sr-users March 2003

sr-users@lists.kamailio.org

77 participants
136 discussions

[Serusers] auth_radius module problem
by Nimal Ratnayake 23 Mar '03

23 Mar '03

Hi, I have built ser and modules from the tar.gz file available on CVS. Authentication using auth_db works fine, but auth_radius results in a segmentation fault when I try to register. The debug log (with debug=9) says: Mar 22 16:21:32 voip ser: SIP Request: Mar 22 16:21:32 voip ser: method: <REGISTER> Mar 22 16:21:32 voip ser: uri: <sip:voip.pdn.ac.lk> Mar 22 16:21:32 voip ser: version: <SIP/2.0> Mar 22 16:21:32 voip ser: parse_headers: flags=1 Mar 22 16:21:32 voip ser: Found param type 232, <branch> = <z9hG4bK3378053857>; state=16 Mar 22 16:21:32 voip ser: end of header reached, state=5 Mar 22 16:21:32 voip ser: parse_headers: Via found, flags=1 Mar 22 16:21:32 voip ser: parse_headers: this is the first via Mar 22 16:21:32 voip ser: After parse_msg... Mar 22 16:21:32 voip ser: preparing to run routing scripts... Mar 22 16:21:32 voip ser: DEBUG : is_maxfwd_present: searching for max_forwards header Mar 22 16:21:32 voip ser: parse_headers: flags=128 Mar 22 16:21:32 voip ser: DEBUG: add_param: tag=2520454554 Mar 22 16:21:32 voip ser: end of header reached, state=29 Mar 22 16:21:32 voip ser: DEBUG: get_hdr_field: <To> [44]; uri=[sip:nimalr@voip.pdn.ac.lk] Mar 22 16:21:32 voip ser: DEBUG: to body [<sip:nimalr@voip.pdn.ac.lk>] Mar 22 16:21:32 voip ser: get_hdr_field: cseq <CSeq>: <0> <REGISTER> Mar 22 16:21:32 voip ser: DEBUG: is_maxfwd_present: value = 10 Mar 22 16:21:32 voip ser: parse_headers: flags=4096 Mar 22 16:21:32 voip ser: DEBUG: get_hdr_body : content_length=0 Mar 22 16:21:32 voip ser: found end of header Mar 22 16:21:32 voip ser: pre_auth(): Credentials with given realm not found Mar 22 16:21:32 voip ser: ERROR: fifo_server fgets failed: Illegal seek Mar 22 16:21:33 voip last message repeated 3 times Mar 22 16:21:33 voip ser: INFO: signal 15 received Mar 22 16:21:33 voip ser: INFO: signal 15 received My configuration is : ......... ......... # Uncomment this if you want digest authentication # mysql.so must be loaded ! loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/auth.so" loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/auth_db.so" loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/auth_radius.so" .......... .......... if (uri=~"voip.pdn.ac.lk") { if (method=="REGISTER") { # Uncomment this if you want to use digest authentication if (!radius_www_authorize("voip.pdn.ac.lk")) { # if (!www_authorize("voip.pdn.ac.lk","subscriber")) { www_challenge("voip.pdn.ac.lk", "0"); break; }; save("location"); break; }; ........ ........ Any help for solving the problem would be appreciated. Thanks. Nimal R.

2 7

[Serusers] �� SearchYourLove!
by SYL Community 22 Mar '03

22 Mar '03

This mail is probably spam. The original message has been attached along with this report, so you can recognize or block similar unwanted mail in future. See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. Content preview: Search Your Love URI:http://thesyl.ru/adv/images/spacer.gif URI:http://thesyl.ru/adv/images/letter1_1_02.gif [...] Content analysis details: (9.60 points, 5 required) HEADER_8BITS (1.2 points) Headers include 3 consecutive 8-bit characters HTML_70_80 (0.4 points) BODY: Message is 70% to 80% HTML HTML_FONT_COLOR_UNSAFE (0.1 points) BODY: HTML font color not within safe 6x6x6 palette HTML_COMMENT_8BITS (2.9 points) BODY: HTML comment has 3 consecutive 8-bit characters HTML_FONT_COLOR_RED (0.1 points) BODY: HTML font color is red HTML_MESSAGE (0.1 points) BODY: HTML included in message SUBJ_FULL_OF_8BITS (4.3 points) Subject is full of 8-bit characters MIME_HTML_ONLY (0.1 points) Message only has text/html MIME parts INVALID_MSGID (0.4 points) Message-Id is not valid, according to RFC 2822 The original message did not contain plain text, and may be unsafe to open with some email clients; in particular, it may contain a virus, or confirm that your address can receive spam. If you wish to view it, it may be safer to save it to a file and open it with an editor.

1 0

[Serusers] New save_noreply() function for the registrar module
by Maxim Sobolev 21 Mar '03

21 Mar '03

Folks, We found that in some cases it is necessary to have a function which will save contact without sending reply to the UA. For example, it is useful when there is a need to do stateless forwarding of the REGISTER request, but at the same time save it in the local registration database (sending reply in this case will disable any retransmissions that might be necessary to ensure that the request actually reached the destination). Attached patch provides necessary functionality, it would be nice to have it included into the next release. Thanks! -Maxim

3 2

[Serusers] Multiple Registrations
by Ricardo Villa 21 Mar '03

21 Mar '03

Hi, When we have a situation in which a PC changes IP addresses (like on dialup), we end up with multiple registrations (see below). Is it possible to configure SER so that it only has the latest registration? [root@maui ser]# serctl ul show rvilla <sip:rvilla@200.58.193.72:5060;transport=udp>;q=0.00;expires=2773 <sip:rvilla@200.58.203.236:5060;transport=udp>;q=0.00;expires=3194 <sip:rvilla@200.58.203.61:5060;transport=udp>;q=0.00;expires=3544 On a related note, the registrar README says: "Name: lookup Params: table - Name of table that should be used for the lookup Desc: The functions extracts username from Request-URI and tries to find all contacts for the username in usrloc. If there are no such contacts, -1 will be returned. If there are such contacts, Request-URI will be overwritten with the contact that has the highest q value and optionally the rest will be appended to the message (depending on append_branches parameter value)." ....but as you can see all 3 contacts have the same "q value" (whatever that stands for). How does one resolve such an issue? Thanks, Ricardo

8 18

[Serusers] Routing all SIP traffic through the proxy
by jaime.gill＠orange.co.uk 21 Mar '03

21 Mar '03

Hi, Not sure if someone has asked this before. Is there any way to route all SIP messages through SER without using record_route()? Jaime ******************************************************************************* Important. Confidentiality: This communication is intended for the above-named person and may be confidential and/or legally privileged. Any opinions expressed in this communication are not necessarily those of the company. If it has come to you in error you must take no action based on it, nor must you copy or show it to anyone; please delete/destroy and inform the sender immediately. Monitoring/Viruses Orange may monitor all incoming and outgoing emails in line with current legislation. Although we have taken steps to ensure that this email and attachments are free from any virus, we advise that in keeping with good computing practice the recipient should ensure they are actually virus free. Orange PCS Limited is a subsidiary of Orange SA and is registered in England No 2178917, with its address at St James Court, Great Park Road, Almondsbury Park, Bradley Stoke, Bristol BS32 4QJ. *******************************************************************************

3 2

[Serusers] dialer of Windows Messenger
by Bo 21 Mar '03

21 Mar '03

Hi, I have successfully registered the Windows Messenger (4.7) to SER. I was also able to make SIP calls to PSTN by entering the number by selecting "Start a Voice Conversation" -> "Other" -> "Enter e-mail address". But how to enter the number directly from the dialer? It seems that the dialer doesn't work (no response) so I have no way to enter DTMF for IVR applications. Anyone has any idea? Thanks. Reagards, Bo

1 1

[Serusers] ATA 186 Behind NAT
by Ricardo Villa 21 Mar '03

21 Mar '03

Hi, I was reading about the ATA186's ability to detect that it is behind a NAT. It requires that: "For the Cisco ATA to automatically detect its presence behind a NAT, the SIP proxy server or remote user agent server must include the "received=" parameter in the Via header in the responses to the Cisco ATA if the proxy detects that the source address and port do not match those in the Via header." Does SER support it? Thanks, Ricardo

3 2

[Serusers] A question about t_uac_dlg
by srm＠cs.stir.ac.uk 21 Mar '03

21 Mar '03

Hi, I am trying to use t_uac_dlg to send a new message from a module. It does not send the message, and I get the following in my log: Mar 21 14:50:54 d254196 /usr/local/sbin/ser[3111]: ERROR: mk_proxy: could not resolve hostname: "cs.stir.ac.uk"Mar 21 14:50:54 d254196 /usr/local/sbin/ser[3111]: ERROR: t_relay: bad host name in URI <sip:srm@cs.stir.ac.uk>Mar 21 14:50:54 d254196 /usr/local/sbin/ser[3111]: ERROR: uri2sock: Can't create a dst proxyMar 21 14:50:54 d254196 /usr/local/sbin/ser[3111]: ERROR: t_uac_dlg: no socket found The code in my module is as follows, where all the ps_ things are str* variables, with values as indicated by comments: tmb.t_uac_dlg( // send request ps_req_type, // INVITE NULL, PROTO_UDP , ps_req_uri, // sip:srm@cs.stir.ac.uk ps_req_to, // srm(a)cs.stir.ac.uk ps_req_from, // mrs(a)cs.stir.ac.uk NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, ps_req_headers, // NULL ps_req_body, // NULL NULL, // transaction_cb callback param // optional NULL // void* callback pointer // optional ); Any hints? I might have misunderstood what is expected from a request uri. If so, an example would be very welcome. thanks Stephan -- The University of Stirling is a university established in Scotland by charter at Stirling, FK9 4LA. Privileged/Confidential Information may be contained in this message. If you are not the addressee indicated in this message (or responsible for delivery of the message to such person), you may not disclose, copy or deliver this message to anyone and any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful. In such case, you should destroy this message and kindly notify the sender by reply email. Please advise immediately if you or your employer do not consent to Internet email for messages of this kind. Opinions, conclusions and other information in this message that do not relate to the official business of the University of Stirling shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by it.

2 1

[Serusers] When will tcp support in ser release?
by Benny Ho 21 Mar '03

21 Mar '03

Dear all, Do anyone know when will the tcp supported version release? Is there any CVS for tcp supported version? Regards,

2 1

[Serusers] �� Trium Eclipse �� 129$
by mcampos＠agris.com 20 Mar '03

20 Mar '03

1 0

← Newer
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
...
14
Older →

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

sr-users March 2003