22 Feb
2019
22 Feb
'19
2:01 p.m.
Hello,
I have trouble with REFER method that has to-tag and Route header , more than one.
When it pass loose_route() method , loose_route function remove all route headar then
sets RURI with top most Route.
Is there a function that removing own route header and sets destination uri ($du) with
top most uri.
Best Regards.
Yasin CANER
https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3515
2.6<https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3515#section-2.6> Behavior of SIP Proxies
SIP proxies do not require modification to support the REFER method.
Specifically, as required by [1<https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3515#ref-1>]1>], a
proxy should process a REFER
request the same way it processes an OPTIONS request.
For example,
---------->mykamailio@test2.test----------->>nextroute@test3.test------>
1
--
REFER : sip:alice@test.test ...
Route:<sip:mykamailio-local@test2.test;lr>,<sip:nextroute@test3.test;lr>,<sip:nextroute2@test4.test>
To: <>;tag=asdads
From:<>;tag=asd123
---
2 - After Kamailio Process
---
REFER : sip:alice@test.test ...
<sip:nextroute@test3.test>,<sip:nextroute2@test4.test>
To: <>;tag=asdads
From:<>;tag=asd123
22 Feb
22 Feb
2:21 p.m.
New subject: How to easily remove top most header and set destination uri
Hi,
First, a proxy should only remove the topmost Route headers whose URI domains correspond
to addresses the proxy perceives to be its own, not another element’s. Are you sure that
is not a possibility in your case?
Second, the loose_route() should set the network and transport-layer next-hop destination
($du) to the next Route hop. However, if another Route hop is not present because all of
them have been consumed by the proxy on the basis that the proxy perceives them to
correspond to itself, then it will consume the RURI domain to determine the final hop.
I think there is something missing with regard to the actual content of the Route hops and
their relationship to your Kamailio instance.
—
Sent from mobile, with due apologies for brevity and errors.
On Feb 22, 2019, at 8:01 AM, YASIN CANER
<caner_yaso(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
Hello,
I have trouble with REFER method that has to-tag and Route header , more than one.
When it pass loose_route() method , loose_route function remove all route headar then
sets RURI with top most Route.
Is there a function that removing own route header and sets destination uri ($du) with
top most uri.
Best Regards.
Yasin CANER
https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3515
2.6 Behavior of SIP Proxies
SIP proxies do not require modification to support the REFER method.
Specifically, as required by [1], a proxy should process a REFER
request the same way it processes an OPTIONS request.
For example,
---------->mykamailio@test2.test----------->>nextroute@test3.test------>
1
--
REFER : sip:alice@test.test ...
Route:<sip:mykamailio-local@test2.test;lr>,<sip:nextroute@test3.test;lr>,<sip:nextroute2@test4.test>
To: <>;tag=asdads
From:<>;tag=asd123
---
2 - After Kamailio Process
---
REFER : sip:alice@test.test ...
<sip:nextroute@test3.test>,<sip:nextroute2@test4.test>
To: <>;tag=asdads
From:<>;tag=asd123
_______________________________________________
Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
sr-users(a)lists.kamailio.org
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
3:27 p.m.
New subject: How to easily remove top most header and set destination uri
Hi Alex,
I got your answer about loose route earl mesagess , saved and still keeping it. I try to
figure out , what s the best way handle refer message with kamailio if there is a route
header.
When there is route header more than one , smth is going wrong.
Today , I worked so many cases , all of them may be mixed in my mind.
I will work on it again. Rfc3261
16.12<https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3261#section-16.12> Summary of Proxy Route
Processing
Best regards.
Yasin C.
Alex Balashov <abalashov@evaristesys.com<mailto:abalashov@evaristesys.com>>
şunları yazdı (22 Şub 2019 16:22):
Hi,
First, a proxy should only remove the topmost Route headers whose URI domains correspond
to addresses the proxy perceives to be its own, not another element’s. Are you sure that
is not a possibility in your case?
Second, the loose_route() should set the network and transport-layer next-hop destination
($du) to the next Route hop. However, if another Route hop is not present because all of
them have been consumed by the proxy on the basis that the proxy perceives them to
correspond to itself, then it will consume the RURI domain to determine the final hop.
I think there is something missing with regard to the actual content of the Route hops and
their relationship to your Kamailio instance.
—
Sent from mobile, with due apologies for brevity and errors.
On Feb 22, 2019, at 8:01 AM, YASIN CANER
<caner_yaso@hotmail.com<mailto:caner_yaso@hotmail.com>> wrote:
Hello,
I have trouble with REFER method that has to-tag and Route header , more than one.
When it pass loose_route() method , loose_route function remove all route headar then
sets RURI with top most Route.
Is there a function that removing own route header and sets destination uri ($du) with
top most uri.
Best Regards.
Yasin CANER
https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3515
2.6<https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3515#section-2.6> Behavior of SIP Proxies
SIP proxies do not require modification to support the REFER method.
Specifically, as required by [1<https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3515#ref-1>]1>], a
proxy should process a REFER
request the same way it processes an OPTIONS request.
For example,
---------->mykamailio@test2.test----------->>nextroute@test3.test------>
1
--
REFER : sip:alice@test.test ...
Route:<sip:mykamailio-local@test2.test;lr>,<sip:nextroute@test3.test;lr>,<sip:nextroute2@test4.test>
To: <>;tag=asdads
From:<>;tag=asd123
---
2 - After Kamailio Process
---
REFER : sip:alice@test.test ...
<sip:nextroute@test3.test>,<sip:nextroute2@test4.test>
To: <>;tag=asdads
From:<>;tag=asd123
_______________________________________________
Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
sr-users@lists.kamailio.org<mailto:sr-users@lists.kamailio.org>
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
_______________________________________________
Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
sr-users@lists.kamailio.org<mailto:sr-users@lists.kamailio.org>
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
25 Feb
25 Feb
1:36 p.m.
New subject: How to easily remove top most header and set destination uri
Hello,
I found the problem. I am sending Refer request with SIPP so writing wrong R-URI name
address that is already responsible Proxy instead of B2Bua contact name address. Thus ,
loose_route function re-write RURI and removed top most route header as specified RFC 3261
16.12
Thanks
Yasin CANER
________________________________
From: sr-users <sr-users-bounces(a)lists.kamailio.org> on behalf of Alex Balashov
<abalashov(a)evaristesys.com>
Sent: Friday, February 22, 2019 4:21 PM
To: Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
Subject: Re: [SR-Users] How to easily remove top most header and set destination uri
Hi,
First, a proxy should only remove the topmost Route headers whose URI domains correspond
to addresses the proxy perceives to be its own, not another element’s. Are you sure that
is not a possibility in your case?
Second, the loose_route() should set the network and transport-layer next-hop destination
($du) to the next Route hop. However, if another Route hop is not present because all of
them have been consumed by the proxy on the basis that the proxy perceives them to
correspond to itself, then it will consume the RURI domain to determine the final hop.
I think there is something missing with regard to the actual content of the Route hops and
their relationship to your Kamailio instance.
—
Sent from mobile, with due apologies for brevity and errors.
On Feb 22, 2019, at 8:01 AM, YASIN CANER
<caner_yaso@hotmail.com<mailto:caner_yaso@hotmail.com>> wrote:
Hello,
I have trouble with REFER method that has to-tag and Route header , more than one.
When it pass loose_route() method , loose_route function remove all route headar then
sets RURI with top most Route.
Is there a function that removing own route header and sets destination uri ($du) with
top most uri.
Best Regards.
Yasin CANER
https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3515
2.6<https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3515#section-2.6> Behavior of SIP Proxies
SIP proxies do not require modification to support the REFER method.
Specifically, as required by [1<https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3515#ref-1>]1>], a
proxy should process a REFER
request the same way it processes an OPTIONS request.
For example,
---------->mykamailio@test2.test----------->>nextroute@test3.test------>
1
--
REFER : sip:alice@test.test ...
Route:<sip:mykamailio-local@test2.test;lr>,<sip:nextroute@test3.test;lr>,<sip:nextroute2@test4.test>
To: <>;tag=asdads
From:<>;tag=asd123
---
2 - After Kamailio Process
---
REFER : sip:alice@test.test ...
<sip:nextroute@test3.test>,<sip:nextroute2@test4.test>
To: <>;tag=asdads
From:<>;tag=asd123
_______________________________________________
Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
sr-users@lists.kamailio.org<mailto:sr-users@lists.kamailio.org>
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
1911
days inactive
1914
days old
3 comments
2 participants
participants (2)
-
Alex Balashov -
YASIN CANER