Lucas,
Thanks a lot for explaining this stuff.
Mohammad
Original Message:
-----------------
From: Lucas Aimaretto lucas(a)cyneric.com
Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2005 16:11:37 -0300
To: info(a)beeplove.com, serusers(a)iptel.org
Subject: RE: [Serusers] STUN server
> Can I have two server, each having one network interface with one ip?
Stun server itself needs 2 IP addresses to work correctly. It will not
work just a Stun server with just one IP address.
You can have 2 stun servers, each on one interface, but each interface
should have 2 IP addresses.
Regards,
Lucas
--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.308 / Virus Database: 266.9.4 - Release Date: 06/04/2005
--------------------------------------------------------------------
mail2web - Check your email from the web at
http://mail2web.com/ .
> Hello Lucas.
> Sorry to bother you.
> I installed about three months ago "mystun" server.
> The experience has been a little bit complicated. I have
> some endpoints with NAT problems, bad returning port form the
> messsages, amog other little problems. I'm still trying to
> understand where the problem is located... could be the stun
> server?, the stun client?, problems with some kind of nat?...
> i don't know yet. That's why i would like to ask you about
> your endpoints.? What type of endpoint are you using? I'm
> using Sipura 2000 and Linksys PAP2. I hope you can give me a
> hand here... Thanks in advance... Best Regards,
Hi there,
I've been using Vovida's server for a while. Some UAs behaved properly
with it, some not. That's when I found myStun.
This are the UAs that I'm now using:
- Xten PRO
- Xten Lite
- Grandstream Budgetone 100
- MTA V102 ( from voipsolutions. It is an ATA ).
The last one could not just use vovida's server. It works great with
mystun.
To find out where is the problem, try this:
- First, see the output of myStun. Some clients do not build the stun
messages in a correct way.
- Make sure you are not behind a Symmetric NAT. If so, you're dead. STUN
does not work with Symmetric NAT.
- There are some stun clients that run under windows or linux. Try one
of those in those cases where your UA will not talk to stun. If the
application can talk to your stun server, your UA's stun client might
not be working correctly.
- Try to upgrade your UAs firmware.
- Lastly, it is always good to have different exits. I mean, install
both: myStun and Vovida's. Try first with one of those, if no answer,
try the other. myStun is working really nice with me, but it does not
mean vovida does not work at all.
Hope I helped.
Regards,
Lucas
--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.308 / Virus Database: 266.9.4 - Release Date: 06/04/2005
Right, I've left it going for a couple weeks and only 4 procs end up
with cpu time.. Not only that I've pounded the server and tested with
external scripts, I've never seen more than 4 being run at once.. All
the hints point to 4 as being the magic number.
-----Original Message-----
From: Greger V. Teigre [mailto:greger@teigre.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 07, 2005 1:30 PM
To: Matt Schulte; serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
Subject: Re: [Serusers] Child procs
Matt,
Why do you believe that you have been running out of processes? At any
given time you may have processes without CPU load, but over time the
processes should have some CPU time.
Have you run serctl ps? AFAIK, the standard number of processes for
each
protocol (udp/tcp) is 8 unless you specify children=x.
If a ser process blocks due to problems with mysql or a radius failover
situation, you may get a problem where all processes blocks.
g-)
Matt Schulte wrote:
> bueller? someone must have some clue
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Matt Schulte
> Sent: Tuesday, April 05, 2005 7:26 AM
> To: Matt Schulte; serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
> Subject: RE: [Serusers] Child procs
>
>
> Does anyone have any opinions on this? What I'm worried about is of
> course running out of procs and thus hanging SER, I believed this to
> have happened several times..
>
> Thanks..
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Matt Schulte
> Sent: Monday, April 04, 2005 8:45 AM
> To: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
> Subject: [Serusers] Child procs
>
>
> Do increasing child procs actually do anything? When I do a 'ps axu' I
> only show 4 of the procs having CPU time, the rest having no cpu time
> at all. Any thoughts on this? Thanks, Matt
>
> _______________________________________________
> Serusers mailing list
> serusers(a)lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
>
> _______________________________________________
> Serusers mailing list
> serusers(a)lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
I have pstn (isdn) gateway 192.168.0.163, and I make calls using prefix "8"
Here's a log from a local call (using CiscoATA186 and Wu-chuang Sipphone):
Apr 7 20:49:09 domenet /usr/sbin/ser[18289]: ACC: transaction answered:
method=PRACK, i-uri=sip:457@192.168.0.145:5060,
o-uri=sip:457@192.168.0.145:5060;user=phone;transport=udp,
call_id=jFB1bc1nyfwVovpk(a)192.168.0.134, from="493"
<sip:493@192.168.0.122>;tag=ncHI214LorUb7iWW, code=200
. Apr 7 20:49:11 domenet /usr/sbin/ser[18283]: ACC: transaction answered:
method=INVITE, i-uri=sip:457@192.168.0.122,
o-uri=sip:457@192.168.0.145:5060;user=phone;transport=udp,
call_id=jFB1bc1nyfwVovpk(a)192.168.0.134, from="493"
<sip:493@192.168.0.122>;tag=ncHI214LorUb7iWW, code=200
Apr 7 20:49:11 domenet /usr/sbin/ser[18285]: ACC: request acknowledged:
method=ACK, i-uri=sip:457@192.168.0.145:5060,
o-uri=sip:457@192.168.0.145:5060;user=phone;transport=udp,
call_id=jFB1bc1nyfwVovpk(a)192.168.0.134, from="493"
<sip:493@192.168.0.122>;tag=ncHI214LorUb7iWW, code=200
And here's a log from calling to pstn (using Wu-chuang sipphone and pstn
gateway) to number 0506633351 (isdn:506633351) :
Apr 7 20:52:54 domenet /usr/sbin/ser[18284]: ACC: request acknowledged:
method=ACK, i-uri=sip:8506633351@192.168.0.163:5060,
o-uri=sip:8506633351@192.168.0.163:5060,
call_id=yPeLkYYVQnG8fiOm(a)192.168.0.134, from="493"
<sip:493@192.168.0.122>;tag=QpR2G8JxdXTiq265, code=200
As You can see, there's no BYE message ,but only if the pstn-side
disconnects. If the LAN side disconnects, theres a succesfull BYE message.
I use forwarding to pstn using the loop:
if (loose_route())
{ t_relay(); break;
}
if (method=="INVITE") {
record_route();
};
setflag(1);
if (uri=~"^sip:8[0-9]{3}@*") {
log(1, "Forwarding to ISDN...");
rewritehostport ("192.168.0.163:5060");
t_relay();
log(1, "..forwarded\n");
break;
};
Moreover, calling PSTN there's only silence in LAN's side, although PSTN
hear LAN very good.
Where am i wrong ?
--
Pozdrawiam,
Wojciech Ziniewicz
Optocomp sp.z.o.o, www.optocomp.pl
mailto: wojtekz(a)optocomp.pl
+48(0)691031535
Do I need to have two interface on the server?
Or I can have two different server.
Thanks,
Mohammad
Original Message:
-----------------
From: Lucas Aimaretto lucas(a)cyneric.com
Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2005 15:43:25 -0300
To: info(a)beeplove.com, serusers(a)iptel.org
Subject: RE: [Serusers] STUN server
> I downloaded mystun from cvs.
> I don't see documentation.
>
> Any help? to install mystun
> or, any documentation on mystun.
Just compile it with make in the source directory ...
I got some errors with the client compilation, but, oh well, I just
needed the server.
Then run ./server
Regards,
Lucas
--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.308 / Virus Database: 266.9.4 - Release Date: 06/04/2005
--------------------------------------------------------------------
mail2web - Check your email from the web at
http://mail2web.com/ .
I downloaded mystun from cvs.
I don't see documentation.
Any help? to install mystun
or, any documentation on mystun.
Thanks,
Mohammad
Original Message:
-----------------
From: Lucas Aimaretto lucas(a)cyneric.com
Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2005 14:48:39 -0300
To: info(a)beeplove.com, serusers(a)iptel.org
Subject: RE: [Serusers] STUN server
> Hello List;
>
> I am going to install STUN server.
> I have found from web that there have two avialable stun
> servers: (I am not aware about any other avaiable stun server)
>
> * vovida.org has an open source STUN server: vovida.org
> STUN server
> http://www.voip-info.org/wiki-vovida.org+STUN+server
> * a Linux open source STUN server is also available here myStun
> http://developer.berlios.de/projects/mystun/
>
> I am not sure which one to pick.
> Any suggession? Your opnion would really help me.
>
> Thanks,
Definitively, myStun. Vovida's one made me thought some clients were not
nat/stun friendly. But, same clients with myStun, worked just perfect
and I could just use voip nicely.
Regards,
Lucas
--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.308 / Virus Database: 266.9.4 - Release Date: 06/04/2005
--------------------------------------------------------------------
mail2web - Check your email from the web at
http://mail2web.com/ .
bueller? someone must have some clue
-----Original Message-----
From: Matt Schulte
Sent: Tuesday, April 05, 2005 7:26 AM
To: Matt Schulte; serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
Subject: RE: [Serusers] Child procs
Does anyone have any opinions on this? What I'm worried about is of
course running out of procs and thus hanging SER, I believed this to
have happened several times..
Thanks..
-----Original Message-----
From: Matt Schulte
Sent: Monday, April 04, 2005 8:45 AM
To: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
Subject: [Serusers] Child procs
Do increasing child procs actually do anything? When I do a 'ps axu' I
only show 4 of the procs having CPU time, the rest having no cpu time at
all. Any thoughts on this? Thanks, Matt
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
serusers(a)lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
Hi
I think I may have seen what is wrong, my problem I was getting the
error when I was getting the confirmation link, whereas I think you are
getting it when you are intially submitting it for a new user, if this
is true then ur calling the scripts under reg/ directory in serweb.
Also my version of serweb is $Id: INSTALL,v 1.15 2005/02/01 09:34:19
kozlik Exp $ from the INSTALL file, hence my configs are different, and
now I have changed the system so that I dont add names to subscriber but
add that to alias, and add the number to the subscriber table.
Anyhow in short what you need to look at is the registration page, it
will be calling a function which is adding the alias, this is in the
data_layer directory. Now in this function the alias must be using fifo
to add to the the alias directly. This is where the error is.
Sorry I cant be of more help I wish I had documented it better, but I
was flying through it like a headless chicken
But do note in the long run adding names to subscriber is NOT the best
way to go, since people will want to dial numbers, which they can, if
they are in alias, but if you want to add voicemail etc at alater date,
then to connect to the voicemail box from a handset dialing a number
which aliagns to the users number is better than trying to dial a
name...well thats my experience anyhow
Iqbal
Mr Greg Plater wrote:
>
>This is the error I see on the server when I try and add an alias to a
>subscriber
>
>
>
>Apr 7 11:35:13 altcall2 /usr/local/sbin/ser[1614]: ERROR: ul_add: flags
>expected
>
>
>
>On the web page I see this :
>
>400 ul_add: flags expected
>
>I will send you my config
>
>
Hello List;
I am going to install STUN server.
I have found from web that there have two avialable stun servers:
(I am not aware about any other avaiable stun server)
* vovida.org has an open source STUN server: vovida.org STUN server
http://www.voip-info.org/wiki-vovida.org+STUN+server
* a Linux open source STUN server is also available here myStun
http://developer.berlios.de/projects/mystun/
I am not sure which one to pick.
Any suggession? Your opnion would really help me.
Thanks,
Mohammad
--------------------------------------------------------------------
mail2web - Check your email from the web at
http://mail2web.com/ .
