sr-users December 2006

sr-users@lists.kamailio.org

152 participants
258 discussions

Start a nNew thread

[Users] 302 routing?
by John Peters 05 Dec '06

05 Dec '06

Not sure why this is happening,

3 3

[Users] radius auth change attribute
by tele＠plexia.com 05 Dec '06

05 Dec '06

Hello all, this was already asked on the SER mailinglist without response. is there a way to rewrite radius auth request information packet before sending to radius? i need to change User-Name attribute of the authentication request. reading the source of auth_radius module i think this is not possible right now. the User-Name is filled by the digest credential username + realm. could be usefull to have the possibility of customize this. thank you, :tele

4 4

RE: [Serusers] Retry count setting for invites
by Paul Antinori (pantinor) 04 Dec '06

04 Dec '06

no that was the TM module docs I used. It was an sgml file. ________________________________ From: Greger V. Teigre [mailto:greger@teigre.com] Sent: Monday, December 04, 2006 3:34 PM To: Paul Antinori (pantinor) Cc: serusers(a)iptel.org Subject: Re: [Serusers] Retry count setting for invites ?? Was that a question? Did you read the documentation I referred to? g-) Paul Antinori (pantinor) wrote: I am using the timers as below: modparam("tm","fr_timer",5) modparam("tm","fr_inv_timer",5) There do not seem to be any max count parameters to set according to the TM module docs. Thanks, Paul ________________________________ From: Greger V. Teigre [mailto:greger@teigre.com] Sent: Monday, December 04, 2006 6:51 AM To: Paul Antinori (pantinor) Cc: serusers(a)iptel.org Subject: Re: [Serusers] Retry count setting for invites See the FAQs on iptel.org for docs on 0.9.x timers and What's new in 0.10.x for docs on the new timers in SER Ottendorf. g-) Paul Antinori (pantinor) wrote: Can the number of times that an INVITE is sent with UDP be configured with a modparam type setting in the cfg file? For example, a max invite retry count setting? I saw modparam "tm" settings for timers, but nothing for the retry count. Thank you, Paul ________________________________ _______________________________________________ Serusers mailing list Serusers(a)lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers

1 0

RE: [Serusers] Retry count setting for invites
by Paul Antinori (pantinor) 04 Dec '06

04 Dec '06

I am using the timers as below: modparam("tm","fr_timer",5) modparam("tm","fr_inv_timer",5) There do not seem to be any max count parameters to set according to the TM module docs. Thanks, Paul ________________________________ From: Greger V. Teigre [mailto:greger@teigre.com] Sent: Monday, December 04, 2006 6:51 AM To: Paul Antinori (pantinor) Cc: serusers(a)iptel.org Subject: Re: [Serusers] Retry count setting for invites See the FAQs on iptel.org for docs on 0.9.x timers and What's new in 0.10.x for docs on the new timers in SER Ottendorf. g-) Paul Antinori (pantinor) wrote: Can the number of times that an INVITE is sent with UDP be configured with a modparam type setting in the cfg file? For example, a max invite retry count setting? I saw modparam "tm" settings for timers, but nothing for the retry count. Thank you, Paul ________________________________ _______________________________________________ Serusers mailing list Serusers(a)lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers

2 1

RE: [Serusers] SRV failover question
by Paul Antinori (pantinor) 04 Dec '06

04 Dec '06

Hi Steve, Yes I am trying to get SER to resend the INVITE to priority 2 after priority 1 timed out due to connection down scenario. Thank you, Paul -----Original Message----- From: Steve Blair [mailto:blairs@isc.upenn.edu] Sent: Monday, December 04, 2006 9:37 AM To: Paul Antinori (pantinor) Cc: Greger V. Teigre; serusers(a)iptel.org Subject: Re: [Serusers] SRV failover question Paul: Are you trying to get the proxy server to re-send the invite based on the SRV list or the phone? _Steve Paul Antinori (pantinor) wrote: > Greger and all, > > The URL does not really help. You will see my cfg script below is > already using rewritehostport with no port and the SRV name. > I also am not using t_on_failure as it should not be necessary > according the post by Klaus. > > Heres my SRV table with the ranking priorities: > > _sip._udp.vxml.pats.cisco.com SRV service location: > priority = 1 > weight = 1 > port = 5060 > svr hostname = vxml-1.pats.cisco.com > _sip._udp.vxml.pats.cisco.com SRV service location: > priority = 2 > weight = 1 > port = 5060 > svr hostname = vxml-2.pats.cisco.com > _sip._udp.vxml.pats.cisco.com SRV service location: > priority = 3 > weight = 1 > port = 5060 > svr hostname = vxml-3.pats.cisco.com > pats.cisco.com nameserver = ns1.pats.cisco.com > vxml-1.pats.cisco.com internet address = 10.86.129.x > vxml-2.pats.cisco.com internet address = 10.86.129.x > vxml-3.pats.cisco.com internet address = 10.86.129.x > ns1.pats.cisco.com internet address = 10.86.129.x > > > Thanks anyone for any help, > > Paul > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > -- > *From:* Greger V. Teigre [mailto:greger@teigre.com] > *Sent:* Monday, December 04, 2006 6:41 AM > *To:* Paul Antinori (pantinor) > *Cc:* serusers(a)iptel.org > *Subject:* Re: [Serusers] SRV failover question > > http://lists.iptel.org/pipermail/serusers/2006-October/030813.html > > Paul Antinori (pantinor) wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> Regarding the SRV query addition in (ser-0.9.7-pre7), when the call >> fails on the first priority destination, it never seems to attempt to >> send the INVITE to the second priority destination in the SRV >> response list. Is there anything else to script in the ser.cfg file >> to get this to work? >> >> Thanks for help, >> >> Paul >> >> [root@iptel-sip-proxy /]# /usr/sbin/tethereal | grep SIP Capturing on >> eth0 >> 10.100556 10.86.142.144 -> 10.86.129.17 SIP Request: INVITE >> sip:77710107773365@10.86.129.17:5060;transport=udp >> 10.101774 10.86.129.17 -> 10.86.142.144 SIP Status: 100 trying -- >> your call is important to us >> 14.233596 10.86.129.17 -> 10.86.142.144 SIP Status: 408 Request >> Timeout 14.235930 10.86.142.144 -> 10.86.129.17 SIP Request: ACK >> sip:77710107773365@10.86.129.17:5060;transport=udp >> 2139 packets captured >> >> [root@iptel-sip-proxy /]# /usr/sbin/tethereal | grep DNS Capturing on >> eth0 >> 4.279486 10.86.129.17 -> 10.86.129.16 DNS Standard query SRV >> _sip._udp.vxml.pats.cisco.com >> 4.279897 10.86.129.16 -> 10.86.129.17 DNS Standard query response >> SRV 1 1 5060 vxml-1.pats.cisco.com SRV 2 1 5060 vxml-2.pats.cisco.com >> SRV 3 1 5060 vxml-3.pats.cisco.com >> >> 4.280045 10.86.129.17 -> 10.86.129.16 DNS Standard query A >> vxml-1.pats.cisco.com >> 4.280231 10.86.129.16 -> 10.86.129.17 DNS Standard query response A >> 10.86.129.2 <--this is unplugged from the network >> >> >> debug=3 >> fork=yes >> log_stderror=yes >> rev_dns=no >> port=5060 >> children=4 >> check_via=no >> sip_warning=yes >> fifo="/tmp/ser_fifo" >> uid="nobody" >> gid="nobody" >> >> #aliases for this proxy server >> #ie hostnames/domains that it routes for alias=sox.cisco.com >> alias=pats.cisco.com >> >> loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/sl.so" >> loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/tm.so" >> loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/rr.so" >> loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/maxfwd.so" >> loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/usrloc.so" >> loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/registrar.so" >> loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/textops.so" >> >> modparam("usrloc", "db_mode", 0) >> modparam("rr", "enable_full_lr", 1) >> modparam("tm","fr_timer",5) >> modparam("tm","fr_inv_timer",5) >> >> route{ >> >> >> if (!mf_process_maxfwd_header("10")) { >> sl_send_reply("483","Too Many Hops"); >> break; >> }; >> >> if (uri=~"^sip:1") { >> log(1, "SER found 1*\n"); >> rewritehostport("ccm.pats.cisco.com");route(1);break; >> } >> if (uri=~"^sip:2") { >> log(1, "SER Found 2*\n"); >> rewritehostport("ccm.pats.cisco.com");route(1);break; >> } >> if (uri=~"^sip:7") { >> log(1, "SER Found 7*\n"); >> rewritehostport("vxml.pats.cisco.com");route(1);break; >> } >> if (uri=~"^sip:8") { >> log(1, "SER Found 8*\n"); >> rewritehostport("SER.pats.cisco.com");route(1);break; >> } >> if (uri=~"^sip:9") { >> log(1, "SER Found 9*\n"); >> >> rewritehostport("ringtone.pats.cisco.com");route(1);break; >> } >> >> log(1,"Could Not Match DN to Route\n"); >> route(1); >> } >> >> route[1] >> { >> if (!t_relay()) { >> sl_reply_error(); >> }; >> } >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> --- >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Serusers mailing list >> Serusers(a)lists.iptel.org >> http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers >> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > -- > > _______________________________________________ > Serusers mailing list > Serusers(a)lists.iptel.org > http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers >

2 1

[Serusers] need help with AVP module (print_sattr())
by Kostas Marneris 04 Dec '06

04 Dec '06

Hello, I have the following config : loadmodule "/opt/ser-0.9.6/lib/ser/modules/avp.so" and in main route block, after the first Sanity Check Section : uri2attr("ruri"); print_sattr("ruri"); # if (is_sattr_set("ruri")) { xlog("L_NOTICE", "SET"); print_sattr("ruri"); } else { xlog("L_NOTICE", "NOT SET"); }; It seems that 'print_sattr()' simply does not work. On first 'print_sattr("ruri")' command I have nothing at my syslog. On 'if' block, the function 'is_sattr_set()' works ok, I get the "SET" message @ syslog, but not the 'ruri' attribute. Am I miss something ? thanks for any help, Kostas -- e-mail: K.Marneris(a)otenet.gr

2 1

[Serusers] ASterisk and SER
by Arun Kumar 04 Dec '06

04 Dec '06

HI, My Asterisk is registed with my SER. My client are connected to asterisk when they dial any no like 62222 asterisk passes this is ser and then again ser passes this no 2222 (strip 1) back to my asterisk. but insted of ringing this exten it says loop detected. can some one tell me what is wrong. thanks arun

1 0

RE: [Serusers] SRV failover question
by Paul Antinori (pantinor) 04 Dec '06

04 Dec '06

Greger and all, The URL does not really help. You will see my cfg script below is already using rewritehostport with no port and the SRV name. I also am not using t_on_failure as it should not be necessary according the post by Klaus. Heres my SRV table with the ranking priorities: _sip._udp.vxml.pats.cisco.com SRV service location: priority = 1 weight = 1 port = 5060 svr hostname = vxml-1.pats.cisco.com _sip._udp.vxml.pats.cisco.com SRV service location: priority = 2 weight = 1 port = 5060 svr hostname = vxml-2.pats.cisco.com _sip._udp.vxml.pats.cisco.com SRV service location: priority = 3 weight = 1 port = 5060 svr hostname = vxml-3.pats.cisco.com pats.cisco.com nameserver = ns1.pats.cisco.com vxml-1.pats.cisco.com internet address = 10.86.129.x vxml-2.pats.cisco.com internet address = 10.86.129.x vxml-3.pats.cisco.com internet address = 10.86.129.x ns1.pats.cisco.com internet address = 10.86.129.x Thanks anyone for any help, Paul ________________________________ From: Greger V. Teigre [mailto:greger@teigre.com] Sent: Monday, December 04, 2006 6:41 AM To: Paul Antinori (pantinor) Cc: serusers(a)iptel.org Subject: Re: [Serusers] SRV failover question http://lists.iptel.org/pipermail/serusers/2006-October/030813.html Paul Antinori (pantinor) wrote: Hi, Regarding the SRV query addition in (ser-0.9.7-pre7), when the call fails on the first priority destination, it never seems to attempt to send the INVITE to the second priority destination in the SRV response list. Is there anything else to script in the ser.cfg file to get this to work? Thanks for help, Paul [root@iptel-sip-proxy /]# /usr/sbin/tethereal | grep SIP Capturing on eth0 10.100556 10.86.142.144 -> 10.86.129.17 SIP Request: INVITE sip:77710107773365@10.86.129.17:5060;transport=udp 10.101774 10.86.129.17 -> 10.86.142.144 SIP Status: 100 trying -- your call is important to us 14.233596 10.86.129.17 -> 10.86.142.144 SIP Status: 408 Request Timeout 14.235930 10.86.142.144 -> 10.86.129.17 SIP Request: ACK sip:77710107773365@10.86.129.17:5060;transport=udp 2139 packets captured [root@iptel-sip-proxy /]# /usr/sbin/tethereal | grep DNS Capturing on eth0 4.279486 10.86.129.17 -> 10.86.129.16 DNS Standard query SRV _sip._udp.vxml.pats.cisco.com 4.279897 10.86.129.16 -> 10.86.129.17 DNS Standard query response SRV 1 1 5060 vxml-1.pats.cisco.com SRV 2 1 5060 vxml-2.pats.cisco.com SRV 3 1 5060 vxml-3.pats.cisco.com 4.280045 10.86.129.17 -> 10.86.129.16 DNS Standard query A vxml-1.pats.cisco.com 4.280231 10.86.129.16 -> 10.86.129.17 DNS Standard query response A 10.86.129.2 <--this is unplugged from the network debug=3 fork=yes log_stderror=yes rev_dns=no port=5060 children=4 check_via=no sip_warning=yes fifo="/tmp/ser_fifo" uid="nobody" gid="nobody" #aliases for this proxy server #ie hostnames/domains that it routes for alias=sox.cisco.com alias=pats.cisco.com loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/sl.so" loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/tm.so" loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/rr.so" loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/maxfwd.so" loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/usrloc.so" loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/registrar.so" loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/textops.so" modparam("usrloc", "db_mode", 0) modparam("rr", "enable_full_lr", 1) modparam("tm","fr_timer",5) modparam("tm","fr_inv_timer",5) route{ if (!mf_process_maxfwd_header("10")) { sl_send_reply("483","Too Many Hops"); break; }; if (uri=~"^sip:1") { log(1, "SER found 1*\n"); rewritehostport("ccm.pats.cisco.com");route(1);break; } if (uri=~"^sip:2") { log(1, "SER Found 2*\n"); rewritehostport("ccm.pats.cisco.com");route(1);break; } if (uri=~"^sip:7") { log(1, "SER Found 7*\n"); rewritehostport("vxml.pats.cisco.com");route(1);break; } if (uri=~"^sip:8") { log(1, "SER Found 8*\n"); rewritehostport("SER.pats.cisco.com");route(1);break; } if (uri=~"^sip:9") { log(1, "SER Found 9*\n"); rewritehostport("ringtone.pats.cisco.com");route(1);break; } log(1,"Could Not Match DN to Route\n"); route(1); } route[1] { if (!t_relay()) { sl_reply_error(); }; } ________________________________ _______________________________________________ Serusers mailing list Serusers(a)lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers

2 1

[Serusers] use of SIP_DOMAIN
by Zeeshan Sajid 04 Dec '06

04 Dec '06

hey ppl, i new to ser and i am struck at a point. I have 3 local machines and i have set them up as shown dialer -----> ser ---------> pstn gateway when i register to ser i use user at IPaddress:Port and then simply dial a pstn number in the script i am simply forwarding it to a pstn gateway .... Now my question is when SER forwards the request to the PSTN gateway it adds a new via header in which it uses IPaddress:Port whereas i want ser to use the domain that has been specified on the ser machine using export SIP_DOMAIN = "test domain" command First of all can i do that if yes please guide me how to do that ... and how do i make ser use example.domain ... is there any other way ??? I am using the hello world cfg file .... with no db / media proxy support. please correct me and help me thanks in advance Zeeshan --------------------------------- Everyone is raving about the all-new Yahoo! Mail beta.

1 0

RE: [Users] t_replicate to multiple destinations
by Thomas Deillon 04 Dec '06

04 Dec '06

Thanks for your answer. I'm just trying to register a phone to multiple openser, for load balancing, instead of having a single usrloc database. The doc of tm module about t_replicate says that: "No information due the replicated request (like reply code) will be forwarded to the original SIP UAC." So it's seems that there should be no problems about reply code, but if ser makes a fork, only a single t_replicate is possible. What am I missing? > You just have to make a tcpdump and see what happen to be sure. > > Thomas

1 0

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

sr-users December 2006