Hello,
The description of this module says it hides the SIP routing headers, does this also include the Via headers?
Grant
It does indeed.
On 05/01/2013 06:57 AM, Grant Bagdasarian wrote:
Hello,
The description of this module says it hides the SIP routing headers, does this also include the Via headers?
Grant
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list sr-users@lists.sip-router.org http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
Let's say we are using SEMS in SBC mode and letting the traffic pass through it, so no new call leg is created.
An incoming INVITE from the supplier reaches the SBC. The signaling then reaches Kamailio which applies topology hiding and the signaling is sent off to the customer's remote PBX. Media is handled by rtpproxy.
The ip addresses in the From/To/CallID/Contact etc will still be that of the endpoint that originated the INVITE right? What does one do in a scenario like this? Use nathelper to rewrite the contact? What about the other IP's? Or should SEMS be configured to create a new call leg? This would solve the issue with the IP's.
-----Original Message----- From: sr-users-bounces@lists.sip-router.org [mailto:sr-users-bounces@lists.sip-router.org] On Behalf Of Alex Balashov Sent: Wednesday, May 1, 2013 1:16 PM To: Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List Subject: Re: [SR-Users] Topoh module also masking Via?
It does indeed.
On 05/01/2013 06:57 AM, Grant Bagdasarian wrote:
Hello,
The description of this module says it hides the SIP routing headers, does this also include the Via headers?
Grant
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list sr-users@lists.sip-router.org http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
-- Alex Balashov - Principal Evariste Systems LLC 235 E Ponce de Leon Ave Suite 106 Decatur, GA 30030 United States Tel: +1-678-954-0670 Web: http://www.evaristesys.com/, http://www.alexbalashov.com/
_______________________________________________ SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list sr-users@lists.sip-router.org http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
Grant Bagdasarian writes:
Let's say we are using SEMS in SBC mode and letting the traffic pass through it, so no new call leg is created.
my understanding is that sems sbc always creates a new call leg. once it does it, you don't need k to hide the topology. optionally you can also let sems to bridge audio in which cases you don't a separate media proxy for that.
-- juha
On 05/01/2013 08:54 AM, Grant Bagdasarian wrote:
Let's say we are using SEMS in SBC mode and letting the traffic pass through it, so no new call leg is created.
It doesn't work like that. SEMS always creates a new call leg. If you are already using SEMS in this manner, you have no need of 'topoh'.
Okay, thanks!
I'm not using SEMS yet, but I'm trying to gather as much information as possible for our new VoIP platform I'm designing.
-----Original Message----- From: sr-users-bounces@lists.sip-router.org [mailto:sr-users-bounces@lists.sip-router.org] On Behalf Of Alex Balashov Sent: Wednesday, May 1, 2013 3:12 PM To: sr-users@lists.sip-router.org Subject: Re: [SR-Users] Topoh module also masking Via?
On 05/01/2013 08:54 AM, Grant Bagdasarian wrote:
Let's say we are using SEMS in SBC mode and letting the traffic pass through it, so no new call leg is created.
It doesn't work like that. SEMS always creates a new call leg. If you are already using SEMS in this manner, you have no need of 'topoh'.
-- Alex Balashov - Principal Evariste Systems LLC 235 E Ponce de Leon Ave Suite 106 Decatur, GA 30030 United States Tel: +1-678-954-0670 Web: http://www.evaristesys.com/, http://www.alexbalashov.com/
_______________________________________________ SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list sr-users@lists.sip-router.org http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
-
Alex Balashov -
Grant Bagdasarian -
Juha Heinanen