sr-users December 2006

sr-users@lists.kamailio.org

152 participants
257 discussions

Re: [Serusers] SER Oracle Support
by Dmitry Semyonov 07 Dec '06

07 Dec '06

Abdul, On Tue, 5 Dec 2006 at 18:22 -0800, Abdul Qadir wrote: > I have attached my oralce include file. You should not send big attachments to the list. I unpacked your archive to /usr/local/oracle9, and changed DEFS definition inside modules/oracle/Makefile to DEFS += -I/usr/local/oracle9/demo -I/usr/local/oracle9/public After that I was able to build the module without errors with "make modules=modules/oracle modules" command. Please, double-check your path to the includes, and verify it is properly passed to the compiler. Sample output for dbase.c compilation is as follows (note the include paths at the end): gcc -fPIC -DPIC -g -O9 -funroll-loops -Wcast-align -Wall -minline-all-stringops -malign-double -falign-loops -ftree-vectorize -mtune=athlon64 -DNAME='"ser"' -DVERSION='"0.9.7-pre7"' -DARCH='"i386"' -DOS='"linux"' -DCOMPILER='"gcc 4.1.2"' -D__CPU_i386 -D__OS_linux -DCFG_DIR='"/usr/local/etc/ser/"' -DPKG_MALLOC -DSHM_MEM -DSHM_MMAP -DDNS_IP_HACK -DUSE_IPV6 -DUSE_MCAST -DUSE_TCP -DDISABLE_NAGLE -DF_MALLOC -DFAST_LOCK -DADAPTIVE_WAIT -DADAPTIVE_WAIT_LOOPS=1024 -DHAVE_GETHOSTBYNAME2 -DHAVE_UNION_SEMUN -DHAVE_SCHED_YIELD -DHAVE_MSG_NOSIGNAL -DHAVE_MSGHDR_MSG_CONTROL -DHAVE_ALLOCA_H -DLINUX -D_GNU_SOURCE -D_REENTRANT -I/usr/local/oracle9/demo -I/usr/local/oracle9/public -c dbase.c -o dbase.o > Dmitry Semyonov <dsemyonov(a)dins.ru> wrote: Abdul, > > On Mon, 4 Dec 2006 at 23:44 -0800, Abdul Qadir wrote: > > > Thats why I did modified the make file to reflect my path. But > > still getting the same error. Do u think I still need to install > > Instant Client, although I have full client installed. > > I don't think so. -- ...Bye..Dmitry.

2 3

Re: [Serusers] Call transfer
by jorain 07 Dec '06

07 Dec '06

Hi all, Is it deal with the ctd.sh script? Configure inside loose_route()? I can get the REFER message but no responses (202 Accepted and NOTIFY) to it. So I send reply 202 inside loose_route if method=REFER. After that, inside ethereal, I can see the code 202 response to REFER. However, It send REFER again and after a while 408 TIMEOUT. This is what i configured: if(loose_route()){ if(method=="BYE"){ setflag(1); setflag(2); }; if(method=="REFER"){ sl_send_reply("202","Accepted"); }; t_relay(); break; }; Please help. Thanks in advance Regards, jorain ----- Original Message ----- From: Greger V. Teigre To: jorain Sent: Tuesday, December 05, 2006 9:30 PM Subject: Re: [Serusers] Call transfer cc serusers jorain wrote: Thanks Greger, Could you give me some clues how to do that or some references about it? I really have no idea. Thanks again. Regards, jorain ----- Original Message ----- From: Greger V. Teigre To: jorain Cc: SER+RTPproxy Sent: Monday, December 04, 2006 7:48 PM Subject: Re: [Serusers] Call transfer Well, yes, you have to route REFER, and you should allow NOTIFYs. g-) jorain wrote: Hi all, I have some question about call transfer. When I press transfer key follow by the new destination and "send", I can see the REFER message inside ethereal but after that request timeout error(408). Inside REFER message, i can see the refer-to and referred-by values are correct. Do I need to add something inside ser.cfg to enable call transfering? Because I cannot find any sample codings regarding ser call transfer. Thanks for any help. Regards, jorain ------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Serusers mailing list Serusers(a)lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers

2 2

Re: [Users] using the acc module
by Daniel Burge 06 Dec '06

06 Dec '06

Hi Nick, Here is how the top of my cfg looks now: debug=3 # debug level (cmd line: -dddddddddd) fork=no log_stderror=no # (cmd line: -E) log_facility=LOG_LOCAL6 I also added this line to syslog.conf: # Save openser accounting logs to openseracc.log local6.* -/var/log/openseracc.log Previously there was information written to /var/log/openser.log which contained mostly things that happened on start up. It seems that openser logs to that file by default even if there is no log_facility set in the cfg file. Now all those messages are instead being put in /var/log/openseracc.log. However, still there are no accounting messages logged. Any ideas? Thanks again, Daniel nick wrote: > Daniel Burge wrote: >> Hello, >> >> I'm trying to configure the accounting module to log messages to >> syslog by following the instructions here: >> >> http://www.openser.org/docs/modules/1.1.x/acc.html >> >> I've included these lines where appropriate according to the example >> on that page. The meaningful parts of the code are as follows: >> >> loadmodule "/usr/local/lib64/openser/modules/acc.so" >> modparam("acc", "log_level", 1) >> modparam("acc", "log_flag", 1) >> >> route >> { >> if (method=="INVITE" || method=="BYE" || method=="CANCEL") >> { >> setflag(1); /* set for accounting (the same value as in log_flag!) >> } } >> >> However this is not causing any information to be logged to syslog. >> >> Any idea? >> >> Thanks in advance, >> >> Daniel >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Users mailing list >> Users(a)openser.org >> http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users >> > > > Make sure you put a line at the top of your config like: > > log_facility=LOG_LOCAL6 > > The number at the end can vary, it depends on what Log facilities you > have "free" on your system. > >

1 0

[Users] using the acc module
by Daniel Burge 06 Dec '06

06 Dec '06

Hello, I'm trying to configure the accounting module to log messages to syslog by following the instructions here: http://www.openser.org/docs/modules/1.1.x/acc.html I've included these lines where appropriate according to the example on that page. The meaningful parts of the code are as follows: loadmodule "/usr/local/lib64/openser/modules/acc.so" modparam("acc", "log_level", 1) modparam("acc", "log_flag", 1) route { if (method=="INVITE" || method=="BYE" || method=="CANCEL") { setflag(1); /* set for accounting (the same value as in log_flag!) } } However this is not causing any information to be logged to syslog. Any idea? Thanks in advance, Daniel

2 2

[Users] NEW Pseudo-Variable: $T_reply_code
by Bogdan-Andrei Iancu 06 Dec '06

06 Dec '06

Hi everybody, following some time ago discussion, a new Pseudo-Variable (PV) is exported by the TM module "- $T_reply_code" - this PV will offer access the the reply code from all different kind of routes. See: http://www.openser.org/docs/modules/1.2.x/tm.html#AEN562 This will allow mainly access (printing, comparing, pushing into AVPs, logging, etc) to the reply code of the winning reply in failure_route. regards, bogdan

1 0

[Users] UAC module use and REGISTER problem
by Christophe Irles 06 Dec '06

06 Dec '06

Hi, I'm using UAC module in order to centralized authentication when I need to use an external proxy server to call PSTN numbers. To use it, I use a unique tuple login/pwd/domain The environment is: My openser handles the domain: "myopenserdomain.com" For each INVITE or REGISTER of SIP client of this domain, I force the authentication The external proxy handles the domain "externaldomain.com" Now I have two questions: 1) before to send an INVITE to the external proxy, must I change the contact header with the correct information of the tuple login/pwd/domain ? Or I must wait the 401 or 407 message before ? In fact I tests several external proxy. Some are waiting a contact header with the information of the tuple and some don't. What is the correct way to do this ? 2) Some of this external proxy accept only my INVITE (with or without contact header modified) if I registered first on it ! I receive 403 message in this situation. But I don't know how to REGISTER first since I don't find any openser module to that . How can I handle this situation ? Thanks, Regards, Christophe

2 1

[Users] NEW FEATURES: t_replay() enhancements
by Bogdan-Andrei Iancu 06 Dec '06

06 Dec '06

Hi everybody, following several discussion threads from some time ago, I added a support for controlling the behaviour of t_relay() functions. This addresses: 1) to ability to stop t_relay() from automatically sending the 100 trying provisional reply before relaying the request. This is useful in scenarios where you already send a stateless 100 trying from the script. 2) ability to do serial forking in failover scenarios - as original t_relay() automatically sends a negative reply in case of a failure (unresolvable URI, TCP connect refused, etc), it was impossible to continue with the next destination. Now, the auto-reply can be disabled. backward compatibility is kept. For more details (how to do it, options, etc), please see the online docs: http://www.openser.org/docs/modules/1.2.x/tm.html#AEN340 regards, bogdan

1 0

RE: [Users] Load Balancing
by Thomas Deillon 06 Dec '06

06 Dec '06

Hi all, Someone using LVS can send his configuration to help us? Thanks, Thomas -----Message d'origine----- De : users-bounces(a)openser.org [mailto:users-bounces@openser.org] De la part de Klaus Darilion Envoyé : mercredi, 6. décembre 2006 09:58 À : Watkins, Bradley Cc : users(a)openser.org Objet : Re: [Users] Load Balancing Hi Bradley! Watkins, Bradley wrote: > > I use UltraMonkey (www.ultramonkey.org), but it's basically a packaging > of Linux-HA and LVS. > > LVS supports connection persistence, and that works very well. The > level of granularity of load balancing is on a per-IP basis, not > per-transaction (LVS only does L3 load-balancing, not L4-7). But > assuming a reasonable value for the persistence timeout, there should be > no problems with SIP transactions (and I haven't experienced anything > problematic). Are you using TCP or UDP (or both) for SIP? Reading LVS doc I see there are several methods for packet forwarding: - Direct Routing - IP-IP Encapsulation - NAT Which one do you use? regards Klaus > > Ldirectord also supports SIP health checks (they're pretty basic OPTIONS > requests, but it's something), and will fail over to working SIP > proxies. Of course, in-progress transactions will fail as the OpenSER > process on one box doesn't have the stateful knowledge of the other. > > Regards, > - Brad > The contents of this e-mail are intended for the named addressee only. It contains information that may be confidential. Unless you are the named addressee or an authorized designee, you may not copy or use it, or disclose it to anyone else. If you received it in error please notify us immediately and then destroy it. > > _______________________________________________ > Users mailing list > Users(a)openser.org > http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users -- Klaus Darilion nic.at _______________________________________________ Users mailing list Users(a)openser.org http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users

1 0

[Users] NEW: XMLRPC implementation for MI
by Bogdan-Andrei Iancu 06 Dec '06

06 Dec '06

Hi, thanks to Lavinia Andrei, we added today a new transport implementation for the Management Interface (MI). This is XMRPC and it the second after the initial FIFO transport, but not the last :). The module is build by using the xmlrpc library, following all XMLRPC standards. It is in alpha stage, so more testing is needed. NOTE that only commands ported to the new MI interface (and not all former FIFO cmds) are available via XMLRPC, but this is a temporary problem - there are only 2 module left to update (TM and USRLOC). For more info, please see the online documentation: http://www.openser.org/docs/modules/1.2.x/mi_xmlrpc.html or ask on the mailing list. Any feedback - bugs or improvements - are welcomed. Regards, Bogdan

2 3

[Users] bug in 1.1.x siptrace online docs?
by Klaus Darilion 06 Dec '06

06 Dec '06

Hi! http://www.openser.org/docs/modules/1.1.x/siptrace.html#AEN119 As far as I can see the "trace_local_ip" module parameter is not in 1.1, but in the online docs. regards klaus -- Klaus Darilion nic.at

2 1

← Newer
1
...
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
...
26
Older →

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

sr-users December 2006