:34 PM
To: users(a)openser.org
Subject: RE: [Users] rtpproxy or RTPProxy,where to download or
checkout--found it:).
Thanks.
Best Regards,
Bill
-----Original Message-----
From: users-bounces(a)openser.org [mailto:users-bounces@openser.org] On Behalf
Of Bill Zhang
Sent: Tuesday, August 22, 2006 5:55 PM
To: users(a)openser.org
Subject: [Users] rtpproxy or RTPProxy, where to download or checkout
This could be a simple question but I went through the whole user archive
and yet to find out where to download it or cvs checkout, I do see
mediaproxy as part of OPENSER module, wonder why rtpproxy or RTPProxy is
not:(.
Thanks in advance for help.
Bill
-----Original Message-----
From: users-bounces(a)openser.org [mailto:users-bounces@openser.org] On Behalf
Of Atle Samuelsen
Sent: Monday, August 14, 2006 12:56 PM
To: Ever Zalazar
Cc: users(a)openser.org
Subject: Re: [Users] mediaproxy vs. rtpproxy
Hi ever,
I would say this is not a proper question. Both work like a charm with
(Open)SER.
The question you should ask yourself is what do you want to accomplish
with mediaproxy/rtpproxy. If it´s only calls between nated useragensts,
you can use both without any problem.
- Atle
* Ever Zalazar <zalazar(a)technologymaker.com> [060814 21:41]:
> Hi people! Just to know, which is much better for openser mediaproxy or
rtpproxy?
>
>
> Best Regards
>
>
> Ever
> _______________________________________________
> Users mailing list
> Users(a)openser.org
> http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users(a)openser.org
http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users(a)openser.org
http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users(a)openser.org
http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
Thanks.
Best Regards,
Bill
-----Original Message-----
From: users-bounces(a)openser.org [mailto:users-bounces@openser.org] On Behalf
Of Bill Zhang
Sent: Tuesday, August 22, 2006 5:55 PM
To: users(a)openser.org
Subject: [Users] rtpproxy or RTPProxy, where to download or checkout
This could be a simple question but I went through the whole user archive
and yet to find out where to download it or cvs checkout, I do see
mediaproxy as part of OPENSER module, wonder why rtpproxy or RTPProxy is
not:(.
Thanks in advance for help.
Bill
-----Original Message-----
From: users-bounces(a)openser.org [mailto:users-bounces@openser.org] On Behalf
Of Atle Samuelsen
Sent: Monday, August 14, 2006 12:56 PM
To: Ever Zalazar
Cc: users(a)openser.org
Subject: Re: [Users] mediaproxy vs. rtpproxy
Hi ever,
I would say this is not a proper question. Both work like a charm with
(Open)SER.
The question you should ask yourself is what do you want to accomplish
with mediaproxy/rtpproxy. If it´s only calls between nated useragensts,
you can use both without any problem.
- Atle
* Ever Zalazar <zalazar(a)technologymaker.com> [060814 21:41]:
> Hi people! Just to know, which is much better for openser mediaproxy or
rtpproxy?
>
>
> Best Regards
>
>
> Ever
> _______________________________________________
> Users mailing list
> Users(a)openser.org
> http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users(a)openser.org
http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users(a)openser.org
http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
Hello,
I'm running OpenSER 1.1.0 in the server
xxx.yyy.91.231, I'm also testing a program as 3rd
party call control at xxx.yyy.91.230 that is sending
"simultaneous" reINVITEs to the 2 parties involved in
the call (10252052 and 10092010) through OpenSER.
Both messages are accepted by the loose_route
function. OpenSER relays the 1st reINVITE (to
10092010) but the second reINVITE (to 10252052) is
not relayed.
Is openSER considering the 2nd message as a
retransmission of the first reINVITE ?
I'm having the same behavior by setting
tm.ruri_matching to 1 and 0. The results are the same
if I call from 10092010 to 10252052, or if I send the
1st reINVITE to 10252052. The only way to make it
work properly is sending the 2nd reInvite after some
seconds.
There is something else that I must add to the
reINVITEs to allow OpenSER to differentiate them?
The OpenSER debug for the ReINVITEs is at
http://pastebin.com/773285
The reInvite to 10092010 is at
http://pastebin.com/773286
The reInvite to 10252052 is at
http://pastebin.com/773287
Thanks for any suggestion.
Regards,
Humberto
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com