Hi, using Kamailio 1.5.4.
I receive llamadas from a Cisco pre-RFC 3261 (non symmetric SIP and no ;branch parameter). It seems that dialog module cannot account such calls. Maybe branch parameter is required?
Hey Iñaki,
On 22.12.2010 17:44, Iñaki Baz Castillo wrote:
I receive llamadas from a Cisco pre-RFC 3261 (non symmetric SIP and no ;branch parameter). It seems that dialog module cannot account such calls. Maybe branch parameter is required?
The dialog module shouldn't need the Via header or branch parameter for dialog tracking. All that is required for building an initial dialog is Call-ID, To URI, From URI, and From tag (see dlg_onreq() and dlg_new_dialog() in dlg_handlers.c).
Do you see any error messages in the log files when receiving such pre-RFC 3261 calls?
Cheers,
--Timo
PS: llamadas? Calls? Hablo solo un poco de español. :)
2010/12/23 Timo Reimann timo.reimann@1und1.de:
The dialog module shouldn't need the Via header or branch parameter for dialog tracking. All that is required for building an initial dialog is Call-ID, To URI, From URI, and From tag (see dlg_onreq() and dlg_new_dialog() in dlg_handlers.c)
Hi Timo, sorry, a stupid error of mine: I removed the dlg_manage() call for PSTN inbound calls some weeks ago :(
On 23.12.2010 11:37, Iñaki Baz Castillo wrote:
2010/12/23 Timo Reimann timo.reimann@1und1.de:
The dialog module shouldn't need the Via header or branch parameter for dialog tracking. All that is required for building an initial dialog is Call-ID, To URI, From URI, and From tag (see dlg_onreq() and dlg_new_dialog() in dlg_handlers.c)
Hi Timo, sorry, a stupid error of mine: I removed the dlg_manage() call for PSTN inbound calls some weeks ago :(
Ok -- good to hear the state of the dialog code is fine (at least to one regard :) ).
Cheers,
--Timo
2010/12/23 Timo Reimann timo.reimann@1und1.de:
Ok -- good to hear the state of the dialog code is fine (at least to one regard :) ).
Yes, I should do a svn log to check when the f*** I removed the dlg_manage() call XD