Hi,
how do I suppress the CLI (CLIR) in SIP-SIP calls? It seems to me,
that SIP-clients of any kind send the CLI information (or originating
user-ID) in any case. Can I somehow suppress CLIs in SER on a per-
user basis?
Brgds,
Gerd
I am currently trying to do an xml-rpc call to usrloc.show_contacts.
The xml packet I am sending is the following
POST /RPC2 HTTP/1.0
User-Agent: Radio UserLand/7.1b7 (WinNT)
Host: localhost:5060
Content-Type: text/xml
Content-length: 131
<?xml version=\"1.0\"?>
<methodCall>
<methodName>usrloc.show_contacts</methodName>
<params>
</params>
</methodCall>
As a return packet I am getting
HTTP/1.0 200 OK
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 127.0.0.1:32769
Server: Sip EXpress router (0.10.99-janakj_experimental (i386/linux))
Content-Length: 303
Warning: 392 127.0.0.1:5060 "Noisy feedback tells: pid=5820
req_src_ip=127.0.0.1 req_src_port=32769 in_uri=/RPC2 out_uri=/RPC2
via_cnt==1"
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<methodResponse>
<fault>
<value><struct>
<member><name>faultCode</name>
<value><i4>400</i4></value></member>
<member><name>faultString</name>
<value><string>More Parameters Expected</string></value></member>
</struct></value>
</fault>
</methodResponse>
This tells me that I am not entering the correct information, but I am
at a loss to exactly what else I should be inserting.
I did a search for rpc_show_contacts and found in
./sip_router/modules/usrloc/ul_rpc.c
static void rpc_show_contacts(rpc_t* rpc)
After searching some more I could not find the rpc_t structure. Does
anyone know what values I should be passing via XML?
Thanks,
Zach Keatts
Software Engineer
Nuvio.com
Hi,
IF I set auth_db:calculate_ha1=no, will the radius
authentication also be in non-digest (plaintext/basic) mode??
Reply please. Very urgent.
Regards,
Ashutosh Kumar
Hi!
I checked how SER would behave with large Max-Forwards values.
Paragraph 20.22 of RFC 3261 notes Max-Forwards to be anywhere between 0
and 255 but SER lacks a check for the upper boundry in the maxfwd module.
I'm not sure how the correct way to remove the broken header field and
introducing a correct one would be so I leave this for somebody who
knows :)
Hendrik
--
freenet Cityline GmbH, Hamburger Chaussee 2-4, 24114 Kiel, Germany
Phone: +49 (0)431 9020552, Fax: +49 (0)431 9020559
Internet: http://www.freenet.de, eMail: hendrik.scholz(a)freenet-ag.de
Hi!
I gave 3.1.2.4 of draft-ietf-sipping-torture-tests-07 a try and
sent
- a REGISTER with Expires > 2^31 and lower than 2^32
(2147483748 in my case).
- a REGISTER with Expires > 2^32
(4294967596 = 2^32 + 300)
I used print_expires() to print the resulting values SER (0.9.3 +
changes) parsed.
It's a negative value in first case and 300 in the latter one.
parser/parse_expires.h defines exp_body_t to have 'int val' which
is not enough to store the parsed values.
Changing it to 'unsigned int val' prevents the negative values from
coming up in SER but does not solve the main problem.
The draft stats that a default value of 3600 seconds should be
assumed in case of errors, so an additional check to make sure
_e->val will always be below 2^32 is necessary.
I do have a small patch for our non-standard branch and could wrap
one up for HEAD if needed.
Hendrik
--
freenet Cityline GmbH, Hamburger Chaussee 2-4, 24114 Kiel, Germany
Phone: +49 (0)431 9020552, Fax: +49 (0)431 9020559
Internet: http://www.freenet.de, eMail: hendrik.scholz(a)freenet-ag.de
To All,
Has anyone tried to setup SER using a DHCP assigned
address behind a NAT? I just want to know what the
pro's and the con's were.
Thanks,
Alfred
____________________________________________________
Start your day with Yahoo! - make it your home page
http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs
