4 Oct
2004
4 Oct
'04
8:56 p.m.
http://www.iptel.org/ser/doc/seruser/seruser.html#AEN923
At 06:42 PM 10/4/2004, Michael Shuler wrote:
What is the difference between forward(uri:host,
uri:port) and t_relay()?
I understand that t_relay() is supposed to be transaction based but I really
can't see a difference between the two.
----------------------------------------
Michael Shuler, C.E.O.
BitWise Communications, Inc. (CLEC) And BitWise Systems, Inc. (ISP)
682 High Point Lane
East Peoria, IL 61611
Office: (217) 585-0357
Cell: (309) 657-6365
Fax: (309) 213-3500
E-Mail: mike(a)bwsys.net
Customer Service: (877) 976-0711
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
--
Jiri Kuthan http://iptel.org/~jiri/
4 Oct
4 Oct
9:07 p.m.
New subject: [Serusers] forward() and t_relay() differences
Thanks, I already read that. What I was concerned about was more of if they
modified the SIP message differently before being sent. For example I have
a layer 4 switch in front of 2 SER servers which runs a virtual IP of
198.88.216.84. The real servers ser0 and ser1 have IP's of 198.88.216.87
and 198.88.216.89 respectively. The problem I am having is that when I run
2 SER seems to get confused when a gateway starts talking to ser0 while a
client is talking to ser1. Since the layer 4 switch is doing reverse NAT so
all traffic coming from the 2 ser servers appears as 198.88.216.84 this
causes a problem when they stick themselves in the Via line as their real IP
and not as 198.88.216.84. Is there a way to override that? Is t_relay()
what is causing the weirdness? By using forward(uri:host, uri:port) inplace
of t_relay() will it break anything (I am not checking the status of
t_relay() on return)?
----------------------------------------
Michael Shuler, C.E.O.
BitWise Communications, Inc. (CLEC) And BitWise Systems, Inc. (ISP)
682 High Point Lane
East Peoria, IL 61611
Office: (217) 585-0357
Cell: (309) 657-6365
Fax: (309) 213-3500
E-Mail: mike(a)bwsys.net
Customer Service: (877) 976-0711
-----Original Message-----
From: Jiri Kuthan [mailto:jiri@iptel.org]
Sent: Monday, October 04, 2004 11:56 AM
To: Michael Shuler; serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
Subject: Re: [Serusers] forward() and t_relay() differences
http://www.iptel.org/ser/doc/seruser/seruser.html#AEN923
At 06:42 PM 10/4/2004, Michael Shuler wrote:
What is the difference between forward(uri:host,
uri:port)
and t_relay()?
I understand that t_relay() is supposed to be transaction
based but I really
can't see a difference between the two.
----------------------------------------
Michael Shuler, C.E.O.
BitWise Communications, Inc. (CLEC) And BitWise Systems, Inc. (ISP)
682 High Point Lane
East Peoria, IL 61611
Office: (217) 585-0357
Cell: (309) 657-6365
Fax: (309) 213-3500
E-Mail: mike(a)bwsys.net
Customer Service: (877) 976-0711
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
--
Jiri Kuthan http://iptel.org/~jiri/
9:50 p.m.
New subject: [Serusers] forward() and t_relay() differences
Sorry if that first line sounded snotty, I didn't mean it that way. I
didn't read it until after I sent it. What I meant to say was thank you for
the response. I had already been through the docs though and found that too
but I was still seeing the following problem... Sorry if I offended you
due to my poor editing skills :)
----------------------------------------
Michael Shuler, C.E.O.
BitWise Communications, Inc. (CLEC) And BitWise Systems, Inc. (ISP)
682 High Point Lane
East Peoria, IL 61611
Office: (217) 585-0357
Cell: (309) 657-6365
Fax: (309) 213-3500
E-Mail: mike(a)bwsys.net
Customer Service: (877) 976-0711
-----Original Message-----
From: serusers-bounces(a)lists.iptel.org
[mailto:serusers-bounces@lists.iptel.org] On Behalf Of Michael Shuler
Sent: Monday, October 04, 2004 12:08 PM
To: 'Jiri Kuthan'; serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
Subject: RE: [Serusers] forward() and t_relay() differences
Thanks, I already read that. What I was concerned about was
more of if they
modified the SIP message differently before being sent. For
example I have
a layer 4 switch in front of 2 SER servers which runs a virtual IP of
198.88.216.84. The real servers ser0 and ser1 have IP's of
198.88.216.87
and 198.88.216.89 respectively. The problem I am having is
that when I run
2 SER seems to get confused when a gateway starts talking to
ser0 while a
client is talking to ser1. Since the layer 4 switch is doing
reverse NAT so
all traffic coming from the 2 ser servers appears as
198.88.216.84 this
causes a problem when they stick themselves in the Via line
as their real IP
and not as 198.88.216.84. Is there a way to override that?
Is t_relay()
what is causing the weirdness? By using forward(uri:host,
uri:port) inplace
of t_relay() will it break anything (I am not checking the status of
t_relay() on return)?
----------------------------------------
Michael Shuler, C.E.O.
BitWise Communications, Inc. (CLEC) And BitWise Systems, Inc. (ISP)
682 High Point Lane
East Peoria, IL 61611
Office: (217) 585-0357
Cell: (309) 657-6365
Fax: (309) 213-3500
E-Mail: mike(a)bwsys.net
Customer Service: (877) 976-0711
-----Original Message-----
From: Jiri Kuthan [mailto:jiri@iptel.org]
Sent: Monday, October 04, 2004 11:56 AM
To: Michael Shuler; serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
Subject: Re: [Serusers] forward() and t_relay() differences
http://www.iptel.org/ser/doc/seruser/seruser.html#AEN923
At 06:42 PM 10/4/2004, Michael Shuler wrote:
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
What is the difference between forward(uri:host,
uri:port)
and t_relay()?
I understand that t_relay() is supposed to be transaction
based but I really
can't see a difference between the two.
----------------------------------------
Michael Shuler, C.E.O.
BitWise Communications, Inc. (CLEC) And BitWise Systems, Inc. (ISP)
682 High Point Lane
East Peoria, IL 61611
Office: (217) 585-0357
Cell: (309) 657-6365
Fax: (309) 213-3500
E-Mail: mike(a)bwsys.net
Customer Service: (877) 976-0711
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
--
Jiri Kuthan http://iptel.org/~jiri/
7341
days inactive
7341
days old
2 comments
2 participants
participants (2)
-
Jiri Kuthan -
Michael Shuler