sr-users May 2006

sr-users@lists.kamailio.org

195 participants
502 discussions

[Users] Regarding on " radtest "
by raviprakash sunkara 11 May '06

11 May '06

Hi Everybody I'm working on openser + freeradius. Recently Installed both . I had a issue below onw, actual what this means... By Typing '" radtest 444 444 192.168.2.55 1812 radiustest " its shows below one. Sending Access-Request of id 236 to 192.168.2.55 port 1812 User-Name = "444" User-Password = "444" NAS-IP-Address = 255.255.255.255 Re-sending Access-Request of id 236 to 192.168.2.55 port 1812 User-Name = "444" User-Password = "444" NAS-IP-Address = 255.255.255.255 -- Thanks and Regards with cheers Sunkara Ravi Prakash (Voip Developer) Hyperion Technology www.hyperion-tech.com

1 0

[Serusers] Ser start but no PID
by Linh Pham 11 May '06

11 May '06

Hi, I compile SER 0.9.6 from source on a computer running Fedora Core 4. I suppose make all, make install all go well as I can't see any warning or error. When I start ser, it seems normal but I can't find the pid with ps. [root@localhost ~]# serctl start Starting SER : started pid(18726) [root@localhost ~]# ser Listening on udp: 127.0.0.1 [127.0.0.1]:5060 udp: 192.168.1.4 [192.168.1.4]:5060 udp: 192.168.1.17 [192.168.1.17]:5060 tcp: 127.0.0.1 [127.0.0.1]:5060 tcp: 192.168.1.4 [192.168.1.4]:5060 tcp: 192.168.1.17 [192.168.1.17]:5060 Aliases: tcp: localhost:5060 tcp: localhost.localdomain:5060 udp: localhost:5060 udp: localhost.localdomain:5060 [root@localhost ~]# serctl stop Stopping SER : /usr/local/sbin/serctl: line 813: kill: (18726) - No such processstopped [root@localhost ~]# How can I fix this so ser run normally? Thank you. -- Best regards, Linh Pham

2 4

[Users] Comma-Separated Via Header
by Dioris Moreno 10 May '06

10 May '06

I was making some fax tests using a Cisco AS5300, OpenSER 1.0.1 and a Grandstream HandyTone 486. Everything results fine when I previously make the same test directly from the HandyTone to the AS5300, however when I put OpenSER in the middle the fax connection could not be established. Checking captures at both ends, I noticed the HandyTone was not receiving the OK response to its RE-INVITE request, but the AS5300 was sending it. Looking a capture in the OpenSER, I suppose it didn't send the OK response from the AS5300 to the HandyTone because the format of the Via Header used by the AS5300. Look at the captures below, the AS5300 sends the Via header in a comma-separated format instead using a line for each one. Is there a way to workaround this? I think my best option is to modify the OpenSER code to support both formats. Is this something that somebody already does it? If the answer it is not, where can I start? I'll appreciate any help. Dioris Moreno Cisco AS5300 IP Address: AAA.BBB.CCC.DDD OpenSER IP Address: WWW.XXX.YYY.ZZZ Grandstream HT486 IP Address: FFF.GGG.HHH.III Calling Party Number (PSTN): UserA Called Party Number (VoIP): UserB Message From OpenSER to Cisco AS5300 Session Initiation Protocol Request-Line: INVITE sip:UserA@AAA.BBB.CCC.DDD:5060 SIP/2.0 Method: INVITE Resent Packet: False Message Header Record-Route: <sip:WWW.XXX.YYY.ZZZ;ftag=266f5f157860b9ca;lr=on> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP WWW.XXX.YYY.ZZZ;branch=z9hG4bK6a82.677fb8e1.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP FFF.GGG.HHH.III:50841;branch=z9hG4bK90436408698e6881 From: <sip:UserB@WWW.XXX.YYY.ZZZ>;tag=266f5f157860b9ca SIP from address: sip:UserB@WWW.XXX.YYY.ZZZ SIP tag: 266f5f157860b9ca To: <sip:UserA@AAA.BBB.CCC.DDD>;tag=D33F86B0-94F SIP to address: sip:UserA@AAA.BBB.CCC.DDD SIP tag: D33F86B0-94F Message From Cisco AS5300 to OpenSER Session Initiation Protocol Status-Line: SIP/2.0 200 OK Status-Code: 200 Resent Packet: False Message Header Via: SIP/2.0/UDP WWW.XXX.YYY.ZZZ;branch=z9hG4bK6a82.677fb8e1.0,SIP/2.0/UDP FFF.GGG.HHH.III:50841;branch=z9hG4bK90436408698e6881 From: <sip:UserB@WWW.XXX.YYY.ZZZ>;tag=266f5f157860b9ca SIP from address: sip:UserB@WWW.XXX.YYY.ZZZ SIP tag: 266f5f157860b9ca To: <sip:UserA@AAA.BBB.CCC.DDD>;tag=D33F86B0-94F SIP to address: sip:UserA@AAA.BBB.CCC.DDD SIP tag: D33F86B0-94F

3 2

[Users] Stateful Transfers
by Douglas Garstang 10 May '06

10 May '06

I got a big problem here that I don't know how to fix. An OpenSER system forwards calls from phones to Asterisk boxes. Up until now we had been using the dispatcher to evenly distribute calls to the Asterisk boxes. However, when someone transfers a call, using the dispatcher, the call can go to a different Asterisk box, which breaks the transfer. I need to find some way to make OpenSER route transfers to the same Asterisk system. I'm not sure how to do this. If there was some way to, upon an INVITE, check and see if there was already a call in progress for that user and then send it to the same Asterisk system. Would stateful processing help in this way? Can stateful processing 'remember' that there's a call already in progress like this, or does the stateful simply relate to stateful processing of a single call from INVITE to OK/ACK? Doug.

2 1

[Users] failure_route
by D'Addelfio Davide 10 May '06

10 May '06

Hi all, i have 2 questions for the forum: 1) What can I do to simulate a failure message to understand if openser store it into database, through acc_db_request? 2) Have I any chance to get information from reply messages, like storing some in db or something else? I know I can't use acc and avp module in on_reply route block, so any suggestion? Thanks in advance Davide

2 1

[Users] Call routing
by Jeff Williams 10 May '06

10 May '06

This is not openser specific, but can I just check my understanding of the SIP RFC? Given an INVITE where the Request-URI is different from the To field, a UAS should route the INVITE based on the Request-URI, correct? The reason I ask it that I am having problems integrating openser with a proprietry SIP proxy as the proprietry proxy routes INVITES based on the To field. Jeff

2 1

RE: [Users] clustering
by Douglas Garstang 10 May '06

10 May '06

Then, if system N fails, all systems >N also fail. That's not very redundant. > -----Original Message----- > From: Edson [mailto:4lists@gmail.com] > Sent: Wednesday, May 10, 2006 9:01 AM > To: Douglas Garstang; 'Bogdan-Andrei Iancu'; 'unplug' > Cc: users(a)openser.org > Subject: RE: [Users] clustering > > > Create a 'chain' of t_replicate (1->2->3->...->n). Than You > can have 'n' > Proxies in the 'cluster'... > > Edson. > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: users-bounces(a)openser.org > [mailto:users-bounces@openser.org] On > > Behalf Of Douglas Garstang > > Sent: quarta-feira, 10 de maio de 2006 11:49 > > To: Bogdan-Andrei Iancu; unplug > > Cc: users(a)openser.org > > Subject: RE: [Users] clustering > > > > Yes, but t_replicate() only allows you to replicate to ONE > other OpenSER > > system. Two OpenSER systems is not a redundant configuration - 3 is > > redundant. > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Bogdan-Andrei Iancu [mailto:bogdan@voice-system.ro] > > > Sent: Wednesday, May 10, 2006 5:28 AM > > > To: unplug > > > Cc: users(a)openser.org > > > Subject: Re: [Users] clustering > > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > try yo google on the mailing list - the topic was often > > > debated. search > > > also for t_replicate() and replication. > > > > > > regards, > > > bogdan > > > > > > unplug wrote: > > > > > > > How to do the clustering of openser? Any reference? > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > Users mailing list > > > > Users(a)openser.org > > > > http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > Users mailing list > > > Users(a)openser.org > > > http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Users mailing list > > Users(a)openser.org > > http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users > >

5 6

[Users] call forwarding and billing
by Jayesh Nambiar 10 May '06

10 May '06

Hi folks, I have implemented the openser.cfg with forwarding and voicemail features completely. Only problem is, if the user is forwarding the call on a pstn number how should he be billed, as the one who has forwarded is accountable and not the one who called. I have implemented forwarding using avps serial forking method. I've read about multiple leg accounting and was not successful in understanding it properly. The docs only mention to set the parametrs and after I set the params, I get a n/a in src_leg and dst_leg column. Can someone pls give me examples of successfully using multiple leg accounting in openser.cfg. Is it like, the call leg accounting will only take place if there is a 3XX response from the server. I am asking this as my cfg does not produce any 302 response, but creates a brand new Invite request for the forwarded call. Can someone pls tell me more about multi-leg accounting. Also I read about the diversion module which can be used in the forwarding scenarios. But I added the diversion header and forwarded the call to Cisco gateway, it gave a 400 Bad Request reponse saying 'Malformed CC-Diversion/Diversion/CC-Redirect Header'. Can someone explain what does this mean. It will help me a lot as this is the only thing I am left with. Thanks a lot in advance. w/regards, Jayesh --------------------------------- Jiyo cricket on Yahoo! India cricket Yahoo! Messenger Mobile Stay in touch with your buddies all the time.

2 3

[Users] OpenSER Docs
by Douglas Garstang 10 May '06

10 May '06

Has anyone seen any good OpenSER documentation, or know of any training courses in North America that relate directly to OpenSER? I've been involved with OpenSER for about 6 months now and the available documentation has remained about the same - REALLY BAD. Thanks, Doug

3 3

[Serusers] RPID?
by Ricardo Martinez 10 May '06

10 May '06

Hello. Sorry for this stupid question. Can someone explain to me how the RPID parameter is used?. Can i use this parameter for other purposes ? Hope thank someone can help me. Thanks in advance. Regards, Ricardo.-

2 1

← Newer
1
...
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
...
51
Older →

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

sr-users May 2006