Hello,
I understand that machines processing RTP are recommended to be physical machines. Does the same apply for machines just proxy'ing RTP? Also, after how many RTP session would you start noticing issues with RTP when using rtpproxy on a virtual VMware machine?
Regard,
Grant
On 05/01/2013 07:44 AM, Grant Bagdasarian wrote:
There is no firm answer to that, but there seems to be widespread consensus that something like 'rtpproxy', especially being a user space process, benefits from access to native hardware, versus the jittery and unreliable intermediated I/O scheduling and contention inside a VM environment.
-- Alex
Thanks
-----Original Message----- From: sr-users-bounces@lists.sip-router.org [mailto:sr-users-bounces@lists.sip-router.org] On Behalf Of Alex Balashov Sent: Wednesday, May 1, 2013 1:55 PM To: sr-users@lists.sip-router.org Subject: Re: [SR-Users] rtpproxy virtual or physical machine
On 05/01/2013 07:44 AM, Grant Bagdasarian wrote:
There is no firm answer to that, but there seems to be widespread consensus that something like 'rtpproxy', especially being a user space process, benefits from access to native hardware, versus the jittery and unreliable intermediated I/O scheduling and contention inside a VM environment.
-- Alex
-- Alex Balashov - Principal Evariste Systems LLC 235 E Ponce de Leon Ave Suite 106 Decatur, GA 30030 United States Tel: +1-678-954-0670 Web: http://www.evaristesys.com/, http://www.alexbalashov.com/
_______________________________________________ SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list sr-users@lists.sip-router.org http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
-
Alex Balashov -
Grant Bagdasarian