26 Mar
2005
26 Mar
'05
11:23 a.m.
Thanks for the reponse, I gathered that much. My question is how long
before the contact gets "removed"? It's late morning now and it's still
there :-)
-----Original Message-----
From: Marian Dumitru [mailto:marian.dumitru@voice-sistem.ro]
Sent: Saturday, March 26, 2005 5:37 AM
To: Matt Schulte
Cc: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
Subject: Re: [Serusers] usrloc and replication
Hi Matt,
After expiration an before being removed, the contact are still kept in
ZOMBIE state - you can see the state in DB changes.
Best regards,
Marian
Matt Schulte wrote:
Ok, I'm using usrloc db_mode 2, I understand the
timer checks every 60
seconds default to see who should be expired and all.
What I don't
understand is why I keep getting these messages:
Keeping binding '+13142664004','sip:s@69.29.57.253:3105' for
replication
This contact expired nonetheless and should be removed, is there
something I'm missing?
+--------------+--------------------------------------+---------------
+--------------+--------------------------------------+--
----+
| username | contact | expires
|
+--------------+--------------------------------------+---------------
+--------------+--------------------------------------+--
----+
| +13142664004 | sip:s@69.29.57.253:3105 | 2005-03-26
00:42:35 |
| +13142664004 | sip:s@69.29.57.253:3118 | 2005-03-26
01:24:58 |
+--------------+--------------------------------------+---------------
+--------------+--------------------------------------+--
----+
--
Voice System
http://www.voice-system.ro
26 Mar
26 Mar
12:05 p.m.
New subject: [Serusers] usrloc and replication
Matt,
You get the message you mentioned "Keeping binding....." *only* if the
contact is marked for replication. You can check this either in DB
column replication, either into memory via "serctl ul show".
As in code the replication flag is hardcoded to 0 (disabled), I would
say you inserted via fifo some contacts with replication value != 0. Or ???
If so, I'm not sure if usrloc will ever remove the contact if the
replication flag is still set.
Best regards,
Marian
Matt Schulte wrote:
Thanks for the reponse, I gathered that much. My
question is how long
before the contact gets "removed"? It's late morning now and it's
still
there :-)
-----Original Message-----
From: Marian Dumitru [mailto:marian.dumitru@voice-sistem.ro]
Sent: Saturday, March 26, 2005 5:37 AM
To: Matt Schulte
Cc: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
Subject: Re: [Serusers] usrloc and replication
Hi Matt,
After expiration an before being removed, the contact are still kept in
ZOMBIE state - you can see the state in DB changes.
Best regards,
Marian
Matt Schulte wrote:
--
Voice System
http://www.voice-system.ro
Ok, I'm using usrloc db_mode 2, I understand
the timer checks every 60
seconds default to see who should be expired and
all. What I don't
understand is why I keep getting these messages:
Keeping binding '+13142664004','sip:s@69.29.57.253:3105' for
replication
This contact expired nonetheless and should be removed, is there
something I'm missing?
+--------------+--------------------------------------+---------------
+--------------+--------------------------------------+--
----+
| username | contact | expires
|
+--------------+--------------------------------------+---------------
+--------------+--------------------------------------+--
----+
| +13142664004 | sip:s@69.29.57.253:3105 | 2005-03-26
00:42:35 |
| +13142664004 | sip:s@69.29.57.253:3118 | 2005-03-26
01:24:58 |
+--------------+--------------------------------------+---------------
+--------------+--------------------------------------+--
----+
3:06 p.m.
New subject: [Serusers] usrloc and replication
There was another SER module written by Nils Ohlmeier that replicated the
user location contacts to a set of servers and kept the replication
state in usrloc. SER itself does not use the replication flag and, as
Marian said, you probably set the replicate flag to non-zero value which
is not correct.
Since you do not have the replication module, there is nothing that
would reset the flag and the contact stays in the user location database
forever.
The replication code was quite complex and it has been abandoned some
time ago. I plan to remove the zombie states and all related code to
make the usr location simpler.
Jan.
On 26-03 18:05, Marian Dumitru wrote:
Matt,
You get the message you mentioned "Keeping binding....." *only* if the
contact is marked for replication. You can check this either in DB
column replication, either into memory via "serctl ul show".
As in code the replication flag is hardcoded to 0 (disabled), I would
say you inserted via fifo some contacts with replication value != 0. Or ???
If so, I'm not sure if usrloc will ever remove the contact if the
replication flag is still set.
Best regards,
Marian
Matt Schulte wrote:
Thanks for the reponse, I gathered that much. My
question is how long
before the contact gets "removed"? It's late morning now and it's still
there :-)
-----Original Message-----
From: Marian Dumitru [mailto:marian.dumitru@voice-sistem.ro]
Sent: Saturday, March 26, 2005 5:37 AM
To: Matt Schulte
Cc: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
Subject: Re: [Serusers] usrloc and replication
Hi Matt,
After expiration an before being removed, the contact are still kept in
ZOMBIE state - you can see the state in DB changes.
Best regards,
Marian
Matt Schulte wrote:
--
Voice System
http://www.voice-system.ro
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers Ok, I'm using usrloc db_mode 2, I understand
the timer checks every 60
seconds default to see who should be expired and
all. What I don't
understand is why I keep getting these messages:
Keeping binding '+13142664004','sip:s@69.29.57.253:3105' for
replication
This contact expired nonetheless and should be removed, is there
something I'm missing?
+--------------+--------------------------------------+---------------
+--------------+--------------------------------------+--
----+
| username | contact | expires
|
+--------------+--------------------------------------+---------------
+--------------+--------------------------------------+--
----+
| +13142664004 | sip:s@69.29.57.253:3105 | 2005-03-26
00:42:35 |
| +13142664004 | sip:s@69.29.57.253:3118 | 2005-03-26
01:24:58 |
+--------------+--------------------------------------+---------------
+--------------+--------------------------------------+--
----+
28 Mar
28 Mar
2:24 a.m.
New subject: [Serusers] Framed IP radius Accounting
Does the latest CVS version of SER send correct FramedIP in radius
accounting. I am using 0.8.14 but it doesn`t send FramedIP Address.
If not is there any way to get the calling party`s IP address in radius
accounting ?
Thanxs
Deepak Singhal
30 Mar
30 Mar
12:57 p.m.
New subject: [Serusers] Framed IP radius Accounting
No, as far as I know.
Jan.
On 28-03 12:54, Deepak Singhal wrote:
Does the latest CVS version of SER send correct
FramedIP in radius
accounting. I am using 0.8.14 but it doesn`t send FramedIP Address.
If not is there any way to get the calling party`s IP address in radius
accounting ?
Thanxs
Deepak Singhal
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
31 Mar
31 Mar
12:43 a.m.
New subject: [Serusers] Framed IP radius Accounting
Is there any plan to include this in near Future? I think this is an
important feature.
Deepak Singhal
-----Original Message-----
From: Jan Janak [mailto:jan@iptel.org]
Sent: Wednesday, March 30, 2005 11:28 PM
To: Deepak Singhal
Cc: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
Subject: Re: [Serusers] Framed IP radius Accounting
No, as far as I know.
Jan.
On 28-03 12:54, Deepak Singhal wrote:
Does the latest CVS version of SER send correct
FramedIP in radius
accounting. I am using 0.8.14 but it doesn`t send FramedIP Address.
If not is there any way to get the calling party`s IP address in radius
accounting ?
Thanxs
Deepak Singhal
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
4 Apr
4 Apr
7:53 a.m.
New subject: [Serusers] Framed IP radius Accounting
What it is good for ?
Jan.
On 31-03 11:13, Deepak Singhal wrote:
Is there any plan to include this in near Future? I
think this is an
important feature.
Deepak Singhal
-----Original Message-----
From: Jan Janak [mailto:jan@iptel.org]
Sent: Wednesday, March 30, 2005 11:28 PM
To: Deepak Singhal
Cc: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
Subject: Re: [Serusers] Framed IP radius Accounting
No, as far as I know.
Jan.
On 28-03 12:54, Deepak Singhal wrote:
Does the latest CVS version of SER send correct
FramedIP in radius
accounting. I am using 0.8.14 but it doesn`t send FramedIP Address.
If not is there any way to get the calling party`s IP address in radius
accounting ?
Thanxs
Deepak Singhal
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
5 Apr
5 Apr
4:43 a.m.
New subject: [Serusers] Framed IP radius Accounting
So the CDR becomes more informative from client perspective. One can detect
any misuse.
Deepak Singhal
-----Original Message-----
From: Jan Janak [mailto:jan@iptel.org]
Sent: Monday, April 04, 2005 5:24 PM
To: Deepak Singhal
Cc: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
Subject: Re: [Serusers] Framed IP radius Accounting
What it is good for ?
Jan.
On 31-03 11:13, Deepak Singhal wrote:
Is there any plan to include this in near Future? I
think this is an
important feature.
Deepak Singhal
-----Original Message-----
From: Jan Janak [mailto:jan@iptel.org]
Sent: Wednesday, March 30, 2005 11:28 PM
To: Deepak Singhal
Cc: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
Subject: Re: [Serusers] Framed IP radius Accounting
No, as far as I know.
Jan.
On 28-03 12:54, Deepak Singhal wrote:
Does the latest CVS version of SER send correct
FramedIP in radius
accounting. I am using 0.8.14 but it doesn`t send FramedIP Address.
If not is there any way to get the calling party`s IP address in radius
accounting ?
Thanxs
Deepak Singhal
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
7206
days inactive
7216
days old
7 comments
4 participants
participants (4)
-
Deepak Singhal -
Jan Janak -
Marian Dumitru -
Matt Schulte