2 Jul
2009
2 Jul
'09
10:16 p.m.
Hey guys,
First off thanks for any help in advanced! I'm saving a nat branch flag
into usrloc when the user registers, now each user has two registrations to
the same username in usrloc, upon lookup("location"), inside of
branch_route[] it appears only one of them have the nat branch flag set,
while the other does not? Is there any case where a branch flag could
somehow get mangled, or what to look for, or what may cause this? Also one
other thing from a database outlook (the cflag) is equivalent on both AOR's.
However again at the time of branch_route, one flag is i.e. 000800, and the
other 000820, any thoughts are appreciated, thanks!
3 Jul
3 Jul
9:59 a.m.
I don't think I understood well...
On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 9:16 PM, Brandon Armstead<brandon(a)cryy.com> wrote:
Hey guys,
First off thanks for any help in advanced! I'm saving a nat branch flag
into usrloc when the user registers, now each user has two registrations to
the same username in usrloc, upon lookup("location"), inside of
branch_route[] it appears only one of them have the nat branch flag set,
while the other does not? Is there any case where a branch flag could
somehow get mangled, or what to look for, or what may cause this? Also one
other thing from a database outlook (the cflag) is equivalent on both AOR's.
Are you saying that you have 2 registrations for the same AoR and one
has some flags and the other doen't?
However again at the time of branch_route, one flag is
i.e. 000800, and the
other 000820, any thoughts are appreciated, thanks!
If you have multiple registrations for the same AoR and keep a NAT
branch flag upon lookup location that flag will only be present for
the natted one, so in branch_route you can check for it...
Hope it helpled,
--
Saúl -- "Nunca subestimes el ancho de banda de un camión lleno de disketes."
----------------------------------------------------------------
http://www.saghul.net/
4 Jul
4 Jul
1:17 a.m.
Hello,
I have two registrations for the same AoR and they both have the same
bflags set in the database, upon branch_route[] they do not. I do not see
at any point either where I would have modified it -- which is my current
problem. Thanks!
On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 11:59 PM, Saúl Ibarra <saghul(a)gmail.com> wrote:
I don't think I understood well...
On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 9:16 PM, Brandon Armstead<brandon(a)cryy.com> wrote:
Are you saying that you have 2 registrations for the same AoR and one
has some flags and the other doen't?
If you have multiple registrations for the same AoR and keep a NAT
branch flag upon lookup location that flag will only be present for
the natted one, so in branch_route you can check for it...
Hope it helpled,
--
Saúl -- "Nunca subestimes el ancho de banda de un camión lleno de
disketes."
----------------------------------------------------------------
http://www.saghul.net/
_______________________________________________
Kamailio (OpenSER) - Users mailing list
Users(a)lists.kamailio.org
http://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
http://lists.openser-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
Hey guys,
First off thanks for any help in advanced! I'm saving a nat branch
flag
into usrloc when the user registers, now each
user has two registrations
to
the same username in usrloc, upon
lookup("location"), inside of
branch_route[] it appears only one of them have the nat branch flag set,
while the other does not? Is there any case where a branch flag could
somehow get mangled, or what to look for, or what may cause this? Also
one
other thing from a database outlook (the cflag)
is equivalent on both
AOR's.
However again at the time of branch_route, one
flag is i.e. 000800, and
the
> other 000820, any thoughts are appreciated, thanks!
1:48 a.m.
Check your cfg and look closely to
El 4 de jul de 2009, 12:17 a.m., "Brandon Armstead" <brandon(a)cryy.com>
escribió:
Hello,
I have two registrations for the same AoR and they both have the same
bflags set in the database, upon branch_route[] they do not. I do not see
at any point either where I would have modified it -- which is my current
problem. Thanks!
On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 11:59 PM, Saúl Ibarra <saghul(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> I
don't think I understood well... > > On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 9:16 PM,
Brandon Armstead<brandon@...
_______________________________________________
> Kamailio (OpenSER) -
Users mailing list > Users@...
1:52 a.m.
Sorry, finger went too fast :)
Check every branch flag setting, they should be set the same way. Xlog each
set and try to debug it a little...
El 4 de jul de 2009, 12:17 a.m., "Brandon Armstead" <brandon(a)cryy.com>
escribió:
Hello,
I have two registrations for the same AoR and they both have the same
bflags set in the database, upon branch_route[] they do not. I do not see
at any point either where I would have modified it -- which is my current
problem. Thanks!
On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 11:59 PM, Saúl Ibarra <saghul(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> I
don't think I understood well... > > On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 9:16 PM,
Brandon Armstead<brandon@...
_______________________________________________
> Kamailio (OpenSER) -
Users mailing list > Users@...
10:28 p.m.
Hello,
On 07/04/2009 12:52 AM, Saúl Ibarra wrote:
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla
http://www.asipto.com/
Sorry, finger went too fast :)
Check every branch flag setting, they should be set the same way. Xlog
each set and try to debug it a little...
> El 4 de jul de 2009, 12:17 a.m., "Brandon Armstead" <brandon(a)cryy.com
> <mailto:brandon@cryy.com>> escribió:
>
> Hello,
>
> I have two registrations for the same AoR and they both have the
> same bflags set in the database, upon branch_route[] they do not.
do you see a
pattern in which branch does not have the proper flags? Is
the first one? You can use $T_branch_idx to print branch index.
Cheers,
Daniel
I do not see
at any point either where I would have modified it --
which is my current problem. Thanks!
On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 11:59 PM, Saúl Ibarra <saghul(a)gmail.com
<mailto:saghul@gmail.com>> wrote:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Kamailio (OpenSER) - Users mailing list
Users(a)lists.kamailio.org
http://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
http://lists.openser-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users > I don't think I understood well... >
> On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at
9:16 PM, Brandon Armstead<brandon@...
_______________________________________________
> Kamailio
(OpenSER) - Users mailing list > Users@...
3 Jul
3 Jul
2:29 p.m.
Hi Brandon!
That sounds strange. I would debug it the following way:
1. set the nat bflag unconditional for every REGISTER request.
2. verify that the natbflag is stored in DB for all contacts
3. after lookup use xlog to log the values of the bflags:
http://sip-router.org/wiki/cookbooks/pseudo-variables/devel#branch_attribut…
$var(i)=0;
while($var(i)<$branch(count))
{
xlog("branch $var(i):\n");
xlog(" uri =$(branch(uri)[$var(i)])\n");
xlog(" bflag=$(branch(flags)[$var(i)])\n");
$var(i) = $var(i) + 1;
}
if there is still a problem, then there might be a bug in Kamailio
regards
klaus
Brandon Armstead schrieb:
Hey guys,
First off thanks for any help in advanced! I'm saving a nat branch
flag into usrloc when the user registers, now each user has two
registrations to the same username in usrloc, upon lookup("location"),
inside of branch_route[] it appears only one of them have the nat branch
flag set, while the other does not? Is there any case where a branch
flag could somehow get mangled, or what to look for, or what may cause
this? Also one other thing from a database outlook (the cflag) is
equivalent on both AOR's.
However again at the time of branch_route, one flag is i.e. 000800, and
the other 000820, any thoughts are appreciated, thanks!
------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Kamailio (OpenSER) - Users mailing list
Users(a)lists.kamailio.org
http://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
http://lists.openser-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
5626
days inactive
5628
days old
6 comments
4 participants
participants (4)
-
Brandon Armstead -
Daniel-Constantin Mierla -
Klaus Darilion -
Saúl Ibarra