sr-users July 2005

sr-users@lists.kamailio.org

199 participants
544 discussions

[Serusers] Configuration example - no register, no auth

by Chris Mason

I need some newbie help to configure ser so that it forwards all requests to another server. I don't need mysql authentication, or any authentication, just a plain proxy that runs on port 5080. Can someone help me modify the config? All the examples I have seen spend a lot of time on mysql authentication, but little on the proxy routng. Chris

18 years, 11 months

[Serusers] Nat_uac_test failing with ATA v3.2 behind NAT, ATA v3.1 works

by Jon Mansey

Hi Serusers, I have 2 ATAs, one is V3.1 and one is V3.2, they are both behind NAT and are behaving differently when registering. With 3.2, the nat_uac_test does not apparently detect it is behind NAT and leaves the flag at 0 in the location table. V3.1 works fine. I can see why nat_uac_test() may be failing, because the ATA seems to have auto-magically detected its public IP and is using it in the via: header, thus receive!=via test fails! Also the contact has the public IP, so the RFC1813 test fails. I have not configured the NAT IP or server in the ATA as the NAT public IP is dynamic. Although the v3.2 ATA seems to have figured out its public IP, it still uses its private IP in the INVITE sdp c= headers, so we get no media. And because the nat flag is 0, the rtpproxy doesn't kick in and fix things. Notice the call-id of the register message includes the private ip. Anyone familiar with ATA firmware versions and features know the magic incarnation to shut off the "auto-detect public IP", ahem, "feature" in v3.2? Or any other suggestions for how to make nat_uac_test() get a positive when it gets one of these smart REGISTERs from behind NAT? Im running the old version of SER 0.8.12 still where nat_uac_test only has 1 2 or 3 options, not the new one that has "19", would that make a difference, upgrading to v0.9? Here are the ngreps of REGISTERs from the 2 versions: (public Ips masked) V3.1 works fine, nat_uac_test results in flag 1 in location table, rtpproxy works fine >From ata v3.1 behind nat1 to ser server: U <nat1 pub ip>:49121 -> <pub ip of ser>:5060 REGISTER sip:sip.mycompany.com SIP/2.0..Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.0.11: 5060..From: <sip:20210@sip.mycompany.com;user=phone>;tag=933299358..To : <sip:20210@sip.mycomapny.com;user=phone>..Call-ID: 4033019825(a)192.16 8.0.11..CSeq: 1 REGISTER..Contact: <sip:20210@192.168.0.11:5060;user=phone; transport=udp>;expires=3600..User-Agent: Cisco ATA 186 v3.1.0 atasip (0402 11A)..Content-Length: 0.... And from ata with v3.2 U <pub ip of nat2>:5060 -> <pub ip of ser>:5060 REGISTER sip:sip.mycompany.com SIP/2.0..Via: SIP/2.0/UDP <pub ip of nat2> :5060;branch=z9hG4bK1c6d78542c385f5e..From: <sip:202111@sip.mycompany.com ;user=phone>;tag=2453464613..To: <sip:202111@sip.mycomapny.com ;user=phone>..Call-ID: 1193202309@172.16.1.100..CSeq: 1 REGISTER..Con tact: <sip:202111@<pub ip of nat2>:5060;user=phone;transport=udp>;expire s=3600..User-Agent: Cisco ATA 186 v3.2.0 atasip (041111A)..Content-Length: 0.... Thx in advance, Jon

18 years, 11 months

[Serusers] serweb-0.9.3.tgz

by harry gaillac

Hi all, I downloaded serweb-0.9.3.tgz for ser-0.9.3 I just (re)install serweb however in config/config_data_layer.php i changed. it's ok for me !! Regards Harry $config->data_sql->table_user_preferences_types="preferences_types"; to $config->data_sql->table_user_preferences_types="usr_preferences_types"; I set in sql file : scripts/sql/usr_preferences.sql # $Id: usr_preferences.sql,v 1.2.2.1 2005/06/28 08:50:08 kozlik Exp $ # # Dumping data for table 'usr_preferences_types' # INSERT INTO usr_preferences_types (att_name, att_rich_type, att_raw_type, att_type_spec, default_value) VALUES("fw_voicemail", "boolean", "1", NULL, "0"); INSERT INTO usr_preferences_types (att_name, att_rich_type, att_raw_type, att_type_spec, default_value) VALUES("sw_user_status_visible", "boolean", "1", NULL, "1"); INSERT INTO usr_preferences_types (att_name, att_rich_type, att_raw_type, att_type_spec, default_value) VALUES("send_daily_missed_calls", "boolean", "1", NULL, "0"); ___________________________________________________________________________ Appel audio GRATUIT partout dans le monde avec le nouveau Yahoo! Messenger Téléchargez cette version sur http://fr.messenger.yahoo.com

18 years, 11 months

[Serusers] URGENT! AS5350 <-> SER incompatibility problem

by Victor Huertas Garcia

Hi everybody! recently I have been testing calls to/from ISDN with a AS5350. My SER version is 0.8.14 and when I make a call from ISDN towards a SIP UA registered in the SER the problem is that the AS5350 is no aware of Call Release. I explain it in more detail... 1. AS5350 sends an INVITE to the SER with destination number 93222222 2. SER forwards the INVITE to the corresponding SIP UA. 3. UA reponds with a 180 Ringing and it is forwarded to the AS5350 by the SER 4. When I pick up the phone, the SIP UA sends a 200 OK message, which is frowarded by the SER as well. 5. AS5350 replies with a ACK to the 200 OK but beware!! the AS5350 has changed UDP source port!! it is different from the one set in INVITE. 6. The SIP UA hangs up the call by sending a BYE message to the SER (it is Record Routing) 7. The SER forwards the BYE to the AS5350 but with the old UDP port!! 8. AS5350 sends ICMP Destination Unreachable (Cause code: port unreachable) every time that the SER retries the BYE. My guess is that the AS5350 expects the BYE packet through the new UDP port... Has anybody found such a problem? Thanks Victor

18 years, 11 months

[Serusers] RE: SERWEB error: "Function aggergate_method() doesn't exists."

by Gareth C. Fowler

I'm currently running Fedora Core 4, SER 0.9.2, and have followed the instruction of running: # pear install -f classkit and when I run: # pear list I receive the following output: Installed packages: =================== Package Version State Archive_Tar 1.1 stable Console_Getopt 1.2 stable DB 1.7.6 stable HTML_Template_IT 1.1 stable HTTP 1.3.5 stable Mail 1.1.4 stable Net_SMTP 1.2.6 stable Net_Socket 1.0.6 stable Net_UserAgent_Detect 2.0.1 stable PEAR 1.3.5 stable XML_Parser 1.2.6 stable XML_RPC 1.2.2 stable classkit 0.4 beta runkit 0.3.0 beta but it's still giving me the "Function aggregate_methods() doesn't exists. Try install Classkit extension. http://pecl.php.net/package/classkit" error. I even installed the runkit which is supposed to be the next version up. Can anyone recommend anything to resolve this error?? I'm more of a perl man, so I'm lost with PHP. Thanks. Gareth

18 years, 11 months

[Serusers] Nat_uac_test failing with ATA v3.2 behind NAT, v3.1 works

by Jon Mansey

Hello Serusers, I have 2 ATAs, one is V3.1 and one is V3.2, they are both behind NAT and are behaving differently when registering. With 3.2, the nat_uac_test does not apparently detect it is behind NAT and leaves the flag at 0 in the location table. V3.1 works fine. I can see why nat_uac_test() may be failing, because the ATA seems to have auto-magically detected its public IP and is using it in the via: header, thus receive!=via test fails! Also the contact has the public IP, so the RFC1813 test fails. I have not configured the NAT IP or server in the ATA as the NAT public IP is dynamic. Although the v3.2 ATA seems to have figured out its public IP, it still uses its private IP in the INVITE sdp c= headers, so we get no media. And because the nat flag is 0, the rtpproxy doesn't kick in and fix things. Notice the call-id of the register message includes the private ip. Anyone familiar with ATA firmware versions and features know the magic incarnation to shut off the "auto-detect public IP", ahem, "feature" in v3.2? Or any other suggestions for how to make nat_uac_test() get a positive when it gets one of these smart REGISTERs from behind NAT? Im running the old version of SER 0.8.12 still where nat_uac_test only has 1 2 or 3 options, not the new one that has "19", would that make a difference, upgrading to v0.9? Here are the ngreps of REGISTERs from the 2 versions: (public Ips masked) V3.1 works fine, nat_uac_test results in flag 1 in location table, rtpproxy works fine >From ata v3.1 behind nat1 to ser server: U <nat1 pub ip>:49121 -> <pub ip of ser>:5060 REGISTER sip:sip.mycompany.com SIP/2.0..Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.0.11: 5060..From: <sip:20210@sip.mycompany.com;user=phone>;tag=933299358..To : <sip:20210@sip.mycomapny.com;user=phone>..Call-ID: 4033019825(a)192.16 8.0.11..CSeq: 1 REGISTER..Contact: <sip:20210@192.168.0.11:5060;user=phone; transport=udp>;expires=3600..User-Agent: Cisco ATA 186 v3.1.0 atasip (0402 11A)..Content-Length: 0.... And from ata with v3.2 U <pub ip of nat2>:5060 -> <pub ip of ser>:5060 REGISTER sip:sip.mycompany.com SIP/2.0..Via: SIP/2.0/UDP <pub ip of nat2> :5060;branch=z9hG4bK1c6d78542c385f5e..From: <sip:202111@sip.mycompany.com ;user=phone>;tag=2453464613..To: <sip:202111@sip.mycomapny.com ;user=phone>..Call-ID: 1193202309@172.16.1.100..CSeq: 1 REGISTER..Con tact: <sip:202111@<pub ip of nat2>:5060;user=phone;transport=udp>;expire s=3600..User-Agent: Cisco ATA 186 v3.2.0 atasip (041111A)..Content-Length: 0.... Thx in advance, Jon

18 years, 11 months

[Serusers] Problems compiling SER 0.9.3 with lcr module

by Alberto Cruz

Hi I'm trying to compile the lcr backported module from Onsip.org but I'm getting the following error: make[1]: Entering directory `/root/sources/sip_router/modules/lcr' gcc -fPIC -DPIC -g -O9 -funroll-loops -Wcast-align -Wall -minline-all-stringops -malign-double -falign-loops -mcpu=athlon -DNAME='"ser"' -DVERSION='"0.9.3"' -DARCH='"i386"' -DOS='"linux"' -DCOMPILER='"gcc 3.3"' -D__CPU_i386 -D__OS_linux -DCFG_DIR='"/usr/local/etc/ser/"' -DPKG_MALLOC -DSHM_MEM -DSHM_MMAP -DDNS_IP_HACK -DUSE_IPV6 -DUSE_MCAST -DUSE_TCP -DDISABLE_NAGLE -DFAST_LOCK -DADAPTIVE_WAIT -DADAPTIVE_WAIT_LOOPS=1024 -DHAVE_GETHOSTBYNAME2 -DHAVE_UNION_SEMUN -DHAVE_SCHED_YIELD -DHAVE_MSG_NOSIGNAL -DHAVE_MSGHDR_MSG_CONTROL -DHAVE_ALLOCA_H -c lcr_mod.c -o lcr_mod.o lcr_mod.c: In function `load_gws': lcr_mod.c:591: error: `HDR_FROM_F' undeclared (first use in this function) lcr_mod.c:591: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once lcr_mod.c:591: error: for each function it appears in.) lcr_mod.c: In function `load_contacts': lcr_mod.c:890: error: too many arguments to function `next_branch' lcr_mod.c:912: error: too many arguments to function `next_branch' make[1]: *** [lcr_mod.o] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/root/sources/sip_router/modules/lcr' Does anybody know if I'm missing something? Regards Alberto Cruz

18 years, 11 months

[Serusers] simple ser configurtion

by chris

hi, i installed ser with mysql support and authentication on solaris9, i have 2 ordinary phones, connected to a linksys 2phone port pap2 device. what i need a simple ser routing configuration where i can call from one of the phones to the other phone on the same pap2 device using ser. pls. help.. thnks in advance. chris.

18 years, 11 months

[Serusers] session duration accounting

by Ryan Pagquil

guys, just want to ask if i can make ser to account session durations for billing purposes? Thanks, -- Ryan Pagquil Infodyne Inc. - PhilOnline.com 3603 Antel Global Corporate Center Doña Julia Vargas Ave. Ortigas Center Pasig City Tel: 687-0715 Web: www.philonline.com

18 years, 11 months

[Serusers] installing sipsak error

by chris

i'm Installaing sipsak on a solaris 9, when i run ./configure i got this: checking ctype.h presence... yes checking for ctype.h... yes checking arpa/inet.h usability... yes checking arpa/inet.h presence... yes checking for arpa/inet.h... yes checking getopt.h usability... no checking getopt.h presence... no checking for getopt.h... no configure: error: missing required header (see above) where can i get the getopt.h? what package will i install? thnks

18 years, 11 months

← Newer
1
...
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
...
55
Older →

Jump to page:

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

sr-users July 2005