Personally I think the software itself is same or better than industry average. The challenge for reliability is in configuration and network design. If you would like to make it really resillient against various hard conditions, you are going to spend quite some time on the network design and test with SIP UAs you are going to use if they can deal with it.

-jiri

Jeremy A wrote:

Hello,

I'm looking at a project which requires a higher than normal reliability for a SIP server. The project involves risk-of-life communications. The volume of traffic is quite low.

I have been using SER in embedded applications for some time now without problems but I am now looking at a larger scale project.

Assuming I can provide hardware server(s) with suitable characteristics, then :

• How reliable is SER?
• In each version?
• In each module?

Are there any well established high availability configurations for SER?

Are there any risk-of-life deployments I can reference?

We may well use SEMS for part of the project so the same questions apply.

I'm not expecting 100% reliability, just a system that matches or exceeds present high reliability PABX deployments.

If you are of the honest opinion that SER is not good enough, what SIP server products should I be looking at? Or is SIP not suitable full stop?

Thanks in advance

Jeremy

---

Serusers mailing list Serusers@lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers