subsequent ds_select_dst with different groups

List overview All Threads
Download

newer

older

No of registartions

Compact SIP

David VILLAUME

10 Jul 2020 10 Jul '20

5:50 p.m.

Hello,

Is it possible to use the following logic :

Route() ds_select_dst (1,2) failure_route(1) ds_next_dst(first_dispatcher_ secondgateway) failure_route(newdispatcher_group) ds_select_dst (2,2) failure_route(secondispatcher_secondgateway) ds_next_dst()

Thanks in advance.

Regards, David

Attachments:

attachment.html (text/html — 2.9 KB)

Show replies by date

David Villasmil

11 Jul 11 Jul

1:06 a.m.

Sure, have you tried implementing it?

On Fri, 10 Jul 2020 at 18:52, David VILLAUME david.villaume@sewan.fr wrote:

...

Hello,

Is it possible to use the following logic :

Route()
ds_select_dst (1,2)
failure_route(1)
ds_next_dst(first_dispatcher_ secondgateway)
failure_route(newdispatcher_group)
ds_select_dst (2,2)
failure_route(secondispatcher_secondgateway)
ds_next_dst()
Thanks in advance.

Regards,

David

Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List sr-users@lists.kamailio.org https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users

-- Regards, David Villasmil email: david.villasmil.work@gmail.com phone: +34669448337

Julien Chavanton

1:17 a.m.

This seems standard behavior.

One advise, make sure you clear the xavps between each ds_select unless you are sure to iterate over the ds_select_next until it is emptied.

On Fri, Jul 10, 2020, 10:51 David VILLAUME david.villaume@sewan.fr wrote:

...

Hello,

Is it possible to use the following logic :

Route()
ds_select_dst (1,2)
failure_route(1)
ds_next_dst(first_dispatcher_ secondgateway)
failure_route(newdispatcher_group)
ds_select_dst (2,2)
failure_route(secondispatcher_secondgateway)
ds_next_dst()
Thanks in advance.

Regards,

David

Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List sr-users@lists.kamailio.org https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users

David VILLAUME

13 Jul 13 Jul

11:24 a.m.

Hello,

Thanks both of you for your answers, my problem was effectively with unexhausted set/group.

Thanks again.

Regards, David

From: David VILLAUME Sent: Friday, July 10, 2020 7:51 PM To: Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List sr-users@lists.kamailio.org Subject: subsequent ds_select_dst with different groups

Hello,

Is it possible to use the following logic :

Thanks in advance.

Regards, David

Daniel-Constantin Mierla

11:38 a.m.

Hello,

Maybe suits better to do all selections in one step.

Cheers, Daniel

On 13.07.20 13:24, David VILLAUME wrote:

...

Hello,

Thanks both of you for your answers, my problem was effectively with unexhausted set/group.

Thanks again.

Regards,

David

*From:*David VILLAUME *Sent:* Friday, July 10, 2020 7:51 PM *To:* Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List sr-users@lists.kamailio.org *Subject:* subsequent ds_select_dst with different groups

Hello,

Is it possible to use the following logic :

Route()

ds_select_dst (1,2)

failure_route(1)

ds_next_dst(first_dispatcher_ secondgateway)

failure_route(newdispatcher_group)

ds_select_dst (2,2)

failure_route(secondispatcher_secondgateway)

ds_next_dst()

Thanks in advance.

Regards,

David

Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List sr-users@lists.kamailio.org https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users

-- Daniel-Constantin Mierla -- www.asipto.com www.twitter.com/miconda -- www.linkedin.com/in/miconda Funding: https://www.paypal.me/dcmierla

David VILLAUME

11:52 a.m.

Hello,

Thanks Daniel , I missed it in 5.2 releases notes, my code went really clearer now.

Regards, David

From: Daniel-Constantin Mierla miconda@gmail.com Sent: Monday, July 13, 2020 1:39 PM To: Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List sr-users@lists.kamailio.org; David VILLAUME david.villaume@sewan.fr Subject: Re: [SR-Users] subsequent ds_select_dst with different groups

Hello,