They both look to me like they do the same thing, which is better?
----------------------------------------
Michael Shuler, C.E.O.
BitWise Systems, Inc.
682 High Point Lane
East Peoria, IL 61611
Office: (217) 585-0357
Cell: (309) 657-6365
Fax: (309) 213-3500
E-Mail: mike(a)bwsys.net
Customer Service: (877) 976-0711
Cisco 5350
There is timers but maxim is 1000 milisec I increase all of them and
have now:
sip-ua
nat symmetric role active
nat symmetric check-media-src
timers trying 1000
timers expires 360000
timers connect 1000
timers rel1xx 1000
sip-server dns:XXX
I guess that more correct way to do that ON ser.. to limit amount of RE
INVITE before SER decide that that call fail
Is it possible ?
> -----Original Message-----
> From: mark wehberg [mailto:mark.wehberg@clearviewcatv.net]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 25, 2004 3:20 PM
> To: Vitaly Nikolaev
> Subject: RE: [Serusers] Sort question regarding INVITE and timeout
>
> There should be timers that you can set on the cisco, which cisco are
u
> using?
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Vitaly Nikolaev [mailto:vitaly@switchgate.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 25, 2004 3:18 PM
> To: mark wehberg
> Cc: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
> Subject: RE: [Serusers] Sort question regarding INVITE and timeout
>
>
> Well, is it working in case when call coming from Cisco GW and
> client that supposed to get call offline but still registered on SER ?
>
> In this case cisco send cancel to SER before fr_inv_timer triggered I
> thing 3-4 reinvite without answer is enough to realize that client is
> offline and give up with it but how to program it
>
>
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: mark wehberg [mailto:mark.wehberg@clearviewcatv.net]
> > Sent: Wednesday, August 25, 2004 3:14 PM
> > To: Vitaly Nikolaev
> > Subject: RE: [Serusers] Sort question regarding INVITE and timeout
> >
> > I have not used SER's voicemail server, but have sent calls to other
> > voicemail servers under failure conditions....
> >
> > -Mark
> >
> >
> >
> > Set your timer
> >
> > modparam("tm", "fr_inv_timer", 20 )
> >
> >
> > then set the flag before the t_relay
> >
> > t_on_failure("1");
> > t_relay_to_udp("xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx", "5060");
> >
> >
> > then set up your failure case
> >
> >
> > failure_route[1] {
> > log(1,"failed Call");
> > t_relay_to_udp("xxx.xxx.xxx", "5060");
> > }
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: serusers-bounces(a)iptel.org [mailto:serusers-bounces@lists.iptel.org]
> On
> > Behalf Of Vitaly Nikolaev
> > Sent: Wednesday, August 25, 2004 2:40 PM
> > To: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
> > Subject: [Serusers] Sort question regarding INVITE and timeout
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > I could not find answer to my question in the list though it was
> > discussed before without ultimate solution :)
> >
> >
> > I have customer who registered on SER then go offline (internet
> > connecting or power problem)
> >
> > Call coming from cisco and going via SER to this customers.
> >
> > I have INVITE from cisco
> > Ser sends trying to cisco
> >
> > Ser send invite to customer
> > Ser send invite to customer
> > Ser send invite to customer
> > Ser send invite to customer
> >
> >
> > Cisco sends cancel to ser...
> >
> >
> > And that is it. And that is not what I want... because falure route
> > supposed to get control over the call and send it to voicemail. I
> tried
> > playing with timers on cisco/ser but without success.
> >
> > Any ideas?
> >
> > Thank you
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Serusers mailing list
> > serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
> > http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
>
I'm trying to understand the NAT process, can someone tell me if this is
correct
Here is my original INVITE from client IP 123.123.123.123 which is received
from port 5002 (because its behind a NAT router):
INVITE sip:2175850357@sip2.bwsys.net;user=phone SIP/2.0
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.100.2:5060;branch=z9hG4bK-4qxhdyvuyz6t;rport
From: "Mike's Springfield snom 1"
<sip:MikeSnom1@sip2.bwsys.net>;tag=k91lt5ydem
To: <sip:2175850357@sip2.bwsys.net;user=phone>
Call-ID: 3c275253ad55-krb7eduyhd2m@192-168-100-2
CSeq: 1 INVITE
Max-Forwards: 70
Contact: <sip:MikeSnom1@192.168.100.2:5060;line=rygvn8mw>
P-Key-Flags: keys="3"
User-Agent: snom200-3.42
Accept-Language: en
Accept: application/sdp
Allow: INVITE, ACK, CANCEL, BYE, REFER, OPTIONS, NOTIFY, SUBSCRIBE, PRACK,
MESSAGE, INFO
Allow-Events: talk, hold, refer
Supported: timer, 100rel, replaces
Session-Expires: 3600
Content-Type: application/sdp
Content-Length: 256
v=0
o=root 20147217 20147217 IN IP4 192.168.100.2
s=call
c=IN IP4 192.168.100.2
t=0 0
m=audio 10048 RTP/AVP 18 0 8 101
a=rtpmap:18 g729/8000
a=rtpmap:0 pcmu/8000
a=rtpmap:8 pcma/8000
a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000
a=fmtp:101 0-15
a=sendrecv
Now this invite is going to get forwarded to my TNT (with a public IP) which
has SIP capabilities and hands of PRI to a phone switch. So to make NAT
support work what would this message look like after being proxied and NAT
"adjusted" and what function in SER would be needed to make the changes
happen?
Now I know the proxy should be able to learn the port that the INVITE comes
in on and can send SIP messages back via the learned port, but I do not
understand how the RTP stream works when NAT is involved. My guess is that
anything what says 192.168.100.2 (the NAT'ed IP) needs to get changed to the
proxy's public IP of 198.88.216.87:5060. This would include the Via and
Contact. Now the SDP "c" line has to be changed because it says
192.168.100.2 but it should be changed to 123.123.123.123 (the clients
learned IP). Now that leaves us to the problem of the RTP port. The client
says it wants to receive on 10048, but how does the generic NAT router know
that the snom wants this port opened?
----------------------------------------
Michael Shuler, C.E.O.
BitWise Systems, Inc.
682 High Point Lane
East Peoria, IL 61611
Office: (217) 585-0357
Cell: (309) 657-6365
Fax: (309) 213-3500
E-Mail: mike(a)bwsys.net
Customer Service: (877) 976-0711
Well, is it working in case when call coming from Cisco GW and
client that supposed to get call offline but still registered on SER ?
In this case cisco send cancel to SER before fr_inv_timer triggered I
thing 3-4 reinvite without answer is enough to realize that client is
offline and give up with it but how to program it
> -----Original Message-----
> From: mark wehberg [mailto:mark.wehberg@clearviewcatv.net]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 25, 2004 3:14 PM
> To: Vitaly Nikolaev
> Subject: RE: [Serusers] Sort question regarding INVITE and timeout
>
> I have not used SER's voicemail server, but have sent calls to other
> voicemail servers under failure conditions....
>
> -Mark
>
>
>
> Set your timer
>
> modparam("tm", "fr_inv_timer", 20 )
>
>
> then set the flag before the t_relay
>
> t_on_failure("1");
> t_relay_to_udp("xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx", "5060");
>
>
> then set up your failure case
>
>
> failure_route[1] {
> log(1,"failed Call");
> t_relay_to_udp("xxx.xxx.xxx", "5060");
> }
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: serusers-bounces(a)iptel.org [mailto:serusers-bounces@lists.iptel.org]
On
> Behalf Of Vitaly Nikolaev
> Sent: Wednesday, August 25, 2004 2:40 PM
> To: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
> Subject: [Serusers] Sort question regarding INVITE and timeout
>
> Hello,
>
> I could not find answer to my question in the list though it was
> discussed before without ultimate solution :)
>
>
> I have customer who registered on SER then go offline (internet
> connecting or power problem)
>
> Call coming from cisco and going via SER to this customers.
>
> I have INVITE from cisco
> Ser sends trying to cisco
>
> Ser send invite to customer
> Ser send invite to customer
> Ser send invite to customer
> Ser send invite to customer
>
>
> Cisco sends cancel to ser...
>
>
> And that is it. And that is not what I want... because falure route
> supposed to get control over the call and send it to voicemail. I
tried
> playing with timers on cisco/ser but without success.
>
> Any ideas?
>
> Thank you
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Serusers mailing list
> serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
> http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
>
>
Hi,
I installed SER exactly following INSTALL guide. I am running
on the same machine MySQL 4.0.20 and I successfuly initialised
ser database. After running ser by "serctl start" I got message:
Starting SER : cat: /var/run/ser.pid: No such file or directory
started pid ()
~#
Of course ser is not running.
In syslog I can see messages:
ser: WARNING: could not rev. resolve 10.0.0.8
/usr/sbin/ser[579]: connect_db(): Can't connect to local MySQL server \
through socket '/var/run/mysqld/mysqld.sock' (2)
/usr/sbin/ser[579]: db_init(): Error while trying to connect database
/usr/sbin/ser[579]: mod_init(): Error while connecting database
/usr/sbin/ser[579]: init_mod(): Error while initializing module usrloc
The IP 10.0.0.8 is address of PC where I'm running this SER and MySQL.
Any hint/idea?
Pali
Hi
I have downloaded ser-0.8.14_src.tar and did
tar zxvf ser-0.8.14_src.tar.gz
make all
make prefix=/ install
#and then
export SIP_DOMAIN="sipser.zeurolink.co.il"
# then I tried to start the server
serctl start
Starting SER : cat: /var/run/ser.pid: No such file or directory
started pid()
please help
Shiran Guez
Hi guys,
I'm trying to implement the sms functionality. I already have a sms
gateway on a seperate server than ser is running. What I want to do is to
send the sms messages via this server. Is this possible? (In a similar way
we route calls to a PSTN gateway) According to the doc what I realised it
that the modem needs to be connected to the machine where ser is running.
The other question is what sort of a client can be used for sending sms?
--
Regards,
Lakmal
Lankacom Services (Pvt) Ltd.
65C, Dharmapala Mawatha,
Colombo 07.
Sri Lanka.
Tel: +94-11-2437545
www.lankacom.net
Hi,
I am trying to establish call b/w window messenger
(5.0.0482) and X-lite. i am able to place call but
communication is one way means
voice is transmitted from X-lite to messenger
but voice from messenger is not coming.
media is established through rtpproxy...
is window messenger support symmetric client
same problem if both client is window messenger.
I think , it is NAT problem. but how to fix the
problem
can u help
version of ser -0.8.13
version nathelper- v 1.51
rtpproxy version - v 1.19
plzz can anyone tell me whats the problem
Thanks
Ram
_______________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Win 1 of 4,000 free domain names from Yahoo! Enter now.
http://promotions.yahoo.com/goldrush