sr-users October 2005

sr-users@lists.kamailio.org

214 participants
457 discussions

by Rick Thompson

Aisling I am using the following to get to voicemail. failure_route[1] { xlog("L_ALERT", "%Tf %mf ****** Failure Route 1: <%rm> <%rr> <%rs>\n"); if(t_check_status("487")) { break; }; if(method=="INVITE" && (t_check_status("486|408|404|480"))) { if(avp_db_load("$ruri", "s:mailbox")) avp_pushto("$ruri/username", "s:mailbox"); prefix("V"); rewritehostport("66.236.248.133:5060"); append_branch(); xlog("L_ALERT", "****** Transfering to Voicemail\n"); t_on_reply("1"); t_relay(); }; } This works for uid busy and uid not registered but doesn't work for ser's 30 sec time out 408 "modparam("tm", "fr_inv_timer", 30)" So if someone can help me figure out why I would appreciate it. Rick _____ From: serusers-bounces(a)iptel.org [mailto:serusers-bounces@lists.iptel.org] On Behalf Of Aisling Sent: Tuesday, October 04, 2005 5:56 AM To: 'Greger V. Teigre'; serusers(a)lists.iptel.org Subject: RE: [Serusers] voicemail route Ok Greger, thanks for the reply. Just a quick question, for the forward to voicemail on busy scenario, I can see the callee phone sending the 486 busy message to SER and SER sends an ACK back. At this stage I then see SER send a 404 to the caller.I presume the correct sequence instead for this would be SER forwarding the INVITE to Asterisk? Many thanks. -----Original Message----- From: Greger V. Teigre [mailto:greger@teigre.com] Sent: 04 October 2005 06:55 To: Aisling; serusers(a)lists.iptel.org Subject: Re: [Serusers] voicemail route Aisling, I think the only way you can get further on this is to use ngrep and create a complete trace of the call. Then you have to match each of your log messages to each SIP message. sip_scenario can help you in drawing out who sent what. Remember that once you relay to Asterisk, Asterisk will get in the loop and these messages should also be relayed properly. My guess is that this has something to do with the OK or ACK at the end of call. Most likely you forget about a SIP message when reading your logs... ;-) (I've done it myself so many times) g-) ----- Original Message ----- From: Aisling <mailto:ashling.odriscoll@cit.ie> To: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org Sent: Monday, October 03, 2005 09:05 PM Subject: [Serusers] voicemail route Hello everyone, I am using the onsip call features ser.cfg and am adapting it for asterisk voicemail. This is what I currently have changed: 1) In the usr_preferences table in the ser database have an entry for user 2092. Insert into usr_preferences (username, attribute, value) values ("2092", "voicemail", "y"); 2) In Route[3] (used for call invite handling) if(avp_db_load("$ruri/username","s:voicemail")){ if(avp_check("s:voicemail", "eq/y/i")){ setflag(18); }; }; This will check if the user wants to use voicemail according to the preference that is set for them in the usr_preferences table. I they don't want to use voicemail set value to "n" 3) In failure route[1] if (call fwd on no answer is enabled{ } else if(isflagset(18) && t_check_status("408")){ route(x); break; }; 4) route[x] { acc_db_request("missed called", "missed_calls"); revert_uri(); rewritehostport("x.x.x.x:5064"); #port where asterisk is listening append_branch(); t_relay_to_udp(x.x.x.x", "5064"); break(); } I am getting a 404 sent back to the phone..I suspect this is something got to do with route 1 as I have used loads of log messages and I can see the flag being set, route x being called but after the failure route, the code jumps to route 1...This is probably because in route 3 it says t_on_failure("1") followed by route 4 followed by route 1...I just don't know what to do about it....Does anyone have any suggestions? Kindest Regards, Aisling. -------------------Legal Disclaimer--------------------------------------- The above electronic mail transmission is confidential and intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. Its contents may be protected by legal and/or professional privilege. Should it be received by you in error please contact the sender at the above quoted email address. Any unauthorised form of reproduction of this message is strictly prohibited. The Institute does not guarantee the security of any information electronically transmitted and is not liable if the information contained in this communication is not a proper and complete record of the message as transmitted by the sender nor for any delay in its receipt. _____ _______________________________________________ Serusers mailing list serusers(a)lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers -------------------Legal Disclaimer--------------------------------------- The above electronic mail transmission is confidential and intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. Its contents may be protected by legal and/or professional privilege. Should it be received by you in error please contact the sender at the above quoted email address. Any unauthorised form of reproduction of this message is strictly prohibited. The Institute does not guarantee the security of any information electronically transmitted and is not liable if the information contained in this communication is not a proper and complete record of the message as transmitted by the sender nor for any delay in its receipt. -------------------Legal Disclaimer--------------------------------------- The above electronic mail transmission is confidential and intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. Its contents may be protected by legal and/or professional privilege. Should it be received by you in error please contact the sender at the above quoted email address. Any unauthorised form of reproduction of this message is strictly prohibited. The Institute does not guarantee the security of any information electronically transmitted and is not liable if the information contained in this communication is not a proper and complete record of the message as transmitted by the sender nor for any delay in its receipt.

18 years, 7 months

[Serusers] 403 No relaying

by rajesh volluru

hi I had installed SER. I get following error when I try to configure jain sip communicator to use SER. SIP/2.0 403 No relaying Call-ID: aa7c1df636a1640571eb10e920781a2b(a)192.168.1.169 CSeq: 1 REGISTER From: "Rajesh" <sip:admin@192.168.1.207:20318;transport=udp>;tag=6972371 To: "Rajesh" <sip:admin@192.168.1.207:20318;transport=udp>;tag=b51ece8fd8c195776737473dd6552d43.1682 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.1.169:20318;branch=z9hG4bKcba4c28b1d1942c2fe848a76e481591d;rport=20318;received=68.225.20.250 P-Behind-NAT: Yes Server: Sip EXpress router (0.9.0udpfifo (i386/linux)) Warning: 392 195.37.77.99:5060 "Noisy feedback tells: pid=8440 req_src_ip=68.225.20.250 req_src_port=20318 in_uri=sip:192.168.1.207:5060;transport=udp out_uri=sip:192.168.1.207:5060;transport=udp via_cnt==1" Content-Length: 0 Please help me resolve this. Thanks Rajesh --------------------------------- Yahoo! India Matrimony: Find your partner now. --------------------------------- Yahoo! India Matrimony: Find your partner now.

18 years, 7 months

[Serusers] acc module and failed_transactions

by Federico Giannici

I have activated the "failed_transactions" flag in SER 0.9.4. Now the "acc" module logs the 487 errors for INVITEs, but it DOESN'T log the 404 or 480 errors. Why? Perhaps they are considered "missed calls" (i don't log missed calls)? But then the 487 should be considered missed call too... Thanks. -- ___________________________________________________ __ |- giannici(a)neomedia.it |ederico Giannici http://www.neomedia.it ___________________________________________________

18 years, 7 months

[Serusers] SER Distributions

by gorand＠dvvti.com

Are there any SER Distrobutions already set up on an ISo File with all the appropriate scrips. Something similar to Asterisk@Home. Please let me know if one exists and where I can find it. Thanks

18 years, 7 months

[Users] mediaproxy and registrar on two different server

by andrea

Dear all, I'm working to separate on two different servers registrar and mediaproxy. Mediaproxy server (with both mediaproxy and ser proxy process) will be the front-end and all registers and calls from Intenet will be directed to this server and then routed to internal registrar. Now, I'm working with natted clients. I've started with only one server (with only one ser) and it works fine. When I've tried to split the architecture on two server I can't fine a good configuration. In particular, when a user with a public IP calls a natted user, the RTP doesn't use mediaproxy Anyone can help me? do you have any working configurations? thanks, Andrea

18 years, 7 months

[Serusers] when binding can't invite?

by Chia Huey Lim

Hi, I notice that whenever SER is binding UAs, everyone who register / invite at that time will just get stucked for a few seconds. SER will not response when it's binding UAs Is this normal? Anything can be done to improve this situation? Thanks in advance Regards, Chia

18 years, 7 months

[Serusers] Re: [Serdev] Conferencing

by Paul Hazlett

Rajeev, SER itself cannot do conferencing. In fact it doesn't understand anything about RTP streams at all. If you want to do conferencing or voice mail or other sorts of things then you need to look at integrating SER with other software applications, such as Asterisk PBX or SEMS. Regards, Paul On 10/4/05, rajeev.khetan(a)cem-solutions.net <rajeev.khetan(a)cem-solutions.net> wrote: > Hi, > > I want to know wheather ser proxy support conferencing ?. > If it support plz. send the config file for it. > Thanks in advance. > > Regards, > Rajeev > > > _______________________________________________ > Serdev mailing list > serdev(a)lists.iptel.org > http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serdev >

18 years, 7 months

[Serusers] Radius

by Andrej Sirk

Hello, How to load radius authentication modules into ser. I have compiled ser as described in the radius howto and I can not load modules in it. I have tried lots of options but without success. When added a line (example: loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/auth_radius.so") in ser.cfg there was an error. Please Help.

18 years, 7 months

[Serusers] relocation error with binary 0.9.4 for linux

by Christian Gerstner

Hi! I tried to run binary from package ser-0.9.4_linux_i368.tar.gz and I get: ser: relocation error: ser: symbol regexec, version GLIBC_2.3.4 not defined in file libc.so.6 with link time reference What's wrong? Is it my fault? Regards, Christian

18 years, 7 months

[Serusers] voicemail route

by Aisling

Hello everyone, I am using the onsip call features ser.cfg and am adapting it for asterisk voicemail. This is what I currently have changed: 1) In the usr_preferences table in the ser database have an entry for user 2092. Insert into usr_preferences (username, attribute, value) values ("2092", "voicemail", "y"); 2) In Route[3] (used for call invite handling) if(avp_db_load("$ruri/username","s:voicemail")){ if(avp_check("s:voicemail", "eq/y/i")){ setflag(18); }; }; This will check if the user wants to use voicemail according to the preference that is set for them in the usr_preferences table. I they don't want to use voicemail set value to "n" 3) In failure route[1] if (call fwd on no answer is enabled{ } else if(isflagset(18) && t_check_status("408")){ route(x); break; }; 4) route[x] { acc_db_request("missed called", "missed_calls"); revert_uri(); rewritehostport("x.x.x.x:5064"); #port where asterisk is listening append_branch(); t_relay_to_udp(x.x.x.x", "5064"); break(); } I am getting a 404 sent back to the phone..I suspect this is something got to do with route 1 as I have used loads of log messages and I can see the flag being set, route x being called but after the failure route, the code jumps to route 1...This is probably because in route 3 it says t_on_failure("1") followed by route 4 followed by route 1...I just don't know what to do about it....Does anyone have any suggestions? Kindest Regards, Aisling. -------------------Legal Disclaimer--------------------------------------- The above electronic mail transmission is confidential and intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. Its contents may be protected by legal and/or professional privilege. Should it be received by you in error please contact the sender at the above quoted email address. Any unauthorised form of reproduction of this message is strictly prohibited. The Institute does not guarantee the security of any information electronically transmitted and is not liable if the information contained in this communication is not a proper and complete record of the message as transmitted by the sender nor for any delay in its receipt.

18 years, 7 months

Jump to page:

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

sr-users October 2005