sr-users September 2005

sr-users@lists.kamailio.org

231 participants
508 discussions

[Serusers] BYE's not accounted
by Ashutosh Kumar 02 Sep '05

02 Sep '05

HI, My BYE's are not getting accounted in the mysql DB, though all other messages are getting reflected. I have put setflag for all messages, at the beginning of cfg. My relevant ser.cfg code is following. ..... ..... if (loose_route()) { if (has_totag() && (method=="INVITE" || method=="ACK")) { if (client_nat_test("3") || search("^Route:.*;nat=yes")) { setflag(6); use_media_proxy(); }; }; route(1); break; }; setflag(1); ..... ..... Please guide. Regards, Ashutosh Kumar

3 2

[Serusers] SEMS + SER howto
by Ryan Pagquil 01 Sep '05

01 Sep '05

Guys, Anybody has a good and detailed SEMS+SER howto, could please share it with me. I'm making SEMS as a voicemail for SER. I'm having a hard time configuring it. Or if not SEMS + SER maybe Asterisk + SER. Thanks, -- Ryan Pagquil Infodyne Inc. - PhilOnline.com 3603 Antel Global Corporate Center Doña Julia Vargas Ave. Ortigas Center Pasig City Tel: 687-0715 Web: www.philonline.com

5 9

[Serusers] Ser 0.9.3 and mysql module
by Daniel Corbe 01 Sep '05

01 Sep '05

Trying to load mysql.so with ser0.9.3 and I'm getting the following error: jomama:/usr/local/etc root# /usr/local/sbin/ser 0(6444) ERROR: load_module: could not open module </usr/local/lib/ser/modules/mysql.so>: dlopen(/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/mysql.so, 2): Symbol not found: _fm_malloc Referenced from: /usr/local/lib/ser/modules/mysql.so Expected in: /usr/local/sbin/ser 0(6444) parse error (26,13-14): failed to load module ERROR: bad config file (1 errors) I'm running Mac OS X Any help is appriciated. -Daniel

2 2

[Serusers] SEMS on Solaris10
by Jack Damn 01 Sep '05

01 Sep '05

Anyone got SEMS running on a Solaris 10 SPARC box ? Here it was compiled with gcc 3.3.2. When communicating with SER with FIFO, it dies with "(4576) ERROR: run (AmServer.cpp:164): odd trailer" when trying to read a line from the fifo. Any help appreciated. JJ.

1 0

[Users] question about LCR module
by jayesh nambiar 01 Sep '05

01 Sep '05

hi juha, I went through the readme, but i still did'nt understand one thing: In which order are the gateways in same group selected. suppose there are 2 gws in group_id 1, and if that group is given he highest priority, which gw will be selected. pls help me understand this... jayesh --------------------------------- Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail - You care about security. So do we.

2 1

[Users] Admin Guide, where?
by gmart-openser＠coinet.com 01 Sep '05

01 Sep '05

The INSTALL document refers to "admin's guide available from OpenSer website". I have not been able to find it. Is it currently one and the same as the Admin Guide from SER (iptel.org)? Gary

2 1

[Serusers] Question about auth_radius module
by Ricardo Martinez 01 Sep '05

01 Sep '05

Hello list. I was wondering if the module auth_radius can receive extra parameters from the Radius Server and proccess them as AVP values (something like the avp_radius can do) . I'm using : version: ser 0.9.4-rc1 (i386/linux) flags: STATS: Off, USE_IPV6, USE_TCP, DISABLE_NAGLE, USE_MCAST, DNS_IP_HACK, SHM_MEM, SHM_MMAP, PKG_MALLOC, FAST_LOCK-ADAPTIVE_WAIT ADAPTIVE_WAIT_LOOPS=1024, MAX_RECV_BUFFER_SIZE 262144, MAX_LISTEN 16, MAX_URI_SIZE 1024, BUF_SIZE 65535 @(#) $Id: main.c,v 1.197 2004/12/03 19:09:31 andrei Exp $ main.c compiled on 04:26:34 Jul 21 2005 with gcc 3.2 I was browsing the CVS directory and i noticed that this revision : Revision 1.18 / (view) - annotate - [select for diffs] , Thu Jun 30 20:29:31 2005 UTC (2 months ago) by andrei Branch: MAIN CVS Tags: last_merge_to_janakj, HEAD Changes since 1.17: +6 -2 lines Diff to previous 1.17 seems to do what i want. Am i right? Can the version that i'm actually using do the same? I Hope that somone can help me. Thanks! Regards, Ricardo Martinez.-

2 1

[Serusers] Re: [Serdev] PA query
by Mark Aiken 01 Sep '05

01 Sep '05

I've tried without success to get the PA module working properly. I did ask questions on the serusers list bit no one ever responded. I had a bit more luck with the internet2 PA code. I get the feeling they are the only folks working on the PA module. Even that code does not work as one would expect - NOTIFYs are not sent out to reflect changes in the location database. It would appear much work needs doing in this area. Mark On 7/25/05, Chiradeep Chhaya <cbchhaya(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi, > > Is anyone aware of a a documentation (apart from the guide available > online or the README) for the Presence Agent module? I am having some > difficulties figuring out how the code fits together and it's interface > with the router/registrar. > > Any help will be much appreciated. > > Regards > > -Chiradeep Chhaya > (MS in Information Security > Georgia Institute of Technology) > http://chiradeepchhaya.blogspot.com > > _______________________________________________ > Serdev mailing list > serdev(a)lists.iptel.org > http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serdev >

2 2

Re: [Serusers] problem with LCR and CANCEL
by Ben Smithurst 01 Sep '05

01 Sep '05

Miguel Angel Villar wrote: > Hi Ben. > You shouldn't use next_gw() in failure route if you receive Busy or > Cancel from user: > > failure_route[1] { ... thanks for the quick reply! I was sure I'd tried that already... :-( Your example works fine though - I think the key thing I had wrong before was having a t_on_failure call inside the failure route - I'm sure I saw this in an example config somewhere, and while I thought it seemed odd, assumed there was a good reason for it. Evidently not. :-) Using your failure block has made it all seem to work fine. thanks again -ben -- Ben Smithurst ben(a)gradwell.net gradwell dot com Ltd Systems Developer http://bensmithurst.com/ http://www.gradwell.com/

2 1

RE: [Serusers] problem with LCR and CANCEL
by Miguel Angel Villar 01 Sep '05

01 Sep '05

Hi Ben. You shouldn't use next_gw() in failure route if you receive Busy or Cancel from user: failure_route[1] { if (t_check_status("486")) { # Busy Here xlog("L_INFO", "time [%Tf] FAILURE ROUTE - 486 BUSY HERE\n"); t_relay(); break; }; if (t_check_status("487")) { # Request Terminated by CANCEL from Calling Party xlog("L_INFO", "time [%Tf] FAILURE ROUTE - 487 CANCEL BY CALLING PARTY\n"); break; }; if (!next_gw()) { t_reply("503", "Service not available - No more Gateways"); break; } else { t_relay(); }; } Regards. MaV.- > -----Mensaje original----- > De: Ben Smithurst [SMTP:ben@gradwell.net] > Enviado el: Jueves, 01 de Septiembre de 2005 11:20 a.m. > Para: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org > Asunto: [Serusers] problem with LCR and CANCEL > > hello, > > apologies if this is a silly question... > > Basically when using the LCR module, if I CANCEL the call before the > remote party picks up, the LCR system will place the call again through > the next gateway. I have found quite a few references to this in this > list archives etc, so it is probably something fairly simple I have > setup wrong, but none of the messages I found seemed to solve the > problem for me. :-( > > After some googling I have read that this is because the first gateway > is not responding with a 487 (which it is in my case). My config has, > among other bits, > > route { > > ...... > > t_on_failure("1"); > if (!next_gw()) { > sl_send_reply("500", "cannot use next gateway"); > break; > }; > > ..... > } > > failure_route[1] { > > t_on_failure("1"); > if (!next_gw()) { > t_reply("503", "No more gateways"); > break; > }; > > t_relay(); > } > > If required I can provide more details but is there anything obviously > missing from the config above which I should be using? > > thanks > -ben > > -- > > Ben Smithurst ben(a)gradwell.net gradwell dot com Ltd > Systems Developer http://bensmithurst.com/ http://www.gradwell.com/ > > _______________________________________________ > Serusers mailing list > serusers(a)lists.iptel.org > http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers

1 0

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

sr-users September 2005