22 May
2004
22 May
'04
11:42 p.m.
23 May
23 May
12:17 a.m.
Ri Liang C. wrote:
Please advise what kind of media proxy or rtproxy is
using at for the free
users iptel.org.
I think they are using rtpproxy - but I don't know which version.
Is posible to get the ser.cfg that iptel.org is using
?
They wont post their current configuration file, nevertheless you can
find old ones in the cvs.
Try to build your own cfg and use the snippets from the mailing list
(there are also complete ser.cfg in the mailing list, but never consider
them as complete but only as a hint how to do things). If you have
problems, ask on the mailinglist for advice (exact questions - exact
answers) :-)
If you want a running configuration file fitted to your needs, ask for
commercial support (->iptel.org)
regards,
klaus
2:51 a.m.
Hi,
Has anybody successfully installed and implemented mediaproxy for NAT
penetration with SER?
Tjapko.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Klaus Darilion" <klaus.mailinglists(a)pernau.at>
To: "Ri Liang C." <rliang(a)callmyway.com>
Cc: <serusers(a)lists.iptel.org>
Sent: Saturday, May 22, 2004 6:17 PM
Subject: Re: [Serusers] NAT
---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.688 / Virus Database: 449 - Release Date: 18/05/2004
Ri Liang C. wrote:
> Please advise what kind of media proxy or rtproxy is using at for the
free
users
iptel.org.
I think they are using rtpproxy - but I don't know which version.
Is posible to get the ser.cfg that iptel.org is
using ?
They wont post their current configuration file, nevertheless you can
find old ones in the cvs.
Try to build your own cfg and use the snippets from the mailing list
(there are also complete ser.cfg in the mailing list, but never consider
them as complete but only as a hint how to do things). If you have
problems, ask on the mailinglist for advice (exact questions - exact
answers) :-)
If you want a running configuration file fitted to your needs, ask for
commercial support (->iptel.org)
regards,
klaus
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers 
25 May
25 May
10:14 a.m.
I guess so, at least ag-project guys have been using it.
Jan.
On 22-05 20:51, Tjapko Smits wrote:
Hi,
Has anybody successfully installed and implemented mediaproxy for NAT
penetration with SER?
Tjapko.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Klaus Darilion" <klaus.mailinglists(a)pernau.at>
To: "Ri Liang C." <rliang(a)callmyway.com>
Cc: <serusers(a)lists.iptel.org>
Sent: Saturday, May 22, 2004 6:17 PM
Subject: Re: [Serusers] NAT
---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.688 / Virus Database: 449 - Release Date: 18/05/2004
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
Ri Liang C. wrote:
> Please advise what kind of media proxy or rtproxy is using at for the
free
users
iptel.org.
I think they are using rtpproxy - but I don't know which version.
Is posible to get the ser.cfg that iptel.org is
using ?
They wont post their current configuration file, nevertheless you can
find old ones in the cvs.
Try to build your own cfg and use the snippets from the mailing list
(there are also complete ser.cfg in the mailing list, but never consider
them as complete but only as a hint how to do things). If you have
problems, ask on the mailinglist for advice (exact questions - exact
answers) :-)
If you want a running configuration file fitted to your needs, ask for
commercial support (->iptel.org)
regards,
klaus
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
2:22 p.m.
Thanks, Since I am new with SER and SIP I wondered what NAT penetration
module to choose and obviously selected the least convenient one.
Nevertheless it took me some time but it seems to work now. The question
that raised with me is, IS it opensource and supported this way or more a
"project based" development tool that is for a selected public only? I
don't
want to be critical at all it is just that I am unfamiliar with this kind of
semi commercializing a product on a opensource mailinglist. If I want
support I obviously will have to pay for it. Maybe I am absolutely wrong?
Tjapko.
-----Original Message-----
From: Jan Janak [mailto:jan@iptel.org]
Sent: Martes, 25 de Mayo de 2004 04:15 a.m.
To: Tjapko Smits
Cc: Klaus Darilion; Ri Liang C.; serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
Subject: Re: [Serusers] NAT
I guess so, at least ag-project guys have been using it.
Jan.
On 22-05 20:51, Tjapko Smits wrote:
Hi,
Has anybody successfully installed and implemented mediaproxy for NAT
penetration with SER?
Tjapko.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Klaus Darilion" <klaus.mailinglists(a)pernau.at>
To: "Ri Liang C." <rliang(a)callmyway.com>
Cc: <serusers(a)lists.iptel.org>
Sent: Saturday, May 22, 2004 6:17 PM
Subject: Re: [Serusers] NAT
---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.688 / Virus Database: 449 - Release Date: 18/05/2004
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
---
Incoming mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.688 / Virus Database: 449 - Release Date: 18/05/2004
---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.688 / Virus Database: 449 - Release Date: 18/05/2004
Ri Liang C. wrote:
> Please advise what kind of media proxy or rtproxy is using at for the
free
users
iptel.org.
I think they are using rtpproxy - but I don't know which version.
Is posible to get the ser.cfg that iptel.org is
using ?
They wont post their current configuration file, nevertheless you can
find old ones in the cvs.
Try to build your own cfg and use the snippets from the mailing list
(there are also complete ser.cfg in the mailing list, but never consider
them as complete but only as a hint how to do things). If you have
problems, ask on the mailinglist for advice (exact questions - exact
answers) :-)
If you want a running configuration file fitted to your needs, ask for
commercial support (->iptel.org)
regards,
klaus
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
28 May
28 May
5:04 p.m.
On 25-05 08:22, Tjapko ITS Consult@ncy wrote:
Thanks, Since I am new with SER and SIP I wondered
what NAT penetration
module to choose and obviously selected the least convenient one.
Nevertheless it took me some time but it seems to work now. The question
that raised with me is, IS it opensource and supported this way or more a
"project based" development tool that is for a selected public only? I
don't
want to be critical at all it is just that I am unfamiliar with this kind of
semi commercializing a product on a opensource mailinglist. If I want
support I obviously will have to pay for it. Maybe I am absolutely wrong?
Tjapko.
It is open source and it is distributed under the terms of the GPL.
Anything you can find in the CVS is under GPL and opensource. That's
the policy for accepting code into the main source tree. Also authors
of the code should respond to questions regarding their code on this
list.
Regarding support, it is in the terms of GPL that the code comes with
no warranty. That means, if you have a problem or need some advice,
you can ask on this mailing list. If you get no anwer or the answer is
not sufficient, then you can ask for commercial support.
Jan.
29 May
29 May
2 a.m.
Thanks for your answer. I figured it out by myself. The problem was the need
of using domain.so. I have asked them a question directly and they are
willing to help....for money.... because they state that everything they put
on paper is clear enough to install mediaproxy yourself. For the rest no
hard feelings. It is mainly my unexperience with this product but SER is
working very well. Tjapko.
-----Original Message-----
From: Jan Janak [mailto:jan@iptel.org]
Sent: Viernes, 28 de Mayo de 2004 11:04 a.m.
To: tjapko(a)xeloq.com
Cc: Tjapko Smits; Klaus Darilion; Ri Liang C.; serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
Subject: Re: [Serusers] NAT
On 25-05 08:22, Tjapko ITS Consult@ncy wrote:
Thanks, Since I am new with SER and SIP I wondered
what NAT penetration
module to choose and obviously selected the least convenient one.
Nevertheless it took me some time but it seems to work now. The question
that raised with me is, IS it opensource and supported this way or more a
"project based" development tool that is for a selected public only? I
don't
want to be critical at all it is just that I am
unfamiliar with this kind
of
semi commercializing a product on a opensource
mailinglist. If I want
support I obviously will have to pay for it. Maybe I am absolutely
wrong?
Tjapko.
It is open source and it is distributed under the terms of the GPL.
Anything you can find in the CVS is under GPL and opensource. That's
the policy for accepting code into the main source tree. Also authors
of the code should respond to questions regarding their code on this
list.
Regarding support, it is in the terms of GPL that the code comes with
no warranty. That means, if you have a problem or need some advice,
you can ask on this mailing list. If you get no anwer or the answer is
not sufficient, then you can ask for commercial support.
Jan.
---
Incoming mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.691 / Virus Database: 452 - Release Date: 26/05/2004
---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.691 / Virus Database: 452 - Release Date: 26/05/2004
7279
days inactive
7286
days old
6 comments
6 participants
participants (6)
-
Jan Janak -
Klaus Darilion -
Ri Liang C. -
Tjapko ITS Consult＠ncy -
Tjapko Smits
-
XeloQ Communications