11 Aug
2008
11 Aug
'08
6:50 a.m.
Hello everybody,
some people expressed inconveniences regarding the new name, so we would
like to get your opinion about, therefore this is a poll that will get
us to a decision. Here is the question:
Do you like the name "Kamailio"?
1) Yes, I love it. Please keep it.
2) It is OK.
3) I do not mind the name at all
4) I do not like it
5) I hate the name and we should change it
There is no need of explanations, as it is up to personal taste and
decision. Just vote by option.
Cheers,
Daniel
PS. for those interested...
As short history about renaming story. On the 28th of March the board
was informed about issues with SER part of project name. You can easily
find who has the trademarks. On the 7th of April the board was informed
about an agreement for the deadline as of September 30, 2008 to use old
name. From there on, all old releases, documents, etc. can be referred
by the old name, but nothing new. Other few discussions about what
should/could be kept/changed followed and on 12th of May started the
discussion about the new name with two main direction, something
similar, to remind about old project or just something completely new,
to be used as brand name. Couple of proposals and discussions regarding
possible names followed up to 16th of July when was the deadline and the
start of vote. Majority was reached on 17th but it was required to have
opinions from all members of the board, last came from Bogdan, on the
28th of July.
All discussions about migration were on the board mailing list. No
change were done to openser.org configuration, just the new domain with
kamailio in it was pointed to same server. Every step done was reported
to board, following a schedule discussed there. Another discussion was
about making the renaming and 1.4.0 release in same day. Being
practically impossible to do all the work in one day, it was decided to
do first the announcement about renaming. That happened on 28th when all
agreed with the new name.
As you can see, there was no 5 months of renaming duration. There was no
change in openser.org DNS configuration undertaken with/without the
knowledge of all board members. The new name domains were reserved when
majority was achieved, in any case; dns entries for new name were
pointed to old server shortly after booking the domains.
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla
http://www.asipto.com
11 Aug
11 Aug
6:58 a.m.
I don't like the name. Not so good to pronounce :)
On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 4:20 PM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla <miconda(a)gmail.com
wrote:
Hello everybody,
some people expressed inconveniences regarding the new name, so we would
like to get your opinion about, therefore this is a poll that will get
us to a decision. Here is the question:
Do you like the name "Kamailio"?
1) Yes, I love it. Please keep it.
2) It is OK.
3) I do not mind the name at all
4) I do not like it
5) I hate the name and we should change it
There is no need of explanations, as it is up to personal taste and
decision. Just vote by option.
Cheers,
Daniel
PS. for those interested...
As short history about renaming story. On the 28th of March the board
was informed about issues with SER part of project name. You can easily
find who has the trademarks. On the 7th of April the board was informed
about an agreement for the deadline as of September 30, 2008 to use old
name. From there on, all old releases, documents, etc. can be referred
by the old name, but nothing new. Other few discussions about what
should/could be kept/changed followed and on 12th of May started the
discussion about the new name with two main direction, something
similar, to remind about old project or just something completely new,
to be used as brand name. Couple of proposals and discussions regarding
possible names followed up to 16th of July when was the deadline and the
start of vote. Majority was reached on 17th but it was required to have
opinions from all members of the board, last came from Bogdan, on the
28th of July.
All discussions about migration were on the board mailing list. No
change were done to openser.org configuration, just the new domain with
kamailio in it was pointed to same server. Every step done was reported
to board, following a schedule discussed there. Another discussion was
about making the renaming and 1.4.0 release in same day. Being
practically impossible to do all the work in one day, it was decided to
do first the announcement about renaming. That happened on 28th when all
agreed with the new name.
As you can see, there was no 5 months of renaming duration. There was no
change in openser.org DNS configuration undertaken with/without the
knowledge of all board members. The new name domains were reserved when
majority was achieved, in any case; dns entries for new name were
pointed to old server shortly after booking the domains.
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla
http://www.asipto.com
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users(a)lists.kamailio.org
http://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
7:01 a.m.
Choice No 4 for me
________________________________
From: users-bounces(a)lists.kamailio.org
[mailto:users-bounces@lists.kamailio.org] On Behalf Of Ruchir
Sent: 2008-08-11 13:59
To: miconda(a)gmail.com
Cc: users; devel
Subject: Re: [Kamailio-Users] poll: project name
I don't like the name. Not so good to pronounce :)
On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 4:20 PM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla
<miconda(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Hello everybody,
some people expressed inconveniences regarding the new name, so we would
like to get your opinion about, therefore this is a poll that will get
us to a decision. Here is the question:
Do you like the name "Kamailio"?
1) Yes, I love it. Please keep it.
2) It is OK.
3) I do not mind the name at all
4) I do not like it
5) I hate the name and we should change it
There is no need of explanations, as it is up to personal taste and
decision. Just vote by option.
Cheers,
Daniel
PS. for those interested...
As short history about renaming story. On the 28th of March the board
was informed about issues with SER part of project name. You can easily
find who has the trademarks. On the 7th of April the board was informed
about an agreement for the deadline as of September 30, 2008 to use old
name. From there on, all old releases, documents, etc. can be referred
by the old name, but nothing new. Other few discussions about what
should/could be kept/changed followed and on 12th of May started the
discussion about the new name with two main direction, something
similar, to remind about old project or just something completely new,
to be used as brand name. Couple of proposals and discussions regarding
possible names followed up to 16th of July when was the deadline and the
start of vote. Majority was reached on 17th but it was required to have
opinions from all members of the board, last came from Bogdan, on the
28th of July.
All discussions about migration were on the board mailing list. No
change were done to openser.org configuration, just the new domain with
kamailio in it was pointed to same server. Every step done was reported
to board, following a schedule discussed there. Another discussion was
about making the renaming and 1.4.0 release in same day. Being
practically impossible to do all the work in one day, it was decided to
do first the announcement about renaming. That happened on 28th when all
agreed with the new name.
As you can see, there was no 5 months of renaming duration. There was no
change in openser.org DNS configuration undertaken with/without the
knowledge of all board members. The new name domains were reserved when
majority was achieved, in any case; dns entries for new name were
pointed to old server shortly after booking the domains.
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla
http://www.asipto.com
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users(a)lists.kamailio.org
http://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner <http://www.mailscanner.info/> , and is
believed to be clean.
8:02 a.m.
I don't like the name. Not so good to pronounce :)
Does this actually mean that somebody knows how it's pronounced? ;) I am
quite curious about the correct pronounciation.
Do you like the name "Kamailio"?
1) Yes, I love it. Please keep it.
2) It is OK.
3) I do not mind the name at all
4) I do not like it
5) I hate the name and we should change it
That 4 for me, I don't think that the new name sounds very "mature",
which might hurt the image people have of this project (and
unfortunately in light of the current developments I don't think this
image needs more damage at the moment). But I'm not quite sure that
changing the name again would be a good idea either, after 1 name
change, a fork and several "heated" arguments on the mailing lists
(that's the most diplomatic and understated description I've ever made)
I think some stability for now would be best.
Kind regards,
Ardjan Zwartjes.
8:24 a.m.
New subject: [Kamailio-Users] [Kamailio-Devel] poll: project name
5
should be something like
exsip.org
;)
On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 2:02 PM, Ardjan Zwartjes <a.zwartjes(a)telecats.nl>wrote;wrote:
I don't like the name. Not so good to
pronounce :)
Does this actually mean that somebody knows how it's pronounced? ;) I am
quite curious about the correct pronounciation.
Do you like the name "Kamailio"?
1) Yes, I love it. Please keep it.
2) It is OK.
3) I do not mind the name at all
4) I do not like it
5) I hate the name and we should change it
That 4 for me, I don't think that the new name sounds very "mature",
which might hurt the image people have of this project (and
unfortunately in light of the current developments I don't think this
image needs more damage at the moment). But I'm not quite sure that
changing the name again would be a good idea either, after 1 name
change, a fork and several "heated" arguments on the mailing lists
(that's the most diplomatic and understated description I've ever made)
I think some stability for now would be best.
Kind regards,
Ardjan Zwartjes.
_______________________________________________
Devel mailing list
Devel(a)lists.kamailio.org
http://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devel
8:32 a.m.
New subject: [Kamailio-Users] [Kamailio-Devel] poll: project name
2008/8/11, David Villasmil <david.villasmil.work(a)gmail.com>om>:
5
should be something like
exsip.org
Please, don't suggest names in the public maillist since anyone could
buy the domain ;)
--
Iñaki Baz Castillo
<ibc(a)aliax.net>
8:42 a.m.
New subject: [Kamailio-Users] [Kamailio-Devel] poll: project name
Sorry about that... didn't think people belonging to this list would be such
vultures! ;-)
David
On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 2:32 PM, Iñaki Baz Castillo <ibc(a)aliax.net> wrote:
2008/8/11, David Villasmil
<david.villasmil.work(a)gmail.com>om>:
5
should be something like
exsip.org
Please, don't suggest names in the public maillist since anyone could
buy the domain ;)
--
Iñaki Baz Castillo
<ibc(a)aliax.net>
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users(a)lists.kamailio.org
http://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
10:09 a.m.
Number 5 for me as well. I think the name has a great concept behind
it, but few if any will remember/know what it is.
Cheers
Miles Scruggs
Wide Ideas | Operations | miles.scruggs(a)wideideas.com | 509.525.6522
ext 4880
On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 4:20 PM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla <miconda(a)gmail.com
wrote:
Hello everybody,
some people expressed inconveniences regarding the new name, so we
would
like to get your opinion about, therefore this is a poll that will get
us to a decision. Here is the question:
Do you like the name "Kamailio"?
1) Yes, I love it. Please keep it.
2) It is OK.
3) I do not mind the name at all
4) I do not like it
5) I hate the name and we should change it
7:04 a.m.
New subject: [Kamailio-Users] [Kamailio-Devel] poll: project name
Selecting from the proposed list, I would pick 4) I do not like it.
However, I do not really care, just feel that it is a bad marketing
name, not carrying any meaning and hard to remember for people.
On Mon, 2008-08-11 at 13:50 +0300, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:
Hello everybody,
some people expressed inconveniences regarding the new name, so we would
like to get your opinion about, therefore this is a poll that will get
us to a decision. Here is the question:
Do you like the name "Kamailio"?
1) Yes, I love it. Please keep it.
2) It is OK.
3) I do not mind the name at all
4) I do not like it
5) I hate the name and we should change it
There is no need of explanations, as it is up to personal taste and
decision. Just vote by option.
Cheers,
Daniel
PS. for those interested...
As short history about renaming story. On the 28th of March the board
was informed about issues with SER part of project name. You can easily
find who has the trademarks. On the 7th of April the board was informed
about an agreement for the deadline as of September 30, 2008 to use old
name. From there on, all old releases, documents, etc. can be referred
by the old name, but nothing new. Other few discussions about what
should/could be kept/changed followed and on 12th of May started the
discussion about the new name with two main direction, something
similar, to remind about old project or just something completely new,
to be used as brand name. Couple of proposals and discussions regarding
possible names followed up to 16th of July when was the deadline and the
start of vote. Majority was reached on 17th but it was required to have
opinions from all members of the board, last came from Bogdan, on the
28th of July.
All discussions about migration were on the board mailing list. No
change were done to openser.org configuration, just the new domain with
kamailio in it was pointed to same server. Every step done was reported
to board, following a schedule discussed there. Another discussion was
about making the renaming and 1.4.0 release in same day. Being
practically impossible to do all the work in one day, it was decided to
do first the announcement about renaming. That happened on 28th when all
agreed with the new name.
As you can see, there was no 5 months of renaming duration. There was no
change in openser.org DNS configuration undertaken with/without the
knowledge of all board members. The new name domains were reserved when
majority was achieved, in any case; dns entries for new name were
pointed to old server shortly after booking the domains.
Jérôme Martin | LongPhone
Responsable Architecture Réseau
122, rue la Boetie | 75008 Paris
Tel : +33 (0)1 56 26 28 44
Fax : +33 (0)1 56 26 28 45
Mail : jmartin(a)longphone.fr
Web : www.longphone.com
12 Aug
12 Aug
5:12 a.m.
New subject: [Kamailio-Users] [Kamailio-Devel] poll: project name
4)
Selecting from the proposed list, I would pick 4) I do
not like it.
However, I do not really care, just feel that it is a bad marketing name, not carrying
any meaning and hard to remember for people.
On Mon, 2008-08-11 at 13:50 +0300, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:
Hello everybody,
some people expressed inconveniences regarding the new name, so we would
like to get your opinion about, therefore this is a poll that will get
us to a decision. Here is the question:
Do you like the name "Kamailio"?
1) Yes, I love it. Please keep it.
2) It is OK.
3) I do not mind the name at all
4) I do not like it
5) I hate the name and we should change it
There is no need of explanations, as it is up to personal taste and
decision. Just vote by option.
Cheers,
Daniel
PS. for those interested...
As short history about renaming story. On the 28th of March the board
was informed about issues with SER part of project name. You can easily
find who has the trademarks. On the 7th of April the board was informed
about an agreement for the deadline as of September 30, 2008 to use old
name. From there on, all old releases, documents, etc. can be referred
by the old name, but nothing new. Other few discussions about what
should/could be kept/changed followed and on 12th of May started the
discussion about the new name with two main direction, something
similar, to remind about old project or just something completely new,
to be used as brand name. Couple of proposals and discussions regarding
possible names followed up to 16th of July when was the deadline and the
start of vote. Majority was reached on 17th but it was required to have
opinions from all members of the board, last came from Bogdan, on the
28th of July.
All discussions about migration were on the board mailing list. No
change were done to openser.org configuration, just the new domain with
kamailio in it was pointed to same server. Every step done was reported
to board, following a schedule discussed there. Another discussion was
about making the renaming and 1.4.0 release in same day. Being
practically impossible to do all the work in one day, it was decided to
do first the announcement about renaming. That happened on 28th when all
agreed with the new name.
As you can see, there was no 5 months of renaming duration. There was no
change in openser.org DNS configuration undertaken with/without the
knowledge of all board members. The new name domains were reserved when
majority was achieved, in any case; dns entries for new name were
pointed to old server shortly after booking the domains.
Jérôme Martin | LongPhone
Responsable Architecture Réseau
122, rue la Boetie | 75008 Paris
Tel : +33 (0)1 56 26 28 44
Fax : +33 (0)1 56 26 28 45
Mail : jmartin(a)longphone.fr
Web : www.longphone.com
---------------------------------------
Marek Cervenka
Centrum Vypocetni Techniky
jabber - cervajs(a)njs.netlab.cz
CVT - http://cvt.fpf.slu.cz
FPF SLU OPAVA - http://www.fpf.slu.cz
=======================================
11 Aug
11 Aug
7:10 a.m.
hi,
5) I hate the name and we should change it
the name sounds like a KDE application
cheers,
Patrick.
Hello everybody,
some people expressed inconveniences regarding the new name, so we would
like to get your opinion about, therefore this is a poll that will get
us to a decision. Here is the question:
Do you like the name "Kamailio"?
1) Yes, I love it. Please keep it.
2) It is OK.
3) I do not mind the name at all
4) I do not like it
5) I hate the name and we should change it
There is no need of explanations, as it is up to personal taste and
decision. Just vote by option.
Cheers,
Daniel
PS. for those interested...
As short history about renaming story. On the 28th of March the board
was informed about issues with SER part of project name. You can easily
find who has the trademarks. On the 7th of April the board was informed
about an agreement for the deadline as of September 30, 2008 to use old
name. From there on, all old releases, documents, etc. can be referred
by the old name, but nothing new. Other few discussions about what
should/could be kept/changed followed and on 12th of May started the
discussion about the new name with two main direction, something
similar, to remind about old project or just something completely new,
to be used as brand name. Couple of proposals and discussions regarding
possible names followed up to 16th of July when was the deadline and the
start of vote. Majority was reached on 17th but it was required to have
opinions from all members of the board, last came from Bogdan, on the
28th of July.
All discussions about migration were on the board mailing list. No
change were done to openser.org configuration, just the new domain with
kamailio in it was pointed to same server. Every step done was reported
to board, following a schedule discussed there. Another discussion was
about making the renaming and 1.4.0 release in same day. Being
practically impossible to do all the work in one day, it was decided to
do first the announcement about renaming. That happened on 28th when all
agreed with the new name.
As you can see, there was no 5 months of renaming duration. There was no
change in openser.org DNS configuration undertaken with/without the
knowledge of all board members. The new name domains were reserved when
majority was achieved, in any case; dns entries for new name were
pointed to old server shortly after booking the domains.
7:31 a.m.
New subject: [Kamailio-Users] [Kamailio-Devel] poll: project name
2) It is OK.
On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 7:50 PM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla <miconda(a)gmail.com
wrote:
Hello everybody,
some people expressed inconveniences regarding the new name, so we would
like to get your opinion about, therefore this is a poll that will get
us to a decision. Here is the question:
Do you like the name "Kamailio"?
1) Yes, I love it. Please keep it.
2) It is OK.
3) I do not mind the name at all
4) I do not like it
5) I hate the name and we should change it
There is no need of explanations, as it is up to personal taste and
decision. Just vote by option.
Cheers,
Daniel
7:39 a.m.
New subject: [Kamailio-Users] [Kamailio-Devel] poll: project name
speaking as user:
1) Yes, I love it. Please keep it.
Daniel-Constantin Mierla schrieb:
Hello everybody,
some people expressed inconveniences regarding the new name, so we would
like to get your opinion about, therefore this is a poll that will get
us to a decision. Here is the question:
Do you like the name "Kamailio"?
1) Yes, I love it. Please keep it.
2) It is OK.
3) I do not mind the name at all
4) I do not like it
5) I hate the name and we should change it
There is no need of explanations, as it is up to personal taste and
decision. Just vote by option.
Cheers,
Daniel
PS. for those interested...
As short history about renaming story. On the 28th of March the board
was informed about issues with SER part of project name. You can easily
find who has the trademarks. On the 7th of April the board was informed
about an agreement for the deadline as of September 30, 2008 to use old
name. From there on, all old releases, documents, etc. can be referred
by the old name, but nothing new. Other few discussions about what
should/could be kept/changed followed and on 12th of May started the
discussion about the new name with two main direction, something
similar, to remind about old project or just something completely new,
to be used as brand name. Couple of proposals and discussions regarding
possible names followed up to 16th of July when was the deadline and the
start of vote. Majority was reached on 17th but it was required to have
opinions from all members of the board, last came from Bogdan, on the
28th of July.
All discussions about migration were on the board mailing list. No
change were done to openser.org configuration, just the new domain with
kamailio in it was pointed to same server. Every step done was reported
to board, following a schedule discussed there. Another discussion was
about making the renaming and 1.4.0 release in same day. Being
practically impossible to do all the work in one day, it was decided to
do first the announcement about renaming. That happened on 28th when all
agreed with the new name.
As you can see, there was no 5 months of renaming duration. There was no
change in openser.org DNS configuration undertaken with/without the
knowledge of all board members. The new name domains were reserved when
majority was achieved, in any case; dns entries for new name were
pointed to old server shortly after booking the domains.
8:32 a.m.
I have already expressed some of my thoughts on the choice of name in
times past, but at this point I'm going to go for option 3 - I don't
mind it.
Not because I truly feel the name befits the project, but simply as a
pragmatic recognition that considerable work has already been put into
changing the name to Kamailio by Daniel-Constantin, Elena-Ramona, Juha
Heinanen, Henning Westerholt, and others. It would be a shame if their
valuable efforts were in vain.
What this project doesn't need is yet *another* name change; that would
just seem downright capricious to outsiders not privy to the nuances.
Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:
Hello everybody,
some people expressed inconveniences regarding the new name, so we would
like to get your opinion about, therefore this is a poll that will get
us to a decision. Here is the question:
Do you like the name "Kamailio"?
1) Yes, I love it. Please keep it.
2) It is OK.
3) I do not mind the name at all
4) I do not like it
5) I hate the name and we should change it
--
Alex Balashov
Evariste Systems
Web : http://www.evaristesys.com/
Tel : (+1) (678) 954-0670
Direct : (+1) (678) 954-0671
Mobile : (+1) (706) 338-8599
8:34 a.m.
Hi,
i also take 4.
I mistyped the name several times... the old name (though not available
anymore) was much better to remember and more clear what the project was
about...
Carsten
Am Montag, den 11.08.2008, 13:50 +0300 schrieb Daniel-Constantin Mierla:
Hello everybody,
some people expressed inconveniences regarding the new name, so we would
like to get your opinion about, therefore this is a poll that will get
us to a decision. Here is the question:
Do you like the name "Kamailio"?
1) Yes, I love it. Please keep it.
2) It is OK.
3) I do not mind the name at all
4) I do not like it
5) I hate the name and we should change it
There is no need of explanations, as it is up to personal taste and
decision. Just vote by option.
Cheers,
Daniel
PS. for those interested...
As short history about renaming story. On the 28th of March the board
was informed about issues with SER part of project name. You can easily
find who has the trademarks. On the 7th of April the board was informed
about an agreement for the deadline as of September 30, 2008 to use old
name. From there on, all old releases, documents, etc. can be referred
by the old name, but nothing new. Other few discussions about what
should/could be kept/changed followed and on 12th of May started the
discussion about the new name with two main direction, something
similar, to remind about old project or just something completely new,
to be used as brand name. Couple of proposals and discussions regarding
possible names followed up to 16th of July when was the deadline and the
start of vote. Majority was reached on 17th but it was required to have
opinions from all members of the board, last came from Bogdan, on the
28th of July.
All discussions about migration were on the board mailing list. No
change were done to openser.org configuration, just the new domain with
kamailio in it was pointed to same server. Every step done was reported
to board, following a schedule discussed there. Another discussion was
about making the renaming and 1.4.0 release in same day. Being
practically impossible to do all the work in one day, it was decided to
do first the announcement about renaming. That happened on 28th when all
agreed with the new name.
As you can see, there was no 5 months of renaming duration. There was no
change in openser.org DNS configuration undertaken with/without the
knowledge of all board members. The new name domains were reserved when
majority was achieved, in any case; dns entries for new name were
pointed to old server shortly after booking the domains.
8:37 a.m.
11 aug 2008 kl. 12.50 skrev Daniel-Constantin Mierla:
Hello everybody,
some people expressed inconveniences regarding the new name, so we
would
like to get your opinion about, therefore this is a poll that will get
us to a decision. Here is the question:
Do you like the name "Kamailio"?
1) Yes, I love it. Please keep it.
2) It is OK.
3) I do not mind the name at all
4) I do not like it
I'll go with 2. Hard to say that I love it ... yet. A name is
something we create and fill
with meaning. This one's free, available and weird enough to be
remembered.
It's very hard to come up with those names.
/O
8:44 a.m.
Kamilio means , " Free To Talk" .
My options are 2) but 5).
Its Very Hard to pronounce it. But its Sound Good
Thanks &Regards
Ravi Prakash Sunkara
VoIP Development Tech Lead
91-9999882776
Lucille Ball - "The secret of staying young is to live honestly, eat
slowly, and lie about your age."
2008/8/11 Daniel-Constantin Mierla <miconda(a)gmail.com>
Hello everybody,
some people expressed inconveniences regarding the new name, so we would
like to get your opinion about, therefore this is a poll that will get
us to a decision. Here is the question:
Do you like the name "Kamailio"?
1) Yes, I love it. Please keep it.
2) It is OK.
3) I do not mind the name at all
4) I do not like it
5) I hate the name and we should change it
There is no need of explanations, as it is up to personal taste and
decision. Just vote by option.
Cheers,
Daniel
PS. for those interested...
As short history about renaming story. On the 28th of March the board
was informed about issues with SER part of project name. You can easily
find who has the trademarks. On the 7th of April the board was informed
about an agreement for the deadline as of September 30, 2008 to use old
name. From there on, all old releases, documents, etc. can be referred
by the old name, but nothing new. Other few discussions about what
should/could be kept/changed followed and on 12th of May started the
discussion about the new name with two main direction, something
similar, to remind about old project or just something completely new,
to be used as brand name. Couple of proposals and discussions regarding
possible names followed up to 16th of July when was the deadline and the
start of vote. Majority was reached on 17th but it was required to have
opinions from all members of the board, last came from Bogdan, on the
28th of July.
All discussions about migration were on the board mailing list. No
change were done to openser.org configuration, just the new domain with
kamailio in it was pointed to same server. Every step done was reported
to board, following a schedule discussed there. Another discussion was
about making the renaming and 1.4.0 release in same day. Being
practically impossible to do all the work in one day, it was decided to
do first the announcement about renaming. That happened on 28th when all
agreed with the new name.
As you can see, there was no 5 months of renaming duration. There was no
change in openser.org DNS configuration undertaken with/without the
knowledge of all board members. The new name domains were reserved when
majority was achieved, in any case; dns entries for new name were
pointed to old server shortly after booking the domains.
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla
http://www.asipto.com
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users(a)lists.kamailio.org
http://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
10:26 a.m.
It is number 2 for me. At first I -really- didn't like it, but I think
that happens most times with such a big change anyways.
- Darren
_____________________________
dmsessions(a)gmail.com
http://www.darrensessions.com
_____________________________
On Aug 11, 2008, at 4:50 AM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:
Hello everybody,
some people expressed inconveniences regarding the new name, so we
would
like to get your opinion about, therefore this is a poll that will get
us to a decision. Here is the question:
Do you like the name "Kamailio"?
1) Yes, I love it. Please keep it.
2) It is OK.
3) I do not mind the name at all
4) I do not like it
5) I hate the name and we should change it
There is no need of explanations, as it is up to personal taste and
decision. Just vote by option.
Cheers,
Daniel
PS. for those interested...
As short history about renaming story. On the 28th of March the board
was informed about issues with SER part of project name. You can
easily
find who has the trademarks. On the 7th of April the board was
informed
about an agreement for the deadline as of September 30, 2008 to use
old
name. From there on, all old releases, documents, etc. can be referred
by the old name, but nothing new. Other few discussions about what
should/could be kept/changed followed and on 12th of May started the
discussion about the new name with two main direction, something
similar, to remind about old project or just something completely new,
to be used as brand name. Couple of proposals and discussions
regarding
possible names followed up to 16th of July when was the deadline and
the
start of vote. Majority was reached on 17th but it was required to
have
opinions from all members of the board, last came from Bogdan, on the
28th of July.
All discussions about migration were on the board mailing list. No
change were done to openser.org configuration, just the new domain
with
kamailio in it was pointed to same server. Every step done was
reported
to board, following a schedule discussed there. Another discussion was
about making the renaming and 1.4.0 release in same day. Being
practically impossible to do all the work in one day, it was decided
to
do first the announcement about renaming. That happened on 28th when
all
agreed with the new name.
As you can see, there was no 5 months of renaming duration. There
was no
change in openser.org DNS configuration undertaken with/without the
knowledge of all board members. The new name domains were reserved
when
majority was achieved, in any case; dns entries for new name were
pointed to old server shortly after booking the domains.
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla
http://www.asipto.com
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users(a)lists.kamailio.org
http://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
10:32 a.m.
New subject: [Kamailio-Users] [Kamailio-Devel] poll: project name
5 - I would prefer a name that is more or less easy to pronounce in English.
Norm
Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:
Hello everybody,
some people expressed inconveniences regarding the new name, so we would
like to get your opinion about, therefore this is a poll that will get
us to a decision. Here is the question:
Do you like the name "Kamailio"?
1) Yes, I love it. Please keep it.
2) It is OK.
3) I do not mind the name at all
4) I do not like it
5) I hate the name and we should change it
There is no need of explanations, as it is up to personal taste and
decision. Just vote by option.
Cheers,
Daniel
PS. for those interested...
As short history about renaming story. On the 28th of March the board
was informed about issues with SER part of project name. You can easily
find who has the trademarks. On the 7th of April the board was informed
about an agreement for the deadline as of September 30, 2008 to use old
name. From there on, all old releases, documents, etc. can be referred
by the old name, but nothing new. Other few discussions about what
should/could be kept/changed followed and on 12th of May started the
discussion about the new name with two main direction, something
similar, to remind about old project or just something completely new,
to be used as brand name. Couple of proposals and discussions regarding
possible names followed up to 16th of July when was the deadline and the
start of vote. Majority was reached on 17th but it was required to have
opinions from all members of the board, last came from Bogdan, on the
28th of July.
All discussions about migration were on the board mailing list. No
change were done to openser.org configuration, just the new domain with
kamailio in it was pointed to same server. Every step done was reported
to board, following a schedule discussed there. Another discussion was
about making the renaming and 1.4.0 release in same day. Being
practically impossible to do all the work in one day, it was decided to
do first the announcement about renaming. That happened on 28th when all
agreed with the new name.
As you can see, there was no 5 months of renaming duration. There was no
change in openser.org DNS configuration undertaken with/without the
knowledge of all board members. The new name domains were reserved when
majority was achieved, in any case; dns entries for new name were
pointed to old server shortly after booking the domains.
11 a.m.
New subject: [Kamailio-Users] [Kamailio-Devel] poll: project name
Is it really that difficult? It german its easy - just pronounce it as
it is written.
klaus
Norman Brandinger schrieb:
5 - I would prefer a name that is more or less easy to
pronounce in English.
Norm
Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:
Hello everybody,
some people expressed inconveniences regarding the new name, so we would
like to get your opinion about, therefore this is a poll that will get
us to a decision. Here is the question:
Do you like the name "Kamailio"?
1) Yes, I love it. Please keep it.
2) It is OK.
3) I do not mind the name at all
4) I do not like it
5) I hate the name and we should change it
There is no need of explanations, as it is up to personal taste and
decision. Just vote by option.
Cheers,
Daniel
PS. for those interested...
As short history about renaming story. On the 28th of March the board
was informed about issues with SER part of project name. You can easily
find who has the trademarks. On the 7th of April the board was informed
about an agreement for the deadline as of September 30, 2008 to use old
name. From there on, all old releases, documents, etc. can be referred
by the old name, but nothing new. Other few discussions about what
should/could be kept/changed followed and on 12th of May started the
discussion about the new name with two main direction, something
similar, to remind about old project or just something completely new,
to be used as brand name. Couple of proposals and discussions regarding
possible names followed up to 16th of July when was the deadline and the
start of vote. Majority was reached on 17th but it was required to have
opinions from all members of the board, last came from Bogdan, on the
28th of July.
All discussions about migration were on the board mailing list. No
change were done to openser.org configuration, just the new domain with
kamailio in it was pointed to same server. Every step done was reported
to board, following a schedule discussed there. Another discussion was
about making the renaming and 1.4.0 release in same day. Being
practically impossible to do all the work in one day, it was decided to
do first the announcement about renaming. That happened on 28th when all
agreed with the new name.
As you can see, there was no 5 months of renaming duration. There was no
change in openser.org DNS configuration undertaken with/without the
knowledge of all board members. The new name domains were reserved when
majority was achieved, in any case; dns entries for new name were
pointed to old server shortly after booking the domains.
_______________________________________________
Devel mailing list
Devel(a)lists.kamailio.org
http://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devel 
1:26 p.m.
New subject: [Kamailio-Users] [Kamailio-Devel] poll: project name
I go with 2 (It is OK)... For me it's just like colors, taste,
religious, Linux Distro, etc.... at last it's just a name.
Edson
Klaus Darilion escreveu:
Is it really that difficult? It german its easy - just
pronounce it as
it is written.
klaus
Norman Brandinger schrieb:
5 - I would prefer a name that is more or less
easy to pronounce in English.
Norm
Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users(a)lists.kamailio.org
http://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
Hello everybody,
some people expressed inconveniences regarding the new name, so we would
like to get your opinion about, therefore this is a poll that will get
us to a decision. Here is the question:
Do you like the name "Kamailio"?
1) Yes, I love it. Please keep it.
2) It is OK.
3) I do not mind the name at all
4) I do not like it
5) I hate the name and we should change it
There is no need of explanations, as it is up to personal taste and
decision. Just vote by option.
Cheers,
Daniel
PS. for those interested...
As short history about renaming story. On the 28th of March the board
was informed about issues with SER part of project name. You can easily
find who has the trademarks. On the 7th of April the board was informed
about an agreement for the deadline as of September 30, 2008 to use old
name. From there on, all old releases, documents, etc. can be referred
by the old name, but nothing new. Other few discussions about what
should/could be kept/changed followed and on 12th of May started the
discussion about the new name with two main direction, something
similar, to remind about old project or just something completely new,
to be used as brand name. Couple of proposals and discussions regarding
possible names followed up to 16th of July when was the deadline and the
start of vote. Majority was reached on 17th but it was required to have
opinions from all members of the board, last came from Bogdan, on the
28th of July.
All discussions about migration were on the board mailing list. No
change were done to openser.org configuration, just the new domain with
kamailio in it was pointed to same server. Every step done was reported
to board, following a schedule discussed there. Another discussion was
about making the renaming and 1.4.0 release in same day. Being
practically impossible to do all the work in one day, it was decided to
do first the announcement about renaming. That happened on 28th when all
agreed with the new name.
As you can see, there was no 5 months of renaming duration. There was no
change in openser.org DNS configuration undertaken with/without the
knowledge of all board members. The new name domains were reserved when
majority was achieved, in any case; dns entries for new name were
pointed to old server shortly after booking the domains.
_______________________________________________
Devel mailing list
Devel(a)lists.kamailio.org
http://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devel 
11:43 a.m.
4
Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:
Hello everybody,
some people expressed inconveniences regarding the new name, so we would
like to get your opinion about, therefore this is a poll that will get
us to a decision. Here is the question:
Do you like the name "Kamailio"?
1) Yes, I love it. Please keep it.
2) It is OK.
3) I do not mind the name at all
4) I do not like it
5) I hate the name and we should change it
There is no need of explanations, as it is up to personal taste and
decision. Just vote by option.
Cheers,
Daniel
PS. for those interested...
As short history about renaming story. On the 28th of March the board
was informed about issues with SER part of project name. You can easily
find who has the trademarks. On the 7th of April the board was informed
about an agreement for the deadline as of September 30, 2008 to use old
name. From there on, all old releases, documents, etc. can be referred
by the old name, but nothing new. Other few discussions about what
should/could be kept/changed followed and on 12th of May started the
discussion about the new name with two main direction, something
similar, to remind about old project or just something completely new,
to be used as brand name. Couple of proposals and discussions regarding
possible names followed up to 16th of July when was the deadline and the
start of vote. Majority was reached on 17th but it was required to have
opinions from all members of the board, last came from Bogdan, on the
28th of July.
All discussions about migration were on the board mailing list. No
change were done to openser.org configuration, just the new domain with
kamailio in it was pointed to same server. Every step done was reported
to board, following a schedule discussed there. Another discussion was
about making the renaming and 1.4.0 release in same day. Being
practically impossible to do all the work in one day, it was decided to
do first the announcement about renaming. That happened on 28th when all
agreed with the new name.
As you can see, there was no 5 months of renaming duration. There was no
change in openser.org DNS configuration undertaken with/without the
knowledge of all board members. The new name domains were reserved when
majority was achieved, in any case; dns entries for new name were
pointed to old server shortly after booking the domains.
11:52 a.m.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Hello,
hm, not sure, but definately 4 or 5!
Main reason: hard to guess that the name belongs to a SIP project
Secondary reason: hard to pronounce (at least here in germany)
Tertiary reason: To a german marketing ear it is not very sexy (even not
a bit at all ...)
regards
helmut
Daniel-Constantin Mierla schrieb:
| Hello everybody,
|
| some people expressed inconveniences regarding the new name, so we would
| like to get your opinion about, therefore this is a poll that will get
| us to a decision. Here is the question:
|
| Do you like the name "Kamailio"?
| 1) Yes, I love it. Please keep it.
| 2) It is OK.
| 3) I do not mind the name at all
| 4) I do not like it
| 5) I hate the name and we should change it
|
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.8 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iEYEARECAAYFAkigYCEACgkQ4tZeNddg3dysWQCfYR5JroFLaKeIkFUlV+AYaroF
56UAn2pwudCjMnyM4xbkxLcoJqwiUMJz
=SpMH
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
noon
Helmut Kuper wrote:
Tertiary reason: To a german marketing ear it is not
very sexy (even not
a bit at all ...)
Well, that would certainly seem to be a show-stopper. :)
--
Alex Balashov
Evariste Systems
Web : http://www.evaristesys.com/
Tel : (+1) (678) 954-0670
Direct : (+1) (678) 954-0671
Mobile : (+1) (706) 338-8599
12:06 p.m.
El Monday 11 August 2008 17:52:01 Helmut Kuper escribió:
Main reason: hard to guess that the name belongs to a
SIP project
Secondary reason: hard to pronounce (at least here in germany)
As a curiosity, Klaus said it's easy to pronounce in german ;)
Tertiary reason: To a german marketing ear it is not
very sexy (even not
a bit at all ...)
Well, in Spanish it seems an exotic plant name XDD
--
Iñaki Baz Castillo
ibc(a)in.ilimit.es
12:29 p.m.
Iñaki Baz Castillo schrieb:
El Monday 11 August 2008 17:52:01 Helmut Kuper
escribió:
Yeah, strange - although lot of people say Austrians do not speak german
I think it should not be that hard for germans too :-)
Main reason: hard to guess that the name belongs
to a SIP project
Secondary reason: hard to pronounce (at least here in germany)
As a curiosity, Klaus said it's easy to pronounce in german ;) 
12:10 p.m.
I would like to add another option:
6) Irrespective of personal like/dislike, recognize that spending any
more time on it is not the best use of time/resources.
imho, we need to put this issue to bed and move on. its done.. the
name change has happened, site/domain changed, naming policy applied
(near enough completely) to the codebase. Should this poll have been
done before the decision was taken? Maybe, but lets all accept,
learn, and move on. Our project has already received criticism from
commercial corners regarding being in flux and with an uncertain
future, and the whole naming topic is also closely linked to other
recent events which have had a negative impact on the larger
community. What we need is proactivity and solidarity. Looking
forward, not back.
"What's in a name? That which we call a rose
By any other name would smell as sweet."
Cheers,
Adam
On 11 Aug 2008, at 11:50, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:
Hello everybody,
some people expressed inconveniences regarding the new name, so we
would
like to get your opinion about, therefore this is a poll that will get
us to a decision. Here is the question:
Do you like the name "Kamailio"?
1) Yes, I love it. Please keep it.
2) It is OK.
3) I do not mind the name at all
4) I do not like it
5) I hate the name and we should change it
There is no need of explanations, as it is up to personal taste and
decision. Just vote by option.
Cheers,
Daniel
PS. for those interested...
As short history about renaming story. On the 28th of March the board
was informed about issues with SER part of project name. You can
easily
find who has the trademarks. On the 7th of April the board was
informed
about an agreement for the deadline as of September 30, 2008 to use
old
name. From there on, all old releases, documents, etc. can be referred
by the old name, but nothing new. Other few discussions about what
should/could be kept/changed followed and on 12th of May started the
discussion about the new name with two main direction, something
similar, to remind about old project or just something completely new,
to be used as brand name. Couple of proposals and discussions
regarding
possible names followed up to 16th of July when was the deadline and
the
start of vote. Majority was reached on 17th but it was required to
have
opinions from all members of the board, last came from Bogdan, on the
28th of July.
All discussions about migration were on the board mailing list. No
change were done to openser.org configuration, just the new domain
with
kamailio in it was pointed to same server. Every step done was
reported
to board, following a schedule discussed there. Another discussion was
about making the renaming and 1.4.0 release in same day. Being
practically impossible to do all the work in one day, it was decided
to
do first the announcement about renaming. That happened on 28th when
all
agreed with the new name.
As you can see, there was no 5 months of renaming duration. There
was no
change in openser.org DNS configuration undertaken with/without the
knowledge of all board members. The new name domains were reserved
when
majority was achieved, in any case; dns entries for new name were
pointed to old server shortly after booking the domains.
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla
http://www.asipto.com
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users(a)lists.kamailio.org
http://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
4:21 p.m.
New subject: [Kamailio-Users] [Kamailio-Devel] poll: project name
imho, we need to put this issue to bed and move on.
its done..
I have to agree with Adam here :)
It's done. Move forward and spend time in testing and coding!
Cheers,
Ovidiu
Cheers,
Adam
On 11 Aug 2008, at 11:50, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:
Hello everybody,
some people expressed inconveniences regarding the new name, so we
would
like to get your opinion about, therefore this is a poll that will get
us to a decision. Here is the question:
Do you like the name "Kamailio"?
1) Yes, I love it. Please keep it.
2) It is OK.
3) I do not mind the name at all
4) I do not like it
5) I hate the name and we should change it
There is no need of explanations, as it is up to personal taste and
decision. Just vote by option.
Cheers,
Daniel
PS. for those interested...
As short history about renaming story. On the 28th of March the board
was informed about issues with SER part of project name. You can
easily
find who has the trademarks. On the 7th of April the board was
informed
about an agreement for the deadline as of September 30, 2008 to use
old
name. From there on, all old releases, documents, etc. can be referred
by the old name, but nothing new. Other few discussions about what
should/could be kept/changed followed and on 12th of May started the
discussion about the new name with two main direction, something
similar, to remind about old project or just something completely new,
to be used as brand name. Couple of proposals and discussions
regarding
possible names followed up to 16th of July when was the deadline and
the
start of vote. Majority was reached on 17th but it was required to
have
opinions from all members of the board, last came from Bogdan, on the
28th of July.
All discussions about migration were on the board mailing list. No
change were done to openser.org configuration, just the new domain
with
kamailio in it was pointed to same server. Every step done was
reported
to board, following a schedule discussed there. Another discussion was
about making the renaming and 1.4.0 release in same day. Being
practically impossible to do all the work in one day, it was decided
to
do first the announcement about renaming. That happened on 28th when
all
agreed with the new name.
As you can see, there was no 5 months of renaming duration. There
was no
change in openser.org DNS configuration undertaken with/without the
knowledge of all board members. The new name domains were reserved
when
majority was achieved, in any case; dns entries for new name were
pointed to old server shortly after booking the domains.
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla
http://www.asipto.com
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users(a)lists.kamailio.org
http://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
_______________________________________________
Devel mailing list
Devel(a)lists.kamailio.org
http://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devel
5:05 p.m.
New subject: [Kamailio-Users] [Kamailio-Devel] poll: project name
Yeah, It's kind of like hearing a baby's name for the first time; you
might cringe for a moment, but you get over it. At this point I think
changing the name again would do more harm than good.
Ovidiu Sas wrote:
imho, we need
to put this issue to bed and move on. its done..
I have to agree with Adam here :)
It's done. Move forward and spend time in testing and coding!
Cheers,
Ovidiu
Cheers,
Adam
On 11 Aug 2008, at 11:50, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users(a)lists.kamailio.org
http://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
Hello everybody,
some people expressed inconveniences regarding the new name, so we
would
like to get your opinion about, therefore this is a poll that will get
us to a decision. Here is the question:
Do you like the name "Kamailio"?
1) Yes, I love it. Please keep it.
2) It is OK.
3) I do not mind the name at all
4) I do not like it
5) I hate the name and we should change it
There is no need of explanations, as it is up to personal taste and
decision. Just vote by option.
Cheers,
Daniel
PS. for those interested...
As short history about renaming story. On the 28th of March the board
was informed about issues with SER part of project name. You can
easily
find who has the trademarks. On the 7th of April the board was
informed
about an agreement for the deadline as of September 30, 2008 to use
old
name. From there on, all old releases, documents, etc. can be referred
by the old name, but nothing new. Other few discussions about what
should/could be kept/changed followed and on 12th of May started the
discussion about the new name with two main direction, something
similar, to remind about old project or just something completely new,
to be used as brand name. Couple of proposals and discussions
regarding
possible names followed up to 16th of July when was the deadline and
the
start of vote. Majority was reached on 17th but it was required to
have
opinions from all members of the board, last came from Bogdan, on the
28th of July.
All discussions about migration were on the board mailing list. No
change were done to openser.org configuration, just the new domain
with
kamailio in it was pointed to same server. Every step done was
reported
to board, following a schedule discussed there. Another discussion was
about making the renaming and 1.4.0 release in same day. Being
practically impossible to do all the work in one day, it was decided
to
do first the announcement about renaming. That happened on 28th when
all
agreed with the new name.
As you can see, there was no 5 months of renaming duration. There
was no
change in openser.org DNS configuration undertaken with/without the
knowledge of all board members. The new name domains were reserved
when
majority was achieved, in any case; dns entries for new name were
pointed to old server shortly after booking the domains.
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla
http://www.asipto.com
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users(a)lists.kamailio.org
http://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
_______________________________________________
Devel mailing list
Devel(a)lists.kamailio.org
http://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devel
6:01 p.m.
New subject: [Kamailio-Users] [Kamailio-Devel] poll: project name
On Mon, 2008-08-11 at 16:21 -0400, Ovidiu Sas wrote:
Yeah, even I who initially "voted" differently have to agree when faced
with reason: let's move on. It was nice to ask the community thought :-)
If we could just all agree on that consensus, that would at least bind
the community around "the story of the name everyone hated but now chose
to like anyway !" :-)
--
Jérôme Martin | LongPhone
Responsable Architecture Réseau
122, rue la Boetie | 75008 Paris
Tel : +33 (0)1 56 26 28 44
Fax : +33 (0)1 56 26 28 45
Mail : jmartin(a)longphone.fr
Web : www.longphone.com <http://www.longphone.com>
imho, we need
to put this issue to bed and move on. its done..
I have to agree with Adam here :)
It's done. Move forward and spend time in testing and coding! 
2:37 p.m.
#2
I don't care what the name of the project is as long as the development
is stable.
Bob
-----Original Message-----
From: users-bounces(a)lists.kamailio.org
[mailto:users-bounces@lists.kamailio.org] On Behalf Of Daniel-Constantin
Mierla
Sent: Monday, August 11, 2008 6:51 AM
To: users; devel
Subject: [Kamailio-Users] poll: project name
Hello everybody,
some people expressed inconveniences regarding the new name, so we would
like to get your opinion about, therefore this is a poll that will get
us to a decision. Here is the question:
Do you like the name "Kamailio"?
1) Yes, I love it. Please keep it.
2) It is OK.
3) I do not mind the name at all
4) I do not like it
5) I hate the name and we should change it
There is no need of explanations, as it is up to personal taste and
decision. Just vote by option.
Cheers,
Daniel
PS. for those interested...
As short history about renaming story. On the 28th of March the board
was informed about issues with SER part of project name. You can easily
find who has the trademarks. On the 7th of April the board was informed
about an agreement for the deadline as of September 30, 2008 to use old
name. From there on, all old releases, documents, etc. can be referred
by the old name, but nothing new. Other few discussions about what
should/could be kept/changed followed and on 12th of May started the
discussion about the new name with two main direction, something
similar, to remind about old project or just something completely new,
to be used as brand name. Couple of proposals and discussions regarding
possible names followed up to 16th of July when was the deadline and the
start of vote. Majority was reached on 17th but it was required to have
opinions from all members of the board, last came from Bogdan, on the
28th of July.
All discussions about migration were on the board mailing list. No
change were done to openser.org configuration, just the new domain with
kamailio in it was pointed to same server. Every step done was reported
to board, following a schedule discussed there. Another discussion was
about making the renaming and 1.4.0 release in same day. Being
practically impossible to do all the work in one day, it was decided to
do first the announcement about renaming. That happened on 28th when all
agreed with the new name.
As you can see, there was no 5 months of renaming duration. There was no
change in openser.org DNS configuration undertaken with/without the
knowledge of all board members. The new name domains were reserved when
majority was achieved, in any case; dns entries for new name were
pointed to old server shortly after booking the domains.
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla
http://www.asipto.com
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users(a)lists.kamailio.org
http://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
This email with all information contained herein or attached hereto may contain
confidential and/or privileged information intended for the addressee(s) only. If you have
received this email in error, please contact the sender and immediately delete this email
in its entirety and any attachments thereto.
(W1)
12 Aug
12 Aug
6:21 a.m.
Daniel-Constantin Mierla <miconda(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Do you like the name "Kamailio"?
1) Yes, I love it. Please keep it.
2) It is OK.
3) I do not mind the name at all
4) I do not like it
5) I hate the name and we should change it
3, but I want the bikeshed painted bright fluorescent yellow!
(Good lord, it was hard enough understanding what's going on, coming
back from a two-week vacation -- I get subscription reminders from
this strange kamailio.org domain I hadn't heard of, and openser.org
talks about opensips all of a sudden. Newcomers are going to have to
deal with utter confusion. May I suggest that the website have a
small FAQ or some such about the name change AND the fork, in a
suitably prominent place?)
Thanks,
Sajith.
--
"the lyf so short, the craft so long to lerne."
-- Chaucer.
6:40 a.m.
Answer 4
Tks,
Aymeric MOIZARD / ANTISIP
amsip - http://www.antisip.com
osip2 - http://www.osip.org
eXosip2 - http://savannah.nongnu.org/projects/exosip/
On Mon, 11 Aug 2008, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:
Hello everybody,
some people expressed inconveniences regarding the new name, so we would
like to get your opinion about, therefore this is a poll that will get
us to a decision. Here is the question:
Do you like the name "Kamailio"?
1) Yes, I love it. Please keep it.
2) It is OK.
3) I do not mind the name at all
4) I do not like it
5) I hate the name and we should change it
There is no need of explanations, as it is up to personal taste and
decision. Just vote by option.
Cheers,
Daniel
PS. for those interested...
As short history about renaming story. On the 28th of March the board
was informed about issues with SER part of project name. You can easily
find who has the trademarks. On the 7th of April the board was informed
about an agreement for the deadline as of September 30, 2008 to use old
name. From there on, all old releases, documents, etc. can be referred
by the old name, but nothing new. Other few discussions about what
should/could be kept/changed followed and on 12th of May started the
discussion about the new name with two main direction, something
similar, to remind about old project or just something completely new,
to be used as brand name. Couple of proposals and discussions regarding
possible names followed up to 16th of July when was the deadline and the
start of vote. Majority was reached on 17th but it was required to have
opinions from all members of the board, last came from Bogdan, on the
28th of July.
All discussions about migration were on the board mailing list. No
change were done to openser.org configuration, just the new domain with
kamailio in it was pointed to same server. Every step done was reported
to board, following a schedule discussed there. Another discussion was
about making the renaming and 1.4.0 release in same day. Being
practically impossible to do all the work in one day, it was decided to
do first the announcement about renaming. That happened on 28th when all
agreed with the new name.
As you can see, there was no 5 months of renaming duration. There was no
change in openser.org DNS configuration undertaken with/without the
knowledge of all board members. The new name domains were reserved when
majority was achieved, in any case; dns entries for new name were
pointed to old server shortly after booking the domains.
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla
http://www.asipto.com
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users(a)lists.kamailio.org
http://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
7:07 a.m.
Hi,
2) It is OK. Name is not very important but continue maintaining is.
Regards.
El 11/08/2008, a las 12:50, Daniel-Constantin Mierla escribió:
Hello everybody,
some people expressed inconveniences regarding the new name, so we
would
like to get your opinion about, therefore this is a poll that will get
us to a decision. Here is the question:
Do you like the name "Kamailio"?
1) Yes, I love it. Please keep it.
2) It is OK.
3) I do not mind the name at all
4) I do not like it
5) I hate the name and we should change it
There is no need of explanations, as it is up to personal taste and
decision. Just vote by option.
Cheers,
Daniel
PS. for those interested...
As short history about renaming story. On the 28th of March the board
was informed about issues with SER part of project name. You can
easily
find who has the trademarks. On the 7th of April the board was
informed
about an agreement for the deadline as of September 30, 2008 to use
old
name. From there on, all old releases, documents, etc. can be referred
by the old name, but nothing new. Other few discussions about what
should/could be kept/changed followed and on 12th of May started the
discussion about the new name with two main direction, something
similar, to remind about old project or just something completely new,
to be used as brand name. Couple of proposals and discussions
regarding
possible names followed up to 16th of July when was the deadline and
the
start of vote. Majority was reached on 17th but it was required to
have
opinions from all members of the board, last came from Bogdan, on the
28th of July.
All discussions about migration were on the board mailing list. No
change were done to openser.org configuration, just the new domain
with
kamailio in it was pointed to same server. Every step done was
reported
to board, following a schedule discussed there. Another discussion was
about making the renaming and 1.4.0 release in same day. Being
practically impossible to do all the work in one day, it was decided
to
do first the announcement about renaming. That happened on 28th when
all
agreed with the new name.
As you can see, there was no 5 months of renaming duration. There
was no
change in openser.org DNS configuration undertaken with/without the
knowledge of all board members. The new name domains were reserved
when
majority was achieved, in any case; dns entries for new name were
pointed to old server shortly after booking the domains.
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla
http://www.asipto.com
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users(a)lists.kamailio.org
http://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
18 Aug
18 Aug
11:52 a.m.
4
Daniel-Constantin Mierla schrieb:
Hello everybody,
some people expressed inconveniences regarding the new name, so we would
like to get your opinion about, therefore this is a poll that will get
us to a decision. Here is the question:
Do you like the name "Kamailio"?
1) Yes, I love it. Please keep it.
2) It is OK.
3) I do not mind the name at all
4) I do not like it
5) I hate the name and we should change it
There is no need of explanations, as it is up to personal taste and
decision. Just vote by option.
Cheers,
Daniel
2:24 p.m.
Bastian Schern wrote:
4
Daniel-Constantin Mierla schrieb:
5
Hello everybody,
some people expressed inconveniences regarding the new name, so we would
like to get your opinion about, therefore this is a poll that will get
us to a decision. Here is the question:
Do you like the name "Kamailio"?
1) Yes, I love it. Please keep it.
2) It is OK.
3) I do not mind the name at all
4) I do not like it
5) I hate the name and we should change it
There is no need of explanations, as it is up to personal taste and
decision. Just vote by option.
Cheers,
Daniel
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users(a)lists.kamailio.org
http://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
12:11 p.m.
Answer 4
On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 12:50 PM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla <
miconda(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Hello everybody,
some people expressed inconveniences regarding the new name, so we would
like to get your opinion about, therefore this is a poll that will get
us to a decision. Here is the question:
Do you like the name "Kamailio"?
1) Yes, I love it. Please keep it.
2) It is OK.
3) I do not mind the name at all
4) I do not like it
5) I hate the name and we should change it
There is no need of explanations, as it is up to personal taste and
decision. Just vote by option.
Cheers,
Daniel
PS. for those interested...
As short history about renaming story. On the 28th of March the board
was informed about issues with SER part of project name. You can easily
find who has the trademarks. On the 7th of April the board was informed
about an agreement for the deadline as of September 30, 2008 to use old
name. From there on, all old releases, documents, etc. can be referred
by the old name, but nothing new. Other few discussions about what
should/could be kept/changed followed and on 12th of May started the
discussion about the new name with two main direction, something
similar, to remind about old project or just something completely new,
to be used as brand name. Couple of proposals and discussions regarding
possible names followed up to 16th of July when was the deadline and the
start of vote. Majority was reached on 17th but it was required to have
opinions from all members of the board, last came from Bogdan, on the
28th of July.
All discussions about migration were on the board mailing list. No
change were done to openser.org configuration, just the new domain with
kamailio in it was pointed to same server. Every step done was reported
to board, following a schedule discussed there. Another discussion was
about making the renaming and 1.4.0 release in same day. Being
practically impossible to do all the work in one day, it was decided to
do first the announcement about renaming. That happened on 28th when all
agreed with the new name.
As you can see, there was no 5 months of renaming duration. There was no
change in openser.org DNS configuration undertaken with/without the
knowledge of all board members. The new name domains were reserved when
majority was achieved, in any case; dns entries for new name were
pointed to old server shortly after booking the domains.
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla
http://www.asipto.com
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users(a)lists.kamailio.org
http://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
--
TC
5977
days inactive
5984
days old
40 comments
34 participants
participants (34)
-
Adam Linford -
Alex Balashov -
Ali Jawad -
Ardjan Zwartjes -
Aymeric Moizard -
Bastian Schern -
Carsten Bock -
Carsten Gross -
Daniel-Constantin Mierla -
Darren Sessions -
David Villasmil -
Edson - Listas -
Helmut Kuper -
Iñaki Baz Castillo -
Iñaki Baz Castillo -
Jerome Martin -
Johansson Olle E -
Klaus Darilion -
Kofi Obiri-Yeboah -
LetMeKnow -
marek cervenka -
mayamatakeshi -
Mik Cheez -
Miles Scruggs -
muhammad akl -
Norman Brandinger -
Ovidiu Sas -
Patrick Miccio -
Peter Lemenkov -
Robert McGilvray -
Ruchir -
Sajith T S -
TCB -
Vicente Ferrando Berenguer