"failed_transactions" is not a flag - it's enabled (<>0) or disabled (==0) - it generally apply and says if the transaction marker for acc (via flags) should or not be still log in case of failure.

bogdan

Martin Kjeldsen wrote:

Thanks for the info. Just to be on the safe side, does that mean I'll have to setflag with the flag number ascociated with modparam("acc", "failed_transactions", 2), e.g. setflag(2), if I'm using modparam("acc", "db_flag", 1)?

if (method=="INVITE" & search("Diversion:")) { log(1, "Call is being forwarded and we need to account it to this person\n"); append_hf("P-hint: Call being forwarded from\r\n"); setflag(2); };

Help greatly appreciated Martin

Bogdan-Andrei Iancu wrote:

...

to get non-200 transactions accounted you need to add this for acc module: modparam("acc", "failed_transactions", 1)

bogdan

PS: by doing this *all* non-200 transactions marked for acc will be logged

Martin Kjeldsen wrote:

...

Hi

I was wondering if anybody had some advice on howto account forwarded calls to the subscriber who farwarded his phone? ATM I account people by the From address, and I was thinking of adding a control prior to the routes in ser.cfg, which serched the message for any diversion header:

if (method=="INVITE" & search("Diversion:")) { log(1, "Call is being forwarded and we need to account it to this person\n"); append_hf("P-hint: Call being forwarded from\r\n"); setflag(1); };

But I dont seem to be getting the information, that I seek, cause no 302 status gets recorded in my accouonting table. Any help on what I'm doing wrong? And is there a better way to use setflag, or more correct?

Regards Martin

---

Serusers mailing list serusers@lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers