6 Dec
2008
6 Dec
'08
2:09 a.m.
Hi
Is there any way (special module, or something like that) to implement RFC 3323 in
Kamailio. Or do I have to do it manually, by changing the header fields that require
privacy and change them for something like ("Anonymous"
<sip:anonymous@anonymous.invalid>) and keep the relation of this new URI with the
original one, in a separate table of my database?. How can I do this in a more easy way?.
David Cespedes
6 Dec
6 Dec
2:57 a.m.
New subject: [Kamailio-Users] Kamalio Support for RFC 3323 " Privacy"
ingdavidcespedes(a)cable.net.co writes:
Is there any way (special module, or something like
that) to
implement RFC 3323 in Kamailio. Or do I have to do it manually, by
changing the header fields that require privacy and change them for
something like ("Anonymous" <sip:anonymous@anonymous.invalid>) and
keep the relation of this new URI with the original one, in a
separate table of my database?. How can I do this in a more easy
way?.
if caller needs privacy, then it is up to the UA to send anonymous from
header together with p-p-i and privacy headers.
-- juha
3:06 a.m.
El Viernes, 5 de Diciembre de 2008, Juha Heinanen escribió:
if caller needs privacy, then it is up to the UA to
send anonymous from
header together with p-p-i and privacy headers.
That would be so cool... Unfortunatelly I just know a SIP phone implementing
it: Twinkle.
Other phones (as Linksys) when the user enables privacy during a call, just
set the From Display-Name with "Anonymous" value, while the From username
remains the real :(
--
Iñaki Baz Castillo
3:10 a.m.
Iñaki Baz Castillo writes:
That would be so cool... Unfortunatelly I just know a
SIP phone implementing
it: Twinkle.
nokia sip phones implement p-p-i/identity based privacy.
Other phones (as Linksys) when the user enables
privacy during a call, just
set the From Display-Name with "Anonymous" value, while the From username
remains the real :(
linksys phones do also many other things that are against standards.
-- juha
5:13 a.m.
Iñaki Baz Castillo пишет:
El Viernes, 5 de Diciembre de 2008, Juha Heinanen
escribió:
Yep, some UAC set "Anonymous" only in Display Name. But u can fix it
using this code:
$var(url) = $fu;
if(is_present_hf("Privacy") && ($hdr(Privacy)=="id" ||
$hdr(Privacy)=="user") &&
search("(From|f):\s*\"?anonymous")) {
uac_replace_from("Anonymous","sip:anonymous@anonymous.invalid");
if(!is_present_hf("P-Asserted-Identity")) {
append_hf("P-Asserted-Identity: <$var(url)>\r\n"); };
}
With best regards,
--
Alexandr Dubovikov * baron@iRC RusNet * mailto:shurik@start4.info
AD1-UANIC * ICQ: 122351182 * http://www.start4.info
if caller needs privacy, then it is up to the UA
to send anonymous from
header together with p-p-i and privacy headers.
That would be so cool... Unfortunatelly I just know a SIP phone implementing
it: Twinkle.
Other phones (as Linksys) when the user enables privacy during a call, just
set the From Display-Name with "Anonymous" value, while the From username
remains the real :(
5892
days inactive
5892
days old
4 comments
4 participants
participants (4)
-
Alexandr Dubovikov -
ingdavidcespedes＠cable.net.co -
Iñaki Baz Castillo -
jh＠tutpro.com