Hello! I want to configure ser+asterisk in a same host, I don't know asterisk if run correct when I watch the asterisk process is run ,but when I used the command astman to handle asterisk ,it's show be connect refuse, cann't open port:5038 .Could you give me some hint to resolve it? and Could you pasted you ser.cfg and asterisk's conf file for a referrence?
regard!
ZhaoMin
----- Original Message -----
From: "Dave" <ddx66(a)yahoo.com>
To: <serusers(a)iptel.org>
Sent: Tuesday, July 05, 2005 10:19 PM
Subject: [Serusers] SDP c= field mangled
> Hi,I am experiencing a strange issue. I am forwarding
> calls to Asterisk voicemail upon no-response. So, in
> failure route, I simply check the status 408 or 486
> and if true, I jump to a routing-block. In there, I
> have the following:
> -----
> revert_uri();
> rewritehost(Asterisk-IP);
> append_branch();
> if (isflagset(6) || isflagset(7)) use_media_proxy();
> if (!t_relay()...)
> ------
>
>
> Now, Asterisk does receive the invite, except that the
> SDP in the SIP invite looks like (PAY ATTENTION TO c=
> field).
>
> -------------------------------
> v=0
> o=208500512 8000 8001 IN IP4 192.168.1.104
> s=SIP Call
> c=IN IP4 213.189.X.Y213.189.X.Y
> t=0 0
> m=audio 3532235322 RTP/AVP 0 8 4 18 3
> a=sendrecv
> a=rtpmap:0 PCMU/8000
> a=rtpmap:8 PCMA/8000
> a=rtpmap:4 G723/8000
> a=rtpmap:18 G729/8000
> a=rtpmap:3 GSM/8000
> a=ptime:20
> ------------------------------------------
>
> The c= field has the same IP twice and thus the INVITE
> is rejected by Asterisk.
>
> Is this a bug and did someone have such an issue?
> Thanks
>
>
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> http://mail.yahoo.com
>
> _______________________________________________
> Serusers mailing list
> Serusers(a)iptel.org
> http://mail.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
Hello i already running Ser 0.9.3 with Mysql and Serweb, but I cant know how
to configure Ser with SEMS, I read the doc install, but no work, any basic
example of configuration ser+sems for newbye user.
Thanks and sorry for my bad english
I'm running OpenSER 0.10.x and SEMS HEAD. A few questions:
1. What permissions to the fifo's normally need and how does that
affect the uid/gid you run openser & sems as?
2. Will those versions work together?
Thanks,
A.
--
Adam Sherman
Technologist
"bad username or password" display when i have
default username and password (admin/heslo) login
SERWEB,my domain is local IP address.
would you link to tell why and how to do it ?
thanks.
___________________________________________________________
雅虎免费G邮箱－中国第一绝无垃圾邮件骚扰超大邮箱
http://cn.mail.yahoo.com/?id=77071
HI,
Dear Iqbal, i checked in /usr/local/lib/ser/modules
But i am not able to find lcr module.
If it is second party module let me please know from
where i can get it?
Thank You
Yours,
Abdul Lateef
Computer Programmer
HATIF COM
Mob: +974 - 5405022
Tel: +974 - 4883068
ICQ: 276994704
YM!: abdul_zu
Fax: +974 - 4883063
Doha Qatar
http://www.hatif.com
__________________________________
Yahoo! Mail
Stay connected, organized, and protected. Take the tour:
http://tour.mail.yahoo.com/mailtour.html
Hi. I have a centralized mysql server for SER database, and have 2 SER
server connecting to the database.
I failed to bridge UA 1 that is connected to SER A and the other UA 2 that
is connected to SER B.
Quite confused with the domain and alias actually, I wish to differentiate
UA that register to different SER, thus I configure such that SER A has its
IP as domain name and SER B has its IP as its domain name. Is it
inappropriate to do that? What is the proper way to do so?
Any guideline that I can bridge UA that is connected to different proxy to
talk to each other?
Thanks in advance. =)
Regards,
Chia
Hi all I have been looking at the debugs in order to try to figure out
If I'm doing something wrong at my SER.CFG
I have the following:
UA ----> SER -----> B2BUA -----> SER ------> PSTN-GW
1. The user agent place a call to the SER proxy.
2. SER Proxy receives the call and forwads to B2BUA (VOCAL at the same
server using UDP port 5065)
3. B2BUA receives the calls activates the Billing supervision and Sends
an invite for a new call to the SER.
4. SER receives the call from the B2BUA and rewrite host and port to the
PSTN-GW.
5. PSTN-GW receives the invite from the SER and sends back the ACK.
6. Inmediatly from some reason SER is sending a BYE to the call.
I'm attaching a debug from the SER and my SER.CFG file
Could anybody help me please?
Regards
Alberto Cruz
Jun 25 08:43:31 sipsrv ser[1936]: SIP Request:
Jun 25 08:43:31 sipsrv ser[1936]: method: <INVITE>
Jun 25 08:43:31 sipsrv ser[1936]: uri: <sip:018183324166@sipsrv.conecta-te.com>
Jun 25 08:43:31 sipsrv ser[1936]: version: <SIP/2.0>
Jun 25 08:43:31 sipsrv ser[1936]: parse_headers: flags=1
Jun 25 08:43:31 sipsrv ser[1936]: Found param type 232, <branch> = <z9hG4bK-46d68929>; state=16
Jun 25 08:43:31 sipsrv ser[1936]: end of header reached, state=5
Jun 25 08:43:31 sipsrv ser[1936]: parse_headers: Via found, flags=1
Jun 25 08:43:31 sipsrv ser[1936]: parse_headers: this is the first via
Jun 25 08:43:31 sipsrv ser[1936]: After parse_msg...
Jun 25 08:43:31 sipsrv ser[1936]: preparing to run routing scripts...
Jun 25 08:43:31 sipsrv ser[1936]: parse_headers: flags=128
Jun 25 08:43:31 sipsrv ser[1936]: end of header reached, state=9
Jun 25 08:43:31 sipsrv ser[1936]: DEBUG: get_hdr_field: <To> [42]; uri=[sip:018183324166@sipsrv.conecta-te.com]
Jun 25 08:43:31 sipsrv ser[1936]: DEBUG: to body [<sip:018183324166@sipsrv.conecta-te.com>^M ]
Jun 25 08:43:31 sipsrv ser[1936]: get_hdr_field: cseq <CSeq>: <101> <INVITE>
Jun 25 08:43:31 sipsrv ser[1936]: DEBUG:maxfwd:is_maxfwd_present: value = 70
Jun 25 08:43:31 sipsrv ser[1936]: DBG:maxfwd:process_maxfwd_header: value 70 decreased to 16
Jun 25 08:43:31 sipsrv ser[1936]: parse_headers: flags=64
Jun 25 08:43:31 sipsrv ser[1936]: DEBUG: add_param: tag=7a83401cfe54b69o0
Jun 25 08:43:31 sipsrv ser[1936]: end of header reached, state=29
Jun 25 08:43:31 sipsrv ser[1936]: parse_headers: flags=256
Jun 25 08:43:31 sipsrv ser[1936]: DEBUG: get_hdr_body : content_length=316
Jun 25 08:43:31 sipsrv ser[1936]: found end of header
Jun 25 08:43:31 sipsrv ser[1936]: find_first_route: No Route headers found
Jun 25 08:43:31 sipsrv ser[1936]: loose_route: There is no Route HF
Jun 25 08:43:31 sipsrv ser[1936]: grep_sock_info - checking if host==us: 21==11 && [sipsrv.conecta-te.com] == [200.94.75.6]
Jun 25 08:43:31 sipsrv ser[1936]: grep_sock_info - checking if port 5060 matches port 5060
Jun 25 08:43:31 sipsrv ser[1936]: grep_sock_info - checking if host==us: 21==11 && [sipsrv.conecta-te.com] == [200.94.75.6]
Jun 25 08:43:31 sipsrv ser[1936]: grep_sock_info - checking if port 5060 matches port 5060
Jun 25 08:43:31 sipsrv ser[1936]: grep_sock_info - checking if host==us: 21==11 && [sipsrv.conecta-te.com] == [200.94.75.6]
Jun 25 08:43:31 sipsrv ser[1936]: grep_sock_info - checking if port 5060 matches port 5060
Jun 25 08:43:31 sipsrv ser[1936]: grep_sock_info - checking if host==us: 21==11 && [sipsrv.conecta-te.com] == [200.94.75.6]
Jun 25 08:43:31 sipsrv ser[1936]: grep_sock_info - checking if port 5060 matches port 5060
Jun 25 08:43:31 sipsrv ser[1936]: Hey this request is NOT from B2BUA
Jun 25 08:43:31 sipsrv ser[1936]: FORWARDING TO B2BUA
Jun 25 08:43:31 sipsrv ser[1936]: parse_headers: flags=-1
Jun 25 08:43:31 sipsrv ser[1936]: parse_headers: flags=64
Jun 25 08:43:31 sipsrv ser[1936]: parse_headers: flags=64
Jun 25 08:43:31 sipsrv ser[1936]: parse_headers: flags=-1
Jun 25 08:43:31 sipsrv ser[1936]: check_via_address(200.67.33.247, 172.31.253.127, 0)
Jun 25 08:43:31 sipsrv ser[1936]: Sending: INVITE sip:018183324166@sipsrv.conecta-te.com SIP/2.0^M Record-Route: <sip:018183324166@200.94.75.6:5060;nat=yes;ftag=7a83401cfe54b69o0;lr=on>^M Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 200.94.75.6;branch=0^M Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 172.31.253.127:5060;rport=60425;received=200.67.33.247;branch=z9hG4bK-46d68929^M From: 8183651723 <sip:8183651723@sipsrv.conecta-te.com>;tag=7a83401cfe54b69o0^M To: <sip:018183324166@sipsrv.conecta-te.com>^M Call-ID: b5fcf1e1-baf4a709(a)172.31.253.127^M CSeq: 101 INVITE^M Max-Forwards: 16^M Contact: 8183651723 <sip:8183651723@200.67.33.247:60425>^M Expires: 240^M User-Agent: Linksys/PAP2-2.0.12(LS)^M Content-Length: 316^M Allow: ACK, BYE, CANCEL, INFO, INVITE, NOTIFY, OPTIONS, REFER^M Supported: x-sipura^M Content-Type: application/sdp^M P-hint: PASANDO POR EL B2BUA^M P-hint: APLICO NAT AL B2BUA^M ^M v=0^M o=- 23012599 23012599 IN IP4 172.31.253.127^M s=-^M c=IN IP4 172.31.253.127^M t=0 0^M m=audio 16458 RTP/AVP 18 0 4 8 100 101^M a=rtpmap:18 G729a/8000^M a=rtpmap:0 PCMU/800
Jun 25 08:43:31 sipsrv ser[1936]: orig. len=884, new_len=1105, proto=1
Jun 25 08:43:31 sipsrv ser[1936]: DEBUG:destroy_avp_list: destroying list (nil)
Jun 25 08:43:31 sipsrv ser[1936]: receive_msg: cleaning up
Jun 25 08:43:31 sipsrv ser[1929]: SIP Request:
Jun 25 08:43:31 sipsrv ser[1929]: method: <INVITE>
Jun 25 08:43:31 sipsrv ser[1929]: uri: <sip:018183324166@200.94.75.6:5060>
Jun 25 08:43:31 sipsrv ser[1929]: version: <SIP/2.0>
Jun 25 08:43:31 sipsrv ser[1929]: parse_headers: flags=1
Jun 25 08:43:31 sipsrv ser[1929]: end of header reached, state=5
Jun 25 08:43:31 sipsrv ser[1929]: parse_headers: Via found, flags=1
Jun 25 08:43:31 sipsrv ser[1929]: parse_headers: this is the first via
Jun 25 08:43:31 sipsrv ser[1929]: After parse_msg...
Jun 25 08:43:31 sipsrv ser[1929]: preparing to run routing scripts...
Jun 25 08:43:31 sipsrv ser[1929]: parse_headers: flags=128
Jun 25 08:43:31 sipsrv ser[1929]: end of header reached, state=9
Jun 25 08:43:31 sipsrv ser[1929]: DEBUG: get_hdr_field: <To> [42]; uri=[sip:018183324166@sipsrv.conecta-te.com]
Jun 25 08:43:31 sipsrv ser[1929]: DEBUG: to body [<sip:018183324166@sipsrv.conecta-te.com>^M ]
Jun 25 08:43:31 sipsrv ser[1929]: get_hdr_field: cseq <CSeq>: <101> <INVITE>
Jun 25 08:43:31 sipsrv ser[1929]: DEBUG:maxfwd:is_maxfwd_present: value = 16
Jun 25 08:43:31 sipsrv ser[1929]: parse_headers: flags=64
Jun 25 08:43:31 sipsrv ser[1929]: check_via_address(200.94.75.6, 200.94.75.6, 0)
Jun 25 08:43:31 sipsrv ser[1929]: parse_headers: flags=33554432
Jun 25 08:43:31 sipsrv ser[1929]: DEBUG: add_param: tag=7a83401cfe54b69o0
Jun 25 08:43:31 sipsrv ser[1929]: end of header reached, state=29
Jun 25 08:43:31 sipsrv ser[1929]: parse_headers: flags=256
Jun 25 08:43:31 sipsrv ser[1929]: DEBUG: get_hdr_body : content_length=316
Jun 25 08:43:31 sipsrv ser[1929]: found end of header
Jun 25 08:43:31 sipsrv ser[1929]: find_first_route: No Route headers found
Jun 25 08:43:31 sipsrv ser[1929]: loose_route: There is no Route HF
Jun 25 08:43:31 sipsrv ser[1929]: grep_sock_info - checking if host==us: 11==11 && [200.94.75.6] == [200.94.75.6]
Jun 25 08:43:31 sipsrv ser[1929]: grep_sock_info - checking if port 5060 matches port 5060
Jun 25 08:43:31 sipsrv ser[1929]: grep_sock_info - checking if host==us: 11==11 && [200.94.75.6] == [200.94.75.6]
Jun 25 08:43:31 sipsrv ser[1929]: grep_sock_info - checking if port 5060 matches port 5060
Jun 25 08:43:31 sipsrv ser[1929]: parse_headers: flags=64
Jun 25 08:43:31 sipsrv ser[1929]: check_via_address(200.94.75.6, 200.94.75.6, 0)
Jun 25 08:43:31 sipsrv ser[1929]: parse_headers: flags=33554432
Jun 25 08:43:31 sipsrv ser[1929]: lookup(): '018183324166' Not found in usrloc
Jun 25 08:43:31 sipsrv ser[1929]: grep_sock_info - checking if host==us: 11==11 && [200.94.75.6] == [200.94.75.6]
Jun 25 08:43:31 sipsrv ser[1929]: grep_sock_info - checking if port 5060 matches port 5060
Jun 25 08:43:31 sipsrv ser[1929]: lookup(): '018183324166' Not found in usrloc
Jun 25 08:43:31 sipsrv ser[1929]: DEBUG: t_newtran: msg id=9 , global msg id=1 , T on entrance=0xffffffff
Jun 25 08:43:31 sipsrv ser[1929]: parse_headers: flags=-1
Jun 25 08:43:31 sipsrv ser[1929]: parse_headers: flags=60
Jun 25 08:43:31 sipsrv ser[1929]: t_lookup_request: start searching: hash=21902, isACK=0
Jun 25 08:43:31 sipsrv ser[1929]: DEBUG: proceeding to pre-RFC3261 transaction matching
Jun 25 08:43:31 sipsrv ser[1929]: DEBUG: t_lookup_request: no transaction found
Jun 25 08:43:31 sipsrv ser[1929]: DBG: trans=0x4057c048, callback type 1, id 0 entered
Jun 25 08:43:31 sipsrv ser[1929]: SER: new INVITE
Jun 25 08:43:31 sipsrv ser[1929]: parse_headers: flags=-1
Jun 25 08:43:31 sipsrv ser[1929]: check_via_address(200.94.75.6, 200.94.75.6, 0)
Jun 25 08:43:31 sipsrv ser[1929]: WARNING:vqm_resize: resize(0) called
Jun 25 08:43:31 sipsrv ser[1929]: DEBUG: reply sent out. buf=0x810fe78: SIP/2.0 1..., shmem=0x4057bcd8: SIP/2.0 1
Jun 25 08:43:31 sipsrv ser[1929]: DEBUG: _reply_light: finished
Jun 25 08:43:31 sipsrv ser[1929]: DEBUG: mk_proxy: doing DNS lookup...
Jun 25 08:43:31 sipsrv ser[1929]: check_via_address(200.94.75.6, 200.94.75.6, 0)
Jun 25 08:43:31 sipsrv ser[1929]: DEBUG: add_to_tail_of_timer[4]: 0x4057c160
Jun 25 08:43:31 sipsrv ser[1929]: DEBUG: add_to_tail_of_timer[0]: 0x4057c170
Jun 25 08:43:31 sipsrv ser[1929]: SER: new transaction fwd'ed
Jun 25 08:43:31 sipsrv ser[1929]: DEBUG:destroy_avp_list: destroying list (nil)
Jun 25 08:43:31 sipsrv ser[1929]: receive_msg: cleaning up
Jun 25 08:43:31 sipsrv ser[1931]: SIP Reply (status):
Jun 25 08:43:31 sipsrv ser[1931]: version: <SIP/2.0>
Jun 25 08:43:31 sipsrv ser[1931]: status: <100>
Jun 25 08:43:31 sipsrv ser[1931]: reason: <Trying>
Jun 25 08:43:31 sipsrv ser[1931]: parse_headers: flags=1
Jun 25 08:43:31 sipsrv ser[1931]: Found param type 232, <branch> = <z9hG4bKe855.757a9ce3.0>; state=9
Jun 25 08:43:31 sipsrv ser[1931]: parse_via: next_via
Jun 25 08:43:31 sipsrv ser[1931]: end of header reached, state=5
Jun 25 08:43:31 sipsrv ser[1931]: parse_headers: Via found, flags=1
Jun 25 08:43:31 sipsrv ser[1931]: parse_headers: this is the first via
Jun 25 08:43:31 sipsrv ser[1931]: After parse_msg...
Jun 25 08:43:31 sipsrv ser[1931]: forward_reply: found module tm, passing reply to it
Jun 25 08:43:31 sipsrv ser[1931]: DEBUG: t_check: msg id=12 global id=2 T start=(nil)
Jun 25 08:43:31 sipsrv ser[1931]: parse_headers: flags=17
Jun 25 08:43:31 sipsrv ser[1931]: DEBUG: add_param: tag=2BBC1008-1340
Jun 25 08:43:31 sipsrv ser[1931]: end of header reached, state=29
Jun 25 08:43:31 sipsrv ser[1931]: DEBUG: get_hdr_field: <To> [60]; uri=[sip:018183324166@sipsrv.conecta-te.com]
Jun 25 08:43:31 sipsrv ser[1931]: DEBUG: to body [<sip:018183324166@sipsrv.conecta-te.com>]
Jun 25 08:43:31 sipsrv ser[1931]: get_hdr_field: cseq <CSeq>: <101> <INVITE>
Jun 25 08:43:31 sipsrv ser[1931]: parse_headers: flags=4
Jun 25 08:43:31 sipsrv ser[1931]: DEBUG: t_reply_matching: hash 21902 label 1053402967 branch 0
Jun 25 08:43:31 sipsrv ser[1931]: DEBUG: t_reply_matching: reply matched (T=0x4057c048)!
Jun 25 08:43:31 sipsrv ser[1931]: DEBUG: t_check: msg id=12 global id=12 T end=0x4057c048
Jun 25 08:43:31 sipsrv ser[1931]: DEBUG: reply_received: org. status uas=100, uac[0]=0 local=0 is_invite=1)
Jun 25 08:43:31 sipsrv ser[1931]: ->>>>>>>>> T_code=100, new_code=100
Jun 25 08:43:31 sipsrv ser[1931]: DEBUG: relay_reply: branch=0, save=0, relay=-1
Jun 25 08:43:31 sipsrv ser[1931]: DEBUG: add_to_tail_of_timer[1]: 0x4057c170
Jun 25 08:43:31 sipsrv ser[1931]: DEBUG:destroy_avp_list: destroying list (nil)
Jun 25 08:43:31 sipsrv ser[1931]: receive_msg: cleaning up
Jun 25 08:43:32 sipsrv ser[1943]: DEBUG: timer routine:4,tl=0x4057c160 next=(nil)
Jun 25 08:43:36 sipsrv ser[1930]: SIP Reply (status):
Jun 25 08:43:36 sipsrv ser[1930]: version: <SIP/2.0>
Jun 25 08:43:36 sipsrv ser[1930]: status: <183>
Jun 25 08:43:36 sipsrv ser[1930]: reason: <Session Progress>
Jun 25 08:43:36 sipsrv ser[1930]: parse_headers: flags=1
Jun 25 08:43:36 sipsrv ser[1930]: Found param type 232, <branch> = <z9hG4bKe855.757a9ce3.0>; state=9
Jun 25 08:43:36 sipsrv ser[1930]: parse_via: next_via
Jun 25 08:43:36 sipsrv ser[1930]: end of header reached, state=5
Jun 25 08:43:36 sipsrv ser[1930]: parse_headers: Via found, flags=1
Jun 25 08:43:36 sipsrv ser[1930]: parse_headers: this is the first via
Jun 25 08:43:36 sipsrv ser[1930]: After parse_msg...
Jun 25 08:43:36 sipsrv ser[1930]: forward_reply: found module tm, passing reply to it
Jun 25 08:43:36 sipsrv ser[1930]: DEBUG: t_check: msg id=6 global id=2 T start=0xffffffff
Jun 25 08:43:36 sipsrv ser[1930]: parse_headers: flags=17
Jun 25 08:43:36 sipsrv ser[1930]: DEBUG: add_param: tag=2BBC1008-1340
Jun 25 08:43:36 sipsrv ser[1930]: end of header reached, state=29
Jun 25 08:43:36 sipsrv ser[1930]: DEBUG: get_hdr_field: <To> [60]; uri=[sip:018183324166@sipsrv.conecta-te.com]
Jun 25 08:43:36 sipsrv ser[1930]: DEBUG: to body [<sip:018183324166@sipsrv.conecta-te.com>]
Jun 25 08:43:36 sipsrv ser[1930]: get_hdr_field: cseq <CSeq>: <101> <INVITE>
Jun 25 08:43:36 sipsrv ser[1930]: parse_headers: flags=4
Jun 25 08:43:36 sipsrv ser[1930]: DEBUG: t_reply_matching: hash 21902 label 1053402967 branch 0
Jun 25 08:43:36 sipsrv ser[1930]: DEBUG: t_reply_matching: reply matched (T=0x4057c048)!
Jun 25 08:43:36 sipsrv ser[1930]: DEBUG: t_check: msg id=6 global id=6 T end=0x4057c048
Jun 25 08:43:36 sipsrv ser[1930]: DEBUG: reply_received: org. status uas=100, uac[0]=100 local=0 is_invite=1)
Jun 25 08:43:36 sipsrv ser[1930]: ->>>>>>>>> T_code=100, new_code=183
Jun 25 08:43:36 sipsrv ser[1930]: DEBUG: relay_reply: branch=0, save=0, relay=0
Jun 25 08:43:36 sipsrv ser[1930]: old size: 752, new size: 698
Jun 25 08:43:36 sipsrv ser[1930]: build_res_from_sip_res: copied size: orig:89, new: 35, rest: 663 msg= SIP/2.0 183 Session Progress^M Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 200.94.75.6:5065^M From: 8183651723 <sip:8183651723@sipsrv.conecta-te.com>;tag=7a83401cfe54b69o0^M To: <sip:018183324166@sipsrv.conecta-te.com>;tag=2BBC1008-1340^M Date: Sat, 25 Jun 2005 13:43:56 GMT^M Call-ID: 5c2d7341271e8b55e0cb066402224168(a)200.94.75.6^M Server: Cisco-SIPGateway/IOS-12.x^M CSeq: 101 INVITE^M Allow-Events: telephone-event^M Content-Type: application/sdp^M Content-Disposition: session;handling=required^M Content-Length: 212^M ^M v=0^M o=CiscoSystemsSIP-GW-UserAgent 375 1794 IN IP4 200.94.75.1^M s=SIP Call^M c=IN IP4 200.94.27.30^M t=0 0^M m=audio 16960 RTP/AVP 18^M c=IN IP4 200.94.27.30^M a=rtpmap:18 G729/8000^M a=fmtp:18 annexb=no^M a=ptime:20^M
Jun 25 08:43:36 sipsrv ser[1930]: DEBUG: reply relayed. buf=0x810f708: SIP/2.0 1..., shmem=0x4057bcd8: SIP/2.0 1
Jun 25 08:43:36 sipsrv ser[1930]: DEBUG: add_to_tail_of_timer[1]: 0x4057c170
Jun 25 08:43:36 sipsrv ser[1930]: DEBUG:destroy_avp_list: destroying list (nil)
Jun 25 08:43:36 sipsrv ser[1930]: receive_msg: cleaning up
Jun 25 08:43:41 sipsrv ser[1935]: SIP Reply (status):
Jun 25 08:43:41 sipsrv ser[1935]: version: <SIP/2.0>
Jun 25 08:43:41 sipsrv ser[1935]: status: <200>
Jun 25 08:43:41 sipsrv ser[1935]: reason: <OK>
Jun 25 08:43:41 sipsrv ser[1935]: parse_headers: flags=1
Jun 25 08:43:41 sipsrv ser[1935]: Found param type 232, <branch> = <z9hG4bKe855.757a9ce3.0>; state=9
Jun 25 08:43:41 sipsrv ser[1935]: parse_via: next_via
Jun 25 08:43:41 sipsrv ser[1935]: end of header reached, state=5
Jun 25 08:43:41 sipsrv ser[1935]: parse_headers: Via found, flags=1
Jun 25 08:43:41 sipsrv ser[1935]: parse_headers: this is the first via
Jun 25 08:43:41 sipsrv ser[1935]: After parse_msg...
Jun 25 08:43:41 sipsrv ser[1935]: forward_reply: found module tm, passing reply to it
Jun 25 08:43:41 sipsrv ser[1935]: DEBUG: t_check: msg id=11 global id=0 T start=0xffffffff
Jun 25 08:43:41 sipsrv ser[1935]: parse_headers: flags=17
Jun 25 08:43:41 sipsrv ser[1935]: DEBUG: add_param: tag=2BBC1008-1340
Jun 25 08:43:41 sipsrv ser[1935]: end of header reached, state=29
Jun 25 08:43:41 sipsrv ser[1935]: DEBUG: get_hdr_field: <To> [60]; uri=[sip:018183324166@sipsrv.conecta-te.com]
Jun 25 08:43:41 sipsrv ser[1935]: DEBUG: to body [<sip:018183324166@sipsrv.conecta-te.com>]
Jun 25 08:43:41 sipsrv ser[1935]: get_hdr_field: cseq <CSeq>: <101> <INVITE>
Jun 25 08:43:41 sipsrv ser[1935]: parse_headers: flags=4
Jun 25 08:43:41 sipsrv ser[1935]: DEBUG: t_reply_matching: hash 21902 label 1053402967 branch 0
Jun 25 08:43:41 sipsrv ser[1935]: DEBUG: t_reply_matching: reply matched (T=0x4057c048)!
Jun 25 08:43:41 sipsrv ser[1935]: parse_headers: flags=4
Jun 25 08:43:41 sipsrv ser[1935]: DEBUG: t_check: msg id=11 global id=11 T end=0x4057c048
Jun 25 08:43:41 sipsrv ser[1935]: DEBUG: reply_received: org. status uas=183, uac[0]=183 local=0 is_invite=1)
Jun 25 08:43:41 sipsrv ser[1935]: ->>>>>>>>> T_code=183, new_code=200
Jun 25 08:43:41 sipsrv ser[1935]: DEBUG: relay_reply: branch=0, save=0, relay=0
Jun 25 08:43:41 sipsrv ser[1935]: old size: 886, new size: 832
Jun 25 08:43:41 sipsrv ser[1935]: build_res_from_sip_res: copied size: orig:75, new: 21, rest: 811 msg= SIP/2.0 200 OK^M Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 200.94.75.6:5065^M From: 8183651723 <sip:8183651723@sipsrv.conecta-te.com>;tag=7a83401cfe54b69o0^M To: <sip:018183324166@sipsrv.conecta-te.com>;tag=2BBC1008-1340^M Date: Sat, 25 Jun 2005 13:43:56 GMT^M Call-ID: 5c2d7341271e8b55e0cb066402224168(a)200.94.75.6^M Server: Cisco-SIPGateway/IOS-12.x^M CSeq: 101 INVITE^M Allow: INVITE, OPTIONS, BYE, CANCEL, ACK, PRACK, COMET, REFER, SUBSCRIBE, NOTIFY, INFO^M Allow-Events: telephone-event^M Contact: <sip:018183324166@200.94.75.1:5060>^M Record-Route: <sip:200.94.75.6;ftag=7a83401cfe54b69o0;lr=on>^M Content-Type: application/sdp^M Content-Length: 212^M ^M v=0^M o=CiscoSystemsSIP-GW-UserAgent 375 1794 IN IP4 200.94.75.1^M s=SIP Call^M c=IN IP4 200.94.27.30^M t=0 0^M m=audio 16960 RTP/AVP 18^M c=IN IP4 200.94.27.30^M a=rtpmap:18 G729/8000^M a=fmtp:18 annexb=no^M a=ptime:20^M
Jun 25 08:43:41 sipsrv ser[1935]: DEBUG: update_totag_set: new totag
Jun 25 08:43:41 sipsrv ser[1935]: DEBUG: add_to_tail_of_timer[2]: 0x4057c090
Jun 25 08:43:41 sipsrv ser[1935]: DEBUG: reply relayed. buf=0x8110388: SIP/2.0 2..., shmem=0x4057bcd8: SIP/2.0 2
Jun 25 08:43:41 sipsrv ser[1935]: DEBUG: cleanup_uac_timers: RETR/FR timers reset
Jun 25 08:43:41 sipsrv ser[1935]: DEBUG:destroy_avp_list: destroying list (nil)
Jun 25 08:43:41 sipsrv ser[1935]: receive_msg: cleaning up
Jun 25 08:43:41 sipsrv ser[1924]: SIP Request:
Jun 25 08:43:41 sipsrv ser[1924]: method: <ACK>
Jun 25 08:43:41 sipsrv ser[1924]: uri: <sip:018183324166@200.94.75.6:5060>
Jun 25 08:43:41 sipsrv ser[1924]: version: <SIP/2.0>
Jun 25 08:43:41 sipsrv ser[1924]: parse_headers: flags=1
Jun 25 08:43:41 sipsrv ser[1924]: Found param type 232, <branch> = <z9hG4bK-76d2bc25>; state=16
Jun 25 08:43:41 sipsrv ser[1924]: end of header reached, state=5
Jun 25 08:43:41 sipsrv ser[1924]: parse_headers: Via found, flags=1
Jun 25 08:43:41 sipsrv ser[1924]: parse_headers: this is the first via
Jun 25 08:43:41 sipsrv ser[1924]: After parse_msg...
Jun 25 08:43:41 sipsrv ser[1924]: preparing to run routing scripts...
Jun 25 08:43:41 sipsrv ser[1924]: DEBUG : sl_filter_ACK: to late to be a local ACK!
Jun 25 08:43:41 sipsrv ser[1924]: parse_headers: flags=128
Jun 25 08:43:41 sipsrv ser[1924]: DEBUG: add_param: tag=2cbe59e2
Jun 25 08:43:41 sipsrv ser[1924]: end of header reached, state=29
Jun 25 08:43:41 sipsrv ser[1924]: DEBUG: get_hdr_field: <To> [55]; uri=[sip:018183324166@sipsrv.conecta-te.com]
Jun 25 08:43:41 sipsrv ser[1924]: DEBUG: to body [<sip:018183324166@sipsrv.conecta-te.com>]
Jun 25 08:43:41 sipsrv ser[1924]: get_hdr_field: cseq <CSeq>: <101> <ACK>
Jun 25 08:43:41 sipsrv ser[1924]: DEBUG:maxfwd:is_maxfwd_present: value = 70
Jun 25 08:43:41 sipsrv ser[1924]: DBG:maxfwd:process_maxfwd_header: value 70 decreased to 16
Jun 25 08:43:41 sipsrv ser[1924]: DEBUG: add_param: tag=7a83401cfe54b69o0
Jun 25 08:43:41 sipsrv ser[1924]: end of header reached, state=29
Jun 25 08:43:41 sipsrv ser[1924]: parse_headers: flags=256
Jun 25 08:43:41 sipsrv ser[1924]: is_preloaded: No
Jun 25 08:43:41 sipsrv ser[1924]: grep_sock_info - checking if host==us: 11==11 && [200.94.75.6] == [200.94.75.6]
Jun 25 08:43:41 sipsrv ser[1924]: grep_sock_info - checking if port 5060 matches port 5060
Jun 25 08:43:41 sipsrv ser[1924]: grep_sock_info - checking if host==us: 11==11 && [200.94.75.6] == [200.94.75.6]
Jun 25 08:43:41 sipsrv ser[1924]: grep_sock_info - checking if port 5060 matches port 5065
Jun 25 08:43:41 sipsrv ser[1924]: grep_sock_info - checking if host==us: 11==11 && [200.94.75.6] == [200.94.75.6]
Jun 25 08:43:41 sipsrv ser[1924]: grep_sock_info - checking if port 5060 matches port 5065
Jun 25 08:43:41 sipsrv ser[1924]: parse_headers: flags=256
Jun 25 08:43:41 sipsrv ser[1924]: DEBUG: get_hdr_body : content_length=0
Jun 25 08:43:41 sipsrv ser[1924]: found end of header
Jun 25 08:43:41 sipsrv ser[1924]: find_next_route: No next Route HF found
Jun 25 08:43:41 sipsrv ser[1924]: after_strict: No next URI found
Jun 25 08:43:41 sipsrv ser[1924]: grep_sock_info - checking if host==us: 11==11 && [200.94.75.6] == [200.94.75.6]
Jun 25 08:43:41 sipsrv ser[1924]: grep_sock_info - checking if port 5060 matches port 5060
Jun 25 08:43:41 sipsrv ser[1924]: grep_sock_info - checking if host==us: 11==11 && [200.94.75.6] == [200.94.75.6]
Jun 25 08:43:41 sipsrv ser[1924]: grep_sock_info - checking if port 5060 matches port 5060
Jun 25 08:43:41 sipsrv ser[1924]: lookup(): '018183324166' Not found in usrloc
Jun 25 08:43:41 sipsrv ser[1924]: grep_sock_info - checking if host==us: 11==11 && [200.94.75.6] == [200.94.75.6]
Jun 25 08:43:41 sipsrv ser[1924]: grep_sock_info - checking if port 5060 matches port 5060
Jun 25 08:43:41 sipsrv ser[1924]: PASE POR AQUI POR QUE NO SOY CANCEL, INVITE O REGISTER
Jun 25 08:43:41 sipsrv ser[1924]: parse_headers: flags=-1
Jun 25 08:43:41 sipsrv ser[1924]: lookup(): '018183324166' Not found in usrloc
Jun 25 08:43:41 sipsrv ser[1924]: LOOKUP LOCATION PARA CUALQUIER COSA
Jun 25 08:43:41 sipsrv ser[1924]: DEBUG:destroy_avp_list: destroying list (nil)
Jun 25 08:43:41 sipsrv ser[1924]: receive_msg: cleaning up
Jun 25 08:43:41 sipsrv ser[1943]: DEBUG: timer routine:1,tl=0x4057c170 next=(nil)
Jun 25 08:43:41 sipsrv ser[1942]: SIP Reply (status):
Jun 25 08:43:41 sipsrv ser[1942]: version: <SIP/2.0>
Jun 25 08:43:41 sipsrv ser[1942]: status: <200>
Jun 25 08:43:41 sipsrv ser[1942]: reason: <OK>
Jun 25 08:43:41 sipsrv ser[1942]: parse_headers: flags=1
Jun 25 08:43:41 sipsrv ser[1942]: Found param type 232, <branch> = <z9hG4bKe855.757a9ce3.0>; state=9
Jun 25 08:43:41 sipsrv ser[1942]: parse_via: next_via
Jun 25 08:43:41 sipsrv ser[1942]: end of header reached, state=5
Jun 25 08:43:41 sipsrv ser[1942]: parse_headers: Via found, flags=1
Jun 25 08:43:41 sipsrv ser[1942]: parse_headers: this is the first via
Jun 25 08:43:41 sipsrv ser[1942]: After parse_msg...
Jun 25 08:43:41 sipsrv ser[1942]: forward_reply: found module tm, passing reply to it
Jun 25 08:43:41 sipsrv ser[1942]: DEBUG: t_check: msg id=14 global id=2 T start=0xffffffff
Jun 25 08:43:41 sipsrv ser[1942]: parse_headers: flags=17
Jun 25 08:43:41 sipsrv ser[1942]: DEBUG: add_param: tag=2BBC1008-1340
Jun 25 08:43:41 sipsrv ser[1942]: end of header reached, state=29
Jun 25 08:43:41 sipsrv ser[1942]: DEBUG: get_hdr_field: <To> [60]; uri=[sip:018183324166@sipsrv.conecta-te.com]
Jun 25 08:43:41 sipsrv ser[1942]: DEBUG: to body [<sip:018183324166@sipsrv.conecta-te.com>]
Jun 25 08:43:41 sipsrv ser[1942]: get_hdr_field: cseq <CSeq>: <101> <INVITE>
Jun 25 08:43:41 sipsrv ser[1942]: parse_headers: flags=4
Jun 25 08:43:41 sipsrv ser[1942]: DEBUG: t_reply_matching: hash 21902 label 1053402967 branch 0
Jun 25 08:43:41 sipsrv ser[1942]: DEBUG: t_reply_matching: reply matched (T=0x4057c048)!
Jun 25 08:43:41 sipsrv ser[1942]: parse_headers: flags=4
Jun 25 08:43:41 sipsrv ser[1942]: DEBUG: t_check: msg id=14 global id=14 T end=0x4057c048
Jun 25 08:43:41 sipsrv ser[1942]: DEBUG: reply_received: org. status uas=200, uac[0]=200 local=0 is_invite=1)
Jun 25 08:43:41 sipsrv ser[1942]: ->>>>>>>>> T_code=200, new_code=200
Jun 25 08:43:41 sipsrv ser[1942]: DBG: t_should_relay_response: 200 INV after final sent
Jun 25 08:43:41 sipsrv ser[1942]: DEBUG: relay_reply: branch=0, save=0, relay=0
Jun 25 08:43:41 sipsrv ser[1942]: old size: 886, new size: 832
Jun 25 08:43:41 sipsrv ser[1942]: build_res_from_sip_res: copied size: orig:75, new: 21, rest: 811 msg= SIP/2.0 200 OK^M Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 200.94.75.6:5065^M From: 8183651723 <sip:8183651723@sipsrv.conecta-te.com>;tag=7a83401cfe54b69o0^M To: <sip:018183324166@sipsrv.conecta-te.com>;tag=2BBC1008-1340^M Date: Sat, 25 Jun 2005 13:43:56 GMT^M Call-ID: 5c2d7341271e8b55e0cb066402224168(a)200.94.75.6^M Server: Cisco-SIPGateway/IOS-12.x^M CSeq: 101 INVITE^M Allow: INVITE, OPTIONS, BYE, CANCEL, ACK, PRACK, COMET, REFER, SUBSCRIBE, NOTIFY, INFO^M Allow-Events: telephone-event^M Contact: <sip:018183324166@200.94.75.1:5060>^M Record-Route: <sip:200.94.75.6;ftag=7a83401cfe54b69o0;lr=on>^M Content-Type: application/sdp^M Content-Length: 212^M ^M v=0^M o=CiscoSystemsSIP-GW-UserAgent 375 1794 IN IP4 200.94.75.1^M s=SIP Call^M c=IN IP4 200.94.27.30^M t=0 0^M m=audio 16960 RTP/AVP 18^M c=IN IP4 200.94.27.30^M a=rtpmap:18 G729/8000^M a=fmtp:18 annexb=no^M a=ptime:20^M
Jun 25 08:43:41 sipsrv ser[1942]: DEBUG: update_totag_set: totag retransmission
Jun 25 08:43:41 sipsrv ser[1942]: DEBUG: reply relayed. buf=0x8110218: SIP/2.0 2..., shmem=0x4057bcd8: SIP/2.0 2
Jun 25 08:43:41 sipsrv ser[1942]: DEBUG:destroy_avp_list: destroying list (nil)
Jun 25 08:43:41 sipsrv ser[1942]: receive_msg: cleaning up
Jun 25 08:43:42 sipsrv ser[1931]: SIP Reply (status):
Jun 25 08:43:42 sipsrv ser[1931]: version: <SIP/2.0>
Jun 25 08:43:42 sipsrv ser[1931]: status: <200>
Jun 25 08:43:42 sipsrv ser[1931]: reason: <OK>
Jun 25 08:43:42 sipsrv ser[1931]: parse_headers: flags=1
Jun 25 08:43:42 sipsrv ser[1931]: Found param type 232, <branch> = <z9hG4bKe855.757a9ce3.0>; state=9
Jun 25 08:43:42 sipsrv ser[1931]: parse_via: next_via
Jun 25 08:43:42 sipsrv ser[1931]: end of header reached, state=5
Jun 25 08:43:42 sipsrv ser[1931]: parse_headers: Via found, flags=1
Jun 25 08:43:42 sipsrv ser[1931]: parse_headers: this is the first via
Jun 25 08:43:42 sipsrv ser[1931]: After parse_msg...
Jun 25 08:43:42 sipsrv ser[1931]: forward_reply: found module tm, passing reply to it
Jun 25 08:43:42 sipsrv ser[1931]: DEBUG: t_check: msg id=13 global id=12 T start=0xffffffff
Jun 25 08:43:42 sipsrv ser[1931]: parse_headers: flags=17
Jun 25 08:43:42 sipsrv ser[1931]: DEBUG: add_param: tag=2BBC1008-1340
Jun 25 08:43:42 sipsrv ser[1931]: end of header reached, state=29
Jun 25 08:43:42 sipsrv ser[1931]: DEBUG: get_hdr_field: <To> [60]; uri=[sip:018183324166@sipsrv.conecta-te.com]
Jun 25 08:43:42 sipsrv ser[1931]: DEBUG: to body [<sip:018183324166@sipsrv.conecta-te.com>]
Jun 25 08:43:42 sipsrv ser[1931]: get_hdr_field: cseq <CSeq>: <101> <INVITE>
Jun 25 08:43:42 sipsrv ser[1931]: parse_headers: flags=4
Jun 25 08:43:42 sipsrv ser[1931]: DEBUG: t_reply_matching: hash 21902 label 1053402967 branch 0
Jun 25 08:43:42 sipsrv ser[1931]: DEBUG: t_reply_matching: reply matched (T=0x4057c048)!
Jun 25 08:43:42 sipsrv ser[1931]: parse_headers: flags=4
Jun 25 08:43:42 sipsrv ser[1931]: DEBUG: t_check: msg id=13 global id=13 T end=0x4057c048
Jun 25 08:43:42 sipsrv ser[1931]: DEBUG: reply_received: org. status uas=200, uac[0]=200 local=0 is_invite=1)
Jun 25 08:43:42 sipsrv ser[1931]: ->>>>>>>>> T_code=200, new_code=200
Jun 25 08:43:42 sipsrv ser[1931]: DBG: t_should_relay_response: 200 INV after final sent
Jun 25 08:43:42 sipsrv ser[1931]: DEBUG: relay_reply: branch=0, save=0, relay=0
Jun 25 08:43:42 sipsrv ser[1931]: old size: 886, new size: 832
Jun 25 08:43:42 sipsrv ser[1931]: build_res_from_sip_res: copied size: orig:75, new: 21, rest: 811 msg= SIP/2.0 200 OK^M Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 200.94.75.6:5065^M From: 8183651723 <sip:8183651723@sipsrv.conecta-te.com>;tag=7a83401cfe54b69o0^M To: <sip:018183324166@sipsrv.conecta-te.com>;tag=2BBC1008-1340^M Date: Sat, 25 Jun 2005 13:43:56 GMT^M Call-ID: 5c2d7341271e8b55e0cb066402224168(a)200.94.75.6^M Server: Cisco-SIPGateway/IOS-12.x^M CSeq: 101 INVITE^M Allow: INVITE, OPTIONS, BYE, CANCEL, ACK, PRACK, COMET, REFER, SUBSCRIBE, NOTIFY, INFO^M Allow-Events: telephone-event^M Contact: <sip:018183324166@200.94.75.1:5060>^M Record-Route: <sip:200.94.75.6;ftag=7a83401cfe54b69o0;lr=on>^M Content-Type: application/sdp^M Content-Length: 212^M ^M v=0^M o=CiscoSystemsSIP-GW-UserAgent 375 1794 IN IP4 200.94.75.1^M s=SIP Call^M c=IN IP4 200.94.27.30^M t=0 0^M m=audio 16960 RTP/AVP 18^M c=IN IP4 200.94.27.30^M a=rtpmap:18 G729/8000^M a=fmtp:18 annexb=no^M a=ptime:20^M
Jun 25 08:43:42 sipsrv ser[1931]: DEBUG: update_totag_set: totag retransmission
Jun 25 08:43:42 sipsrv ser[1931]: DEBUG: reply relayed. buf=0x81102a8: SIP/2.0 2..., shmem=0x4057bcd8: SIP/2.0 2
Jun 25 08:43:42 sipsrv ser[1931]: DEBUG:destroy_avp_list: destroying list (nil)
Jun 25 08:43:42 sipsrv ser[1931]: receive_msg: cleaning up
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1936]: SIP Request:
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1936]: method: <BYE>
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1936]: uri: <sip:018183324166@200.94.75.6:5060>
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1936]: version: <SIP/2.0>
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1936]: parse_headers: flags=1
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1936]: Found param type 232, <branch> = <z9hG4bK-c79dc8ef>; state=16
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1936]: end of header reached, state=5
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1936]: parse_headers: Via found, flags=1
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1936]: parse_headers: this is the first via
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1936]: After parse_msg...
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1936]: preparing to run routing scripts...
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1936]: parse_headers: flags=128
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1936]: DEBUG: add_param: tag=2cbe59e2
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1936]: end of header reached, state=29
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1936]: DEBUG: get_hdr_field: <To> [55]; uri=[sip:018183324166@sipsrv.conecta-te.com]
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1936]: DEBUG: to body [<sip:018183324166@sipsrv.conecta-te.com>]
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1936]: get_hdr_field: cseq <CSeq>: <102> <BYE>
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1936]: DEBUG:maxfwd:is_maxfwd_present: value = 70
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1936]: DBG:maxfwd:process_maxfwd_header: value 70 decreased to 16
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1936]: DEBUG: add_param: tag=7a83401cfe54b69o0
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1936]: end of header reached, state=29
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1936]: parse_headers: flags=-1
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1936]: DEBUG: get_hdr_body : content_length=0
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1936]: found end of header
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1936]: parse_headers: flags=256
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1936]: is_preloaded: No
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1936]: grep_sock_info - checking if host==us: 11==11 && [200.94.75.6] == [200.94.75.6]
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1936]: grep_sock_info - checking if port 5060 matches port 5060
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1936]: grep_sock_info - checking if host==us: 11==11 && [200.94.75.6] == [200.94.75.6]
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1936]: grep_sock_info - checking if port 5060 matches port 5065
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1936]: grep_sock_info - checking if host==us: 11==11 && [200.94.75.6] == [200.94.75.6]
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1936]: grep_sock_info - checking if port 5060 matches port 5065
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1936]: parse_headers: flags=256
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1936]: found end of header
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1936]: find_next_route: No next Route HF found
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1936]: after_strict: No next URI found
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1936]: grep_sock_info - checking if host==us: 11==11 && [200.94.75.6] == [200.94.75.6]
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1936]: grep_sock_info - checking if port 5060 matches port 5060
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1936]: grep_sock_info - checking if host==us: 11==11 && [200.94.75.6] == [200.94.75.6]
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1936]: grep_sock_info - checking if port 5060 matches port 5060
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1936]: Hey this request is NOT from B2BUA
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1936]: FORWARDING TO B2BUA
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1936]: parse_headers: flags=-1
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1936]: parse_headers: flags=64
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1936]: check_via_address(200.67.33.247, 172.31.253.127, 0)
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1936]: parse_headers: flags=33554432
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1936]: parse_headers: flags=64
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1936]: parse_headers: flags=-1
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1936]: check_via_address(200.67.33.247, 172.31.253.127, 0)
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1936]: Sending: BYE sip:018183324166@200.94.75.6:5060 SIP/2.0^M Record-Route: <sip:200.94.75.6;ftag=7a83401cfe54b69o0;lr=on>^M Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 200.94.75.6;branch=0^M Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 172.31.253.127:5060;rport=60425;received=200.67.33.247;branch=z9hG4bK-c79dc8ef^M From: 8183651723 <sip:8183651723@sipsrv.conecta-te.com>;tag=7a83401cfe54b69o0^M To: <sip:018183324166@sipsrv.conecta-te.com>;tag=2cbe59e2^M Call-ID: b5fcf1e1-baf4a709(a)172.31.253.127^M CSeq: 102 BYE^M Max-Forwards: 16^M User-Agent: Linksys/PAP2-2.0.12(LS)^M Content-Length: 0^M P-hint: finishing call^M P-hint: PASANDO POR EL B2BUA^M P-hint: APLICO NAT AL B2BUA^M ^M .
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1936]: orig. len=425, new_len=600, proto=1
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1936]: DEBUG:destroy_avp_list: destroying list (nil)
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1936]: receive_msg: cleaning up
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1924]: SIP Reply (status):
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1924]: version: <SIP/2.0>
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1924]: status: <200>
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1924]: reason: <OK>
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1924]: parse_headers: flags=1
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1924]: Found param type 232, <branch> = <0>; state=16
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1924]: end of header reached, state=5
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1924]: parse_headers: Via found, flags=1
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1924]: parse_headers: this is the first via
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1924]: After parse_msg...
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1924]: forward_reply: found module tm, passing reply to it
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1924]: DEBUG: t_check: msg id=8 global id=2 T start=0xffffffff
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1924]: parse_headers: flags=17
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1924]: Found param type 235, <rport> = <60425>; state=6
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1924]: Found param type 234, <received> = <200.67.33.247>; state=6
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1924]: Found param type 232, <branch> = <z9hG4bK-c79dc8ef>; state=16
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1924]: end of header reached, state=5
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1924]: parse_headers: Via found, flags=17
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1924]: parse_headers: this is the second via
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1924]: DEBUG: add_param: tag=2cbe59e2
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1924]: end of header reached, state=29
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1924]: DEBUG: get_hdr_field: <To> [55]; uri=[sip:018183324166@sipsrv.conecta-te.com]
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1924]: DEBUG: to body [<sip:018183324166@sipsrv.conecta-te.com>]
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1924]: get_hdr_field: cseq <CSeq>: <102> <BYE>
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1924]: DEBUG: t_reply_matching: failure to match a transaction
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1924]: DEBUG: t_check: msg id=8 global id=8 T end=(nil)
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1924]: parse_headers: flags=2
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1924]: old size: 436, new size: 392
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1924]: build_res_from_sip_res: copied size: orig:60, new: 16, rest: 376 msg= SIP/2.0 200 OK^M Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 172.31.253.127:5060;rport=60425;received=200.67.33.247;branch=z9hG4bK-c79dc8ef^M To: <sip:018183324166@sipsrv.conecta-te.com>;tag=2cbe59e2^M From: 8183651723 <sip:8183651723@sipsrv.conecta-te.com>;tag=7a83401cfe54b69o0^M Call-ID: b5fcf1e1-baf4a709(a)172.31.253.127^M CSeq: 102 BYE^M Record-Route: <sip:200.94.75.6;ftag=7a83401cfe54b69o0;lr=on>^M Content-Length: 0^M ^M
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1924]: update_sock_struct_from_via: using 'rport'
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1924]: update_sock_struct_from_via: using 'received'
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1924]: update_sock_struct_from_via: trying SRV lookup
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1924]: reply forwarded to 172.31.253.127:5060
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1924]: DEBUG:destroy_avp_list: destroying list (nil)
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1924]: receive_msg: cleaning up
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1942]: SIP Request:
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1942]: method: <BYE>
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1942]: uri: <sip:200.94.75.6;lr=on>
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1942]: version: <SIP/2.0>
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1942]: parse_headers: flags=1
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1942]: end of header reached, state=5
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1942]: parse_headers: Via found, flags=1
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1942]: parse_headers: this is the first via
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1942]: After parse_msg...
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1942]: preparing to run routing scripts...
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1942]: parse_headers: flags=128
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1942]: DEBUG: add_param: tag=2BBC1008-1340
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1942]: end of header reached, state=29
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1942]: DEBUG: get_hdr_field: <To> [60]; uri=[sip:018183324166@sipsrv.conecta-te.com]
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1942]: DEBUG: to body [<sip:018183324166@sipsrv.conecta-te.com>]
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1942]: get_hdr_field: cseq <CSeq>: <102> <BYE>
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1942]: DEBUG:maxfwd:is_maxfwd_present: value = 70
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1942]: DBG:maxfwd:process_maxfwd_header: value 70 decreased to 16
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1942]: DEBUG: add_param: tag=7a83401cfe54b69o0
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1942]: end of header reached, state=29
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1942]: parse_headers: flags=-1
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1942]: DEBUG: get_hdr_body : content_length=0
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1942]: found end of header
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1942]: parse_headers: flags=256
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1942]: is_preloaded: No
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1942]: grep_sock_info - checking if host==us: 11==11 && [200.94.75.6] == [200.94.75.6]
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1942]: grep_sock_info - checking if port 5060 matches port 5060
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1942]: grep_sock_info - checking if host==us: 11==11 && [200.94.75.1] == [200.94.75.6]
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1942]: grep_sock_info - checking if port 5060 matches port 5060
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1942]: grep_sock_info - checking if host==us: 11==11 && [200.94.75.1] == [200.94.75.6]
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1942]: grep_sock_info - checking if port 5060 matches port 5060
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1942]: check_self: host != me
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1942]: after_strict: Next hop: 'sip:018183324166@200.94.75.1:5060' is strict router
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1942]: TOI: rewrite_uri: Rewriting Request-URI with 'sip:018183324166@200.94.75.1:5060'
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1942]: parse_headers: flags=-1
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1942]: DEBUG: has_totag: totag found
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1942]: DEBUG: t_newtran: msg id=15 , global msg id=14 , T on entrance=0xffffffff
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1942]: parse_headers: flags=-1
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1942]: parse_headers: flags=60
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1942]: t_lookup_request: start searching: hash=21899, isACK=0
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1942]: DEBUG: proceeding to pre-RFC3261 transaction matching
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1942]: DEBUG: t_lookup_request: no transaction found
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1942]: DBG: trans=0x40579e98, callback type 1, id 0 entered
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1942]: DEBUG: mk_proxy: doing DNS lookup...
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1942]: check_via_address(200.94.75.6, 200.94.75.6, 0)
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1942]: DEBUG: add_to_tail_of_timer[4]: 0x40579fb0
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1942]: DEBUG: add_to_tail_of_timer[0]: 0x40579fc0
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1942]: SER: new transaction fwd'ed
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1942]: DEBUG:destroy_avp_list: destroying list (nil)
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1942]: receive_msg: cleaning up
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1931]: SIP Reply (status):
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1931]: version: <SIP/2.0>
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1931]: status: <481>
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1931]: reason: <Call Leg/Transaction Does Not Exist>
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1931]: parse_headers: flags=1
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1931]: Found param type 232, <branch> = <z9hG4bKb855.107310d2.0>; state=9
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1931]: parse_via: next_via
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1931]: end of header reached, state=5
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1931]: parse_headers: Via found, flags=1
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1931]: parse_headers: this is the first via
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1931]: After parse_msg...
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1931]: forward_reply: found module tm, passing reply to it
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1931]: DEBUG: t_check: msg id=14 global id=13 T start=0xffffffff
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1931]: parse_headers: flags=17
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1931]: DEBUG: add_param: tag=2BBC1008-1340
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1931]: end of header reached, state=29
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1931]: DEBUG: get_hdr_field: <To> [60]; uri=[sip:018183324166@sipsrv.conecta-te.com]
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1931]: DEBUG: to body [<sip:018183324166@sipsrv.conecta-te.com>]
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1931]: get_hdr_field: cseq <CSeq>: <102> <BYE>
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1931]: DEBUG: t_reply_matching: hash 21899 label 755054337 branch 0
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1931]: DEBUG: t_reply_matching: reply matched (T=0x40579e98)!
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1931]: DEBUG: t_check: msg id=14 global id=14 T end=0x40579e98
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1931]: DEBUG: reply_received: org. status uas=0, uac[0]=0 local=0 is_invite=0)
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1931]: ->>>>>>>>> T_code=0, new_code=481
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1931]: DEBUG: relay_reply: branch=0, save=0, relay=0
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1931]: old size: 372, new size: 318
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1931]: build_res_from_sip_res: copied size: orig:108, new: 54, rest: 264 msg= SIP/2.0 481 Call Leg/Transaction Does Not Exist^M Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 200.94.75.6:5065^M From: 8183651723 <sip:8183651723@sipsrv.conecta-te.com>;tag=7a83401cfe54b69o0^M To: <sip:018183324166@sipsrv.conecta-te.com>;tag=2BBC1008-1340^M Call-ID: 5c2d7341271e8b55e0cb066402224168(a)200.94.75.6^M CSeq: 102 BYE^M Content-Length: 0^M ^M
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1931]: WARNING:vqm_resize: resize(0) called
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1931]: DEBUG: add_to_tail_of_timer[2]: 0x40579ee0
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1931]: DEBUG: reply relayed. buf=0x810f708: SIP/2.0 4..., shmem=0x4057d8d8: SIP/2.0 4
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1931]: DEBUG: cleanup_uac_timers: RETR/FR timers reset
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1931]: DEBUG:destroy_avp_list: destroying list (nil)
Jun 25 08:43:50 sipsrv ser[1931]: receive_msg: cleaning up
Jun 25 08:43:51 sipsrv ser[1943]: DEBUG: timer routine:0,tl=0x40579fc0 next=(nil)
Jun 25 08:43:51 sipsrv ser[1943]: DEBUG: timer routine:4,tl=0x40579fb0 next=(nil)
Jun 25 08:44:00 sipsrv ser[1943]: DEBUG: timer routine:2,tl=0x4057c090 next=(nil)
Jun 25 08:44:00 sipsrv ser[1943]: DEBUG: wait_handler : removing 0x4057c048 from table
Jun 25 08:44:00 sipsrv ser[1943]: DEBUG: delete transaction 0x4057c048
Jun 25 08:44:00 sipsrv ser[1943]: DEBUG: wait_handler : done
Jun 25 08:44:10 sipsrv ser[1943]: DEBUG: timer routine:2,tl=0x40579ee0 next=(nil)
Jun 25 08:44:10 sipsrv ser[1943]: DEBUG: wait_handler : removing 0x40579e98 from table
Jun 25 08:44:10 sipsrv ser[1943]: DEBUG: delete transaction 0x40579e98
Jun 25 08:44:10 sipsrv ser[1943]: DEBUG: wait_handler : done
#
# $Id: ser.cfg,v 1.25.2.1 2005/02/18 14:30:44 andrei Exp $
#
# simple quick-start config script
#
# ----------- global configuration parameters ------------------------
debug=5 # debug level (cmd line: -ddddd)
fork=yes
log_stderror=no
/* Uncomment these lines to enter debugging mode
fork=no
log_stderror=yes # (cmd line: -E)
debug=7
*/
check_via=no # (cmd. line: -v)
dns=no # (cmd. line: -r)
rev_dns=no # (cmd. line: -R)
listen=200.94.75.6
port=5060
alias=200.94.75.6
alias=sipsrv.conecta-te.com
fifo_mode=0666
fifo="/tmp/ser_fifo"
fifo_db_url="mysql://ser:heslo@localhost/ser"
# ------------------ module loading ----------------------------------
# Uncomment this if you want to use SQL database
loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/mysql.so"
loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/sl.so"
loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/tm.so"
loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/rr.so"
loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/maxfwd.so"
loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/usrloc.so"
loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/registrar.so"
loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/auth.so"
loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/auth_radius.so"
loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/auth_db.so"
loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/uri.so"
loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/uri_db.so"
loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/uri_radius.so"
loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/group.so"
loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/group_radius.so"
loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/mediaproxy.so"
loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/nathelper.so"
loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/textops.so"
loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/acc.so"
loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/domain.so"
# ----------------- setting module-specific parameters ---------------
# -- usrloc params --
# modparam("usrloc", "db_mode", 0)
# Uncomment this if you want to use SQL database
# for persistent storage and comment the previous line
modparam("usrloc", "db_mode", 2)
modparam("domain", "db_mode", 1)
modparam("usrloc|domain", "db_url", "mysql://ser:heslo@localhost/ser")
# -- auth params --
# Uncomment if you are using auth module
#modparam("auth_db", "calculate_ha1", yes)
#
# If you set "calculate_ha1" parameter to yes (which true in this config),
# uncomment also the following parameter)
#modparam("auth_db", "password_column", "password")
# -- Radius Configuration --
modparam("auth_radius", "radius_config", "/usr/local/etc/radiusclient/radiusclient.conf")
modparam("auth_radius", "service_type", 15)
modparam("group_radius", "radius_config", "/usr/local/etc/radiusclient/radiusclient.conf")
modparam("group_radius", "use_domain", 0)
# -- nathelper params --
modparam("nathelper", "rtpproxy_disable", 1)
modparam("nathelper", "natping_interval", 0)
# -- mediaproxy params --
modparam("mediaproxy", "natping_interval", 30)
modparam("mediaproxy", "mediaproxy_socket", "/var/run/mediaproxy.sock")
modparam("mediaproxy", "sip_asymmetrics", "/usr/local/etc/ser/sip-clients")
modparam("mediaproxy", "rtp_asymmetrics", "/usr/local/etc/ser/rtp-clients")
# -- rr params --
# add value to ;lr param to make some broken UAs happy
modparam("rr", "enable_full_lr", 1)
modparam("registrar", "nat_flag", 6)
# ------------------------- request routing logic -------------------
# main routing logic
route{
#----------------------------------------------
# initial sanity checks -- messages with
# max_forwards==0, or excessively long requests
#----------------------------------------------
if (!mf_process_maxfwd_header("10")) {
sl_send_reply("483","Too Many Hops");
break;
};
if (msg:len > max_len ) {
sl_send_reply("513", "Message too big");
break;
};
#----------------------------------------------------
# we record-route all messages -- to make sure that
# subsequent messages will go through our proxy; that's
# particularly good if upstream and downstream entities
# use different transport protocol
#----------------------------------------------------
if (method=="INVITE" && client_nat_test("3")){
record_route_preset("200.94.75.6:5060;nat=yes");
}else if (!method=="REGISTER"){
record_route();
};
#---------------------------------------------
# we tear down the call before entering to loose route
#---------------------------------------------
if (method=="BYE" || method=="CANCEL") {
end_media_session();
append_hf("P-hint: finishing call\r\n");
};
#-------------------------------------------------
# subsequent messages withing a dialog should take the
# path determined by record-routing
#-------------------------------------------------
if (loose_route()) {
append_hf("P-hint: rr-enforced\r\n");
# The following lines are added due media proxy
if (has_totag() && (method=="INVITE" || method=="ACK")) {
if (client_nat_test("3") || search("^Route:.*;nat=yes")) {
# Mark as NAT'ed
setflag(6);
use_media_proxy();
};
};
# end media session for BYE and CANCEL is done above
# before entering the loose route. no need to call it here
route(1);
break;
};
#----------------------------------------
# processing the most common sip messages
# for all the calls
#----------------------------------------
if (!uri==myself) {
# mark routing logic in request
append_hf("P-hint: outbound\r\n");
route(1);
break;
};
if (uri==myself) {
#---------------------------------
#all the calls from the sip uacs should
#be handled by the b2bua for authorization
#and accounting
#---------------------------------
if (!(src_ip==200.94.75.6 || src_ip==200.94.75.1)and(method=="INVITE" || method=="BYE" || method=="CANCEL")) {
log("Hey this request is NOT from B2BUA\n");
log("Forwarding to B2BUA\n");
if (client_nat_test("3")) {
setflag(7);
force_rport();
fix_nated_contact();
};
forward(200.94.75.6,5065);
break;
};
if (method=="CANCEL" || method=="INVITE") {
route(3);
break;
} else if (method=="REGISTER") {
route(2);
break;
};
route(4);
if (!lookup("location")) {
sl_send_reply("404", "User Not Found");
break;
};
};
route(1);
}
route[1] {
#-------------------------------
# Default SIP message handler
# forward to current uri now; use stateful forwarding; that
# works reliably even if we forward from TCP to UDP
#------------------------------
t_on_reply("1");
if (!t_relay()) {
if (method=="INVITE" || method=="ACK") {
end_media_session();
append_hf("P-hint: finishing call no-relay\r\n");
};
sl_reply_error();
};
}
route[2] {
#---------------------------
# "REGISTER" message handler
#---------------------------
sl_send_reply("100", "Trying");
if (!search("^Contact:\ +\*") && client_nat_test("7")) {
setflag(6);
fix_nated_register();
force_rport();
};
if (is_from_local() || uri==myself) {
if (!radius_www_authorize("")) {
www_challenge("", "0");
break;
} else if (!check_to()){
sl_send_reply("403", "Username!=To not allowed");
break;
};
if (!save("location")) {
sl_reply_error();
};
} else {
append_hf("P-hint: outbound alias\r\n");
sl_send_reply("403", "This domain is not served here");
};
}
route[3] {
#--------------------------
#"CANCEL" and "INVITE" message handler
#--------------------------
if (client_nat_test("3")) {
setflag(7);
force_rport();
fix_nated_contact();
};
if (method=="INVITE") {
if (!(is_from_local() || uri==myself || is_uri_host_local())) {
sl_send_reply("403", "Relaying is forbidden");
break;
};
} else if (method=="CANCEL") {
route(1);
break;
};
route(4);
if (!lookup("location")) {
if ((uri=~"sip:01[1-9][0-9]+@.*") || (uri=~"sip:00[1-9][0-9]+@.*")) {
rewritehost("200.94.75.1");
};
} else {
sl_send_reply("404", "User not found");
break;
};
#-------------------------------------
#RTP Proxy handler
#-------------------------------------
if (isflagset(6) || isflagset(7)) {
use_media_proxy();
append_hf("P-hint: are you nated?\r\n");
};
route(1);
}
route[4] {
#---------------
#we need to check for the alias
#---------------
lookup("aliases");
if (uri!=myself) {
route(1);
break;
};
}
failure_route[1] {
end_media_session();
append_hf("P-hint: finishing call on failure\r\n");
}
onreply_route[1] {
if ((isflagset(6) || isflagset(7)) && (status=~"(180)|(183)|(2[0-9][0-9])")) {
if (client_nat_test("1")) {
fix_nated_contact();
};
if (!search("^Content-Length:\ +0")) {
use_media_proxy();
append_hf("P-hint: use nat for call\r\n");
};
};
}
Sure. I'm using the mystun server. I used the vovida's one, but it does
not work as expected.
Regards,
Lucas
> Hi Lucas.
> May I ask you which STUN server are you using?
> TNX
>
> Juan
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: serusers-bounces(a)lists.iptel.org
> [mailto:serusers-bounces@lists.iptel.org] On Behalf Of Lucas
> Aimaretto
> Sent: Wednesday, July 06, 2005 12:44 PM
> To: andres(a)telesip.net; 'Giovanni Balasso'
> Cc: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
> Subject: RE: [Serusers] NAT considerations...
>
> > > Why don't people use stun?
> > > Has it some major drawbacks I still haven't found? What are main
> > > advantages of rtpproxy-mediaproxy solutions?
> > > I'm really curious to know serusers opinions about this issue.
> > >
> > > thank you all for your two cents ;)
> >
> > STUN does not work if your NAT is Symmetric. For example all Linux
> > NATs or routers with Linux OS like the Linksys ones.
> Unless you have
> > full control on what type of NAT your customer will deploy,
> it will be
> > very hard to stick to an all STUN solution.
> >
>
> I have many linuxes around there, and many linksys routers
> too, and had no
> problems with STUN at all. In fact, when I run my stun-client
> application
> behind a linux-like OS, this is what I'm told:
>
> Port restricted NAT detected - VoIP will work with STUN Preserves port
> number Does not supports hairpin of media
>
> Regards,
>
> Lucas
>
> --
> No virus found in this outgoing message.
> Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
> Version: 7.0.323 / Virus Database: 267.8.9/42 - Release Date:
> 06/07/2005
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Serusers mailing list
> serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
> http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
>
> --
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
> Version: 7.0.323 / Virus Database: 267.8.9/42 - Release Date:
> 06/07/2005
>
>
--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.323 / Virus Database: 267.8.9/42 - Release Date: 06/07/2005
Hello,
I have a big problem with serweb. I'm searching for the solution since
hours... but I didn't find it!!
I installed serweb according to in the installation guide and the HOWTOs
that I found in the internet. The problem is that if I want to open the
index.php-page (of admin), always appears the Explorer Window
"The page cannot be displayed"
and when I look at the access_log of apache2 there appears something like
that:
GET
/serweb/index.php?phplib_Session=d69f77e7ccb0d3b6c7d684bcbc368063&phplib_Ses
sion=4c8a0c40e09c1bfa01a91ef5832a026a&phplib_Session=5f354e9a405ade8796a54a3
88b0353db&phplib_Session=769c3fa2b669f1dcdd2291c24227ef5d&phplib_Session=4ca
670bdd9a1f4f20441eac5f96c7b8e&phplib_Session=da194f7b1855c60daf515de13b14dab
2&phplib_Session=9bba333123ff119f94f924aeb0bc4710&phplib_Session=f6c9842d7cf
429c632608ad4ee7645c7&phplib_Session=bf06f602d09a1d313297a00f4b293133&phplib
_Session=6d798a6dcc84dac416415312debe47d3&phplib_Session=4d1991912b23d4a59ee
1f29f40830317&phplib_Session=31268d0242558745860dbacf41a1be15&phplib_Session
=5255e631f1cde5c708cb985db5ebfcaa&phplib_Session=7020b63c06bd983fb5eb054ac4e
f627f&phplib_Session=9651b78d2f391f94f23c8b46c603d0a5&phplib_Session=466c61f
55a87cb7ac4661e2816a3ec9d&phplib_Session=9515dbc324cc048f72fb7e1149166f18&ph
plib_Session=e0940531f81730793c23a703d772e738&phplib_Session=8e67ddbe3e69eec
9a952b2a59eed48ea&phplib_Session=621fc501c7590d413a79c58278956677&phplib_Ses
sion=a4f2af4b0d2e757e0568ee76f8563262&phplib_Session=70960d0cd7a32896b7fd80a
0a4c7f806&phplib_Session=5b78a5a53455042a992def2ab3012430&phplib_Session=0c8
fb10161429bca54375b4dda5aec51&phplib_Session=b1ddb14986db2740a239b5f3494ae08
3&phplib_Session=e281788f6b7533869817cce01a1ebaeb&phplib_Session=d16de271da5
e37b5de9f81268975330b&phplib_Session=45a453bdc8d3969f392c2a4e230c7e0a&phplib
_Session=8cd36450b9f6d0592bfe9864bb4e3782&phplib_Session=db9b2e8ca0094fafc2b
923cd377c558c&phplib_Session=dcd92ee19095fba1c4a1475183b27352&phplib_Session
=38e1ab2e6f6a65a1bce8d7602db10014&phplib_Session=b074fa09bae847e186be4c22ed8
280a5&phplib_Session=27e2d0c9e4172bed9752fe20a744195c&phplib_Session=d817e3e
3639c105042228e083f9081dd&phplib_Session=f9ac5312dcfcdf3bade2f80a7d6d98bf&ph
plib_Session=5f15600e879327263d4d83f489ec6422&phplib_Session=dde588458177dde
8907b932a4ee8a0fe&phplib_Session=d55285a056e6e5a873735a673d80a7cc&phplib_Ses
sion=1c51e86702ef7004638d9488cd967304&phplib_Session=bf5b51775d6208711b6904f
eeddf5d7b&phplib_Session=a7940c6ed31b41c83b60174ae05b023d HTTP/1.1" 302 -
... that means that serweb wants to make "thousands" of sessions. I didn't
find a solution for that in the internet and I hope that someone of you can
help me!
Thanks!
Sebastian
