sr-users July 2004

sr-users@lists.kamailio.org

178 participants
449 discussions

[Serusers] ser fifo
by list＠chung.li 30 Jul '04

30 Jul '04

Ehlo, got this nice error ... anyone have any idea how to fix this ???? thanks in advance Fremen --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Jul 29 19:54:23 mixer ser: ser shutdown succeeded Jul 29 19:54:23 mixer ser: --Listening on Jul 29 19:54:23 mixer ser: 2xx.1xx.1xx.1xx [213.173.188.175]:5060 Jul 29 19:54:23 mixer ser: Aliases: mixer.xxx-company.xx:5060 213.173.188.175:* company.xx:* xxx:* company.xx:* mixer.xxx:* Jul 29 19:54:23 mixer ser: ser startup succeeded Jul 29 19:57:27 mixer /usr/sbin/ser[1048]: ERROR: security: fifo_check: inode/dev number differ: 1073768285 -1073744848 (/tmp/ser_receiver_1077) Jul 29 19:57:27 mixer /usr/sbin/ser[1048]: ERROR: ps_fifo_cmd: opening reply pipe (/tmp/ser_receiver_1077) failed Jul 29 19:57:27 mixer /usr/sbin/ser[1048]: ERROR: fifo_server: command (ps) processing failed ----------------------------------------------------------------------------

2 2

Re: [Serusers] t_check_status/t_on_failure does not work with ser v.0.8.12 rpm
by David Lee 30 Jul '04

30 Jul '04

Hi Bogdan, We upgraded to v0.8.14, and t_check_status works as you described, and perfectly for what we want to accomplish. Thank you, Dave ----- Original Message ----- From: Bogdan-Andrei IANCU <iancu(a)fokus.fraunhofer.de> Date: Thursday, July 29, 2004 3:19 am Subject: Re: [Serusers] t_check_status/t_on_failure does not work with ser v.0.8.12 rpm > David Lee wrote: > > Hello, > > > > In the admin documentation of ser, it says that all messages > greater than 300 are considered failures when using t_on_failure. > > > > In our scenario, we would like the ability to forward to a voice > mail on 4xx failure, but not on 302 failure. We are using XTEN > Pro softphones and want to be able to allow users the > functionality to forward to another SIP url (uses 302). But when > ser is seeing 302 (and t_on_failure is active) it considers it a > failure and immediately runs failure route block (to voicemail). > So our users cannot using forwarding to URL. > > > > An example would be ... When I'm out for lunch I would like to > forward my line to my secretary first before going to voicemail. > > > > We saw some mention of t_check_status ... but ser wont start > with that in the cfg. We are using ser v.0.8.12 rpm. Is that in > a unstable version only. If some could post how to accomplish > this it would be appreciated. > > yes, indeed, the answer is t_on_failure - this function didn't > existed > in the original release 0.8.12 (so, not present in rpm), but you > can > find it in the cvs tree of 0.8.12 - so, get the sources from cvs. > > bogdan >

1 0

Re: [Serusers] SER dies when call reaches 12000
by Bogdan-Andrei IANCU 30 Jul '04

30 Jul '04

Kenny Lam wrote: >Hi bogdan, > > I mean the calls are cumulative calls. > cumulative calls doesn't load ser. from ser point of view, the call is processed only when it's initialised and terminated. So, basically you can have as much active call as you want, without loading ser at all. anyhow, it's an impresiv number of parallel call. It's a stress test or ....? if it not, may I ask the number of registered user? > I received the following error log >when it was down. > > 0(4798) ERROR: build_res_buf_from_sip_req: out of memory ; needs 584 > 0(4798) ERROR: build_res_buf_from_sip_req: out of memory ; needs 584 > 0(4798) ERROR: sl_reply_error used: I'm terribly sorry, server error occured >(1/SL) > 0(4798) ERROR: build_res_buf_from_sip_req: out of memory ; needs 533 > 0(4798) ERROR: build_req_buf_from_sip_req: out of memory > 0(4798) ERROR: print_uac_request: no pkg_mem > 0(4798) ERROR: t_forward_nonack: failure to add branches > 0(4798) ERROR: build_res_buf_from_sip_req: out of memory ; needs 584 > 0(4798) ERROR: build_res_buf_from_sip_req: out of memory ; needs 584 > 0(4798) ERROR: sl_reply_error used: I'm terribly sorry, server error occured >(1/SL) > 2(4805) ERROR: fifo_server fgets failed: Illegal seek > 2(4805) ERROR: fifo_server fgets failed: Illegal seek > 2(4805) ERROR: fifo_server fgets failed: Illegal seek > 2(4805) ERROR: fifo_server fgets failed: Illegal seek > > > looks like your ser gets into troubles because of insufficient private memory (default is 1M). Try to increase it in config.h, PKG_MEM_POOL_SIZE value (it's a define). about the crash...excepting this log, do you have any additional info that will help us to track the problem down? no coredump is generated? bogdan >Thanks a lot for your kindly help! > > >On Fri, 30 Jul 2004 10:18:38 +0200, Bogdan-Andrei IANCU wrote > > >>Hi Kenny, >> >>first what do you mean by 12000-15000 calls? established calls in >>parallel or calls that initiated in the same time? there is a huge >>diference. >>second....what kind of failures? can you be a little bit more >>specific >>(even c'n'p from log will do it) third... when ser goes down.. there >>is no core dumped? no message in the log related to receiving a signal?.. >> >>regards, >>bogdan >> >>Kenny Lam wrote: >> >> >> >>>Hi all, >>> >>> I have setup the SER with media proxy to deal with the problem of NAT. >>>However, each time the number of calls reaches around 12000-15000, the SER >>>will either doesn't accept call and increase failurerates or it will be down >>>without any prior warnings. Anyone got the same experience before? I've tried >>>using both CVS 8.12-1rc6 and rc5 before, both get the same problem. >>> >>>Thanks a lot! >>>Best Regards, >>> >>>Kenny Lam >>>SIP Application Engineer >>>Deltapath Commerce & Technology Limited >>>--------------------------------------- >>>SIP By Deltapath! >>>www.deltapath.com >>> >>>_______________________________________________ >>>Serusers mailing list >>>serusers(a)lists.iptel.org >>>http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> > > >Kenny Lam >SIP Application Engineer >Deltapath Commerce & Technology Limited >--------------------------------------- >SIP By Deltapath! >www.deltapath.com > > > >

1 0

[Serusers] multiple domains, table domain
by Tony Sarendal 30 Jul '04

30 Jul '04

I'm trying out this what looks like nice software while the kids are sleeping. I just installed 0.8.14 and I'm messing around with getting multiple domains to play. What is the correct way to update the table domain ? Just an INSERT directly into the database ? Regards Tony -- --- Tony Sarendal - tony.sarendal(a)polarcap.org Cisco/Unix/Babies -= The scorpion replied, "I couldn't help it, it's my nature." =-

3 8

RE: [Serusers] Broken "SIP Aware" Router
by dhiraj.2.bhuyan＠bt.com 30 Jul '04

30 Jul '04

Totally agree with Jiri. An ALG unnecessarily brings up the price of the ADSL modem as well. --- Dhiraj Bhuyan Network Security Specialist, BT Exact Business Assurance Solutions Tel: +44 1473 643932 Mob: +44 7962 012145 Email: dhiraj.2.bhuyan(a)bt.com -----Original Message----- From: serusers-bounces(a)iptel.org [mailto:serusers-bounces@lists.iptel.org]On Behalf Of Jiri Kuthan Sent: 30 July 2004 10:46 To: andres(a)telesip.net; serusers(a)lists.iptel.org Subject: Re: [Serusers] Broken "SIP Aware" Router At 11:40 PM 7/29/2004, Andres wrote: >We have started having problems with customers in BellSouths ADSL network. New customers are being given the Westell ADSL modem which appears to be "SIP Aware". But the implementation is terribly broken. Well, I think that Application-Level-Gateways (ALGs) is _fundamentally_ broken concept with very negative impact on interoperability, security and software engineering. There will be attempt to create an effort documenting these issues in the upcoming IETF meeting; till this effort brings fruits it will take some time. Some enlighted vendors are aware of this: Cisco/Linksys gave up on the idea to introduce SIP awareness in residential routers. Thank you for your report. -jiri >The symptoms are that SIP INVITES cannot penetrate the NAT on the Modem even though we have a permanent Keep-Alive from the inside (every 15 seconds). Furthermore when the customer tries to make a call, the modem changes the source port of every single packet of the dialog. Thus breaking the SIP dialog completely. > >Our interim solution was to setup these customer on an alternate server listening on a different port. >For everybody's reference the modem version is: Westell B9061003006 and the Software is: 03.00.61 > >I have tried to contact Westell directly but they have not answered. I hope this is not something thats going to start happening with all modem manufacturers or else were going to have loads of trouble. > > >-- >Andres >Network Admin >http://www.telesip.net > > >_______________________________________________ >Serusers mailing list >serusers(a)lists.iptel.org >http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers -- Jiri Kuthan http://iptel.org/~jiri/ _______________________________________________ Serusers mailing list serusers(a)lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers

1 0

[Serusers] how to retrieve voicemail
by 祥仔 30 Jul '04

30 Jul '04

hello, I just start learned sip and sems, can you tell me how to use sems+voicemail? can you give me the ser.cfg file and tell me how to test voicemail? thanks Sean

1 0

[Serusers] Broken "SIP Aware" Router
by Andres 30 Jul '04

30 Jul '04

We have started having problems with customers in BellSouths ADSL network. New customers are being given the Westell ADSL modem which appears to be "SIP Aware". But the implementation is terribly broken. The symptoms are that SIP INVITES cannot penetrate the NAT on the Modem even though we have a permanent Keep-Alive from the inside (every 15 seconds). Furthermore when the customer tries to make a call, the modem changes the source port of every single packet of the dialog. Thus breaking the SIP dialog completely. Our interim solution was to setup these customer on an alternate server listening on a different port. For everybody's reference the modem version is: Westell B9061003006 and the Software is: 03.00.61 I have tried to contact Westell directly but they have not answered. I hope this is not something thats going to start happening with all modem manufacturers or else were going to have loads of trouble. -- Andres Network Admin http://www.telesip.net

2 1

[Serusers] Firewall
by "Juan G. Castañeda" 30 Jul '04

30 Jul '04

Sirs: Could you please advise the most protective firewall available that should be used to protect SER from net attackers? Juan Castañeda

2 1

[Serusers] please help... sip parsing error
by Cory Zue 30 Jul '04

30 Jul '04

Can someone please help me figure out why I am getting this error from my SER: ERROR: t_newtran: EoH not parsed The message it is responding to is this: ACK sip:user@172.18.1.100:5060 SIP/2.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 172.18.1.45:5060 From: "Cory Zue" <sip:czue@172.18.1.100>;tag=2005707378 To: <sip:user@172.18.1.100>;tag=1047340964 Call-ID: 1555446853(a)172.18.1.45 CSeq: 101 ACK User-Agent: Cory's VoIP UA Route: <sip:user@172.18.1.35:5060> Content-Length: 0 Every line in the message ends with a "\r\n". Any help with this problem, or where to look to get more output (see what line causes the error) would be greatly appreciated. thanks in advance, Cory

2 1

[Serusers] SER dies when call reaches 12000
by Kenny Lam 30 Jul '04

30 Jul '04

Hi all, I have setup the SER with media proxy to deal with the problem of NAT. However, each time the number of calls reaches around 12000-15000, the SER will either doesn't accept call and increase failurerates or it will be down without any prior warnings. Anyone got the same experience before? I've tried using both CVS 8.12-1rc6 and rc5 before, both get the same problem. Thanks a lot! Best Regards, Kenny Lam SIP Application Engineer Deltapath Commerce & Technology Limited --------------------------------------- SIP By Deltapath! www.deltapath.com

2 1

← Newer
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
...
45
Older →

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

sr-users July 2004