Hi again,
I've attached the core dump.
Br
hw
-----Original Message-----
From: Bogdan-Andrei Iancu [mailto:bogdan@voice-system.ro]
Sent: 29. september 2005 19:37
To: Helge Waastad
Cc: users(a)openser.org
Subject: Re: [Users] TLS
Hi Helge,
looks like a double free - since the mem functions used by TLS are
embedded, it quite hard to trace it. BTW, do you have the backtrace of
the core? it will help until I'm able to reproduce the crash.
regards,
bogdan
Helge Waastad wrote:
>Hi,
>sometimes when I retstart OpenSER eith tls support, I get:
>
>BUG: qm_free: freeing already freed pointer, first free:
tls/tls_init.c:
>ser_free(207) - aborting
>
>
>br hw
>
>
>
Hi,
I have a small problem :
I am running my openser on a system(linux/freebsd) with a loopback
interface(non routable) with some ip (10.102.4.139), now the incoming
packet come to openser with this IP (forwarded in l2 mode), it excepts
the packet and sends the reply, but the srcip of replied packet is
loopback ip, instead of the routable ip of the system. Can it be
configured to send the packet out using the routable ip.
Regards,
Ranveer.
Hi guys,
I got these errors whenever I restarted SER. What is the meaning
of these?
0(0) preload_udomain: ERROR: bad contact record in table aliases
0(0) preload_udomain: ERROR: for username 123
0(0) preload_udomain: ERROR: skipping...
0(0) preload_udomain: ERROR: bad contact record in table aliases
0(0) preload_udomain: ERROR: for username 108
0(0) preload_udomain: ERROR: skipping...
0(0) preload_udomain: ERROR: bad contact record in table aliases
0(0) preload_udomain: ERROR: for username 100
0(0) preload_udomain: ERROR: skipping...
0(0) preload_udomain: ERROR: bad contact record in table aliases
0(0) preload_udomain: ERROR: for username 130
0(0) preload_udomain: ERROR: skipping...
0(0) preload_udomain: ERROR: bad contact record in table aliases
0(0) preload_udomain: ERROR: for username 104
0(0) preload_udomain: ERROR: skipping...
0(0) preload_udomain: ERROR: bad contact record in table aliases
0(0) preload_udomain: ERROR: for username 124
0(0) preload_udomain: ERROR: skipping...
0(0) preload_udomain: ERROR: bad contact record in table aliases
0(0) preload_udomain: ERROR: for username 118
0(0) preload_udomain: ERROR: skipping...
0(0) preload_udomain: ERROR: bad contact record in table aliases
0(0) preload_udomain: ERROR: for username 128
0(0) preload_udomain: ERROR: skipping...
0(0) preload_udomain: ERROR: bad contact record in table aliases
0(0) preload_udomain: ERROR: for username 112
0(0) preload_udomain: ERROR: skipping...
0(0) preload_udomain: ERROR: bad contact record in table aliases
0(0) preload_udomain: ERROR: for username 111
0(0) preload_udomain: ERROR: skipping...
0(0) preload_udomain: ERROR: bad contact record in table aliases
0(0) preload_udomain: ERROR: for username 110
0(0) preload_udomain: ERROR: skipping...
0(0) preload_udomain: ERROR: bad contact record in table aliases
0(0) preload_udomain: ERROR: for username 109
0(0) preload_udomain: ERROR: skipping...
0(0) preload_udomain: ERROR: bad contact record in table aliases
0(0) preload_udomain: ERROR: for username 132
Could this be the problem with my aliases that are not been used by SER?
Thanks,
--
Ryan Pagquil
Infodyne Inc. - PhilOnline.com
3603 Antel Global Corporate Center
Doña Julia Vargas Ave.
Ortigas Center Pasig City
Tel: 687-0715
Web: www.philonline.com
I have tethereal on my ser server but didn't see a 408.
_____
From: Leon Sun [mailto:leon.sun@keywestcommunications.com]
Sent: Friday, September 30, 2005 5:41 PM
To: 'Leon Sun'; rthompson(a)vir2com.com
Cc: 'Mark Aiken'
Subject: RE: [Serusers] ser and * voicemail
Hi, guys,
I used Ethereal to trace SIP and found code 408 when it's time out. I
believe we need focus 408 rather than 487.
Sorry Rick, for last e-mail.
Regards
Leon
_____
From: Leon Sun [mailto:leon.sun@keywestcommunications.com]
Sent: Friday, September 30, 2005 2:33 PM
To: 'rthompson(a)vir2com.com'
Cc: 'Mark Aiken'
Subject: RE: [Serusers] ser and * voicemail
>From Mark:
SER normally sends a 487 when the INVITE timer runs out so you would need to
trigger the voicemail on that event. We have our feature server handing
timeouts not SER (our SER timeout is set to a very large value) so I'm not
sure the best way to proceed.
Does SER call the failure_route for a locally generated 487 timeout? If so
then rather than the 'break' you have there now just forward to vm. I would
set a different t_on_failure instead of reusing "1" though, so you dont keep
forwarding if the vm fails.
Mark
_____
From: Rick Thompson [mailto:rthompson@vir2com.com]
Sent: Friday, September 30, 2005 2:27 PM
To: 'Leon Sun'
Subject: RE: [Serusers] ser and * voicemail
Leon
Thanks for the reply to my post
I see what you are doing here, but that part has been taken care of. When I
get a failure on "INVITE" of 486, 404, 408 or 480 I look in the mysql
database and find the voicemail box for that uri and replace the sip contact
then prefix it with a "V" and relay it to asterisk. Over on the asterisk
side, I route the call to the voicemail context and delete the "V" and send
it to voicemail. All this works except when ser times out on the "INVITE"
and for some reason it doesn't route to asterisk. That's the problem I'm
having.
Rick
_____
From: Leon Sun [mailto:leon.sun@keywestcommunications.com]
Sent: Friday, September 30, 2005 4:36 PM
To: rthompson(a)vir2com.com; serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
Subject: RE: [Serusers] ser and * voicemail
Rick,
I had same problem before and I gave it up since I didn't get any answer
from list. I am using another way(tricky but working) to do voice mail. Hope
it can help you if you can't fix it.
1. Check location in your routing parts before relay, if not, forward
to Asterisk.
2. set up unconditional forward in ATA as 00 + ATA'DID. Make a route
in SER and point 00* to Asterisk.
3. Strip 00 in Asterisk and send it to voicemail2(${EXTEN})
Regards
Leon Sun
_____
From: serusers-bounces(a)iptel.org [mailto:serusers-bounces@lists.iptel.org] On
Behalf Of Rick Thompson
Sent: Friday, September 30, 2005 12:58 PM
To: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
Subject: [Serusers] ser and * voicemail
Hi All
I'm working with a ser script, written by someone that's gone now, that
routes inbound calls to an asterisk server for voicemail. The
failure_route[1], sends calls to asterisk and the IVR plays if the ua is
unreachable (not in location) "404", "408" or the ua is busy "486" but it
doesn't when the inv time exceeds 30 sec (rings for 30 sec or more). The
call just stops ringing and 10 sec later gets a fast busy. Any ideas from
anyone would be greatly appreciated. Here is the code I'm working with.
failure_route[1] {
xlog("L_ALERT", "%Tf %mf ****** Failure Route 1: <%rm> <%rr>
<%rs>\n");
if(t_check_status("487")) {
break;
};
if(method=="INVITE" && (t_check_status("486|408|404|480"))) {
if(avp_db_load("$ruri", "s:mailbox"))
avp_pushto("$ruri/username",
"s:mailbox");
prefix("V");
rewritehostport("A.B.C.D:5060");
append_branch();
xlog("L_ALERT", "****** Transfering to
Voicemail\n");
t_on_reply("1");
t_relay();
};
}
Thanks
Rick
hi
i just came by http://www.iptelorg.de/SOP.php, and it's quite clearly
SER, but then, on the downloads site, it tells me "This site offers
only commercial products and services . Please follow the links below
if you wish to find support related to respective software".
although their stuff looks good, can you really make GPLed code a
"commercial product"?
roy
Mark
Thanks for the re-post
What I see in ngrep and var/log/messages is a "CANCEL" from the ua and a
failure "487" on a reply. Don't know which happens first. Even if I take out
the "break" if and add "487" to the if(method== statement, it goes to the
asterisk server but vm doesn't play, no audio, and it drops the call anyway.
I think I'll try what you suggested about creating another t_on_failure[]
and test for it within the main routing block.
Rick
_____
From: Mark Aiken [mailto:aiken.mark@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, September 30, 2005 5:22 PM
To: Leon Sun
Cc: rthompson(a)vir2com.com; serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
Subject: Re: [Serusers] ser and * voicemail
SER normally sends a 487 when the INVITE timer runs out so you would need to
trigger the voicemail on that event. We have our feature server handing
timeouts not SER (our SER timeout is set to a very large value) so I'm not
sure the best way to proceed.
Does SER call the failure_route for a locally generated 487 timeout? If so
then rather than the 'break' you have there now just forward to vm. I would
set a different t_on_failure instead of reusing "1" though, so you dont keep
forwarding if the vm fails.
Mark
On 9/30/05, Leon Sun <leon.sun(a)keywestcommunications.com> wrote:
Rick,
I had same problem before and I gave it up since I didn't get any answer
from list. I am using another way(tricky but working) to do voice mail. Hope
it can help you if you can't fix it.
1. Check location in your routing parts before relay, if not, forward
to Asterisk.
2. set up unconditional forward in ATA as 00 + ATA'DID. Make a route
in SER and point 00* to Asterisk.
3. Strip 00 in Asterisk and send it to voicemail2(${EXTEN})
Regards
Leon Sun
_____
From: serusers-bounces(a)iptel.org [mailto:serusers-bounces@lists.iptel.org
<mailto:nces@iptel.org> ] On Behalf Of Rick Thompson
Sent: Friday, September 30, 2005 12:58 PM
To: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
Subject: [Serusers] ser and * voicemail
Hi All
I'm working with a ser script, written by someone that's gone now, that
routes inbound calls to an asterisk server for voicemail. The
failure_route[1], sends calls to asterisk and the IVR plays if the ua is
unreachable (not in location) "404", "408" or the ua is busy "486" but it
doesn't when the inv time exceeds 30 sec (rings for 30 sec or more). The
call just stops ringing and 10 sec later gets a fast busy. Any ideas from
anyone would be greatly appreciated. Here is the code I'm working with.
failure_route[1] {
xlog("L_ALERT", "%Tf %mf ****** Failure Route 1: <%rm> <%rr>
<%rs>\n");
if(t_check_status("487")) {
break;
};
if(method=="INVITE" && (t_check_status("486|408|404|480"))) {
if(avp_db_load("$ruri", "s:mailbox"))
avp_pushto("$ruri/username",
"s:mailbox");
prefix("V");
rewritehostport("A.B.C.D:5060");
append_branch();
xlog("L_ALERT", "****** Transfering to
Voicemail\n");
t_on_reply("1");
t_relay();
};
}
Thanks
Rick
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
Hi All
I'm working with a ser script, written by someone that's gone now, that
routes inbound calls to an asterisk server for voicemail. The
failure_route[1], sends calls to asterisk and the IVR plays if the ua is
unreachable (not in location) "404", "408" or the ua is busy "486" but it
doesn't when the inv time exceeds 30 sec (rings for 30 sec or more). The
call just stops ringing and 10 sec later gets a fast busy. Any ideas from
anyone would be greatly appreciated. Here is the code I'm working with.
failure_route[1] {
xlog("L_ALERT", "%Tf %mf ****** Failure Route 1: <%rm> <%rr>
<%rs>\n");
if(t_check_status("487")) {
break;
};
if(method=="INVITE" && (t_check_status("486|408|404|480"))) {
if(avp_db_load("$ruri", "s:mailbox"))
avp_pushto("$ruri/username",
"s:mailbox");
prefix("V");
rewritehostport("A.B.C.D:5060");
append_branch();
xlog("L_ALERT", "****** Transfering to
Voicemail\n");
t_on_reply("1");
t_relay();
};
}
Thanks
Rick
Hi,
I'm having problems getting SER to (loose) route requests from UDP to TCP.
I'm not sure if the UA is at fault here or some SER config issue.
SER receives an INVITE over TCP, record_route() is called and then the
request is relayed via UDP (t_relay_to_udp) to the UA. The INVITE relayed to
the UDP UA now has 2 Record-Route headers added by SER. One has the
transport=tcp parameter.
Record-Route: <sip:xx.xx.xx.xx;r2=on;ftag=xyz;lr=on>
Record-Route: <sip:xx.xx.xx.xx;transport=tcp;r2=on;ftag=xyz>
When the UA sends the BYE to SER, it has the 2 Route headers like so (on a
single line):
Route: <sip:xx.xx.xx.xx;r2=on;ftag=xyz;lr=on>,<sip:xx.xx.xx.xx
;transport=tcp;r2=on;ftag=xyz;lr=on>
The SER script simply calls t_relay() in the loose_route section of the
script.
I expected t_relay() to relay the BYE via TCP, since the Route header has
transport=tcp, but it sends the BYE via UDP instead.
Anyone seen this problem before? Do I need to check for transport=tcp and
call t_relay_to_tcp, rather than using t_relay after loose_route()?
Mark
I am probably not the best person to ask that, since I have been brute
forcing my way through - i.e. reading and debugging code without
consulting a manual. There are tons of resources on the net for coding
in C and since you already have 3 years of experience I am sure that
moving to ANSI C won't be too hard. If you have coded in JAVA or C++
then it should be a breeze. If anything you should read up on pointers
and memory allocation, because those two seem to catch most new coders
the most.
The GDB suggestion is also excellent. I have found it to be one of the
most useful debugging tools that I have ever used since it gives a nice
stack backtrace with line numbers etc.
good luck,
Zach Keatts
Software Engineer
Nuvio.com
viquar syed wrote:
> Hey Zach,
> First off, thanks for your reply. Yours is the first one I got beside
> the OUT OF OFFICE notices.
> I plan on getting the installation up. I want to get down to Stack
> level, but I guess learning ANSI C would be my first step, have your
> foud anything useful towards this ?
> Again I appreciate your input.
>
> Thanks
> Viq
> DBA/Developer
> Cordia Communications
> Orlando FL
> 407-313-7015
>
> On 9/30/05, *zkeatts* <zkeatts(a)nuvio.com <mailto:zkeatts@nuvio.com>>
> wrote:
>
> I am in a similar situation, as far as the ANSI C goes. What has
> helped
> me is to jump in, find a bug and try to figure out what is going on.
> Granted you might not be as lucky as me on your first try in finding
> bugs, but trust me even if you don't there is plenty to look
> at. I can
> promise you it will be confusing and infuriating, but slowly
> things will
> begin to make sense.
>
> Start by setting up a basic SER installation on a Linux box. Once you
> get it set up and working then you can try out different features.
> Don't be afraid to send messages to this group, I have found them
> very
> helpful and attentive to all levels of questions.
>
> good luck,
>
> Zach Keatts
> Software Engineer
> Nuvio.com <http://Nuvio.com>
>
> viquar syed wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> > My company wants me to hop on to Linux/Unix from Bill Gates, and to
> > make it even better I am suppose to get upto speed writing
> modules to
> > enhance our SER deployment.
> > What experience do I have writing in ANSI C "0", "ZERO", "nada",
> > BUT, I have been programming for over three yrs now so the logic is
> > not an issue.
> > My question, whats the best way to start, I am currently going
> through
> > the documentation on SER Admin, need to have a plan.
> > I know no one likes newbees, but hey any help would be highly
> appreciated.
> > Thanks
> > Viq
> >
> >------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >Serusers mailing list
> >serusers(a)lists.iptel.org <mailto:serusers@lists.iptel.org>
> >http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
> >
> >
>
>
