http://www.iptel.org/ser/doc/seruser/seruser.html#AEN923
At 06:42 PM 10/4/2004, Michael Shuler wrote:
What is the difference between forward(uri:host, uri:port) and t_relay()?
I understand that t_relay() is supposed to be transaction based but I really can't see a difference between the two.
Michael Shuler, C.E.O. BitWise Communications, Inc. (CLEC) And BitWise Systems, Inc. (ISP) 682 High Point Lane East Peoria, IL 61611 Office: (217) 585-0357 Cell: (309) 657-6365 Fax: (309) 213-3500 E-Mail: mike@bwsys.net Customer Service: (877) 976-0711
Serusers mailing list serusers@lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
-- Jiri Kuthan http://iptel.org/~jiri/
Thanks, I already read that. What I was concerned about was more of if they modified the SIP message differently before being sent. For example I have a layer 4 switch in front of 2 SER servers which runs a virtual IP of 198.88.216.84. The real servers ser0 and ser1 have IP's of 198.88.216.87 and 198.88.216.89 respectively. The problem I am having is that when I run 2 SER seems to get confused when a gateway starts talking to ser0 while a client is talking to ser1. Since the layer 4 switch is doing reverse NAT so all traffic coming from the 2 ser servers appears as 198.88.216.84 this causes a problem when they stick themselves in the Via line as their real IP and not as 198.88.216.84. Is there a way to override that? Is t_relay() what is causing the weirdness? By using forward(uri:host, uri:port) inplace of t_relay() will it break anything (I am not checking the status of t_relay() on return)?
----------------------------------------
Michael Shuler, C.E.O. BitWise Communications, Inc. (CLEC) And BitWise Systems, Inc. (ISP) 682 High Point Lane East Peoria, IL 61611 Office: (217) 585-0357 Cell: (309) 657-6365 Fax: (309) 213-3500 E-Mail: mike@bwsys.net Customer Service: (877) 976-0711
-----Original Message----- From: Jiri Kuthan [mailto:jiri@iptel.org] Sent: Monday, October 04, 2004 11:56 AM To: Michael Shuler; serusers@lists.iptel.org Subject: Re: [Serusers] forward() and t_relay() differences
http://www.iptel.org/ser/doc/seruser/seruser.html#AEN923
At 06:42 PM 10/4/2004, Michael Shuler wrote:
What is the difference between forward(uri:host, uri:port)
and t_relay()?
I understand that t_relay() is supposed to be transaction
based but I really
can't see a difference between the two.
Michael Shuler, C.E.O. BitWise Communications, Inc. (CLEC) And BitWise Systems, Inc. (ISP) 682 High Point Lane East Peoria, IL 61611 Office: (217) 585-0357 Cell: (309) 657-6365 Fax: (309) 213-3500 E-Mail: mike@bwsys.net Customer Service: (877) 976-0711
Serusers mailing list serusers@lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
-- Jiri Kuthan http://iptel.org/~jiri/
Sorry if that first line sounded snotty, I didn't mean it that way. I didn't read it until after I sent it. What I meant to say was thank you for the response. I had already been through the docs though and found that too but I was still seeing the following problem... Sorry if I offended you due to my poor editing skills :)
----------------------------------------
Michael Shuler, C.E.O. BitWise Communications, Inc. (CLEC) And BitWise Systems, Inc. (ISP) 682 High Point Lane East Peoria, IL 61611 Office: (217) 585-0357 Cell: (309) 657-6365 Fax: (309) 213-3500 E-Mail: mike@bwsys.net Customer Service: (877) 976-0711
-----Original Message----- From: serusers-bounces@lists.iptel.org [mailto:serusers-bounces@lists.iptel.org] On Behalf Of Michael Shuler Sent: Monday, October 04, 2004 12:08 PM To: 'Jiri Kuthan'; serusers@lists.iptel.org Subject: RE: [Serusers] forward() and t_relay() differences
Thanks, I already read that. What I was concerned about was more of if they modified the SIP message differently before being sent. For example I have a layer 4 switch in front of 2 SER servers which runs a virtual IP of 198.88.216.84. The real servers ser0 and ser1 have IP's of 198.88.216.87 and 198.88.216.89 respectively. The problem I am having is that when I run 2 SER seems to get confused when a gateway starts talking to ser0 while a client is talking to ser1. Since the layer 4 switch is doing reverse NAT so all traffic coming from the 2 ser servers appears as 198.88.216.84 this causes a problem when they stick themselves in the Via line as their real IP and not as 198.88.216.84. Is there a way to override that? Is t_relay() what is causing the weirdness? By using forward(uri:host, uri:port) inplace of t_relay() will it break anything (I am not checking the status of t_relay() on return)?
Michael Shuler, C.E.O. BitWise Communications, Inc. (CLEC) And BitWise Systems, Inc. (ISP) 682 High Point Lane East Peoria, IL 61611 Office: (217) 585-0357 Cell: (309) 657-6365 Fax: (309) 213-3500 E-Mail: mike@bwsys.net Customer Service: (877) 976-0711
-----Original Message----- From: Jiri Kuthan [mailto:jiri@iptel.org] Sent: Monday, October 04, 2004 11:56 AM To: Michael Shuler; serusers@lists.iptel.org Subject: Re: [Serusers] forward() and t_relay() differences
http://www.iptel.org/ser/doc/seruser/seruser.html#AEN923
At 06:42 PM 10/4/2004, Michael Shuler wrote:
What is the difference between forward(uri:host, uri:port)
and t_relay()?
I understand that t_relay() is supposed to be transaction
based but I really
can't see a difference between the two.
Michael Shuler, C.E.O. BitWise Communications, Inc. (CLEC) And BitWise Systems, Inc. (ISP) 682 High Point Lane East Peoria, IL 61611 Office: (217) 585-0357 Cell: (309) 657-6365 Fax: (309) 213-3500 E-Mail: mike@bwsys.net Customer Service: (877) 976-0711
Serusers mailing list serusers@lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
-- Jiri Kuthan http://iptel.org/~jiri/
Serusers mailing list serusers@lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
-
Jiri Kuthan -
Michael Shuler