Thanks Adrian.
My opinion is that MEDIAPROXY it's necessary for my purpose (more than 1000
users on ser !!!) but radius auth supported only in businnes version
(7000,00 eur) !
Have you a solution for mediaproxy with radius auth ?
Can anyone help me for this NAT problem?
Thanks
-----Original Message-----
From: Adrian Georgescu <ag(a)ag-projects.com>
To: ser users <serusers(a)lists.iptel.org>
Date: Sun, 20 Nov 2005 13:14:19 +0100
Subject: [Serusers] Urgent NAT question: mediaproxy,rtp or STUN ?
Antonello,
There is no better solution for all possible cases. The solutions have
differences explained in the readme files for example RTP proxy can
take more load per server, Media Proxy can distribute load on multiple
boxes based on DNS SRV records and STUN can help your Stun enabled
clients to traverse the NAT in majority of cases but not all. So a
combination between STUN plus one of the relay solutions will cover all
cases. Configuring per session when to use Stun or a media relay is
quite a daunting task given the number of possible call flow scenarios
so if you wish that your calls always work regardless of UA type or
call flow you will enable a media relay because Stun is not reliable
100%.
Adrian
>>>>>>>>>
Terrible question:
Is mediaproxy better than rtp or STUN server for NAT problem ???
Radius Authentication work fine with Mediaproxy, STUN and RTP ?
In Mediaproxy Server, radius auth supported only in non-free version
(7.000,00 euro) !
My work is:
Private Network for more than 1000 users
Public SER SERVER
Public Radius+MySQL
Public Patton MediaGW
Please, answer !
Thanks
Antonello