sr-users December 2006

sr-users@lists.kamailio.org

152 participants
257 discussions

[Serusers] onreply_route and EXEC module
by Benito Caracuel 01 Dec '06

01 Dec '06

Hello all, I need to execute an exec_msg command inside onreply_route code buy SER doesn't permit this. This is my ser.cfg: route{ ...... if (method=="INVITE"){ .......... t_relay(); route(2); break; }; route[2] { t_on_reply("2"); } onreply_route[2] { if (status=~"200"){ if ( search("msrp:") ){ exec_msg("printenv SRCIP > /tmp/200ok.txt; cat >> /tmp/200ok.txt; /bin/bash /usr/local/ser_snapshot/sbin/controlador2"); replace_all_file("msrp:\/\/[0-9\.:\/;a-z]*\r","/tmp/pathmsrp200ok.txt"); } } } In onreply_route, I need to execute exec_msg to manipulate 200 ok, but SER doesn't permit it. What can I execute exec_msg?? I try to probe this: route[2] { t_on_reply("2"); } onreply_route[2] { if (status=~"200"){ if ( search("msrp:") ){ t_on_failure("2"); } } } failure_route[2] { exec_msg("printenv SRCIP > /tmp/200ok.txt; cat >> /tmp/200ok.txt; /bin/bash /usr/local/ser_snapshot/sbin/controlador2"); replace_all_file("msrp:\/\/[0-9\.:\/;a-z]*\r","/tmp/pathmsrp200ok.txt"); t_relay(); } But never enter in failure route!!! Thank you in advance for any help. _________________________________________________________________ Busca desde cualquier página Web con una protección excepcional. Consigue la Barra de herramientas de Windows Live hoy mismo y GRATUITAMENTE. http://www.toolbar.live.com

2 1

[Serusers] Use TCP protocol
by Katty Xiong 01 Dec '06

01 Dec '06

Hi, I am trying to do some tests using TCP protocol with SER as a proxy. SER accepts SIP message through TCP correctly, but after SER accepts SIP messages, SER automatically picks up UDP for transmission. Is there a way to force SER to use TCP for forwarding message? thanks, Joy ____________________________________________________________________________________ Want to start your own business? Learn how on Yahoo! Small Business. http://smallbusiness.yahoo.com/r-index

1 1

[Serusers] Problem with ser-freeradius-mysql
by Lokesh Kumar 01 Dec '06

01 Dec '06

Hello list, I had ser-0.9.6, freeradius-1.1.3 and mysql installed. I am doing AAA for ser by freeradius where freeradius should have to fetch data from default mysql tables setup by freeradius. I am able to do authentication of sip clients without problem, accounting packets also gets logged into mysql database (when group membership checking disabled in ser.cfg).But I am unable to manage with group membership check. I am not sure what should be the AVPs I have to insert into mysql tables for group membership check. I followed various articles about freeradius and ser, and tried all possibilities, but no success. Can anyone give me any clue about that. Below mentioned are some of my conf files. In radiusd.conf I had enabled “sql” and disabled “files” in order to read values from mysql db instead of flat files. Part of ser.cfg for radius group check if (!lookup("location")) { if(uri=~"^sip:0[1-9].*@abc.xyz.pt") { #Towards National PSTN gateway if (!radius_is_user_in("From", "ld")) { sl_send_reply("403", "No permission to call on National numbers..."); break; }; route(4); route(5); break; }; In radcheck table I have 2 entries for each user they are like mentioned below mysql> select * from radcheck; +----+--------------------------------+---------------+----+-------------+ | id | UserName | Attribute | op | Value | +----+--------------------------------+---------------+----+-------------+ | 1 | 69021(a)abc.xyz.pt | User-Password | == | "teste" | 17 | 69021(a)abc.xyz.pt | Auth-Type | := | Digest usergroup table has entry like below mysql> select * from usergroup; +----------------------------+-----------+----------+ | UserName | GroupName | priority | +----------------------------+-----------+----------+ | 69021(a)abc.xyz.pt | ld | 1 | +----------------------------+-----------+----------+ 1 row in set (0.00 sec) And radgroupcheck has entries like mentioned below mysql> select * from radgroupcheck; +----+-----------+--------------+----+-------------+ | id | GroupName | Attribute | op | Value | +----+-----------+--------------+----+-------------+ | 1 | ld | Service-type | == | Group-Check | +----+-----------+--------------+----+-------------+ 1 row in set (0.00 sec) Any clue will be much appreciated.. Thanks Lokesh -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.1.409 / Virus Database: 268.15.3/561 - Release Date: 12/1/2006

1 0

[Users] SIP over TCP or TLS - Contact Header - NAT problematic
by Christophe Irles 01 Dec '06

01 Dec '06

Hi, If a SIP device is using TCP, to accept incoming calls it must bind on port 5060. To call someone, this device must create a socket to reach the proxy on port 5060. The port source of this socket cannot be 5060 ! In TCP you cannot bind on a port and in same time using it in another socket. So the port source is generally chosen randomly (XYZ) Now that all sockets and bind are done, what are the correct info used to create the Contact header ? For me, the port used in the contact header in this case must be 5060 since the device accepts incoming calls on this port and never XYZ. But in a NAT context, if this SIP device is behind a NAT, the port 5060 cannot be used to reach it ! It's necessary to reuse the socket previously opensed to reach it. So in conclusion, the Contact header must be set with 5060 by the device and on the proxy side, if the client is detected behind a NAT, this Contact header is modified to used instead XYZ Am I right ? For TLS, the problem is the same but instead of 5060 it's 5061. Thanks, Christophe

2 1

[Users] mysql insert
by Helge Waastad 01 Dec '06

01 Dec '06

Hi, just a little question about mysql insert into location. I might be wrong here, but please be patient whith me. Im not too good to read through the source tree.... :-) Would there be anything wrong with changing the insert statement from insert into..... to: insert into.....on duplicate key update..... (my sipp register stress-test scenario gave me this idea....) br hw

3 3

[Users] Problem Radius Authentication - NO username in DIGEST-URI
by bogos dan-cristian 01 Dec '06

01 Dec '06

Hello Folks, I got some strange issue with RadAuth module. I have a running server which works just great with RadAuth. The problem comes when in the FROM and TO headers are no descriptions. EG: Following request will be properly processed: # INVITE sip:0012345@babble.net SIP/2.0. To: "0012345"<sip:0012345@babble.net>. From: "Some User"<sip:user@babble.net>;tag=5a7e9242. BUT the following one will not: INVITE sip:00123456@babble.net SIP/2.0. To: <sip:0012345@babble.net>. From: <sip:user@babble.net:10101>;tag=1-2963920204. Here is what I will get WRONG in RADIUS Server: Packet-Type = Access-Request Thu Nov 30 22:52:31 2006 User-Name = "user(a)babble.net" Digest-Attributes = "\n\020user(a)babble.net" Digest-Attributes = "\001\014babble.net" Digest-Attributes = "\002*456f61dc0d715ea80fd0ed0431df75b73a4c4092" Digest-Attributes = "\004\020sip:babble.net" Digest-Attributes = "\003\010INVITE" Digest-Response = "c96792da6dfb093215150ccd250fac34" Service-Type = Sip-Session Sip-Uri-User = "user" NAS-IP-Address = 127.0.0.1 NAS-Port = 5060 Client-IP-Address = 87.102.50.17 The problem is that in the Digest-URI part I will not get the sip:0012345@babble.net, but the sip:babble.net, therefore completly erroneous info. I have checked with xlog the request on openser server just before passing the info to radius_proxy_authorize function, and all the FROM-URI, TO-URI, R-URI avps were just fine. Can somebody from the DEVELOPERS help me? I cannot see other solution, since there is nothing to be tuned in the settings of radauth module. Thank you in advance for your time! Cheers, Dan ____________________________________________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Everyone is raving about the all-new Yahoo! Mail beta. http://new.mail.yahoo.com

2 1

[Serusers] Download for later version of SER - "cvs head"?
by Paul Antinori (pantinor) 01 Dec '06

01 Dec '06

I have been using 0.9.6 version of SER that has DNS SRV load balancing, but now want to try the build that has DNS SRV failover/rollover capabilities built in using the SRV priority. I think this is called the "CVS HEAD" build. I cannot see this on the FTP download directories. Is this available? Thank you, Paul

3 2

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

sr-users December 2006