Thanks
-----Original Message-----
From: sr-users-bounces(a)lists.sip-router.org [mailto:sr-users-bounces@lists.sip-router.org]
On Behalf Of Alex Balashov
Sent: Wednesday, May 1, 2013 1:55 PM
To: sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org
Subject: Re: [SR-Users] rtpproxy virtual or physical machine
On 05/01/2013 07:44 AM, Grant Bagdasarian wrote:
Hello,
I understand that machines processing RTP are recommended to be
physical machines. Does the same apply for machines just proxy'ing RTP?
Also, after how many RTP session would you start noticing issues with
RTP when using rtpproxy on a virtual VMware machine?
There is no firm answer to that, but there seems to be widespread consensus that something
like 'rtpproxy', especially being a user space process, benefits from access to
native hardware, versus the jittery and unreliable intermediated I/O scheduling and
contention inside a VM environment.
-- Alex
--
Alex Balashov - Principal
Evariste Systems LLC
235 E Ponce de Leon Ave
Suite 106
Decatur, GA 30030
United States
Tel: +1-678-954-0670
Web:
http://www.evaristesys.com/,
http://www.alexbalashov.com/
_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users