Hi Alex,
You make a good point about the listener resources, however, all external
traffic is being passed to internal resources so the load on them would be
similar. I was more focused on having "one port for all traffic" and only
one IP to move between HA hosts. It turns out that may require a lot of
work for very little reward now that I know there are literally three
people who would care about the port number for internal traffic. I'd still
like to have this configuration, but other parties agreed they are just as
happy with a two listener configuration using an alternate port.
On Thu, May 25, 2023 at 7:25 AM Alex Balashov <abalashov(a)evaristesys.com>
wrote:
Calvin,
But if you are okay with having two listeners, remember that you can use
the `socket_workers`[1] configuration directive to limit the number of
worker processes associated with the lesser-utilised listener.
This produces a simpler configuration while satisfying one's sense that
twice the listeners shouldn't incur twice the resource commitment, or
something like that.
-- Alex
[1]
https://www.kamailio.org/wikidocs/cookbooks/5.6.x/core/#socket_workers
On May 23, 2023, at 2:09 AM, Daniel-Constantin
Mierla <miconda(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
Hello,
you can skip setting advertise for listen and try to play with
set_advertised_address() and record_route_preset() along with domain alias
for public address.
Cheers,
Daniel
On 22.05.23 19:11, Calvin E. wrote:
> Using 5.6.x, a scenario designed for a public IP now needs to support
life in
the cloud behind NAT. I'd like to avoid having two listeners to
separate on-net from off-net traffic. In a HA scenario, it would be nice
to have only one floating IP.
>
> Is it possible to use the same local address and port for
external/public and
internal/private traffic?
> Should set_advertised_address() override the
listen advertise address?
>
> Initial testing did not produce the expected result. I want to make
sure
I'm following a sane pattern before going down a rabbit hole. The idea
is to toggle the advertised address by checking if the sender or recipient
is rfc1918().
>
> For the dispatcher module, is it possible to use socket names like
below? In
testing it appeared that only one of the two names was valid.
>
> listen=udp:10.0.0.10:5060 name "onnet"
> listen=udp:10.0.0.10:5060 advertise 11.11.11.11:5060 name "offnet"
>
>
>
> __________________________________________________________
> Kamailio - Users Mailing List - Non Commercial Discussions
> To unsubscribe send an email to sr-users-leave(a)lists.kamailio.org
> Important: keep the mailing list in the recipients, do not reply only
to the
sender!
Edit
mailing list options or unsubscribe:
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla --
www.asipto.com
www.twitter.com/miconda --
www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
Kamailio World Conference - June 5-7, 2023 -
www.kamailioworld.com
__________________________________________________________
Kamailio - Users Mailing List - Non Commercial Discussions
To unsubscribe send an email to sr-users-leave(a)lists.kamailio.org
Important: keep the mailing list in the recipients, do not reply only to
the
sender!
Edit mailing list options or unsubscribe:
--
Alex Balashov
Principal Consultant
Evariste Systems LLC
Web:
https://evaristesys.com
Tel: +1-706-510-6800
__________________________________________________________
Kamailio - Users Mailing List - Non Commercial Discussions
To unsubscribe send an email to sr-users-leave(a)lists.kamailio.org
Important: keep the mailing list in the recipients, do not reply only to
the sender!
Edit mailing list options or unsubscribe: