Is it possible to recieve incoming calls to an ATA directly through SER.
Something like this.
Caller --> Cisco AS5350 --> SER --> IP Phone
Anyone know of a way to do this, or am I crazy?
AJ Grinnell
Hi Steven,
Look at these instructions, this should help you.
http://www.iptel.org/ser/cvs/
Let me know if you have any other questions.
Regards,
Freddy
-----Original Message-----
From: serusers-bounces(a)iptel.org [mailto:serusers-bounces@lists.iptel.org]On Behalf Of langals(a)mweb.co.za
Sent: Sunday, June 13, 2004 8:54 AM
To: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
Subject: [Serusers] Downloading from CVS
Hi
I have installed ser 0.8.12 from a rpm and it seems to be working well. However, I it needs to support conferencing, and I am told that the most current version of sems is in the berlios CVS.
Now, I have located the files in the CVS and those relating to the ser_rel_0_8_12 tag. I am very new to CVS and am not sure how do download these files without doing it individually. I am wanting to donwload them from Windows. The help file seems to indicate that a Linux command is needed. I would be very greatful if someone could assist me.
Many thanks
Steven
Reza Kordi wrote:
> Can somone explain differances between SER and ASTERISK.
SER is a SIP Proxy. It doesn't deliver any phone services. SER
never handles the media stream. (The RTP proxy may, but that's
another story...)
Asterisk is a PBX, it answers and originates calls and tries
desperately to stay in the media stream to be able to deliver
IVR services. Asterisk is multiprotocol and can handle
PSTN termination over PRI and BRI as well as analog lines.
> I am particularly interested in functionality that is not available with
> ASTERISK but SER can provide.
>
SER is a full SIP proxy with support not only for phone calls,
but for all other types of SIP sessions, like a game of chess,
a whiteboard session, instant messaging... Ser opens up the wonderful
global world of SIP, where Asterisk handles phone calls, and does
it very well, indeed :-)
You can read more on both of them on http://www.voip-info.org
Best regards,
/Olle
--
Olle E. Johansson, Edvina.net AB, oej(a)edvina.net
----- Web: http://edvina.net
Hello,
I am brand new to SER and need some assistance in setting up SER as a Proxy
Server. The objectives are these.
1.) I need users to be able to register via authentication for one domain
with SER via MSN Messenger. SJphone, Pingtel Etc. For user info I want to
use the built in MySQL mod,and understand how to add users via "secrtl" but
do not fully grasp the complete process to get the server to this point. If
anyone could point me in the right direction, I would greatly appreciate it.
Things that come to mind:
What needs to be uncommented in the ser.cfg?
What do I need to with DNS(i.e DNS_SRV records)?
Do SER have an IRC#?
Thank you,
Harris Coltrain
Harris Coltrain
Sales and Service
Network Data Solutions
502.212.5183
hcoltrain(a)ndsky.net
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------
"The information in this e-mail is the property of Network Data Solutions
and may be confidential and privileged. It is intended solely for the
addressee.
Access to this email by anyone else is unauthorized. If you are not the
intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,distribution or any action taken
in reliance on it is prohibited and may be unlawful. If you receive this
message in error, please notifythe sender immediately and delete all copies
of this message."
Hello,
I am brand new to SER and need some assistance in setting up SER as a Proxy
Server. The objectives are these.
1.) I need users to be able to register via authentication for one domain
with SER via MSN Messenger. SJphone, Pingtel Etc. For user info I want to
use the built in MySQL mod,and understand how to add users via "secrtl" but
do not fully grasp the complete process to get the server to this point. If
anyone could point me in the right direction, I would greatly appreciate it.
Things that come to mind:
What needs to be uncommented in the ser.cfg?
What do I need to with DNS(i.e DNS_SRV records)?
Do SER have an IRC#?
Thank you,
Harris Coltrain
Sales and Service
Network Data Solutions
502.212.5183
hcoltrain(a)ndsky.net
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------
"The information in this e-mail is the property of Network Data Solutions
and may be confidential and privileged. It is intended solely for the
addressee.
Access to this email by anyone else is unauthorized. If you are not the
intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,distribution or any action taken
in reliance on it is prohibited and may be unlawful. If you receive this
message in error, please notifythe sender immediately and delete all copies
of this message."
Hi all !
I would like to change field "From:" in
SIP INVITE method
What command do I have to use ?
Is sometthing opposite to append_hf ?
Which command is usable to change
particular fields in sip headers ?
Regards
Andrzej
Adrian Georgescu writes:
> A SIP provider has interconnect from incumbent PSTN operator (Cisco
> gateway) using SIP (SER installation). This provider has an E164
> number range placed in ENUM. The problem here is that when an ENUM
> number is resolved to a remote domain and the destination username is
> an alias on the remote domain, the provider proxy will pass the
> redirect back to gateway who in term makes the final call.
it is not a good idea to let the gw to process the redirect, since if
call is coming from pstn to a sip user and the sip user has redirect to
expensive 700 number, the gateway would need to pay for the new leg.
but as i tried to explained earlier, i don't think that it is a good
idea for the proxy to process it either, since again, who would pay for
the new leg if it would go to a 700 number? legally the user who has
placed redirect in his or her sip phone cannot be charged for the
redirect.
> This provider gets paid by the incumbent for terminating minutes on IP
> for those E164 numbers but as the proxy is not in the middle they do
> not know how much traffic their numbers generated for anything that is
> an alias. The problem in this case is accounting. The Proxy should stay
> in the middle of the dialog in this scenario so your function makes
> perfect sense.
the proxy would stay in the middle if the proxy is serving the domains
enum queries return. so i don't quite understand your example.
> This scenario is described very nice in this document.
it is not clear from the document, why the 302 can't go all the way to
A, i.e., what the benefit is for the proxy handling the redirect. if
the proxy is A's outbound proxy, it would get the new invite too. if
not, there is nothing the provider can do about it, since use of an
outbound proxy is user's own choice.
-- juha
Hi All,
Is there anyway of printing (for example) the current uri value in the config
file using log() or maybe xlog()?
It would be very useful to be able to print the method variable for debugging
purposes.
Thanks!
-Jev
Hi Juha,
Let me provide a real example.
A SIP provider has interconnect from incumbent PSTN operator (Cisco
gateway) using SIP (SER installation). This provider has an E164
number range placed in ENUM. The problem here is that when an ENUM
number is resolved to a remote domain and the destination username is
an alias on the remote domain, the provider proxy will pass the
redirect back to gateway who in term makes the final call.
This provider gets paid by the incumbent for terminating minutes on IP
for those E164 numbers but as the proxy is not in the middle they do
not know how much traffic their numbers generated for anything that is
an alias. The problem in this case is accounting. The Proxy should stay
in the middle of the dialog in this scenario so your function makes
perfect sense.
The provider receiving the calls has no way to account for the calls if
it provxy the redirect.
This scenario is described very nice in Cisco SIP flows documents.
On Jun 14, 2004, at 6:34 AM, Juha Heinanen wrote:
> Adrian Georgescu writes:
>
>> I would like SER to use the Contact from a Call redirected (30X) and
>> proxy to final destination.
>
> i once wrote a new function that could be called from failure route and
> that replaced request uri of invite by contact uri from 3xx. i never
> committed it, however, because it needed a tm hack that allowed access
> in failure route to the contact header then i started to think that it
> is not a good idea in general for the
> proxy to intercept 3xx replies, since it is up to the original caller
> to
> make the decision regarding the new destination.
>
> -- juha
hello list,
iam trying billing with ser , may i know in current
state which will be best suitable for ser .
is it trabas or ispbs
has any member got success with any of the billing
softwares .
has we got any other good alternative ?
if any members are doing the billing with ser
i request them to share there expirence with me!
with regards
rama kanth varala
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Friends. Fun. Try the all-new Yahoo! Messenger.
http://messenger.yahoo.com/
