sr-users October 2005

sr-users@lists.kamailio.org

214 participants
458 discussions

[Serusers] voicemail route
by Aisling 04 Oct '05

04 Oct '05

Hello everyone, I am using the onsip call features ser.cfg and am adapting it for asterisk voicemail. This is what I currently have changed: 1) In the usr_preferences table in the ser database have an entry for user 2092. Insert into usr_preferences (username, attribute, value) values ("2092", "voicemail", "y"); 2) In Route[3] (used for call invite handling) if(avp_db_load("$ruri/username","s:voicemail")){ if(avp_check("s:voicemail", "eq/y/i")){ setflag(18); }; }; This will check if the user wants to use voicemail according to the preference that is set for them in the usr_preferences table. I they don't want to use voicemail set value to "n" 3) In failure route[1] if (call fwd on no answer is enabled{ } else if(isflagset(18) && t_check_status("408")){ route(x); break; }; 4) route[x] { acc_db_request("missed called", "missed_calls"); revert_uri(); rewritehostport("x.x.x.x:5064"); #port where asterisk is listening append_branch(); t_relay_to_udp(x.x.x.x", "5064"); break(); } I am getting a 404 sent back to the phone..I suspect this is something got to do with route 1 as I have used loads of log messages and I can see the flag being set, route x being called but after the failure route, the code jumps to route 1...This is probably because in route 3 it says t_on_failure("1") followed by route 4 followed by route 1...I just don't know what to do about it....Does anyone have any suggestions? Kindest Regards, Aisling. -------------------Legal Disclaimer--------------------------------------- The above electronic mail transmission is confidential and intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. Its contents may be protected by legal and/or professional privilege. Should it be received by you in error please contact the sender at the above quoted email address. Any unauthorised form of reproduction of this message is strictly prohibited. The Institute does not guarantee the security of any information electronically transmitted and is not liable if the information contained in this communication is not a proper and complete record of the message as transmitted by the sender nor for any delay in its receipt.

3 4

[Serusers] Ser-Web interface errors...
by Pablo Cabezas 04 Oct '05

04 Oct '05

Hi! I have access to the admin web page (http://localhost/serweb/admin/index.php) with the default user "admin". I can see the users I have created with the "serctl add..." wish. The problem comes when clicking in the hyperlink "account" for one of the users in the list (in the administration web page). A new page is opened, and in the upper section appears the errors: # Warning: fopen(/tmp/ser_fifo): failed to open stream: Permission denied in /var/lib/serweb/html/functions.php on line 315 # Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /var/lib/serweb/html/functions.php:315) in /var/lib/serweb/html/page.php on line 35 And written with red font, appears this message too: # DB Error: no such table # sorry -- cannot open write fifo I have uncommented the line "fifo_mode=0660" at the /etc/ser/ser.cfg, as it was told here at the list, but it goes wrong. I have changes permissions in /tmp/ser_fifo, but then the web page doesnt get opened... I would appreciate your help in this point, because I suppose that creating user accounts and managing them is the only required step to intercomunicate softphones in a simple LAN, isnt it? Thanks! Pablo

2 2

Re: [Serusers] Ser-Web interface errors...
by Karel Kozlik 04 Oct '05

04 Oct '05

Hi, please (CC) your mails to the mailing list in order to others can see the replies. Coments are inline. > Ok Karel, that went ok! > > Now, when accessing to http://localhost/serweb/user...) with a user > account, appears the error message "DB Error: No such table". > > What table does it refer to? I thought that launching the initial wish > to create the ser tables should be enough in order to intialize all > these things related to the mySql database... Yes, it is enought. The problem may be in incopatible versions of ser and serweb. Try run: ser_mysql.sh reinstall If it will not help, try enable logging in serweb and see the log file. Here you will see the name of missing table. Karel > > Thanks! > Pablo > > >> From: Karel Kozlik <karel(a)iptel.org> >> To: Pablo Cabezas <paolochan(a)hotmail.com> >> CC: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org >> Subject: Re: [Serusers] Ser-Web interface errors... >> Date: Tue, 04 Oct 2005 11:09:09 +0200 >> >> Hi, >> try set fifo_mode=0666 in your ser.cfg >> >> Karel >> >> Pablo Cabezas napsal(a): >> >>> Hi! >>> >>> I have access to the admin web page >>> (http://localhost/serweb/admin/index.php) with the default user >>> "admin". I can see the users I have created with the "serctl add..." >>> wish. >>> >>> The problem comes when clicking in the hyperlink "account" for one of >>> the users in the list (in the administration web page). A new page is >>> opened, and in the upper section appears the errors: >>> >>> >>> # Warning: fopen(/tmp/ser_fifo): failed to open stream: Permission >>> denied in /var/lib/serweb/html/functions.php on line 315 >>> >>> # Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent >>> by (output started at /var/lib/serweb/html/functions.php:315) in >>> /var/lib/serweb/html/page.php on line 35 >>> >>> >>> >>> And written with red font, appears this message too: >>> >>> # DB Error: no such table >>> # sorry -- cannot open write fifo >>> >>> >>> I have uncommented the line "fifo_mode=0660" at the /etc/ser/ser.cfg, >>> as it was told here at the list, but it goes wrong. I have changes >>> permissions in /tmp/ser_fifo, but then the web page doesnt get opened... >>> >>> I would appreciate your help in this point, because I suppose that >>> creating user accounts and managing them is the only required step to >>> intercomunicate softphones in a simple LAN, isnt it? >>> >>> Thanks! >>> Pablo >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Serusers mailing list >>> serusers(a)lists.iptel.org >>> http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers > > >

1 0

[Serusers] BYE->INVITE
by Xavier TRENTIN 04 Oct '05

04 Oct '05

Hi all, I'd like to implement that kind of scenario: I have 3 user agents UA1 UA2 and UA3 and SER running. UA1 calls UA2. When UA2 sends a BYE request to UA1, I'd like that SER catch this request and initiate an INVITE request from UA1 to UA3, so that UA1 calls now UA3. Is there a way to do that? Thanks. Regards. Xavier

1 0

[Serusers] 483 too many hops
by Chia Huey Lim 04 Oct '05

04 Oct '05

Hi, I am using the standard code for sanity check in the routing script: if (!mf_process_maxfwd_header("10")) { sl_send_reply("483", "Too Many Hops"); break; }; if (msg:len > max_len) { sl_send_reply("513", "Message Overflow"); break; }; And once I start the SER, after 10 minutes, there are around 10% of the users get "483 Too Many Hops" from SER upon re-registration. Subsequently SER is binding them out as their register sip messages are not received in time. Is there any way to eliminate this issue? Will it be routing script problem? Thanks. Regards, Chia

1 0

[Serusers] Multiple domain
by Anders Hansson 04 Oct '05

04 Oct '05

Hi, Can anyone give me a description how to set up SER 0.8.14 to handle multiple domains. How do I use MySQL subscriber table for authentication and how is location table used for routing. Thanks in advance, Anders

1 0

[Serusers] SER Calling Card Platform
by gorand＠dvvti.com 04 Oct '05

04 Oct '05

Is there a third party application that can be used in conjunction with ser to enable a calling card platform through ser?

2 1

RE: [Serusers] Problem/Question regarding mediaproxy
by Ronald Voermans 04 Oct '05

04 Oct '05

Again, Below is the output of /var/log/messages: Sep 26 12:17:57 ser mediaproxy[2876]: session 00-00147-52dbda11-7c108ad21(a)tpsip01.ipvoice.enertel.nl: called signed in from 192.168.0.146:5004 (RTP) (will return to 192.168.0.146:5004) Sep 26 12:17:57 ser mediaproxy[2876]: session 00-00147-52dbda11-7c108ad21(a)tpsip01.ipvoice.enertel.nl: called signed in from 10.166.38.109:37528 (RTP) (will return to 10.166.38.109:37528) Sep 26 12:17:57 ser mediaproxy[2876]: session 00-00147-52dbda11-7c108ad21(a)tpsip01.ipvoice.enertel.nl: called signed in from 192.168.0.146:5004 (RTP) (will return to 192.168.0.146:5004) Sep 26 12:17:57 ser mediaproxy[2876]: session 00-00147-52dbda11-7c108ad21(a)tpsip01.ipvoice.enertel.nl: called signed in from 10.166.38.109:37528 (RTP) (will return to 10.166.38.109:37528) Sep 26 12:17:57 ser mediaproxy[2876]: session 00-00147-52dbda11-7c108ad21(a)tpsip01.ipvoice.enertel.nl: called signed in from 192.168.0.146:5004 (RTP) (will return to 192.168.0.146:5004) Sep 26 12:17:57 ser mediaproxy[2876]: session 00-00147-52dbda11-7c108ad21(a)tpsip01.ipvoice.enertel.nl: called signed in from 10.166.38.109:37528 (RTP) (will return to 10.166.38.109:37528) Sep 26 12:17:57 ser mediaproxy[2876]: session 00-00147-52dbda11-7c108ad21(a)tpsip01.ipvoice.enertel.nl: called signed in from 192.168.0.146:5004 (RTP) (will return to 192.168.0.146:5004) Sep 26 12:17:57 ser mediaproxy[2876]: session 00-00147-52dbda11-7c108ad21(a)tpsip01.ipvoice.enertel.nl: called signed in from 10.166.38.109:37528 (RTP) (will return to 10.166.38.109:37528) Sep 26 12:17:57 ser mediaproxy[2876]: session 00-00147-52dbda11-7c108ad21(a)tpsip01.ipvoice.enertel.nl: called signed in from 192.168.0.146:5004 (RTP) (will return to 192.168.0.146:5004) Sep 26 12:17:57 ser mediaproxy[2876]: session 00-00147-52dbda11-7c108ad21(a)tpsip01.ipvoice.enertel.nl: called signed in from 10.166.38.109:37528 (RTP) (will return to 10.166.38.109:37528) Sep 26 12:17:57 ser mediaproxy[2876]: session 00-00147-52dbda11-7c108ad21(a)tpsip01.ipvoice.enertel.nl: called signed in from 192.168.0.146:5004 (RTP) (will return to 192.168.0.146:5004) Sep 26 12:17:57 ser mediaproxy[2876]: session 00-00147-52dbda11-7c108ad21(a)tpsip01.ipvoice.enertel.nl: called signed in from 10.166.38.109:37528 (RTP) (will return to 10.166.38.109:37528) Sep 26 12:17:57 ser mediaproxy[2876]: session 00-00147-52dbda11-7c108ad21(a)tpsip01.ipvoice.enertel.nl: called signed in from 192.168.0.146:5004 (RTP) (will return to 192.168.0.146:5004) Sep 26 12:17:57 ser mediaproxy[2876]: session 00-00147-52dbda11-7c108ad21(a)tpsip01.ipvoice.enertel.nl: called signed in from 10.166.38.109:37528 (RTP) (will return to 10.166.38.109:37528) Sep 26 12:17:57 ser mediaproxy[2876]: session 00-00147-52dbda11-7c108ad21(a)tpsip01.ipvoice.enertel.nl: called signed in from 192.168.0.146:5004 (RTP) (will return to 192.168.0.146:5004) Sep 26 12:17:57 ser mediaproxy[2876]: session 00-00147-52dbda11-7c108ad21(a)tpsip01.ipvoice.enertel.nl: called signed in from 10.166.38.109:37528 (RTP) (will return to 10.166.38.109:37528) Sep 26 12:17:57 ser mediaproxy[2876]: session 00-00147-52dbda11-7c108ad21(a)tpsip01.ipvoice.enertel.nl: called signed in from 192.168.0.146:5004 (RTP) (will return to 192.168.0.146:5004) Sep 26 12:17:57 ser mediaproxy[2876]: session 00-00147-52dbda11-7c108ad21(a)tpsip01.ipvoice.enertel.nl: called signed in from 10.166.38.109:37528 (RTP) (will return to 10.166.38.109:37528) Sep 26 12:17:57 ser mediaproxy[2876]: session 00-00147-52dbda11-7c108ad21(a)tpsip01.ipvoice.enertel.nl: called signed in from 192.168.0.146:5004 (RTP) (will return to 192.168.0.146:5004) Sep 26 12:17:57 ser mediaproxy[2876]: session 00-00147-52dbda11-7c108ad21(a)tpsip01.ipvoice.enertel.nl: called signed in from 10.166.38.109:37528 (RTP) (will return to 10.166.38.109:37528) Sep 26 12:17:57 ser mediaproxy[2876]: session 00-00147-52dbda11-7c108ad21(a)tpsip01.ipvoice.enertel.nl: called signed in from 192.168.0.146:5004 (RTP) (will return to 192.168.0.146:5004) Sep 26 12:17:57 ser mediaproxy[2876]: session 00-00147-52dbda11-7c108ad21(a)tpsip01.ipvoice.enertel.nl: called signed in from 10.166.38.109:37528 (RTP) (will return to 10.166.38.109:37528) Sep 26 12:17:57 ser mediaproxy[2876]: session 00-00147-52dbda11-7c108ad21(a)tpsip01.ipvoice.enertel.nl: called signed in from 192.168.0.146:5004 (RTP) (will return to 192.168.0.146:5004) Sep 26 12:17:57 ser mediaproxy[2876]: session 00-00147-52dbda11-7c108ad21(a)tpsip01.ipvoice.enertel.nl: called signed in from 10.166.38.109:37528 (RTP) (will return to 10.166.38.109:37528) Sep 26 12:17:57 ser mediaproxy[2876]: session 00-00147-52dbda11-7c108ad21(a)tpsip01.ipvoice.enertel.nl: called signed in from 192.168.0.146:5004 (RTP) (will return to 192.168.0.146:5004) Sep 26 12:17:57 ser mediaproxy[2876]: session 00-00147-52dbda11-7c108ad21(a)tpsip01.ipvoice.enertel.nl: called signed in from 10.166.38.109:37528 (RTP) (will return to 10.166.38.109:37528) Sep 26 12:17:57 ser mediaproxy[2876]: session 00-00147-52dbda11-7c108ad21(a)tpsip01.ipvoice.enertel.nl: called signed in from 192.168.0.146:5004 (RTP) (will return to 192.168.0.146:5004) Sep 26 12:17:57 ser mediaproxy[2876]: session 00-00147-52dbda11-7c108ad21(a)tpsip01.ipvoice.enertel.nl: called signed in from 10.166.38.109:37528 (RTP) (will return to 10.166.38.109:37528) Regards, Ronald ________________________________ Van: serusers-bounces(a)iptel.org [mailto:serusers-bounces@lists.iptel.org] Namens Ronald Voermans Verzonden: maandag 26 september 2005 8:41 Aan: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org Onderwerp: [Serusers] Problem/Question regarding mediaproxy Hello, I'm using Ser in combination with Mediaproxy. The situation is as follow: My SER has a private ip address (10.254.254.1), and my UAs also have private IP addresses, they can all see SER, and SER can see the UAs. Next, our company has a Voice Interconnect with a telco. (it's using Cirpack as softswitch). SER can see Cirpack and vice versa. However, the UAs cannot see the Cirpack. So I want to use Mediaproxy to overcome this. I can make outbound calls, but when calling inbound, I sometimes have one-way-voice of no voice at all. I think the problem is related to Cirpack, but I have a question thouh: - When calling mediaproxy, how does mediaproxy decide which one is the caller and which one is the called? Is this based on the From and To header? Because, if i call from PSTN -> SIP, i get serveral thousands (!) of messages saying that the called person signed in (no caller signs in in mediaproxy). This could be due to the fact that the from and to headers are incorrect. My ser.cfg is the one from onsip.org (pstn with nat). I can post configs/traces if someone needs them! Regards, Ronald

2 1

[Serusers] SER Server Behind NAT
by Abdul Lateef 04 Oct '05

04 Oct '05

Hi all, Is it possible to use SER server behind NAT with some modification in router. I have my Linux box connected to our Office Lan with SpeedTouch Router, the Router is having public IP Address. I want to install SER in my linux box to make full test. If possible how i can do it? -------- Yours, Abdul Lateef Computer Programmer HATIF COM Mob: +974 - 5405022 Tel: +974 - 4883068 ICQ: 276994704 YM!: abdul_zu Fax: +974 - 4883063 Doha Qatar http://www.hatif.com __________________________________ Yahoo! Mail - PC Magazine Editors' Choice 2005 http://mail.yahoo.com

2 1

[Serusers] SER + rtpproxy
by KiFuChan 04 Oct '05

04 Oct '05

Hi all.. My test environment is: SER use publice IP address at 163.25.xxx.xxx User A and B use private IP address at 192.168.1.xxx and 192.168.1.xxx( Publice IP is 220.135.xxx.xxx) While A call B, I check the content of SDP that A send to B have rewrite from "IPv4 192.168.1.xxx" to "IPv4 220.135.xxx.xxx" However, the session still cannot create successful.( I use Windows Messenger to be User Agent) Please give me some advices, thanks! Caxton

1 0

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

sr-users October 2005