Guys,
Anybody has a good and detailed SEMS+SER howto, could please
share it with me. I'm making SEMS as a voicemail for SER. I'm having a
hard time configuring it. Or if not SEMS + SER maybe Asterisk + SER.
Thanks,
--
Ryan Pagquil
Infodyne Inc. - PhilOnline.com
3603 Antel Global Corporate Center
Doña Julia Vargas Ave.
Ortigas Center Pasig City
Tel: 687-0715
Web: www.philonline.com
Trying to load mysql.so with ser0.9.3 and I'm getting the following error:
jomama:/usr/local/etc root# /usr/local/sbin/ser
0(6444) ERROR: load_module: could not open module
</usr/local/lib/ser/modules/mysql.so>:
dlopen(/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/mysql.so, 2): Symbol not found:
_fm_malloc
Referenced from: /usr/local/lib/ser/modules/mysql.so
Expected in: /usr/local/sbin/ser
0(6444) parse error (26,13-14): failed to load module
ERROR: bad config file (1 errors)
I'm running Mac OS X
Any help is appriciated.
-Daniel
Anyone got SEMS running on a Solaris 10 SPARC box ?
Here it was compiled with gcc 3.3.2.
When communicating with SER with FIFO, it dies with
"(4576) ERROR: run (AmServer.cpp:164): odd trailer" when trying to read a
line from the fifo.
Any help appreciated.
JJ.
hi juha,
I went through the readme, but i still did'nt understand one thing:
In which order are the gateways in same group selected. suppose there are 2 gws in group_id 1, and if that group is given he highest priority, which gw will be selected.
pls help me understand this...
jayesh
---------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail - You care about security. So do we.
The INSTALL document refers to "admin's guide available from OpenSer
website". I have not been able to find it. Is it currently one
and the same as the Admin Guide from SER (iptel.org)?
Gary
Hello list.
I was wondering if the module auth_radius can receive extra
parameters from the Radius Server and proccess them as AVP values (something
like the avp_radius can do) . I'm using :
version: ser 0.9.4-rc1 (i386/linux)
flags: STATS: Off, USE_IPV6, USE_TCP, DISABLE_NAGLE, USE_MCAST, DNS_IP_HACK,
SHM_MEM, SHM_MMAP, PKG_MALLOC, FAST_LOCK-ADAPTIVE_WAIT
ADAPTIVE_WAIT_LOOPS=1024, MAX_RECV_BUFFER_SIZE 262144, MAX_LISTEN 16,
MAX_URI_SIZE 1024, BUF_SIZE 65535
@(#) $Id: main.c,v 1.197 2004/12/03 19:09:31 andrei Exp $
main.c compiled on 04:26:34 Jul 21 2005 with gcc 3.2
I was browsing the CVS directory and i noticed that this revision :
Revision 1.18 / (view) - annotate - [select for diffs] , Thu Jun 30 20:29:31
2005 UTC (2 months ago) by andrei
Branch: MAIN
CVS Tags: last_merge_to_janakj, HEAD
Changes since 1.17: +6 -2 lines
Diff to previous 1.17
seems to do what i want.
Am i right?
Can the version that i'm actually using do the same?
I Hope that somone can help me.
Thanks!
Regards,
Ricardo Martinez.-
I've tried without success to get the PA module working properly. I did ask
questions on the serusers list bit no one ever responded.
I had a bit more luck with the internet2 PA code. I get the feeling they are
the only folks working on the PA module.
Even that code does not work as one would expect - NOTIFYs are not sent out
to reflect changes in the location database.
It would appear much work needs doing in this area.
Mark
On 7/25/05, Chiradeep Chhaya <cbchhaya(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Is anyone aware of a a documentation (apart from the guide available
> online or the README) for the Presence Agent module? I am having some
> difficulties figuring out how the code fits together and it's interface
> with the router/registrar.
>
> Any help will be much appreciated.
>
> Regards
>
> -Chiradeep Chhaya
> (MS in Information Security
> Georgia Institute of Technology)
> http://chiradeepchhaya.blogspot.com
>
> _______________________________________________
> Serdev mailing list
> serdev(a)lists.iptel.org
> http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serdev
>
Miguel Angel Villar wrote:
> Hi Ben.
> You shouldn't use next_gw() in failure route if you receive Busy or
> Cancel from user:
>
> failure_route[1] {
...
thanks for the quick reply!
I was sure I'd tried that already... :-(
Your example works fine though - I think the key thing I had wrong
before was having a t_on_failure call inside the failure route - I'm
sure I saw this in an example config somewhere, and while I thought it
seemed odd, assumed there was a good reason for it. Evidently not. :-)
Using your failure block has made it all seem to work fine.
thanks again
-ben
--
Ben Smithurst ben(a)gradwell.net gradwell dot com Ltd
Systems Developer http://bensmithurst.com/http://www.gradwell.com/
Hi Ben.
You shouldn't use next_gw() in failure route if you receive Busy or
Cancel from user:
failure_route[1] {
if (t_check_status("486")) { # Busy Here
xlog("L_INFO", "time [%Tf] FAILURE ROUTE - 486 BUSY
HERE\n");
t_relay();
break;
};
if (t_check_status("487")) { # Request Terminated by CANCEL from
Calling Party
xlog("L_INFO", "time [%Tf] FAILURE ROUTE - 487 CANCEL BY
CALLING PARTY\n");
break;
};
if (!next_gw()) {
t_reply("503", "Service not available - No more Gateways");
break;
} else {
t_relay();
};
}
Regards.
MaV.-
> -----Mensaje original-----
> De: Ben Smithurst [SMTP:ben@gradwell.net]
> Enviado el: Jueves, 01 de Septiembre de 2005 11:20 a.m.
> Para: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
> Asunto: [Serusers] problem with LCR and CANCEL
>
> hello,
>
> apologies if this is a silly question...
>
> Basically when using the LCR module, if I CANCEL the call before the
> remote party picks up, the LCR system will place the call again through
> the next gateway. I have found quite a few references to this in this
> list archives etc, so it is probably something fairly simple I have
> setup wrong, but none of the messages I found seemed to solve the
> problem for me. :-(
>
> After some googling I have read that this is because the first gateway
> is not responding with a 487 (which it is in my case). My config has,
> among other bits,
>
> route {
>
> ......
>
> t_on_failure("1");
> if (!next_gw()) {
> sl_send_reply("500", "cannot use next gateway");
> break;
> };
>
> .....
> }
>
> failure_route[1] {
>
> t_on_failure("1");
> if (!next_gw()) {
> t_reply("503", "No more gateways");
> break;
> };
>
> t_relay();
> }
>
> If required I can provide more details but is there anything obviously
> missing from the config above which I should be using?
>
> thanks
> -ben
>
> --
>
> Ben Smithurst ben(a)gradwell.net gradwell dot com Ltd
> Systems Developer http://bensmithurst.com/http://www.gradwell.com/
>
> _______________________________________________
> Serusers mailing list
> serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
> http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
hello,
apologies if this is a silly question...
Basically when using the LCR module, if I CANCEL the call before the
remote party picks up, the LCR system will place the call again through
the next gateway. I have found quite a few references to this in this
list archives etc, so it is probably something fairly simple I have
setup wrong, but none of the messages I found seemed to solve the
problem for me. :-(
After some googling I have read that this is because the first gateway
is not responding with a 487 (which it is in my case). My config has,
among other bits,
route {
......
t_on_failure("1");
if (!next_gw()) {
sl_send_reply("500", "cannot use next gateway");
break;
};
.....
}
failure_route[1] {
t_on_failure("1");
if (!next_gw()) {
t_reply("503", "No more gateways");
break;
};
t_relay();
}
If required I can provide more details but is there anything obviously
missing from the config above which I should be using?
thanks
-ben
--
Ben Smithurst ben(a)gradwell.net gradwell dot com Ltd
Systems Developer http://bensmithurst.com/http://www.gradwell.com/
